The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 37 of the 44 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Mechanism and regulation of cargo entry into the Commander endosomal recycling pathway
Open accessAbstract
Commander is a multiprotein complex that orchestrates endosomal recycling of integral cargo proteins and is essential for normal development. While the structure of this complex has recently been described, how cargo proteins are selected for Commander-mediated recycling remains unclear. Here we identify the mechanism through which the unstructured carboxy-terminal tail of the cargo adaptor sorting nexin-17 (SNX17) directly binds to the Retriever sub-complex of Commander. SNX17 adopts an autoinhibited conformation where its carboxy-terminal tail occupies the cargo binding groove. Competitive cargo binding overcomes this autoinhibition, promoting SNX17 endosomal residency and the release of the tail for Retriever association. Furthermore, our study establishes the central importance of SNX17-Retriever association in the handover of integrin and lipoprotein receptor cargoes into pre-existing endosomal retrieval sub-domains. In describing the principal mechanism of cargo entry into the Commander recycling pathway we provide key insight into the function and regulation of this evolutionary conserved sorting pathway.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
SNX17 enters the Commander recycling pathway by direct binding of its unstructured C-terminal tail to the Retriever sub-complex at the VPS26C:VPS35L interface. Cargo binding to SNX17 relieves an autoinhibited conformation, promoting Retriever association and handover of integrin and lipoprotein receptor cargoes into pre-existing endosomal retrieval sub-domains.
Key findings
- SNX17 directly binds Retriever via its C-terminal tail; the terminal Leu470 is critical, as SNX17(L470G) bound Retriever at significantly lower levels (n = 3). AlphaFold2 predicted the 465IGDEDL470 motif binds a VPS35L pocket defined by Arg248, Trp280, and Lys283, with upstream 459NFAF462 engaging VPS26C.
- Mutagenesis validated the interface: VPS35L(R248A), -(W280A), and -(K283E) showed pronounced loss of SNX17 association; SNX17(I465A), -(D467A), and -(L470G) caused near-complete loss of Retriever binding. VPS35L(R248A) retained Retriever/CCC/Commander assembly but failed to rescue α5β1-integrin and LRP1 recycling in VPS35L KO RPE1 cells (n = 5 for surface biotinylation).
- SNX17 is autoinhibited: its 459NFAF462 sequence occupies the FERM cargo-binding groove. SNX17(NFAF-AAAA), -(F462A), and -(F462E) enhanced LRP1, LRP2, and APP binding; FERM mutants W321A, V380D, and M384E increased Retriever/Commander association. ITC showed LRP1 and APP cargo peptides had approximately 2-fold lower affinity for full-length SNX17 than for SNX17ΔC (residues 1–390).
- LRP1 peptide enhanced SNX17-Retriever binding in a dose-dependent manner (3 µM–30 µM), while an LRP1 Y4473A peptide failed to enhance binding. Endogenous SNX17 localized broadly on EEA1-positive endosomes, whereas VPS35L-GFP and VPS35L(R248A)-GFP were enriched on retrieval sub-domains with COMMD1 and FAM21; SNX17 was not enriched in these sub-domains.
Methods
- Recombinant human Retriever and SNX17 variants were expressed in Sf21 insect cells or E. coli and used in in vitro binding assays, ITC, and AlphaFold2/ColabFold modeling.
- HEK293T cells were used for transient transfections and quantitative GFP-nanotrap immunoprecipitations; RPE1-hTERT VPS35L CRISPR/Cas9 knockout cells were used for lentiviral rescue, cell surface biotinylation, confocal imaging, and immuno-electron microscopy.
- Main analyses included SDS-PAGE/western blot quantification, Pearson’s colocalization, normalized fluorescence line profiles across 30 endosomes from 3 independent experiments, and immunogold labeling with 10-nm and 15-nm gold particles.
Limitations
- The paper states that further experiments are required to understand the dynamics of cargo handover into the retrieval sub-domain, biogenesis of tubular exit gates, control by cellular state, and how Retriever regulates Retromer sub-domain organization and functional cargo retrieval/recycling.
- Evident from the text: key mechanistic conclusions rely heavily on AlphaFold2 predictions, including the autoinhibited SNX17 conformation and the SNX17-Retriever interface; these were validated by mutagenesis but not by an experimental high-resolution structure of the full complex.
- Evident from the text: SNX17-Retriever binding was specific but non-stoichiometric in vitro, and the SNX17 C-terminal tail peptide bound SNX17ΔC only with relatively low affinity.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
37 of 44 cited sources checked · 18 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premiseown data
The carboxy-terminal sequence of SNX17 is essential for binding to Commander.
“The same sequence is essential for binding to Commander”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
The Results section, “Retriever interacts with the evolutionary conserved carboxy-tail of SNX17” (page unavailable), shows that SNX17’s carboxy-terminal tail is necessary for binding to retriever. It does not establish binding to Commander as stated; the paper instead distinguishes SNX17’s association with retriever from association through the CCC complex. (LLM, conf=0.85)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [26] Healy, M. D. et al. Proteomic identification and structural basis for the interaction between sorting nexin SNX17 and PDLIM family proteins. Structure 30, 1590–1602.e1596 (2022). source
- Premisecitation
In the Commander trafficking pathway, sequence-dependent integral protein recognition is principally mediated by the cargo adaptor sorting nexin-17 (SNX17).
“In the Commander trafficking pathway sequence-dependent integral protein recognition is principally mediated by the cargo adaptor sorting nexin-17 (SNX17)9”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
- Premisecitation
Retriever, together with the dodecameric CCDC22, CCDC93, COMMD (CCC) complex and DENND10, forms the 16-subunit Commander super-assembly.
“that together with the dodecameric CCDC22, CCDC93, COMMD (CCC) complex and DENND10, forms the 16-subunit Commander super-assembly7–12”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 6 sources checked- cites [7] Phillips-Krawczak, C. A. et al. COMMD1 is linked to the WASH complex and regulates endosomal trafficking of the copper transporter ATP7A. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 91–103 (2015). source
The Results section, “Identification of the CCC complex” (page unavailable), supports a CCC complex involving CCDC22, CCDC93 and COMMD proteins, including interactions with all 10 human COMMD family members. The copy does not establish that this is a dodecameric complex or that it joins Retriever and DENND10 in a 16-subunit Commander super-assembly; it instead names C16orf62 among the CCC components. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Mallam, A. L. & Marcotte, E. M. Systems-wide studies uncover commander, a multiprotein complex essential to human development. Cell Syst. 4, 483–494 (2017). source
In “Discovery of the 14-subunit Commander complex” (page unavailable), the paper identifies a Commander complex containing the COMMD proteins, CCDC22, CCDC93, DSCR3, and C16orf62, and describes CCC as a subcomplex. It calls Commander putatively 14-member, not 16-subunit, and the passages do not establish the claimed Retriever–DENND10 assembly. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
The Abstract says retriever associates with the CCC complex, and the Results identify retriever as a heterotrimer and CCC as containing CCDC22, CCDC93 and COMMD proteins. Our copy does not establish that CCC is dodecameric or that DENND10 joins these complexes in a 16-subunit Commander super-assembly. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [10] Boesch, D. J. et al. Structural organization of the retriever-CCC endosomal recycling complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 910–924 (2024). source
- cites [11] Healy, M. D. et al. Structure of the endosomal commander complex linked to ritscher-schinzel syndrome. Cell 186, 2219–2237.e2229 (2023). source
- cites [12] Laulumaa, S., Kumpula, E. P., Huiskonen, J. T. & Varjosalo, M. Structure and interactions of the endogenous human Commander complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 925–938 (2024). source
- Premisecitation
Retriever is a stable heterotrimer of VPS26C, VPS35L and VPS29.
