Cited by 196Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

Open access
Grillon, C, Krimsky, M, Charney, D R, Vytal, K, Ernst, M, Cornwell, B·2013·Molecular Psychiatry

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In a double-blind within-subjects startle study, oxytocin increased defensive responding to unpredictable but not predictable shocks in humans. The authors report this as the first evidence that oxytocin can be anxiogenic, suggesting it enhances anxiety under uncertainty.

Key findings

  • Oxytocin significantly increased defensive responses to unpredictable shocks compared with placebo (F(1,42) = 5.1, P < 0.03) and with arginine vasopressin (F(1,42) = 6.6, P < 0.01).
  • Defensive responses to predictable shocks were not affected by treatment (F(2,84) = 0.02, NS).
  • The authors conclude that oxytocin selectively enhances anxiety to unpredictable threat, possibly via BNST/CRF signaling, and suggest this may help explain context-dependent social effects toward in-group versus out-group members.

Methods

  • Double-blind randomized within-subjects design; 43 subjects were tested across three sessions with placebo, oxytocin, arginine vasopressin, and placebo (PLC).
  • Startle reactivity was assayed in three conditions: no shock, predictable shocks administered only during threat cues, and unpredictable shocks administered randomly.
  • Main analysis compared treatment effects on startle potentiation using F tests; methods are said to be fully described in Supplementary Information.

Limitations

  • Stated: the failure to detect an AVP effect might reflect too low an AVP dose, oxytocin acting via oxytocin receptors rather than AVP receptors, or differential OT/AVP effects on brainstem pathways mediating anxiety components.
  • Stated: the findings do not directly inform oxytocin’s pro-social effects, and the authors caution it is too early to speculate about therapeutic use for socio-emotional disorders.
  • Evident: the main text gives only a brief methods summary and refers to Supplementary Information; no effect sizes or confidence intervals are reported in the main text.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/mp.2012.156

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

2 tests recomputed · 0 with the reported and recomputed p on opposite sides of .05

Claims the paper makes

0 of 20 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Treatment did not alter defensive responses to predictable shocks in humans.

    “Defensive responses to predictable shocks were not affected by treatment (F(2,84) = 0.02, NS), suggesting that threat unpredictability is a critical factor underlying OT’s effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    In humans, oxytocin administration increased defensive responses to unpredictable shocks relative to both placebo and arginine vasopressin.

    “Defensive responses to unpredictable shocks were significantly increased by OT compared with both PLC (F(1,42) = 5.1, P<0.03) and AVP (F(1,42) = 6.6, P<0.01), demonstrating selectivity in OT effects on anxiety.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationown data
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    The unpredictability of a threat is a key factor behind oxytocin's effects on defensive responding.

    “suggesting that threat unpredictability is a critical factor underlying OT’s effects.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Interpretationcitation
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Rodent evidence that oxytocin directly activates corticotrophin releasing factor neurons and facilitates excitatory signaling in the BNST can account for the partial dissociation in oxytocin's effects on responses to predictable versus unpredictable shocks.

    “The partial dissociation in the effect of OT on defensive responses to predictable and unpredictable shocks can be explained by evidence in rodents that OT facilitates excitatory signaling in a structure that underlies sustained anxiety-like behavior to uncertainty, the BNST,7,8 by directly activating corticotrophin releasing factor neurons.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [7] Dabrowska J, Hazra R, Ahern TH, Guo J-D, McDonald AJ, Mascagni F et al. Psychoneuroendocrinol 2011; 36: 1312–1326. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [8] Knobloch HS, Charlet A, Hofmann L, Eliava M, Khrulev S, Cetin AH et al. Neuron 2012; 73: 553–566. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Interpretationown data
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Oxytocin makes defensive responses more sensitive under conditions of ambiguity or uncertainty.

    “Our data suggest that OT sensitizes such responses in the face of ambiguity/uncertainty”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 7
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims. 3
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Anxiety caused by oxytocin could account for the different ways oxytocin influences reactions to familiar in-group versus unfamiliar out-group members.

    “Although the finding of increased anxiety following OT administration does not directly inform on OT’s pro-social effects, it may explain why OT affects responses to in-group (familiar) and out-group (unfamiliar) members differently.2,3”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [2] De Dreu CKW, Greer LL, Handgraaf MJJ, Shalvi S, Van Kleef GA, Baas M et al. Science 2010; 328: 1408–1411. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [3] Declerk CH, Boone C, Kiyonari T . Horm Behav 2010; 57: 368–374. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Interpretationreasoning
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    If this sensitization is applied to social situations, it would encompass people who are unfamiliar.

    “which, when extended to the social domain, would include unfamiliar individuals whose behavior is inherently unpredictable.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Unfamiliar individuals' behavior is inherently unpredictable.
  • The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationown data
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Oxytocin enhances anxiety in humans.

    “suggesting that OT enhances anxiety.”
    • Also stated in: § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat · plain
      “This is the first evidence that OT can be anxiogenic in humans.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Oxytocin might reinforce already established human relationships, possibly lowering anxiety as a secondary effect.

    “Although in humans OT may strengthen existing social bonds (for example, between relatives/friends), perhaps reducing anxiety secondarily”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    In the central amygdala, the medial part relates to fear and the lateral part to anxiety, and only the lateral part has abundant oxytocin receptors.

    “The medial CeA (mCeA) and lateral CeA (lCeA) are involved in fear and anxiety,5 respectively, but only the lCeA is rich in OT receptors.6”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites [5] Davis M, Walker DL, Miles L, Grillon C . Neuropsychopharmacol 2010; 35: 105–135. source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites [6] Huber D, Veinante P, Stoop R . Science 2005; 308: 245–248. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    In animals, oxytocin can lessen anxiety-like behavior through its modulatory action on the amygdala.

