Cited by 568Infant Nutrition and HealthGut microbiota and healthMicrobial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology

Consumption of human milk oligosaccharides by gut-related microbes

Open access
Marcobal, Angela, Barboza, Mariana, Froehlich, John W., Block, David E., German, J. Bruce, Lebrilla, Carlito B., Mills, David A.·2010·Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Abstract

Human milk contains large amounts of complex oligosaccharides that putatively modulate the intestinal microbiota of breast-fed infants by acting as decoy binding sites for pathogens and as prebiotics for enrichment of beneficial bacteria. Several bifidobacterial species have been shown to grow well on human milk oligosaccharides. However, few data exist on other bacterial species. This work examined 16 bacterial strains belonging to 10 different genera for growth on human milk oligosaccharides. For this propose, a chemically defined medium, ZMB1, was used, which allows vigorous growth of a number of gut-related microorganisms in a fashion similar to complex media. Interestingly, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bacteroides fragilis , and Bacteroides vulgatus strains were able to metabolize milk oligosaccharides with high efficiency, whereas Enterococcus , Streptococcus , Veillonella , Eubacterium , Clostridium , and Escherichia coli strains grew less well or not at all. Mass spectrometry-based glycoprofiling of the oligosaccharide consumption behavior revealed a specific preference for fucosylated oligosaccharides by Bi. longum subsp. infantis and Ba. vulgatus. This work expands the current knowledge of human milk oligosaccharide consumption by gut microbes, revealing bacteroides as avid consumers of this substrate. These results provide insight on how human milk oligosaccharides shape the infant intestinal microbiota.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/jf9044205

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Select strains of Bifidobacteria possess specialized enzymes capable of metabolizing human milk oligosaccharide glycans.

    “Recent studies have shown that select strains of Bifidobacteria possess specialized enzymes capable of metabolizing MOS glycans15-17.”
  • Breast milk contains more than 200 structurally different human milk oligosaccharides that cannot be digested by the infant but promote the growth of selected genera such as Bifidobacteria and Bacteroides.

    “Breast milk also contains >200 structurally different human milk oligosaccharides (HMOs) (Jost et al., 2015), which cannot be digested by the infant, but rather promote the growth of selected genera, such as Bifidobacteria and Bacteroides (Marcobal et al., 2010), thought to promote the healthy development of the GI tract and immune system.”

    From Viral Infections, the Microbiome, and Probiotics (2021) · cites this paper as Marcobal et al., 2010

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Roberfroid M Prebiotics: The concept revisited J. Nutr 2007 830S 837S 17311983

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Marcobal, A., Barboza, M., Froehlich, J. W., Block, D. E., German, J. B., Lebrilla, C. B., & Mills, D. A.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • Chemistry
  • Chemical Engineering and Material Science
  • Food Science and Technology
  • Departments of Viticulture and Enology
Corresponding author
  • Lebrilla, Carlito B.
  • Mills, David A.
Venue
Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry
Published
2010-04-15
Volume
58
Issue
9
Pages
5334-5340
ISSN
  • 0021-8561 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5118
OpenAlex
W2000311971
Cited by
568
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 54 · 2022: 46 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 40 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 26
FWCI
20.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agricultural Research Service
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HD059127, R01HD061923, R01HD059127)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology
Keywords
human milk oligosaccharides, gut microbiota, Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis, Bacteroides vulgatus, Bacteroides fragilis, fucosylated oligosaccharides, oligosaccharide metabolism, prebiotics, glycan profiling
MeSH terms
Bacteria, Humans, Intestines, Milk, Human, Oligosaccharides, Spectroscopy, Fourier Transform Infrared, Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review