The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Open accessAbstract
We analysed primary breast cancers by genomic DNA copy number arrays, DNA methylation, exome sequencing, messenger RNA arrays, microRNA sequencing and reverse-phase protein arrays. Our ability to integrate information across platforms provided key insights into previously defined gene expression subtypes and demonstrated the existence of four main breast cancer classes when combining data from five platforms, each of which shows significant molecular heterogeneity. Somatic mutations in only three genes (TP53, PIK3CA and GATA3) occurred at >10% incidence across all breast cancers; however, there were numerous subtype-associated and novel gene mutations including the enrichment of specific mutations in GATA3, PIK3CA and MAP3K1 with the luminal A subtype. We identified two novel protein-expression-defined subgroups, possibly produced by stromal/microenvironmental elements, and integrated analyses identified specific signalling pathways dominant in each molecular subtype including a HER2/phosphorylated HER2/EGFR/phosphorylated EGFR signature within the HER2-enriched expression subtype. Comparison of basal-like breast tumours with high-grade serous ovarian tumours showed many molecular commonalities, indicating a related aetiology and similar therapeutic opportunities. The biological finding of the four main breast cancer subtypes caused by different subsets of genetic and epigenetic abnormalities raises the hypothesis that much of the clinically observable plasticity and heterogeneity occurs within, and not across, these major biological subtypes of breast cancer. The Cancer Genome Atlas Network describe their multifaceted analyses of primary breast cancers, shedding light on breast cancer heterogeneity; although only three genes (TP53, PIK3CA and GATA3) are mutated at a frequency greater than 10% across all breast cancers, numerous subtype-associated and novel mutations were identified. This Article from the Cancer Genome Atlas consortium describes a multifaceted analysis of primary breast cancers in 825 people. Exome sequencing, copy number variation, DNA methylation, messenger RNA arrays, microRNA sequencing and proteomic analyses were performed and integrated to shed light on breast-cancer heterogeneity. Just three genes — TP53, PIK3CA and GATA3 — are mutated at greater than 10% frequency across all breast cancers. Many subtype-associated and novel mutations were identified, as well as two breast-cancer subgroups with specific signalling-pathway signatures. The analyses also suggest that much of the clinically observable plasticity and heterogeneity occurs within, and not across, the major subtypes of breast cancer.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In breast cancer, hypoxia is more evident in TNBC than in other breast cancer subtypes11,12.”
From Hypoxia induces HIF1α-dependent epigenetic vulnerability in triple negative breast cancer to confer immune effector dysfunction and resistance to anti-PD-1 immunotherapy (2022) · cites this paper as [11]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α) is a master transcription factor that is highly expressed in cancer tissues, including breast cancer, and is particularly enriched in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC)2.”
From Liposomal Formulation of HIF-1α Inhibitor Echinomycin Eliminates Established Metastases of Triple-negative Breast Cancer (2020) · cites this paper as [2]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“A recent analysis, combining mutation, mRNA expression and protein levels, determined that the PI3K/Akt pathway was elevated in basal-like cancers as compared with luminal or HER2+ (47).”
From Mislocalization of the Cell Polarity Protein Scribble Promotes Mammary Tumorigenesis and Is Associated with Basal Breast Cancer (2014) · cites this paper as [47]
In the citing paper
“data analysis of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) dataset11 identified that hypoxic gene signature, which includes commonly documented hypoxia-responsive genes26, was inversely correlated with immune effector genes (IFNG, TNF, GZMB, PRF1), IFNγ-responsive genes, as well as genes associated with tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) in TNBC (n = 99) (also referred as a basal subtype of breast cancer)”
In the citing paper
“Kaplan–Meier analysis using public breast cancer meta-analysis database11,30 reveals that TNBC patients with higher hypoxia gene signature are associated with worse disease outcomes, including both overall survival (OS) and distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), compared to those with lower expression of hypoxia gene signature (Fig. 1h).”
In the citing paper
“Analysis of hundreds of triple-negative breast cancers revealed a wide diversity of somatic mutations none of which were found at high frequency [4].”
From The hypoxic tumor microenvironment: A driving force for breast cancer progression (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
In the citing paper
“Given the remarkable overexpression of HIF target genes in triple-negative breast cancer [4, 21], the master regulatory role of HIFs in metastasis (Fig. 5), and their involvement in chemotherapy resistance, HIF inhibitors may represent a targeted therapy for these breast cancers.”
