Cited by 184Religion, Spirituality, and PsychologyReligion and Society InteractionsHealth disparities and outcomes

Religious Participation, Interleukin-6, and Mortality in Older Adults.

Lutgendorf, Susan K., Russell, Daniel, Ullrich, Philip, Harris, Tamara B., Wallace, Robert·2004·Health Psychology

Abstract

This study prospectively examined the relationship between religious attendance, interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, and mortality rates in a community-based sample of 557 older adults. Attending religious services more than once weekly was a significant predictor of lower subsequent 12-year mortality and elevated IL-6 levels (> 3.19 pg/mL), with a mortality ratio of.32 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15,0.72; p <.01) and an odds ratio for elevated IL-6 of.34 (95% CI = 0.16, 0.73, p <.01), compared with never attending religious services. Structural equation modeling indicated religious attendance was significantly related to lower mortality rates and IL-6 levels, and IL-6 levels mediated the prospective relationship between religious attendance and mortality. Results were independent of covariates including age, sex, health behaviors, chronic illness, social support, and depression. Findings are consistent with a role for IL-6 in processes mediating the relationship between religious attendance and mortality.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0278-6133.23.5.465

Cites

92 of 92 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More recent research supports a positive link between R/S and better cognitive function in both dementia and old age.

    “More recent research supports a positive link between R/S and better cognitive function in both dementia and in old age [434, 435].”
  • Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level).

    “Considering the 63 methodologically most rigorous studies (quality ratings of 8 or higher), 47 (75%) found R/S predicting greater longevity (two at trend level) [548–566], whereas three (5%) reported shorter longevity [567–569].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 93 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lutgendorf, S. K., Russell, D., Ullrich, P., Harris, T. B., & Wallace, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Iowa (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Venue
Health Psychology
Published
2004
Volume
23
Issue
5
Pages
465-475
ISSN
  • 0278-6133 (ISSN-L)
  • 1930-7810
OpenAlex
W2095240592
Cited by
184
References
93
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 9
FWCI
7.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (AG02106)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH062666, MH62666)
  • National Cancer Institute (R21CA088293)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Religion and Society Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
religious service attendance, interleukin-6, mortality, older adults, religiosity, inflammation, mediation, community-dwelling older adults
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Surveys, Humans, Iowa, Life Change Events, Male, Mortality, Religion and Psychology, Rural Population, Interleukin-6, Confidence Intervals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review