“Retriever is an essential cargo sorting complex and is a stable heterotrimer of VPS26C, VPS35L and VPS29”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim6 of 6 sources checked- cites [7] Phillips-Krawczak, C. A. et al. COMMD1 is linked to the WASH complex and regulates endosomal trafficking of the copper transporter ATP7A. Mol. Biol. Cell 26, 91–103 (2015). source
The Introduction describes retromer as a VPS26–VPS29–VPS35 cargo-selection trimer, not Retriever. Searches for Retriever, VPS26C, and VPS35L found no passage in our copy addressing Retriever’s composition or stability. (LLM, conf=0.76)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [8] Mallam, A. L. & Marcotte, E. M. Systems-wide studies uncover commander, a multiprotein complex essential to human development. Cell Syst. 4, 483–494 (2017). source
The section ‘Commander’s role in trafficking and transport’ describes a three-protein retromer cargo-recognition complex containing VPS26, VPS29 and VPS35, not the claimed Retriever complex. Searches for Retriever and for VPS26C, VPS35L and VPS29 together found no passage in our copy establishing Retriever’s composition or stability. (LLM, conf=0.75)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
- cites [10] Boesch, D. J. et al. Structural organization of the retriever-CCC endosomal recycling complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 910–924 (2024). source
- cites [11] Healy, M. D. et al. Structure of the endosomal commander complex linked to ritscher-schinzel syndrome. Cell 186, 2219–2237.e2229 (2023). source
- cites [12] Laulumaa, S., Kumpula, E. P., Huiskonen, J. T. & Varjosalo, M. Structure and interactions of the endogenous human Commander complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 925–938 (2024). source
- Premisecitation
Over 100 integral proteins require SNX17 and Retriever for their endosomal sorting through the Commander axis, including members of the integrin and lipoprotein receptor families.
“Over 100 integral proteins require SNX17 and Retriever for their endosomal sorting through the Commander axis including members of the integrin and lipoprotein receptor families9.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
The Results section on cell-surface cargo proteins reports that 225 membrane proteins decreased at the surface after SNX17 depletion, including integrins and lipoprotein receptor family members. It validates Retriever dependence for LRP1, but does not establish that all 225—or more than 100—require both SNX17 and Retriever for endosomal sorting. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The FERM domain of SNX17 binds to a ØxNxx[Y/F] sorting motif presented in the cytoplasmic facing domains of integral proteins.
“the FERM domain of which binds to a ØxNxx[Y/F] sorting motif presented in the cytoplasmic facing domains of integral proteins (where Ø is a hydrophobic residue and x is any residue)22–25”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 4 sources checked- cites [22] van Kerkhof, P. et al. Sorting nexin 17 facilitates LRP recycling in the early endosome. Embo j. 24, 2851–2861 (2005). source
The Introduction identifies a FERM domain in SNX17, and the LRP-binding results show that the SNX17 region containing that domain contributes to binding the LRP cytoplasmic tail. The results identify an essential IxNPxY motif in LRP, not the broader ØxNxx[Y/F] motif: proline was required, and the paper does not establish that a terminal phenylalanine can substitute for tyrosine or that the motif generally applies to integral proteins (pages unavailable in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [23] Böttcher, R. T. et al. Sorting nexin 17 prevents lysosomal degradation of β1 integrins by binding to the β1-integrin tail. Nat. Cell Biol. 14, 584–592 (2012). source
- cites [24] Steinberg, F., Heesom, K. J., Bass, M. D. & Cullen, P. J. SNX17 protects integrins from degradation by sorting between lysosomal and recycling pathways. J. Cell Biol. 197, 219–230 (2012). source
The Results and discussion section shows that SNX17’s FERM-like domain directly binds the membrane-distal NPXY motif in integrin β-subunit cytoplasmic tails. Our copy does not establish the more specific ØxNxx[Y/F] consensus motif or show that binding extends generally to integral proteins. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [25] Ghai, R. et al. Structural basis for endosomal trafficking of diverse transmembrane cargos by PX-FERM proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, E643–E652 (2013). source
- Interpretationcitation
These foci represent previously described retrieval sub-domains from where cargo-enriched transport carriers exit the endosome.
“These foci therefore represent the previously described retrieval sub-domains from where cargo-enriched transport carriers exit the endosome for transport to their destination9,34,35,39,41,49.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim6 of 6 sources checked- cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
- cites [34] Puthenveedu, M. A. et al. Sequence-dependent sorting of recycling proteins by actin-stabilized endosomal microdomains. Cell 143, 761–773 (2010). source
- cites [35] Temkin, P. et al. SNX27 mediates retromer tubule entry and endosome-to-plasma membrane trafficking of signalling receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 715–721 (2011). source
- cites [39] Bowman, S. L., Shiwarski, D. J. & Puthenveedu, M. A. Distinct G protein-coupled receptor recycling pathways allow spatial control of downstream G protein signaling. J. Cell Biol. 214, 797–806 (2016). source
The Introduction and Results and discussion (page unavailable) describe endosomal microdomains that sort B2AR into tubular domains for recycling to the cell surface. They do not establish that the citing paper’s foci are those domains or show cargo-enriched transport carriers exiting from them. (LLM, conf=0.82)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [41] Varandas, K. C., Irannejad, R. & von Zastrow, M. Retromer endosome exit domains serve multiple trafficking destinations and regulate local G protein activation by GPCRs. Curr. Biol. 26, 3129–3142 (2016). source
- cites [49] Liu, N., Liu, K. & Yang, C. WDR91 specifies the endosomal retrieval subdomain for retromer-dependent recycling. J. Cell Biol. 221, E202203013 (2022). source
- Findingown data
The interface between SNX17 and Retriever extends to include upstream residues 459NFAF462 in the SNX17 tail engaging primarily with VPS26C.
“The interface between SNX17 and Retriever extended to include upstream residues 459NFAF462 in the SNX17 tail engaging primarily with VPS26C.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GFP-SNX17(I465A), -(D467A) and -(L470G) mutants lead to near-complete loss of Retriever binding.
“GFP-SNX17(I465A), -(D467A) and -(L470G) mutants led to near-complete loss of Retriever binding (Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AlphaFold2 predicts a high-confidence interaction between the unstructured carboxy-terminal region of SNX17 and Retriever.
“AlphaFold2 predictions show a high confidence interaction between the unstructured carboxy-terminal region of SNX17 and Retriever (Fig S5A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Retriever coupling of SNX17 is mediated by motifs within its unstructured carboxy termini binding to surfaces at the VPS26C:VPS35L interface of Retriever.
“Collectively these data show that Retriever coupling of SNX17 is mediated by motifs within its unstructured carboxy termini binding to surfaces at the VPS26C:VPS35L interface of Retriever.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
VPS35L(R293E), which disrupts binding to VPS26C, fails to associate with SNX17 in cell-based immunoprecipitations.
“a VPS35L mutant that specifically disrupted binding to VPS26C, VPS35L(R293E)11, failed to associate with SNX17 in quantitative cell-based immunoprecipitations”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SNX17(D469A) and more modestly SNX17(E468A) impact Retriever association.
“SNX17(D469A) and, more modestly SNX17(E468A) also impacted on the Retriever association (Fig. 2C)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
VPS35L(R248A), -(W280A), and -(K283E) mutations all cause pronounced loss of SNX17 association.
“VPS35L(R248A), -(W280A), and -(K283E) all showed a pronounced loss of SNX17 association (Fig. 2B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The SNX17-binding pocket in VPS35L is highly conserved across eukaryotic Retriever.
“this pocket is highly conserved across eukaryotic Retriever (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
The extreme carboxy-terminal Leu470 residue of SNX17 makes extensive contact with VPS35L through hydrophobic interaction with Trp280 and electrostatic interaction of the carboxy-terminal carboxyl group with Arg248.
“One striking feature of the predicted complex is that the extreme carboxy-terminal Leu470 residue of SNX17 makes extensive contact with VPS35L through hydrophobic interaction with Trp280 and via an electrostatic interaction of the carboxy-terminal carboxyl group with Arg248 (Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
VPS35L(L35D), which disrupts VPS29 binding, has no effect on SNX17 association.
“In contrast a mutant that selectively disrupted VPS29 binding to VPS35L, VPS35L(L35D)11, had no effect on SNX17 association (Fig. 2A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Recombinant SNX17(L470G) binds to Retriever at significantly lower levels than wild-type SNX17.
“recombinant SNX17(L470G) bound to Retriever at significantly lower levels (Fig. 1A, Supplementary Fig. 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SNX17(NFAF-AAAA), SNX17(F462A) and SNX17(F462E) mutants display reduced Retriever and CCC complex association.
“SNX17(NFAF-AAAA) and the more conservative SNX17(F462A) and -(F462E) mutants also displayed reduced Retriever and CCC complex association (Fig. 2D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
AlphaFold2 modelling predicts that the 465IGDEDL470 motif of SNX17 binds to a pocket in VPS35L defined by Arg248, Trp280, and Lys283, close to the VPS35L:VPS26C interface.