From The hypoxic tumor microenvironment: A driving force for breast cancer progression (2016) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Perou, C., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S., Rees, C. A., Pollack, J., Ross, D., Johnsen, H., Akslen, L., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021093 · Cited by 16,551
Slamon, D. J., Clark, G. M., Wong, S. G., Levin, W. J., Ullrich, A., & McGuire, W. L. (1987) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.3798106 · Cited by 11,760
Gene expression profiling predicts clinical outcome of breast cancer
van 't Veer, L. J., Dai, H., van de Vijver, M. J., He, Y. D., Hart, A. A. M., Mao, M., Peterse, H. L., van der Kooy, K., Marton, M. J., Witteveen, A. T., et al. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415530a · Cited by 9,536
Integrated genomic analyses of ovarian carcinoma
Perou, C. M. (2019) · Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) · doi:10.17615/hvp3-wg08 · Cited by 7,927
Comprehensive genomic characterization defines human glioblastoma genes and core pathways
The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07385 · Cited by 7,735
Self-citationA Multigene Assay to Predict Recurrence of Tamoxifen-Treated, Node-Negative Breast Cancer
Paik, S., Shak, S., Tang, G., Kim, C., Baker, J. B., Cronin, M. T., Baehner, F. L., Walker, M. G., Watson, D., Park, T., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa041588 · Cited by 6,321
The genomic and transcriptomic architecture of 2,000 breast tumours reveals novel subgroups
METABRIC Group, Curtis, C., Shah, S. P., Chin, S.-F., Turashvili, G., Rueda, O. M., Dunning, M. J., Speed, D., Lynch, A. G., Samarajiwa, S., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10983 · Cited by 6,097
Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets
Sørlie, T., Tibshirani, R. J., Parker, J. S., Hastie, T. J., Marron, J. S., Nobel, A. B., Deng, S., Johnsen, H., Pesich, R., Geisler, S. B., et al. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0932692100 · Cited by 5,508
Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes
Parker, J. S., Mullins, M., Cheang, M. C. U., Leung, S. C. Y., Voduc, D. K., Vickery, T. L., Davies, S. R., Fauron, C. M. ‐., He, X., Hu, Z., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.1370 · Cited by 4,818
Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase Pathways Mediated by ERK, JNK, and p38 Protein Kinases
Johnson, G. L., & Lapadat, R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1072682 · Cited by 4,295
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,001–1,085 of 1,085
Induction of entosis by epithelial cadherin expression
Sun, Q., Cibas, E. S., Huang, H., Hodgson, L., & Overholtzer, M. (2014) · Cell Research · doi:10.1038/cr.2014.137 · Cited by 148
Jhaveri, K. L., Wang, X. V., Makker, V., Luoh, S.-W., Mitchell, E. P., Zwiebel, J. A., Sharon, E., Gray, R. J., Li, S., McShane, L. M., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz291 · Cited by 151
Volinia, S., & Croce, C. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1304977110 · Cited by 149
Takaku, M., Grimm, S. A., Shimbo, T., Perera, L., Menafra, R., Stunnenberg, H. G., Archer, T. K., Machida, S., Kurumizaka, H., & Wade, P. A. (2016) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-016-0897-0 · Cited by 151
A whole-genome sequence and transcriptome perspective on HER2-positive breast cancers
Ferrari, A., Vincent-Salomon, A., Pivot, X., Sertier, A.-S., Thomas, E., Tonon, L., Boyault, S., Mulugeta, E., Treilleux, I., MacGrogan, G., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12222 · Cited by 150
Truong, D. D., Kratz, A., Park, J. G., Barrientos, E. S., Saini, H., Nguyen, T., Pockaj, B., Mouneimne, G., LaBaer, J., & Nikkhah, M. (2019) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2293 · Cited by 149
Guo, W., Li, H., Zhu, Y., Lan, L., Yang, S., Drukker, K., Morris, E. A., Burnside, E. S., Whitman, G. J., Giger, M. L., et al. (2015) · Journal of Medical Imaging · doi:10.1117/1.jmi.2.4.041007 · Cited by 148
