Cited by 401Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersFetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders

Brainstem, cerebellar and limbic neuroanatomical abnormalities in autism

Courchesne, Eric·1997·Current Opinion in Neurobiology

Abstract

Recent autopsy and/or quantitative magnetic resonance imaging studies of autistic patients have identified agenesis of the superior olive, dysgenesis of the facial nucleus, reduced numbers of Purkinje neurons, hypoplasia of the brainstem and posterior cerebellum, and increased neuron-packing density of the medial, cortical and central nuclei of the amygdala and the medial septum. As neurogenesis occurs for these different neuron types during approximately the fifth week of gestation, the possibility is raised that this may be a 'window of vulnerability' for autism; the likely etiologic heterogeneity of autism suggests that other windows of vulnerability are also possible.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0959-4388(97)80016-5

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Post-mortem anatomical studies of autistic brains reveal loss of Purkinje cells in posterior vermis and intermediate cerebellar cortex as the most consistent neuropathology, suggesting a key role of the cerebellum in autism.

    “Post-mortem anatomical studies of brains from autistic individuals thus far revealed loss of Purkinje cells in the posterior vermis and intermediate cerebellar cortex as the most consistent neuropathology, suggesting a key role of the cerebellum in autism [213].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Courchesne, E.
Affiliations
University of California San Diego (US)
Corresponding author
Courchesne, Eric
Venue
Current Opinion in Neurobiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-04
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
269-278
ISSN
0959-4388 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165792108
Cited by
401
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 20
FWCI
2.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Current Opinion in Neurobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH036840, 1-RO1-MH36840)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (R01NS019855, 2-RO1-NS-19855)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Fetal and Pediatric Neurological Disorders
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, brainstem, cerebellum, limbic system, Purkinje cells, brainstem hypoplasia, amygdala, medial septum, neurogenesis, developmental vulnerability, autism etiology
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Brain Stem, Cerebellum, Humans, Limbic System

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review