“This predicted a high confidence model where the 465IGDEDL470 motif of SNX17 bound to a pocket in VPS35L defined by Arg248, Trp280, and Lys283, that resided close to the VPS35L:VPS26C interface”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SNX17 directly binds to Retriever through a mechanism involving its unstructured carboxy-terminal tail.
“Here we identify the mechanism through which the unstructured carboxy-terminal tail of the cargo adaptor sorting nexin-17 (SNX17) directly binds to the Retriever sub-complex of Commander.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Association of SNX17 (and cargo) with Retriever is not a pre-requisite for sub-domain organization, as VPS35L(R248A)-GFP retains localization to the retrieval sub-domain.
“Our data shows that the association of SNX17 (and cargo) with Retriever was not a pre-requisite for sub-domain organization, as VPS35L(R248A)-GFP retained localization to the retrieval sub-domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Endogenous SNX17 displays a general distribution over the bulk of EEA1-positive endosomal membranes.
“Endogenous SNX17 displayed a general distribution over the bulk of EEA1-positive endosomal membranes (Fig. 6A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SNX17 association with Retriever-coated beads is enhanced in a dose-dependent manner by inclusion of the LRP1 peptide.
“SNX17 associated with Retriever coated beads, and this association was enhanced in a dose-dependent manner by inclusion of the LRP1 peptide (Fig. 5D, Supplementary Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In models of apo SNX17 from various species, the carboxy-terminal 459NFAF462 sequence invariably forms an intramolecular association with the F3 groove, mimicking cargo sequences in an autoinhibitory conformation.
“In models of apo SNX17 from various species (data not shown), the carboxy-terminal 459NFAF462 sequence (human numbering) invariably formed an intramolecular association with the F3 groove, mimicking cargo sequences in what would be an autoinhibitory conformation (Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is clear spatial separation of SNX17 from the Retriever and Retromer labelled retrieval sub-domain.
“Together these data confirm the clear spatial separation of SNX17 from the Retriever and Retromer labelled retrieval sub-domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These FERM domain mutants also show reduced binding to LRP1 cargo.
“These mutants also showed a reduced binding to the LRP1 cargo, consistent with binding being mediated through the same groove.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
VPS35L KO cells display a partial perturbation in the sub-domain organization of FAM21, SNX1 and VPS35.
“VPS35L KO cells displayed a partial perturbation in the sub-domain organization of FAM21, SNX1 and VPS35 (Fig. 6C, and Supplementary Fig. 4A, B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
AlphaFold2 modelling suggests that cargo proteins carrying the ØxNxx[Y/F] sorting motif, including β1-integrin and LRP1, bind through β-sheet augmentation in a complementary groove of the F3 module.
“Alphafold2 modelling suggested that cargo proteins carrying the conserved ØxNxx[Y/F] sorting motif, including β1-integrin and LRP1, bind through β-sheet augmentation in a complementary groove of the F3 module, in agreement with previous X-ray crystallographic structures”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LRP1 and APP cargo peptides display approximately 2-fold lower affinity for full-length SNX17 compared with SNX17ΔC.
“both LRP1 and APP peptides displayed an approximate 2-fold lower affinity for binding to full-length SNX17 when compared with SNX17ΔC (Fig. 5B, Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
On the same endosome, endogenous SNX17 is enriched predominantly on the vacuolar region.
“On the same individual endosome, endogenous SNX17 was enriched predominantly on the vacuolar region (Fig. 7A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In VPS35L KO RPE1 cells, VPS35 loses spatial restriction to the tubular sub-domain and localizes alongside SNX17 on the vacuolar region of the endosomal limiting membrane.
“in the VPS35L KO RPE1 cell line (not rescued by VPS35L-GFP re-expression) we observed the loss of spatial restriction of VPS35 to the tubular sub-domain, rather it localized alongside SNX17 on the vacuolar region of the endosomal limiting membrane (Fig. 7B iii–iv).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The carboxy-terminal 465IGDEDL470 of SNX17 adopts an intramolecular conformation mutually exclusive of Retriever binding.
“The carboxy-terminal 465IGDEDL470 also adopted an intramolecular conformation that would be mutually exclusive of Retriever binding (Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A corresponding LRP1 peptide carrying a Y4473A mutation in the ØxNxx[Y/F] motif fails to enhance SNX17 association to Retriever.
“a corresponding LRP1 peptide carrying a Y4473A mutation in the ØxNxx[Y/F] motif failed to enhance SNX17 association to Retriever (Fig. 5D, Supplementary Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
SNX17(NFAF-AAAA), SNX17(F462A) and SNX17(F462E) mutants show robust enhancement of LRP1, LRP2, and APP binding compared to wild-type SNX17.
“immuno-isolation of GFP-tagged SNX17 mutants from HEK293T cells revealed a robust enhancement of LRP1, LRP2, and APP binding compared to the wild-type protein (Fig. 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In VPS35L KO cells, FAM21, SNX1 and VPS35 occupy multiple, less well-defined foci on the EEA1 and SNX17 endosomal membrane with greater localization overlap with EEA1 or SNX17.
“in VPS35L KO cells, these markers occupied multiple, less well-defined foci on the EEA1 and SNX17 endosomal membrane with greater localization overlap with EEA1 or SNX17 (Fig. 6C, and Supplementary Fig. 4A, B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Retriever, CCC and WASH complex markers co-localize with core Retromer component VPS35 and SNX1.
“Retriever, CCC and WASH complex markers also co-localized with the core Retromer component VPS35 and SNX1, an ESCPE-1 subunit that drives endosomal tubulation during the biogenesis of transport carriers46–48 (Fig. 6C, and Supplementary Fig. 4B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Whilst present, SNX17 is not enriched in these retrieval sub-domains.
“whilst present, SNX17 is not enriched in these retrieval sub-domains.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GFP-SNX17(V380D), which exhibits decreased cargo-binding, fails to localize to the endosomal network when transiently transfected into RPE1 cells.
“the FERM-domain mutant GFP-SNX17(V380D) that exhibited decreased cargo-binding failed to localize to the endosomal network when transiently transfected into RPE1 cells (Fig. 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GFP-SNX17(F462A), which has enhanced cargo-binding, displays increased co-localisation with EEA1 compared with wild-type GFP-SNX17.
“the enhanced cargo-binding GFP-SNX17(F462A) mutant displayed an even more pronounced endosomal association, as evidenced by increased co-localisation with the endosomal marker EEA1 compared with wild-type GFP-SNX17 (Fig. 5E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cargo binding facilitates SNX17 endosomal association.
“Importantly, we establish that cargo binding facilitates SNX17 endosomal association”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
- Findingown data
VPS35L-GFP is enriched on a tubular-vesicular sub-domain extending from the vacuolar endosomal limiting membrane.
“immunogold staining of the VPS35L KO RPE1 cell line engineered to stably re-express VPS35L-GFP revealed enrichment of Retriever on a tubular-vesicular sub-domain extending from the vacuolar endosomal limiting membrane (Fig. 7A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
GFP-SNX17(W321A), -(V380D) and -(M384E) mutants display a modest but significant increase in binding to Retriever and the Commander super-assembly.
“the GFP-tagged SNX17(W321A), -(V380D) and -(M384E) mutants all displayed a modest but significant increase in binding to Retriever and the Commander super-assembly (Fig. 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
When AlphaFold2 modelling incorporates full-length SNX17, only two of five predicted structures display the same mechanism of SNX17 binding to the VPS26C:VPS35L interface.
“when we expanded the AlphaFold2 modelling to incorporate full-length SNX17 only two of the five predicted structures displayed the same mechanism of SNX17 binding to the VPS26C:VPS35L interface (Supplementary Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Loss of VPS35L expression leads to Commander dysfunction including a reduction in association of endogenous COMMD1 to Retromer-labelled endosomes.
“Previous studies have shown that loss of VPS35L expression leads to Commander dysfunction including a reduction in the association of endogenous COMMD1, a marker of the CCC complex and Commander assembly to Retromer labelled endosomes11.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [11] Healy, M. D. et al. Structure of the endosomal commander complex linked to ritscher-schinzel syndrome. Cell 186, 2219–2237.e2229 (2023). source
- Interpretationown data
Weakening or ablating the intramolecular interaction of the 459NFAF462 sequence allows increased intermolecular binding of ØxNxx[Y/F]-containing cargo to the FERM domain.