Fröhlich, F., Kessler, T., Weindl, D., Shadrin, A., Schmiester, L., Hache, H., Muradyan, A., Schütte, M., Lim, J.-H., Heinig, M., et al. (2018) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2018.10.013 · Cited by 143
Hypoxia-induced switch in SNAT2/SLC38A2 regulation generates endocrine resistance in breast cancer
Morotti, M., Bridges, E., Valli, A., Choudhry, H., Sheldon, H., Wigfield, S., Gray, N., Zois, C. E., Grimm, F., Jones, D., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1818521116 · Cited by 131
Feigin, M. E., Akshinthala, S. D., Araki, K., Rosenberg, A. Z., Muthuswamy, L. B., Martin, B., Lehmann, B. D., Berman, H. K., Pietenpol, J. A., Cardiff, R. D., et al. (2014) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-13-3415 · Cited by 135
Therapy response testing of breast cancer in a 3D high-throughput perfused microfluidic platform
Lanz, H. L., Saleh, A., Kramer, B., Cairns, J., Ng, C. P., Yu, J., Trietsch, S. J., Hankemeier, T., Joore, J., Vulto, P., et al. (2017) · BMC Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12885-017-3709-3 · Cited by 135
A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer
Amgad, M., Hodge, J. M., Elsebaie, M. A. T., Bodelon, C., Puvanesarajah, S., Gutman, D. A., Siziopikou, K. P., Goldstein, J. A., Gaudet, M. M., Teras, L. R., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02643-7 · Cited by 137
Johnson, G. L., Stuhlmiller, T. J., Angus, S. P., Zawistowski, J. S., & Graves, L. M. (2014) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-1081 · Cited by 129
Arruabarrena-Aristorena, A., Maag, J. L. V., Kittane, S., Cai, Y., Karthaus, W. R., Ladewig, E., Park, J., Kannan, S., Ferrando, L., Cocco, E., et al. (2020) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.08.003 · Cited by 130
Littlefield, P., Liu, L., Mysore, V., Shan, Y., Shaw, D. E., & Jura, N. (2014) · Science Signaling · doi:10.1126/scisignal.2005786 · Cited by 126
The landscape of somatic genetic alterations in breast cancers from ATM germline mutation carriers
Weigelt, B., Bi, R., Kumar, R., Blecua, P., Mandelker, D. L., Geyer, F. C., Pareja, F., James, P. A., kConFab Investigators, Couch, F. J., et al. (2018) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djy028 · Cited by 128
Dushyanthen, S., Teo, Z. L., Caramia, F., Savas, P., Mintoff, C. P., Virassamy, B., Henderson, M. A., Luen, S. J., Mansour, M., Kershaw, M. H., et al. (2017) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00728-9 · Cited by 124
Evaluation and comparison of multi-omics data integration methods for cancer subtyping
Duan, R., Gao, L., Gao, Y., Hu, Y., Xu, H., Huang, M., Song, K., Wang, H., Dong, Y., Jiang, C., et al. (2021) · PLOS Computational Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009224 · Cited by 122
Transforming Epidemiology for 21st Century Medicine and Public Health
Khoury, M. J., Lam, T. K., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Hartge, P., Spitz, M. R., Buring, J. E., Chanock, S. J., Croyle, R. T., Goddard, K. A., Ginsburg, G. S., et al. (2013) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-13-0146 · Cited by 119
Xiang, L., Gilkes, D. M., Hu, H., Takano, N., Luo, W., Lu, H., Bullen, J. W., Samanta, D., Liang, H., & Semenza, G. L. (2014) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.2997 · Cited by 119
Liver-Type Glutaminase GLS2 Is a Druggable Metabolic Node in Luminal-Subtype Breast Cancer
Lukey, M. J., Cluntun, A. A., Katt, W. P., Lin, M.-C. J., Druso, J. E., Ramachandran, S., Erickson, J. W., Le, H. H., Wang, Z.-E., Blank, B., et al. (2019) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2019.08.076 · Cited by 103
Al-Ejeh, F., Simpson, P. T., Sanus, J. M., Klein, K., Kalimutho, M., Shi, W., Miranda, M., Kutasovic, J., Raghavendra, A., Madore, J., et al. (2014) · Oncogenesis · doi:10.1038/oncsis.2014.14 · Cited by 107
A pan-cancer organoid platform for precision medicine
Larsen, B. M., Kannan, M., Langer, L. F., Leibowitz, B. D., Bentaieb, A., Cancino, A., Dolgalev, I., Drummond, B. E., Dry, J. R., Ho, C.-S., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109429 · Cited by 105
Deep learned tissue “fingerprints” classify breast cancers by ER/PR/Her2 status from H&E images