    “Indeed, OT can reduce anxiety-like behavior in animals, via its neuromodulatory influence on the amygdala, a core hub mediating fear and anxiety.4”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [4] Viviani et al. Science 2011; 333: 104–107. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductcitation
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Startle reactivity is an established measure of aversive state.

    “We assayed startle reactivity, a well-established index of aversive state,5”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [5] Davis M, Walker DL, Miles L, Grillon C . Neuropsychopharmacol 2010; 35: 105–135. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    Oxytocin encourages territoriality, aggression, and other defensive actions directed at out-group members.

    “OT also promotes territoriality, aggression and other defensive behaviors toward out-group members,2”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites [2] De Dreu CKW, Greer LL, Handgraaf MJJ, Shalvi S, Van Kleef GA, Baas M et al. Science 2010; 328: 1408–1411. source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Study design and conductown data
    § Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat

    The study used a double-blind randomized within-subjects design.

    “Using a double-blind randomized within-subjects design, we administered placebo, OT, the structurally-related neuropeptide arginine vasopressin (AVP), and placebo (PLC) to 43 subjects in three sessions.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
9 of 9
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Unfamiliar individuals' behavior is inherently unpredictable.

    “unfamiliar individuals whose behavior is inherently unpredictable.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Anxiety serves as an adaptive defense against unpredictable threats.

    “Anxiety is an adaptive defensive response to unpredictable threat.”
2 of 2

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is mounting evidence that oxytocin has anxiogenic and fear-enhancing effects.

    “However, against the background of mounting evidence for anxiogenic and fearenhancing OXT effects (33,43,44), it is necessary that the mechanisms determining the outcome of an OXT treatment are completely identified.”

    From Oxytocin enhances brain reward system responses in men viewing the face of their female partner (2013) · cites this paper as [44]

    In “Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat” (page not provided), the authors report increased defensive responses to unpredictable shocks and describe this as evidence that oxytocin can be anxiogenic in humans. The same results say responses to predictable shocks were not affected, so this paper does not support the fear-enhancing part of the claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Exogenous OXT can have anxiogenic effects in humans exposed to social stimuli.

    “Likewise, exogenous OXT can have anxiogenic effects in humans exposed to social stimuli (Bartz et al., 2010; Striepens et al., 2012; Grillon et al., 2013; MacDonald et al., 2013).”

    From Sex-specific modulation of juvenile social play behavior by vasopressin and oxytocin depends on social context (2014) · cites this paper as Grillon et al., 2013

    In “Oxytocin increases anxiety to unpredictable threat” (page not supplied), the authors report increased defensive responses after oxytocin administration in humans. The experiment used unpredictable electric shocks, not social stimuli; the paper discusses social contexts only as a possible extension of its findings. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Individual differences in anxiety psychopathology influencing oxytocin have likely contributed to some of the mixed findings in the oxytocin literature.

    “It is likely that this phenomenon has contributed to some of the mixed findings in the OXT literature (see Meyer-Lindenberg et al, 2011;but also Grillon et al, 2013).”
  • Intranasal oxytocin may increase startle responses to stressful stimuli in humans.

    “intranasal oxytocin may increase startle responses to stressful stimuli in humans (Grillon et al., 2013; Striepens et al., 2012)”
  • Four studies investigated the effects of intranasal oxytocin on the physiological response to generally threatening stimuli, including angry faces, images of threatening scenes, and predictable and unpredictable electric shocks.

    “Four studies investigated the effects of intranasal oxytocin on the physiological response to generally threatening stimuli, including angry faces, images of threatening scenes, and predictable and unpredictable electric shocks (Grillon et al., 2013;Leknes et al., 2013;Prehn et al., 2013;Striepens et al., 2012).”

Statistics that don’t add up

Each reported p-value recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom.

  • p-value fits an unstated one-tailed test: F(1,42) = 6.6, p < .01

    Minor

    The paper reports p < .01 here; recomputing from the test statistic and its degrees of freedom gives p = .014. The reported value is what a one-tailed test gives, but the paper does not say near this result that a one-tailed test was used.

    Reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .014

1 of 1

Statistics recomputed

Every reported test result, recomputed from its test statistic and degrees of freedom. A result shows as not adding up only once an independent check has confirmed it.

  • Doesn’t add upF(1, 42) = 6.6reported p < .01 · recomputed p = .014

    “F(1,42) = 6.6, p < .01”

  • ConsistentF(1, 42) = 5.1reported p < .03 · recomputed p = .029

    “F(1,42) = 5.1, p < .03”

2 of 2

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Self-check results appear here once an independent check has confirmed them.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Grillon, C., Krimsky, M., Charney, D. R., Vytal, K., Ernst, M., & Cornwell, B.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Corresponding author
Grillon, C
Venue
Molecular Psychiatry
Published
2012-11-13
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
958-960
ISSN
  • 1359-4184 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5578
OpenAlex
W2093394479
Cited by
192
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 19 · 2013: 18
FWCI
26.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute of Mental Health (ZIAMH002798, Z01MH002798)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
oxytocin, anxiety, unpredictable threat, threat appraisal, fear conditioning, social stress
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Animals, Antidepressive Agents, Anxiety, Arginine Vasopressin, Cross-Sectional Studies, Disease Models, Animal, Double-Blind Method, Electroshock, Female, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Predictive Value of Tests, Septal Nuclei

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-08.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-08.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review