“This suggests that weakening or ablating the intramolecular interaction of the 459NFAF462 sequence allows for increased intermolecular binding of ØxNxx[Y/F]-containing cargo to the FERM domain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
The endosomal localization of SNX17 requires avidity-based co-incident sensing of PI(3)P and ØxNxx[Y/F]-containing cargo proteins.
“the endosomal localization of SNX17 requires avidity-based co-incident sensing of phosphoinositides, specifically phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI(3)P) and ØxNxx[Y/F]-containing cargo proteins25.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Ghai, R. et al. Structural basis for endosomal trafficking of diverse transmembrane cargos by PX-FERM proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, E643–E652 (2013). source
- Interpretationreasoning
Transient coupling of cargo-bound SNX17 to Retriever and Commander may serve to handover cargo into a pre-existing retrieval sub-domain for endosomal exit and recycling to the cell surface.
“Rather it appears that the transient coupling of cargo bound SNX17 to Retriever and Commander may serve to handover cargo into a pre-existing retrieval sub-domain for endosomal exit and recycling to the cell surface (Fig. 8).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The study provides fundamental mechanistic and regulatory insight into the role of the SNX17-dependent Commander retrieval and recycling pathway during essential cellular processes ranging from directed cell migration through to cholesterol homeostasis.
“Overall, our study provides fundamental mechanistic and regulatory insight into the role of the SNX17-dependent Commander retrieval and recycling pathway during essential cellular processes ranging from directed cell migration through to cholesterol homeostasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
- Interpretationreasoning
Cargo enters a pre-existing retrieval sub-domain for the promotion of Commander mediated cell surface recycling.
“and the entry of cargo into a pre-existing retrieval sub-domain for the promotion of Commander mediated cell surface recycling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
- Interpretationreasoning
Cargo occupancy relieves an autoinhibited SNX17 conformation to promote Retriever association.
“and that cargo occupancy relieves an autoinhibited SNX17 conformation to promote Retriever association”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
- Interpretationown data
By identifying the molecular details of SNX17 coupling to Retriever, the study revealed the evolutionarily conserved mechanism through which hundreds of integral membrane proteins, including integrins and lipoprotein receptors, enter the Commander retrieval and recycling pathway.
“In summary, by identifying the molecular details of SNX17 coupling to Retriever we have revealed the evolutionarily conserved mechanism through which hundreds of integral membrane proteins, including integrins and lipoprotein receptors, enter the Commander retrieval and recycling pathway.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
- Interpretationown data
VPS35L and the Retriever complex play a role in organizing endosomal retrieval sub-domains.
“that VPS35L and the Retriever complex play a role in organizing endosomal retrieval sub-domains”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 15
- It may state two separate claims as one. 15
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationRetriever is assembled around a central VPS35L subunit to which VPS26C and VPS29 associate at spatially distant amino- and carboxy-terminal regions of the VPS35L α-solenoid.
“Retriever is assembled around a central VPS35L subunit to which VPS26C and VPS29 associate at spatially distant amino- and carboxy-terminal regions of the VPS35L α-solenoid (Fig. 1B)10–12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim2 of 3 sources checked- cites [10] Boesch, D. J. et al. Structural organization of the retriever-CCC endosomal recycling complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 910–924 (2024). source
- cites [11] Healy, M. D. et al. Structure of the endosomal commander complex linked to ritscher-schinzel syndrome. Cell 186, 2219–2237.e2229 (2023). source
- cites [12] Laulumaa, S., Kumpula, E. P., Huiskonen, J. T. & Varjosalo, M. Structure and interactions of the endogenous human Commander complex. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 31, 925–938 (2024). source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationSpecific endosomal membrane sub-domains are enriched for either degradative components such as ESCRT or recycling machinery including Retromer, Retriever, the CCC complex, and WASH-dependent actin patches.
“A number of studies have shown that specific endosomal membrane sub-domains are enriched for either degradative components such as ESCRT or recycling machinery including Retromer, Retriever, the CCC complex, and WASH-dependent actin patches9,34–44”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim10 of 10 sources checked- cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
- cites [34] Puthenveedu, M. A. et al. Sequence-dependent sorting of recycling proteins by actin-stabilized endosomal microdomains. Cell 143, 761–773 (2010). source
The Discussion describes ESCRT-associated degradative domains and distinct actin-stabilized recycling tubules; the Results report WASH localized to those tubules (page numbers unavailable). The paper does not establish that recycling there is WASH-dependent, describes further specialization of the retromer pathway only as a possibility, and does not address Retriever or the CCC complex. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [35] Temkin, P. et al. SNX27 mediates retromer tubule entry and endosome-to-plasma membrane trafficking of signalling receptors. Nat. Cell Biol. 13, 715–721 (2011). source
The paper reports SNX1 and SNX5 enrichment on endosomal tubules associated with retromer and links SNX27 to the WASH actin-nucleation complex (Abstract section; page unavailable). It does not establish the claimed enrichment of ESCRT, Retriever, or the CCC complex in distinct endosomal sub-domains, or directly show WASH-dependent actin patches there. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [36] Derivery, E., Helfer, E., Henriot, V. & Gautreau, A. Actin polymerization controls the organization of WASH domains at the surface of endosomes. PLoS One 7, e39774 (2012). source
The Results section (page unavailable) reports that Retromer/Vps35 and WASH colocalize in discrete endosomal domains, while HRS, an ESCRT-0 component, occupies distinct domains. This supports the contrast between ESCRT-associated and WASH/Retromer domains, but our copy does not address Retriever or the CCC complex. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [37] Gomez, T. S., Gorman, J. A., de Narvajas, A. A., Koenig, A. O. & Billadeau, D. D. Trafficking defects in WASH-knockout fibroblasts originate from collapsed endosomal and lysosomal networks. Mol. Biol. Cell 23, 3215–3228 (2012). source
The Results section ('Retromer and SHRC components designate an EEA1-negative subdomain'; page not provided) identifies distinct endosomal subdomains enriched in retromer and WASH-complex components. Our copy does not establish the claimed enrichment of ESCRT, Retriever, or the CCC complex, or demonstrate WASH-dependent actin patches in those subdomains; the reported subdomains were observed in WASH-knockout fibroblasts. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [38] van Weering, J. R. et al. Molecular basis for SNX-BAR-mediated assembly of distinct endosomal sorting tubules. EMBO J. 31, 4466–4480 (2012). source
The Introduction and Discussion (page numbers unavailable) describe molecularly distinct endosomal tubules involved in recycling, including SNX-BAR–retromer-associated tubules. Our copy does not establish the claimed enrichment of degradative ESCRT components or identify Retriever, the CCC complex, or WASH-dependent actin patches as machinery in those subdomains. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [39] Bowman, S. L., Shiwarski, D. J. & Puthenveedu, M. A. Distinct G protein-coupled receptor recycling pathways allow spatial control of downstream G protein signaling. J. Cell Biol. 214, 797–806 (2016). source
The Introduction describes actin/sorting nexin/retromer tubular endosomal microdomains and distinguishes specialized recycling domains from bulk-recycling domains. The cited paper therefore supports the retromer- and actin-associated recycling portion, but the passages do not establish enrichment of ESCRT, Retriever, the CCC complex, or WASH-dependent actin patches in the sub-domains described. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [40] Takatori, S. et al. Phosphatidylinositol 3,5-bisphosphate-rich membrane domains in endosomes and lysosomes. Traffic 17, 154–167 (2016). source
The Abstract and “PtdIns(3,5)P₂ in mammalian cells” section report enrichment of VPS35, a retromer subunit, in tubular endosomal domains. Our copy does not establish enrichment of ESCRT, Retriever, the CCC complex, or WASH-dependent actin patches in those domains. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [41] Varandas, K. C., Irannejad, R. & von Zastrow, M. Retromer endosome exit domains serve multiple trafficking destinations and regulate local G protein activation by GPCRs. Curr. Biol. 26, 3129–3142 (2016). source
The Results describe retromer endosome domains containing recycling and retrograde cargos, supporting the Retromer portion of the citing sentence. The passages do not establish enrichment of ESCRT, Retriever, the CCC complex, or WASH-dependent actin patches in distinct endosomal sub-domains. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [42] Norris, A. et al. SNX-1 and RME-8 oppose the assembly of HGRS-1/ESCRT-0 degradative microdomains on endosomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E307–E316 (2017). source
The Results report distinct ESCRT-associated degradative and retromer-associated recycling microdomains on the same endosomes. The Discussion mentions WASH accumulating on endosomal tubules, but does not establish WASH-dependent actin patches as a separate recycling domain; our copy does not support the claim's inclusion of Retriever or the CCC complex. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
It may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAll VPS35L mutants targeting SNX17 binding retained assembly into Retriever, binding to the CCC complex, and assembly into Commander.