Rawat, R. R., Ortega, I., Roy, P., Sha, F., Shibata, D., Ruderman, D., & Agus, D. B. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-64156-4 · Cited by 100
Sirkisoon, S. R., Carpenter, R. L., Rimkus, T., Anderson, A., Harrison, A., Lange, A. M., Jin, G., Watabe, K., & Lo, H.-W. (2018) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-018-0132-4 · Cited by 96
Kinome rewiring reveals AURKA limits PI3K-pathway inhibitor efficacy in breast cancer
Donnella, H. J., Webber, J. T., Levin, R. S., Camarda, R., Momcilovic, O., Bayani, N., Shah, K. N., Korkola, J. E., Shokat, K. M., Goga, A., et al. (2018) · Nature Chemical Biology · doi:10.1038/s41589-018-0081-9 · Cited by 90
Huang, Y., Wei, L., Hu, Y., Shao, N., Lin, Y., He, S., Shi, H., Zhang, X., & Lin, Y. (2021) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2021.706733 · Cited by 82
An integrative deep learning framework for classifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer
Mohaiminul Islam, M., Huang, S., Ajwad, R., Chi, C., Wang, Y., & Hu, P. (2020) · Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1016/j.csbj.2020.08.005 · Cited by 90
Mahara, S., Lee, P. L., Feng, M., Tergaonkar, V., Chng, W. J., & Yu, Q. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1602079113 · Cited by 87
Role of imaging in the era of precision medicine
Giardino, A., Gupta, S., Olson, E., Sepulveda, K., Lenchik, L., Ivanidze, J., Rakow-Penner, R., Patel, M. J., Subramaniam, R. M., & Ganeshan, D. (2017) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2016.11.021 · Cited by 87
Ha, D.-H., Min, A., Kim, S., Jang, H., Kim, S. H., Kim, H.-J., Ryu, H. S., Ku, J.-L., Lee, K.-H., & Im, S.-A. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-66018-5 · Cited by 78
Zhou, J. X., Taramelli, R., Pedrini, E., Knijnenburg, T., & Huang, S. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-09307-w · Cited by 85
Beyond Endometriosis Genome-Wide Association Study: From Genomics to Phenomics to the Patient
Rahmioglu, N., Morris, A., Nyholt, D., Montgomery, G., Becker, C., Missmer, S., & Zondervan, K. (2016) · Seminars in Reproductive Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0036-1585408 · Cited by 84
Bower, J. J., Vance, L. D., Psioda, M., Smith-Roe, S. L., Simpson, D. A., Ibrahim, J. G., Hoadley, K. A., Perou, C. M., & Kaufmann, W. K. (2017) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-017-0009-7 · Cited by 76
Repression of p63 and induction of EMT by mutant Ras in mammary epithelial cells
Yoh, K. E., Regunath, K., Guzman, A., Lee, S.-M., Pfister, N. T., Akanni, O., Kaufman, L. J., Prives, C., & Prywes, R. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1613417113 · Cited by 75
Monitoring of Technical Variation in Quantitative High-Throughput Datasets
Lauss, M., Visne, I., Kriegner, A., Ringnér, M., Jönsson, G., & Höglund, M. (2013) · Cancer Informatics · doi:10.4137/cin.s12862 · Cited by 74
MEK inhibition in non-small cell lung cancer
Stinchcombe, T. E., & Johnson, G. L. (2014) · Lung Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.lungcan.2014.09.005 · Cited by 69
Rodosthenous, T., Shahrezaei, V., & Evangelou, M. (2020) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa530 · Cited by 67
Li, Q., Ren, Z., Cao, K., Li, M. M., Wang, K., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj1624 · Cited by 66
Zhang, C., Zhang, X., Zhao, W., Zeng, C., Li, W., Li, B., Luo, X., Li, J., Jiang, J., Deng, B., et al. (2019) · Nano Research · doi:10.1007/s12274-019-2308-9 · Cited by 61
Chen, Z., Yuan, Y.-C., Wang, Y., Liu, Z., Chan, H. J., & Chen, S. (2015) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-015-3446-8 · Cited by 59
Guestini, F., McNamara, K. M., Ishida, T., & Sasano, H. (2016) · Expert Opinion on Therapeutic Targets · doi:10.1517/14728222.2016.1125469 · Cited by 58
Sviderskiy, V. O., Blumenberg, L., Gorodetsky, E., Karakousi, T. R., Hirsh, N., Alvarez, S. W., Terzi, E. M., Kaparos, E., Whiten, G. C., Ssebyala, S., et al. (2020) · Molecular Cell · doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2020.10.016 · Cited by 56
Atypical plant homeodomain of UBR7 functions as an H2BK120Ub ligase and breast tumor suppressor
