Cited by 244Social and Intergroup PsychologyDeath Anxiety and Social ExclusionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic threat and contingent belonging: Protective benefits of values affirmation on identity development.

Cook, Jonathan E., Purdie-Vaughns, Valerie, Garcia, Julio, Cohen, Geoffrey L.·2012·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Two longitudinal field experiments in a middle school examined how a brief "values affirmation" affects students' psychological experience and the relationship between psychological experience and environmental threat over 2 years. Together these studies suggest that values affirmations insulate individuals' sense of belonging from environmental threat during a key developmental transition. Study 1 provided an analysis of new data from a previously reported study. African American students in the control condition felt a decreasing sense of belonging during middle school, with low-performing students dropping more in 7th grade and high-performing students dropping more in 8th grade. The affirmation reduced this decline for both groups. Consistent with the notion that affirmation insulates belonging from environmental threat, affirmed African American students' sense of belonging in Study 1 fluctuated less over 2 years and became less contingent on academic performance. Based on the idea that developmentally sensitive interventions can have long-lasting benefits, Study 2 showed that the affirmation intervention was more effective if delivered before any drop in performance and subsequent psychological toll could unfold. The role of identity threat and affirmation in affecting the encoding of social experience, and the corresponding importance of timing treatments to developmentally sensitive periods, are explored.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0026312

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 65 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cook, J. E., Purdie-Vaughns, V., Garcia, J., & Cohen, G. L.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • University of Colorado Boulder (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2012-03
Volume
102
Issue
3
Pages
479-496
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2171757188
Cited by
244
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 16 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
28.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • William T. Grant Foundation
  • Russell Sage Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
values affirmation, sense of belonging, identity construction, identity threat, environmental hazards, junior high school students, African American students, academic performance, developmental transitions, treatment timing, protective measures
MeSH terms
Black or African American, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Schools, Psychological Distance, Social Environment, Social Identification, Social Values, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review