“all VPS35L mutants targeting SNX17 binding retained assembly into Retriever, binding to the CCC complex, and assembly into Commander.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataRe-expressed wild-type VPS35L-GFP and VPS35L(R248A)-GFP both localise to the endosomal network.
“Re-expressed wild-type VPS35L-GFP localised to the endosomal network as expected, as did the VPS35L(R248A) mutant which associates normally to Retriever and the CCC complex but is defective in binding to SNX17 (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe α5β1-integrin mis-sorting and cell surface reduction phenotypes in VPS35L KO cells are fully rescued by wild-type VPS35L-GFP but not by SNX17-binding defective VPS35L(R248A)-GFP.
“these phenotypes were fully rescued by re-expression of wild-type VPS35L-GFP but not by the SNX17-binding defective VPS35L(R248A)-GFP mutant (Fig. 3B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataModelling of Retriever and Snx17 from Drosophila melanogaster and zebrafish predicts essentially identical interactions, supporting evolutionary conservation of the coupling mechanism.
“Modeling the association of Retriever and Snx17 from Drosophila melanogaster (Supplementary Fig. 2B) and other species such as zebrafish (not shown) predict essentially identical interactions between SNX17 and the Retriever assembly, supporting the evolutionary conservation of the coupling mechanism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe reduction in COMMD1 recruitment in VPS35L KO cells is rescued by re-expression of either VPS35L-GFP or VPS35L(R248A)-GFP, with a slight but significant trend towards reduced COMMD1 recruitment for R248A.
“This phenotype was rescued by re-expression of either VPS35L-GFP or VPS35L(R248A)-GFP although there was a slight but significant trend towards reduced COMMD1 recruitment for the R248A mutant (Fig. 3A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn parental wild-type RPE1 cells, endogenous VPS35 and SNX17 confirm enrichment of SNX17 on the vacuolar endosomal region and VPS35 to a tubular-vesicular sub-domain morphologically indistinguishable from the Retriever-labelled sub-domain.
“In the parental wild-type RPE1 cells, immunogold staining for endogenous VPS35 and SNX17 confirmed the enrichment of SNX17 on the vacuolar endosomal region and showed the enrichment of VPS35 (Retromer) to a tubular-vesicular sub-domain that was morphological indistinguishable from the Retriever labelled sub-domain (Fig. 7B i-ii).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAlphaFold2 modelling of full-length SNX17 with the cytosolic tail of LRP1 shows β-sheet augmentation of the LRP1 4470NPTY4473 sequence with the FERM domain and displacement of the intramolecular 459NFAF462 interaction.
“This showed the expected β-sheet augmentation of the LRP1 4470NPTY4473 sequence with the FERM domain25 and a displacement of the intramolecular 459NFAF462 interaction (Fig. 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataSNX17ΔC displays very weak affinity binding to a synthetic peptide of the carboxy-terminal tail of SNX17, an interaction no longer observable when using full-length SNX17 or SNX17ΔC pre-incubated with LRP1 peptide.
“SNX17ΔC displayed very weak affinity binding to a synthetic peptide of the carboxy-terminal tail of SNX17, an interaction that was no longer observable when using full-length SNX17 or SNX17ΔC that had been pre-incubated with the LRP1 peptide (Fig. 5C, Supplementary Table 1).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataVPS35L-GFP and VPS35L(R248A)-GFP are enriched on one or more foci of SNX17-labelled endosomes and co-localize with endogenous COMMD1 and FAM21.
“VPS35L-GFP and VPS35L(R248A)-GFP were enriched on one or more foci of the SNX17-labelled endosomes, and co-localized with endogenous COMMD1 (Fig. 6B) and FAM21 (Supplementary Fig. 4A), markers of the CCC and WASH complexes respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationVPS35L KO leads to reduced steady-state cell surface enrichment of α5β1-integrin and mis-sorting of internalized integrin into LAMP1-positive late endosomes/lysosomes, without significantly perturbing whole-cell SNX17 levels.
“VPS35L KO leads to a reduction in the steady-state cell surface enrichment of α5β1-integrin and the mis-sorting of the internalized integrin into LAMP1-positive late endosomes/lysosomes9, but does not significantly perturb whole-cell levels of SNX17 (Supplementary Fig. 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [9] McNally, K. E. et al. Retriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling. Nat. cell Biol. 19, 1214–1225 (2017). source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe carboxy-terminal unstructured 465IGDEDL470 tail of SNX17, with Leu470 as the terminal residue, can bind directly to the PDZ domain of the PDLIM family of proteins.
“Previously we showed that the carboxy-terminal unstructured 465IGDEDL470 tail of SNX17, Leu470 being the terminal residue, can bind directly to the PDZ domain of the PDLIM family of proteins26.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Healy, M. D. et al. Proteomic identification and structural basis for the interaction between sorting nexin SNX17 and PDLIM family proteins. Structure 30, 1590–1602.e1596 (2022). source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataAn autoinhibited SNX17 conformation is released through a competitive interaction with ØxNxx[Y/F] cargo, allowing subsequent association of SNX17 and bound cargos with Retriever and the Commander super-assembly.
“Collectively, these data support the proposed model whereby an autoinhibited SNX17 conformation is released through a competitive interaction with ØxNxx[Y/F] cargo, which allows for the subsequent association of SNX17 and bound cargos with Retriever and the Commander super-assembly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductown dataVPS35L-KO was confirmed by WB analysis.
“VPS35L-KO was confirmed by WB analysis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone given30 endosomes from 3 independent experiments per condition were analysed.
“30 endosomes from 3 independent experiments per condition were analysed.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningThe direct binding of cargo-bound SNX17 to Retriever ultimately leads to Commander-mediated recycling of cargo back to the plasma membrane.
“The direct binding of cargo-bound SNX17 to Retriever ultimately leads to Commander-mediated recycling of cargo back to the plasma membrane.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
Study design and conductnone givenAll experiments were performed at least in triplicate to check for reproducibility of the data.
“All experiments were performed at least in triplicate to check for reproducibility of the data.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Interpretationnone givenWith increasing cargo density, the auto-inhibitory conformation of SNX17, defined by the SNX17 tail associating with the cargo binding groove in the FERM domain, is displaced.
“With increasing cargo density, the auto-inhibitory conformation defined by the SNX17 tail associating with the cargo binding groove in the FERM domain of SNX17 is displaced”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone given5 independent models were generated for each complex and the quality of the predicted complexes was assessed through examination of iPTM score and the predicted alignment error plot.
“5 independent models were generated for each complex and the quality of the predicted complexes was assessed through examination of iPTM score and the predicted alignment error plot.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenFor each staining and condition, images were acquired from two separate grids.
“For each staining and condition, images were aquired from two separate grids.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataSNX17 can cycle between the cytoplasm and the endosomal membrane through low affinity sensing of PI(3)P, with the density of incoming ØxNxx[Y/F]-containing cargo providing additional affinity to prolong endosomal residency and release the autoinhibited conformation, thereby facilitating coupling to Retriever and Commander.
“These results suggest that SNX17 can cycle between the cytoplasm and the endosomal membrane through low affinity sensing of PI(3)P with the density of incoming ØxNxx[Y/F]-containing cargo providing an additional affinity to prolong the endosomal residency of SNX17 and release the autoinhibited conformation thereby facilitating coupling to Retriever and the Commander assembly.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
InterpretationreasoningDisplacement of the auto-inhibitory conformation enables presentation of the SNX17 carboxy-tail to the conserved VPS26C:VPS35L interface.
“enabling the presentation of SNX17 carboxy-tail to the conserved VPS26C:VPS35L interface”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
It may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataCargo sensing by SNX17 can promote its recruitment to EEA1-positive endosomes but is not a pre-requisite for the formation of the retrieval sub-domain.