Adhikary, S., Chakravarti, D., Terranova, C., Sengupta, I., Maitituoheti, M., Dasgupta, A., Srivastava, D. K., Ma, J., Raman, A. T., Tarco, E., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08986-5 · Cited by 57
Anderson, G. R., Wardell, S. E., Cakir, M., Crawford, L., Leeds, J. C., Nussbaum, D. P., Shankar, P. S., Soderquist, R. S., Stein, E. M., Tingley, J. P., et al. (2016) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aae0348 · Cited by 53
The PARTNER trial of neoadjuvant olaparib with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer
Abraham, J. E., Pinilla, K., Dayimu, A., Grybowicz, L., Demiris, N., Harvey, C., Drewett, L. M., Lucey, R., Fulton, A., Roberts, A. N., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07384-2 · Cited by 53
Wu, J., Li, X., Teng, X., Rubin, D. L., Napel, S., Daniel, B. L., & Li, R. (2018) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13058-018-1039-2 · Cited by 53
Breaking the paradigm: Dr Insight empowers signature-free, enhanced drug repurposing
Chan, J., Wang, X., Turner, J. A., Baldwin, N. E., & Gu, J. (2019) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btz006 · Cited by 50
Constitutive activation of RANK disrupts mammary cell fate leading to tumorigenesis
Pellegrini, P., Cordero, A., Gallego, M. I., Dougall, W. C., Purificación, M., Pujana, M. A., & Gonzalez-Suarez, E. (2013) · Stem Cells · doi:10.1002/stem.1454 · Cited by 52
Omics Technologies Improving Breast Cancer Research and Diagnostics
Orsini, A., Diquigiovanni, C., & Bonora, E. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms241612690 · Cited by 52
Hypoxic regulation of RIOK3 is a major mechanism for cancer cell invasion and metastasis
Singleton, D. C., Rouhi, P., Zois, C. E., Haider, S., Li, J.-L., Kessler, B. M., Cao, Y., & Harris, A. L. (2015) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2014.396 · Cited by 52
Kumegawa, K., Takahashi, Y., Saeki, S., Yang, L., Nakadai, T., Osako, T., Mori, S., Noda, T., Ohno, S., Ueno, T., et al. (2022) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-022-00438-6 · Cited by 45
Mundi, P. S., Dela Cruz, F. S., Grunn, A., Diolaiti, D., Mauguen, A., Rainey, A. R., Guillan, K. C., Siddiquee, A., You, D., Realubit, R., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.03.462951 · Cited by 51
Identification of synergistic drug combinations using breast cancer patient-derived xenografts
Turner, T. H., Alzubi, M. A., & Harrell, J. C. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58438-0 · Cited by 50
Laser direct-write onto live tissues: a novel model for studying cancer cell migration
Burks, H. E., Phamduy, T. B., Azimi, M. S., Saksena, J., Burow, M. E., Collins‐Burow, B. M., Chrisey, D. B., & Murfee, W. L. (2016) · Journal of Cellular Physiology · doi:10.1002/jcp.25363 · Cited by 48
Sellergren, A., Kazemzadeh, S., Jaroensri, T., Kiraly, A., Traverse, M., Kohlberger, T., Xu, S., Jamil, F., Hughes, C., Lau, C., et al. (2025) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2507.05201 · Cited by 49
A Review of Imputation Strategies for Isobaric Labeling-Based Shotgun Proteomics
Bramer, L. M., Irvahn, J., Piehowski, P. D., Rodland, K. D., & Webb-Robertson, B.-J. M. (2021) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00123 · Cited by 47
Bailey, C. M., Liu, Y., Peng, G., Zhang, H., He, M., Sun, D., Zheng, P., Liu, Y., & Wang, Y. (2020) · Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.nano.2020.102278 · Cited by 44
Shee, K., Wells, J. D., Jiang, A., & Miller, T. W. (2019) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0224267 · Cited by 43
Network control principles for identifying personalized driver genes in cancer
Guo, W.-F., Zhang, S.-W., Zeng, T., Akutsu, T., & Chen, L. (2020) · Briefings in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bib/bbz089 · Cited by 44
EMUDRA: Ensemble of Multiple Drug Repositioning Approaches to improve prediction accuracy
Zhou, X., Wang, M., Katsyv, I., Irie, H., & Zhang, B. (2018) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bty325 · Cited by 43
BRE/BRCC45 regulates CDC25A stability by recruiting USP7 in response to DNA damage.
