Cited by 16,334Personality Traits and PsychologyPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Testing and Assessment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A circumplex model of affect.

Russell, James A.·1980·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/h0077714

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 58 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–200 of 1,134

Metadata

Authors
Russell, J. A.
Corresponding author
Russell, James A.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1980-12
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
1161-1178
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2149628368
Cited by
16,334
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 1046 · 2025: 1188 · 2024: 1163 · 2023: 1110 · 2022: 1098 · 2021: 1182 · 2020: 1089 · 2019: 967 · 2018: 794 · 2017: 698 · 2016: 698 · 2015: 698 · 2014: 690 · 2013: 630 · 2012: 489
FWCI
8.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
affect, circumplex model, emotions, valence, arousal, affective domain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review