“that cargo sensing by SNX17 can promote its recruitment to EEA1-positive endosomes but is not a pre-requisite for the formation of the retrieval sub-domain”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataFor SNX17-VPS35 double labelling, representative micrographs of 15 (parental) and 20 (VPS35L KO) observed endosomes (2 technical replicates) are shown.
“For SNX17-VPS35 double labelling, representative micrographs of 15 (parental) and 20 (VPS35L KO) observed endosomes (2 technical replicates) are shown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductown dataFor SNX17-GFP double labelling, a representative micrograph of 9 observed endosomes (2 technical replicates) is shown.
“For SNX17-GFP double labelling, a representative micrograph of 9 observed endosomes (2 technical replicates) is shown.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThe core mechanism of SNX17 coupling to Retriever and the essential importance of coupling for endosomal retrieval and recycling of SNX17-selected cargoes through the Commander pathway.
“Together, these data reveal the core mechanism of SNX17 coupling to Retriever and the essential importance of coupling for endosomal retrieval and recycling of SNX17 selected cargoes through the Commander pathway.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenFull open-reading frames were sequenced to verify the results of mutagenesis.
“Full open-reading frames were sequenced to verify the results of mutagenesis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationThe FERM domain of SNX17 comprises three submodules, F1, F2 and F3.
“The FERM domain of SNX17 comprises three submodules, F1, F2 and F325.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [25] Ghai, R. et al. Structural basis for endosomal trafficking of diverse transmembrane cargos by PX-FERM proteins. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, E643–E652 (2013). source
The paper relies on this without support.
How cargo proteins are selected for Commander-mediated recycling was unclear at the time of the study.
“While the structure of this complex has recently been described, how cargo proteins are selected for Commander-mediated recycling remains unclear.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SNX17 associates with endosomal membranes enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).
“SNX17 associates with the endosomal membrane enriched for phosphatidylinositol 3-monophosphate (PI3P).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The finding that SNX17 anchors into Retriever is in line with a recent study derived from AlphaFold structural prediction and mutagenesis validation.
“This is in line with a recent study derived from AlphaFold structural prediction and mutagenesis validation38.”
From Structural basis for Retriever-SNX17 assembly and endosomal sorting (2024) · cites this paper as [38]
SNX17 functions as a cargo receptor on endosomal membranes that enables recycling of numerous membrane cargo proteins by binding to the Retriever complex.
“Cargo recognition and tethering to the Retriever complex is achieved by the cargo adaptor SNX17 (16, 17).”
From Phosphorylation of SNX17 impedes activation of Retriever-mediated sorting (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
A mutation in the SNX17 FERM-like domain (V380D) inhibits both cargo binding and endosomal recruitment.
“A mutation in the SNX17 FERM-like domain (V380D) inhibits both cargo binding and endosomal recruitment (16)”
From Phosphorylation of SNX17 impedes activation of Retriever-mediated sorting (2025) · cites this paper as [16]
The low-density lipoprotein receptors have been shown to interact with SNX17 through their NPxY motifs within their intracellular domains, with SNX17 interacting with the endosomal sorting complex Retriever.
“The low-density lipoprotein receptors have been shown to interact with SNX17 [109, 110] through their NPxY motifs within their intracellular domains, with SNX17 interacting with the endosomal sorting complex Retriever [111][112][113][114].”
From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [111]
SNX17-Retriever assembles into a larger complex, Commander, with perturbation of this complex implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders.
“SNX17-Retriever assembles into a larger complex, Commander, with perturbation of this complex implicated in neurodevelopmental disorders [111-114, 148-150].”
From Global identification of neuronal and astrocytic integral membrane proteins that require Retromer for their endosomal recycling (2026) · cites this paper as [111]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Figure 2A identifies the wrong VPS26C-binding mutant
MinorThe Results identify VPS35L(R293E) as the mutant that disrupts VPS26C binding, while the Fig. 2A caption identifies VPS35L(R248A) as the mutant perturbing that association. Elsewhere, the paper says R248A retains Retriever assembly but disrupts SNX17 binding.
“a VPS35L mutant that specifically disrupted binding to VPS26C, VPS35L(R293E)11, failed to associate with SNX17”
“VPS35L-GFP mutants that perturb VPS35L-VPS26C (VPS35L(R248A)) and VPS35L-VPS29 (VPS35L(L35D)) associations”
Figure 5 reverses the reported effect of removing the SNX17 tail
MinorThe Results state that LRP1 and APP peptides bind full-length SNX17 with approximately twofold lower affinity than SNX17ΔC. The Fig. 5B caption instead says binding decreases when the C-terminal tail is absent, reversing the direction of the result central to the autoinhibition model.
“both LRP1 and APP peptides displayed an approximate 2-fold lower affinity for binding to full-length SNX17 when compared with SNX17ΔC”
“In each case the peptide showed an ~2-fold decrease in binding when the C-terminal tail was absent.”
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all
Mirdita, M., Schütze, K., Moriwaki, Y., Heo, L., Ovchinnikov, S., & Steinegger, M. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.08.15.456425 · Cited by 9,391
Protein complex prediction with AlphaFold-Multimer
Evans, R., O’Neill, M., Pritzel, A., Antropova, N., Senior, A., Green, T., Žídek, A., Bates, R., Blackwell, S., Yim, J., et al. (2021) · doi:10.1101/2021.10.04.463034 · Cited by 3,808
To degrade or not to degrade: Mechanisms and significance of endocytic recycling
Cullen, P. J., & Steinberg, F. (2018) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-018-0053-7 · Cited by 590
Self-citationIdentification of Required Host Factors for SARS-CoV-2 Infection in Human Cells
Daniloski, Z., Jordan, T. X., Wessels, H., Hoagland, D. A., Kasela, S., Legut, M., Maniatis, S., Mimitou, E. P., Lu, L., Geller, E. T., et al. (2020) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2020.10.030 · Cited by 561
Steinberg, F., Gallon, M., Winfield, M., Thomas, E. C., Bell, A. J., Heesom, K. J., Tavaré, J. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2013) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2721 · Cited by 524
Self-citationTemkin, P., Lauffer, B., Jäger, S., Cimermancic, P., Krogan, N. J., & von Zastrow, M. (2011) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2252 · Cited by 459
Cryosectioning and immunolabeling
Slot, J. W., & Geuze, H. J. (2007) · Nature Protocols · doi:10.1038/nprot.2007.365 · Cited by 443
Jackson, L. P., Kelly, B. T., McCoy, A. J., Gaffry, T., James, L. C., Collins, B. M., Höning, S., Evans, P. R., & Owen, D. J. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.05.006 · Cited by 389
Self-citationRetriever is a multiprotein complex for retromer-independent endosomal cargo recycling
McNally, K. E., Faulkner, R., Steinberg, F., Gallon, M., Ghai, R., Pim, D., Langton, P., Pearson, N., Danson, C. M., Nägele, H., et al. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3610 · Cited by 346
Self-citationSequence-Dependent Sorting of Recycling Proteins by Actin-Stabilized Endosomal Microdomains
Puthenveedu, M. A., Lauffer, B., Temkin, P., Vistein, R., Carlton, P., Thorn, K., Taunton, J., Weiner, O. D., Parton, R. G., & von Zastrow, M. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.10.003 · Cited by 317
A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies host factors that regulate SARS-CoV-2 entry
Zhu, Y., Feng, F., Hu, G., Wang, Y., Yin, Y., Zhu, Y., Xü, W., Cai, X., Sun, Z., Han, W., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21213-4 · Cited by 307