Biswas, K., Philip, S., Yadav, A., Martin, B. K., Burkett, S., Singh, V., Babbar, A., North, S. L., Chang, S., & Sharan, S. K. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03020-6 · Cited by 41
The Mutant p53-Targeting Compound APR-246 Induces ROS-Modulating Genes in Breast Cancer Cells
Synnott, N. C., Madden, S. F., Bykov, V. J. N., Crown, J., Wiman, K. G., & Duffy, M. J. (2018) · Translational Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.tranon.2018.08.009 · Cited by 35
Dong, Q., Gao, H., Shi, Y., Zhang, F., Gu, X., Wu, A., Wang, D., Chen, Y., Bandyopadhyay, A., Yeh, I.-T., et al. (2016) · Aging · doi:10.18632/aging.101082 · Cited by 29
Buikhuisen, J. Y., Gomez Barila, P. M., Torang, A., Dekker, D., de Jong, J. H., Cameron, K., Vitale, S., Stassi, G., van Hooff, S. R., Castro, M. A. A., et al. (2021) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers13040801 · Cited by 33
CRISPR screens identify gene targets at breast cancer risk loci
Tuano, N. K., Beesley, J., Manning, M., Shi, W., Perlaza-Jimenez, L., Malaver-Ortega, L. F., Paynter, J. M., Black, D., Civitarese, A., McCue, K., et al. (2023) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-023-02898-w · Cited by 30
Yan, K. K., Zhao, H., & Pang, H. (2017) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-017-1982-4 · Cited by 34
Williams, M. J., Oliphant, M. U. J., Au, V., Liu, C., Baril, C., O’Flanagan, C., Lai, D., Beatty, S., Van Vliet, M., Yiu, J. C., et al. (2024) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/s41588-024-01988-0 · Cited by 34
Qi, F., Qin, W., & Zang, Y. (2019) · Oncology Letters · doi:10.3892/ol.2019.9884 · Cited by 32
Guidelines for using sigQC for systematic evaluation of gene signatures
Dhawan, A., Barberis, A., Cheng, W.-C., Domingo, E., West, C., Maughan, T., Scott, J. G., Harris, A. L., & Buffa, F. M. (2019) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/s41596-019-0136-8 · Cited by 31
Goel, I., Bhaskar, Y., Kumar, N., Singh, S., Amanullah, M., Dhar, R., & Karmakar, S. (2025) · Frontiers in Digital Health · doi:10.3389/fdgth.2025.1550407 · Cited by 31
Zhao, N., Kabotyanski, E. B., Saltzman, A. B., Malovannaya, A., Yuan, X., Reineke, L. C., Lieu, N., Gao, Y., Pedroza, D. A., Calderon, S. J., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci172503 · Cited by 30
Tsigelny, I. F., Wheler, J. J., Greenberg, J. P., Kouznetsova, V. L., Stewart, D. J., Bazhenova, L., & Kurzrock, R. (2015) · Oncotarget · doi:10.18632/oncotarget.3472 · Cited by 30
Functional importance of PP2A regulatory subunit loss in breast cancer
Watt, L. F., Panicker, N., Mannan, A., Copeland, B., Kahl, R. G. S., Dun, M. D., Young, B., Roselli, S., & Verrills, N. M. (2017) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-017-4403-5 · Cited by 29
Yuan, Y., Kos, F. J., He, T.-F., Yin, H. H., Li, M., Hardwick, N., Zurcher, K., Schmolze, D., Lee, P., Pillai, R. K., et al. (2017) · OncoImmunology · doi:10.1080/2162402x.2017.1363138 · Cited by 23
Bidimensional linked matrix factorization for pan-omics pan-cancer analysis
Lock, E. F., Park, J. Y., & Hoadley, K. A. (2022) · The Annals of Applied Statistics · doi:10.1214/21-aoas1495 · Cited by 19
Enhancing radiotherapy techniques for Triple-Negative breast cancer treatment
Sarlak, S., Pagès, G., & Luciano, F. (2025) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2025.102939 · Cited by 19
Davis, R. J., Swanger, J., Hughes, B. T., & Clurman, B. E. (2017) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.00657-16 · Cited by 15
Deep Learning for Integrated Analysis of Breast Cancer Subtype Specific Multi-omics Data
Rakshit, S., Saha, I., Chakraborty, S. S., & Plewczyski, D. (2018) · TENCON 2018 - 2018 IEEE Region 10 Conference · doi:10.1109/tencon.2018.8650144 · Cited by 16