Phillips-Krawczak, C. A., Singla, A., Starokadomskyy, P., Deng, Z., Osborne, D. G., Li, H., Dick, C. J., Gomez, T. S., Koenecke, M., Zhang, J.-S., et al. (2015) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e14-06-1073 · Cited by 246
Structural Mechanism for Cargo Recognition by the Retromer Complex
Lucas, M., Gershlick, D. C., Vidaurrazaga, A., Rojas, A. L., Bonifacino, J. S., & Hierro, A. (2016) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.10.056 · Cited by 223
SNX17 protects integrins from degradation by sorting between lysosomal and recycling pathways
Steinberg, F., Heesom, K. J., Bass, M. D., & Cullen, P. J. (2012) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201111121 · Cited by 206
Self-citationCCC- and WASH-mediated endosomal sorting of LDLR is required for normal clearance of circulating LDL
Bartuzi, P., Billadeau, D. D., Favier, R., Rong, S., Dekker, D., Fedoseienko, A., Fieten, H., Wijers, M., Levels, J. H., Huijkman, N., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10961 · Cited by 205
Sorting nexin 17 prevents lysosomal degradation of β1 integrins by binding to the β1-integrin tail
Böttcher, R. T., Stremmel, C., Meves, A., Meyer, H., Widmaier, M., Tseng, H.-Y., & Fässler, R. (2012) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb2501 · Cited by 202
Molecular basis for SNX‐BAR‐mediated assembly of distinct endosomal sorting tubules
van Weering, J. R. T., Sessions, R. B., Traer, C. J., Kloer, D. P., Bhatia, V. K., Stamou, D., Carlsson, S. R., Hurley, J. H., & Cullen, P. J. (2012) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/emboj.2012.283 · Cited by 200
Self-citationTowards a molecular understanding of endosomal trafficking by Retromer and Retriever
Chen, K., Healy, M. D., & Collins, B. M. (2019) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.12649 · Cited by 193
Self-citationGallon, M., Clairfeuille, T., Steinberg, F., Mas, C., Ghai, R., Sessions, R. B., Teasdale, R. D., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1410552111 · Cited by 182
Self-citationSNX–BAR‐Mediated Endosome Tubulation is Co‐ordinated with Endosome Maturation
van Weering, J. R. T., Verkade, P., & Cullen, P. J. (2011) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0854.2011.01297.x · Cited by 172
Self-citationEndosomal retrieval of cargo: Retromer is not alone
McNally, K. E., & Cullen, P. J. (2018) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2018.06.005 · Cited by 169
Self-citationGomez, T. S., Gorman, J. A., Artal-Martinez de Narvajas, A., Koenig, A. O., & Billadeau, D. D. (2012) · Molecular Biology of the Cell · doi:10.1091/mbc.e12-02-0101 · Cited by 161
Sorting nexin 17 facilitates LRP recycling in the early endosome
van Kerkhof, P., Lee, J., McCormick, L., Tetrault, E., Lu, W., Schoenfish, M., Oorschot, V., Strous, G. J., Klumperman, J., & Bu, G. (2005) · The EMBO Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.emboj.7600756 · Cited by 148
Self-citationSimonetti, B., Paul, B., Chaudhari, K., Weeratunga, S., Steinberg, F., Gorla, M., Heesom, K. J., Bashaw, G. J., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-019-0393-3 · Cited by 145
Self-citationStructural basis for endosomal trafficking of diverse transmembrane cargos by PX-FERM proteins
Ghai, R., Bugarcic, A., Liu, H., Norwood, S. J., Skeldal, S., Coulson, E. J., Li, S. S.-C., Teasdale, R. D., & Collins, B. M. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1216229110 · Cited by 134
Self-citationFedoseienko, A., Wijers, M., Wolters, J. C., Dekker, D., Smit, M., Huijkman, N., Kloosterhuis, N., Klug, H., Schepers, A., Willems van Dijk, K., et al. (2018) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.117.312004 · Cited by 126
Singla, A., Fedoseienko, A., Giridharan, S. S. P., Overlee, B. L., Lopez, A., Jia, D., Song, J., Huff-Hardy, K., Weisman, L., Burstein, E., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-12221-6 · Cited by 113
Systems-wide Studies Uncover Commander, a Multiprotein Complex Essential to Human Development
Mallam, A. L., & Marcotte, E. M. (2017) · Cell Systems · doi:10.1016/j.cels.2017.04.006 · Cited by 94
Structure of the endosomal Commander complex linked to Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome
Healy, M. D., McNally, K. E., Butkovič, R., Chilton, M., Kato, K., Sacharz, J., McConville, C., Moody, E. R. R., Shaw, S., Planelles-Herrero, V. J., et al. (2023) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.003 · Cited by 91
Self-citationSNX-1 and RME-8 oppose the assembly of HGRS-1/ESCRT-0 degradative microdomains on endosomes
Norris, A., Tammineni, P., Wang, S., Gerdes, J., Murr, A., Kwan, K. Y., Cai, Q., & Grant, B. D. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1612730114 · Cited by 90
Architecture and mechanism of metazoan retromer:SNX3 tubular coat assembly
Leneva, N., Kovtun, O., Morado, D. R., Briggs, J. A. G., & Owen, D. J. (2021) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abf8598 · Cited by 90
McGough, I. J., de Groot, R. E. A., Jellett, A. P., Betist, M. C., Varandas, K. C., Danson, C. M., Heesom, K. J., Korswagen, H. C., & Cullen, P. J. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-06114-3 · Cited by 87
Self-citationBowman, S. L., Shiwarski, D. J., & Puthenveedu, M. A. (2016) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201512068 · Cited by 83
Recognising the signals for endosomal trafficking
Weeratunga, S., Paul, B., & Collins, B. M. (2020) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.02.005 · Cited by 83
Self-citationActin Polymerization Controls the Organization of WASH Domains at the Surface of Endosomes
Derivery, E., Helfer, E., Henriot, V., & Gautreau, A. (2012) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0039774 · Cited by 77
Kvainickas, A., Nägele, H., Qi, W., Dokládal, L., Jimenez-Orgaz, A., Stehl, L., Gangurde, D., Zhao, Q., Hu, Z., Dengjel, J., et al. (2019) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.201812110 · Cited by 75
Endosomal microdomains: Formation and function
Norris, A., & Grant, B. D. (2020) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2020.02.018 · Cited by 69
Varandas, K. C., Irannejad, R., & von Zastrow, M. (2016) · Current Biology · doi:10.1016/j.cub.2016.09.052 · Cited by 60
Kolanczyk, M., Krawitz, P., Hecht, J., Hupalowska, A., Miaczynska, M., Marschner, K., Schlack, C., Emmerich, D., Kobus, K., Kornak, U., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.109 · Cited by 54
Structural organization of the retriever–CCC endosomal recycling complex
Boesch, D. J., Singla, A., Han, Y., Kramer, D. A., Liu, Q., Suzuki, K., Juneja, P., Zhao, X., Long, X., Medlyn, M. J., et al. (2024) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01184-4 · Cited by 52
Phosphatidylinositol 3,5‐Bisphosphate‐Rich Membrane Domains in Endosomes and Lysosomes
Takatori, S., Tatematsu, T., Cheng, J., Matsumoto, J., Akano, T., & Fujimoto, T. (2016) · Traffic · doi:10.1111/tra.12346 · Cited by 47
Structure and interactions of the endogenous human Commander complex
Laulumaa, S., Kumpula, E.-P., Huiskonen, J. T., & Varjosalo, M. (2024) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-024-01246-1 · Cited by 46
Kato, K., Oka, Y., Muramatsu, H., Vasilev, F. F., Otomo, T., Oishi, H., Kawano, Y., Kidokoro, H., Nakazawa, Y., Ogi, T., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmedgenet-2019-106213 · Cited by 42
Self-citationArchitecture of the ESCPE-1 membrane coat
Lopez-Robles, C., Scaramuzza, S., Astorga‐Simón, E. N., Ishida, M., Williamson, C. D., Baños-Mateos, S., Gil‐Carton, D., Romero‐Durana, M., Vidaurrazaga, A., Fernández‐Recio, J., et al. (2023) · Nature Structural & Molecular Biology · doi:10.1038/s41594-023-01014-7 · Cited by 29
Rimbert, A., Dalila, N., Wolters, J. C., Huijkman, N., Smit, M., Kloosterhuis, N., Riemsma, M., van der Veen, Y., Singla, A., van Dijk, F., et al. (2020) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehz727 · Cited by 24
Healy, M. D., Sacharz, J., McNally, K. E., McConville, C., Tillu, V. A., Hall, R. J., Chilton, M., Cullen, P. J., Mobli, M., Ghai, R., et al. (2022) · Structure · doi:10.1016/j.str.2022.10.001 · Cited by 23
Self-citationWDR91 specifies the endosomal retrieval subdomain for retromer-dependent recycling
Liu, N., Liu, K., & Yang, C. (2022) · Journal of Cell Biology · doi:10.1083/jcb.202203013 · Cited by 22
Clinical diversity and molecular mechanism of VPS35L-associated Ritscher-Schinzel syndrome