On the inconsistency of ℓ 1-penalised sparse precision matrix estimation
Heinävaara, O., Leppä-aho, J., Corander, J., & Honkela, A. (2016) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/s12859-016-1309-x · Cited by 14
Choi, E., Jeon, K., Lee, H., Mun, G., Kim, J., Shin, J., Kwon, Y., Na, Y., & Lee, Y. (2024) · Cancer Science · doi:10.1111/cas.16174 · Cited by 15
Dynamic visualization of multi-level molecular data: The Director package in R
Icay, K., Liu, C., & Hautaniemi, S. (2018) · Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine · doi:10.1016/j.cmpb.2017.10.013 · Cited by 8
Jongbloed, E. M., Jansen, M. P. H. M., de Weerd, V., Helmijr, J. A., Beaufort, C. M., Reinders, M. J. T., van Marion, R., van IJcken, W. F. J., Sonke, G. S., Konings, I. R., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37409-1 · Cited by 6
Resistance Mechanisms to Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitors
Wiedemeyer, W. R. (2018) · Resistance to Targeted Anti-Cancer Therapeutics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-67932-7_8 · Cited by 7
Comparison of Different Classification Methods for Breast Cancer Subtypes Prediction
Xu, J., Wu, P., Chen, Y., & Zhang, L. (2018) · 2018 International Conference on Security, Pattern Analysis, and Cybernetics (SPAC) · doi:10.1109/spac46244.2018.8965553 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- The Cancer Genome Atlas Network
- Corresponding author
- The Cancer Genome Atlas Network
- Venue
- Nature
- Published
- 2012-09-23
- Volume
- 490
- Issue
- 7418
- Pages
- 61-70
- ISSN
- 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-4687
- PMC
- PMC3465532
- OpenAlex
- W4301159569
- Cited by
- 12,129
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 552 · 2025: 690 · 2024: 761 · 2023: 781 · 2022: 918 · 2021: 1164 · 2020: 1005 · 2019: 961 · 2018: 942 · 2017: 949 · 2016: 979 · 2015: 909 · 2014: 879 · 2013: 590 · 2012: 40
- FWCI
- 256.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
- UNC Libraries
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Breast Cancer Research Foundation (P50CA116201)
- Henry M. Jackson Foundation
- National Institutes of Health
- National Human Genome Research Institute (U54HG003067, U54HG003079, U54HG004028)
- National Cancer Institute (R01CA094143, U24CA143882, U01CA084955, U24CA143840, U24CA143858, U24CA144025, K08CA148912, U24CA143866, U24CA143883, U24CA143845, U24CA143867, U24CA143848, U24CA143799, U24CA143835, P50 CA 58223, P30CA016672, P30CA016058, P50CA058223, P50CA116201, P30CA016086)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (R01LM009722)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Keywords
- breast cancer, molecular subtypes, tumor heterogeneity, somatic mutations, TP53, PIK3CA, GATA3, MAP3K1, luminal A, HER2-enriched breast cancer, basal-like breast cancer, high-grade serous ovarian cancer, DNA methylation, copy number variation, gene expression signatures, signaling pathways, tumor microenvironment, multi-omics integration
- MeSH terms
- Breast Neoplasms, DNA Mutational Analysis, Female, Humans, Mutation, Ovarian Neoplasms, Receptors, Estrogen, RNA, Messenger, RNA, Neoplasm, Genome, Human, Gene Expression Regulation, Neoplastic, Genes, p53, Retinoblastoma Protein, Genes, erbB-2, Genetic Heterogeneity, DNA Methylation, Genes, BRCA1, Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Oligonucleotide Array Sequence Analysis, Gene Expression Profiling, Genomics, MicroRNAs, Protein Array Analysis, Proteomics, MAP Kinase Kinase Kinase 1, GATA3 Transcription Factor, Genes, Neoplasm, DNA Copy Number Variations, Class I Phosphatidylinositol 3-Kinases, Exome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