Otsuji, S., Nishio, Y., Tsujita, M., Rio, M., Huber, C., Antón-Plágaro, C., Mizuno, S., Kawano, Y., Miyatake, S., Simon, M., et al. (2023) · Journal of Medical Genetics · doi:10.1136/jmg-2022-108602 · Cited by 19
Self-citationKolanczyk, M., Krawitz, P., Hecht, J., Hupalowska, A., Miaczynska, M., Marschner, K., Schlack, C., Emmerich, D., Kobus, K., Kornak, U., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Human Genetics · doi:10.1038/ejhg.2014.278 · Cited by 17
Vos, D. Y., Wijers, M., Smit, M., Huijkman, N., Kloosterhuis, N. J., Wolters, J. C., Tissink, J. J., Pronk, A. C. M., Kooijman, S., Rensen, P. C. N., et al. (2023) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.122.318169 · Cited by 16
Explosion in the complexity of membrane protein recycling
McDonald, F. J. (2021) · American Journal of Physiology-Cell Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpcell.00171.2020 · Cited by 13
Ultrastructural Localization of Endogenous LC3 by On-Section Correlative Light-Electron Microscopy
van der Beek, J., Veenendaal, T., de Heus, C., van Dijk, S., ten Brink, C., Liv, N., & Klumperman, J. (2023) · Journal of Visualized Experiments · doi:10.3791/65067 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Assembly and fission of tubular carriers mediating protein sorting in endosomes
Gopaldass, N., Chen, K., Collins, B. M., & Mayer, A. (2024) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41580-024-00746-8 · Cited by 59
Self-citationStructural basis for Retriever-SNX17 assembly and endosomal sorting
Singla, A., Boesch, D. J., Fung, H. Y. J., Ngoka, C., Enriquez, A. S., Song, R., Kramer, D. A., Han, Y., Banarer, E., Lemoff, A., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-54583-6 · Cited by 23
Selective cargo and membrane recognition by SNX17 regulates its interaction with Retriever
Martín-González, A., Méndez-Guzmán, I., Zabala-Zearreta, M., Quintanilla, A., García-López, A., Martínez-Lombardía, E., Albesa-Jové, D., Acosta, J. C., & Lucas, M. (2025) · EMBO Reports · doi:10.1038/s44319-024-00340-1 · Cited by 15
Mapping of endosomal proximity proteomes reveals Retromer as a hub for RAB GTPase regulation
Antón-Plágaro, C., Chen, K.-E., Guo, Q., Liu, M., Evans, A. J., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., Wilkinson, K. A., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-61802-1 · Cited by 14
Self-citationThe winding road to platelet α-granules
Ambrosio, A. L., & Pietro, S. M. D. (2025) · Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology · doi:10.3389/fcell.2025.1584059 · Cited by 10
Potential Roles of SNX17, Rab11, and Rab5 in LDLR Recycling
Zhao, X., Long, S., Zhu, M., Hao, H., Liao, Y., Zhang, C., & Liu, Z. (2025) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.125.322498 · Cited by 8
Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J. (2025) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2025.102516 · Cited by 10
Self-citationRitscher-Schinzel syndrome can be characterized as an endosomal recyclinopathy
Kato, K., Nishio, Y., McMillan, K. J., Al-Maraghi, A., Kroes, H. Y., Abdel-Hamid, M. S., Jones, E., Shaw, S., Yoshida, A., Otsuji, S., et al. (2025) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.adt2426 · Cited by 7
Self-citationDaly, J. L., Chen, K.-E., Butkovič, R., Guo, Q., Healy, M. D., Pennink, E., Gamble-Strutt, G., Higham, Z., Moody, E. R. R., Lewis, P. A., et al. (2025) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2501111122 · Cited by 5
Self-citationButkovič, R., Healy, M. D., de Heus, C., Walker, A. P., Beyers, W. C., McNally, K. E., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., Liv, N., Klumperman, J., et al. (2025) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-025-63855-8 · Cited by 4
Self-citationStockhammer, A., & Ungermann, C. (2025) · Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1515/hsz-2025-0187 · Cited by 2
HOPS disruption impairs APP trafficking and processing, promoting exosomal secretion of APP-CTFs
Draper, D., George, A. E., Veenendaal, T., van Dijk, S., Soltani, E., Sanzà, P., Verweij, F. J., Klumperman, J., & Farı́as, G. G. (2026) · Neurobiology of Disease · doi:10.1016/j.nbd.2026.107269 · Cited by 2
Self-citationPalma-Cobo, M., Toribio, V., Morales, J., López‐Martín, S., Enrich, C., Lu, A., & Yáñez‐Mó, M. (2025) · Journal of Extracellular Vesicles · doi:10.1002/jev2.70166 · Cited by 1
Lysosomal down-regulation of the mu opioid receptor is opposed by the Retromer complex
Dagunts, A., Adoff, H., Novy, B., Ameur, L. B., Maria, M. D., Saunders, A. B., & Lobingier, B. T. (2026) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adx8715 · Cited by 1
CROP2, a Retriever-PROPPIN Complex Mediating Protein Export from Endosomes to the Plasma MembranePreprint
Leo, M. G. D., & Mayer, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.109403.1 · Cited by 1
Phosphorylation of SNX17 impedes activation of Retriever-mediated sorting
Speidel, J. D., Yu, K., & Böttcher, R. T. (2025) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110222
Lui, S. N., Tsao, H., Lo, A. H., Jiang, L., & Wong, K. (2025) · FEBS Journal · doi:10.1111/febs.70245
Sorting nexins associated with recycling complexes regulate epithelial sodium channel trafficking
Scott, M. L., Cheung, T. T., Logue, M. J. E., Zheng, F., Hamilton, K. L., & McDonald, F. J. (2025) · American Journal of Physiology-Renal Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajprenal.00088.2025
CROP2, a Retriever-PROPPIN Complex Mediating Protein Export from Endosomes to the Plasma MembranePreprint
Leo, M. G. D., & Mayer, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.1101/2025.10.08.681146
Leo, M. G. D., & Mayer, A. (2025) · eLife · doi:10.7554/elife.109403
A Remarkable Case of Conserved Domain Swapping in the COMMD Family of ProteinsPreprint
Hall, R. J., Liu, M., Hospenthal, M. K., Celligoi, D. J., Ghai, R., Chen, K., Sacharz, J., Stroud, D. A., Lott, J. S., Healy, M. D., et al. (2026) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.64898/2026.02.02.703414
Self-citationStructural mechanisms of cargo adaptors in membrane trafficking
Sloan, D. E., Chandra, M., Jackson, L. P., & Baker, R. (2026) · Current Opinion in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.ceb.2026.102633
Liu, D. Q., Cheng, Y., Huang, C., Xie, K., Jie, J., Zhang, Q., Lan, L., Chen, P., Xie, J. X., Wang, H., et al. (2026) · Autophagy · doi:10.1080/15548627.2026.2674714
Jones, E., Adams, H., Chen, K.-E., Maroof, F., Ibbotson, T. M., Nakamura, Y., Banks, P. J., Healy, M. D., Lewis, P. A., Heesom, K. J., et al. (2026) · doi:10.64898/2026.05.14.724903
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Butkovič, R., Walker, A. P., Healy, M. D., McNally, K. E., Liu, M., Veenendaal, T., Kato, K., Liv, N., Klumperman, J., Collins, B. M., & Cullen, P. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Bristol (GB)
- The University of Queensland (AU)
- MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology (GB)
- Utrecht University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Butkovič, Rebeka
- Collins, Brett M.
- Cullen, Peter J.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2024-08-21
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7180-7180
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11339278
- OpenAlex
- W4401793493
- Cited by
- 26
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 3
- FWCI
- 3.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Dementia Australia Research Foundation
- Wellcome Trust (220260/Z/20/Z, 104568/Z/14/Z)
- Royal Society (RSRP/R1/211004)
- University of Bristol
- Lister Institute of Preventive Medicine
- Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek (184.034.014)
- Dementia Australia
- Medical Research Council (MR/Y01183X/1, MR/P018807/1, MR/L007363/1)
- National Health and Medical Research Council (1156493, 1136021)
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23K14945, 23KJ1817)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular transport and secretion
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Extracellular vesicles in disease
- Keywords
- endosomal recycling, SNX17, cargo binding, autoinhibition, integrin recycling, cargo selection, protein complex reconstitution
- MeSH terms
- HeLa Cells, Humans, Protein Binding, Endosomes, Integrins, Protein Transport, Sorting Nexins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review