The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Dynamic models of segregation†
Abstract
Some segregation results from the practices of organizations, some from specialized communication systems, some from correlation with a variable that is non‐random; and some results from the interplay of individual choices. This is an abstract study of the interactive dynamics of discriminatory individual choices. One model is a simulation in which individual members of two recognizable groups distribute themselves in neighborhoods defined by reference to their own locations. A second model is analytic and deals with compartmented space. A final section applies the analytics to ‘neighborhood tipping.’ The systemic effects are found to be overwhelming: there is no simple correspondence of individual incentive to collective results. Exaggerated separation and patterning result from the dynamics of movement. Inferences about individual motives can usually not be drawn from aggregate patterns. Some unexpected phenomena, like density and vacancy, are generated. A general theory of ‘tipping’ begins to emerge.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Identification of Endogenous Social Effects: The Reflection Problem
Manski, C. F. (1993) · The Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.2307/2298123 · Cited by 6,209
Threshold models of collective behavior
Granovetter, M. (1978) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226707 · Cited by 6,072
Statistical physics of social dynamics
Castellano, C., Fortunato, S., & Loreto, V. (2009) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.81.591 · Cited by 4,119
Social Structure from Multiple Networks. I. Blockmodels of Roles and Positions
White, H. C., Boorman, S. A., & Breiger, R. L. (1976) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/226141 · Cited by 2,097
A Theory of Social Custom, of Which Unemployment May be One Consequence
Akerlof, G. A. (1980) · The Quarterly Journal of Economics · doi:10.2307/1885667 · Cited by 1,648
Seeing Disorder: Neighborhood Stigma and the Social Construction of “Broken Windows”
Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250406700401 · Cited by 1,436
Social tipping dynamics for stabilizing Earth’s climate by 2050
Otto, I. M., Donges, J. F., Cremades, R., Bhowmik, A., Hewitt, R. J., Lucht, W., Rockström, J., Allerberger, F., McCaffrey, M., Doe, S. S. P., et al. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1900577117 · Cited by 958
Sumpter, D. J. T. (2010) · doi:10.1515/9781400837106 · Cited by 914
Environmental Health Disparities: A Framework Integrating Psychosocial and Environmental Concepts
Gee, G. C., & Payne-Sturges, D. C. (2004) · Environmental Health Perspectives · doi:10.1289/ehp.7074 · Cited by 821
Dissecting the Social: On the Principles of Analytical Sociology
Hedstrom, P. (2005) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511488801 · Cited by 816
(2005) · Cited by 772
What Has Economics to Say About Racial Discrimination?
Arrow, K. J. (1998) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/jep.12.2.91 · Cited by 679
Patterns of gender development
Martin, C. L., & Ruble, D. N. (2010) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.093008.100511 · Cited by 600
Can Large Language Models Transform Computational Social Science?
Ziems, C., Held, W., Shaikh, O., Chen, J., Zhang, Z., & Yang, D. (2024) · Computational Linguistics · doi:10.1162/coli_a_00502 · Cited by 585
Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems
Stella, M., Ferrara, E., & De Domenico, M. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1803470115 · Cited by 492
Cudd, A. E. (2006) · doi:10.1093/0195187431.001.0001 · Cited by 483
Everything you need to know about agent-based modelling and simulation
Macal, C. M. (2016) · Journal of Simulation · doi:10.1057/jos.2016.7 · Cited by 469
DellaPosta, D., Shi, Y., & Macy, M. (2015) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/681254 · Cited by 440
Biased assimilation, homophily, and the dynamics of polarization
Dandekar, P., Goel, A., & Lee, D. T. (2013) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1217220110 · Cited by 435
Segregation by Design: Local Politics and Inequality in American Cities
Trounstine, J. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108555722 · Cited by 428
Manifesto of computational social science
Conte, R., Gilbert, N., Bonelli, G., Cioffi-Revilla, C., Deffuant, G., Kertesz, J., Loreto, V., Moat, S., Nadal, J. P., Sanchez, A., et al. (2012) · The European Physical Journal Special Topics · doi:10.1140/epjst/e2012-01697-8 · Cited by 426
Measuring structural racism: a guide for epidemiologists and other health researchers
Adkins-Jackson, P. B., Chantarat, T., Bailey, Z. D., & Ponce, N. A. (2022) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/kwab239 · Cited by 417
Cooperative and competitive spreading dynamics on the human connectome
Mišić, B., Betzel, R. F., Nematzadeh, A., Goñi, J., Griffa, A., Hagmann, P., Flammini, A., Ahn, Y.-Y., & Sporns, O. (2015) · Neuron · doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2015.05.035 · Cited by 342
Challenges for land system science
Rounsevell, M. D. A., Pedroli, B., Erb, K.-H., Gramberger, M., Busck, A. G., Haberl, H., Kristensen, S., Kuemmerle, T., Lavorel, S., Lindner, M., et al. (2012) · Land Use Policy · doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.01.007 · Cited by 393
Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate
Tam Cho, W. K., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2013) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.720229 · Cited by 315
Large Language Models as Simulated Economic Agents: What Can We Learn from Homo Silicus?
Horton, J., Filippas, A., & Manning, B. (2023) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w31122 · Cited by 329
A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis
Romei, A., & Ruggieri, S. (2014) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888913000039 · Cited by 288
Why Partisans Do Not Sort: The Constraints on Political Segregation
Mummolo, J., & Nall, C. (2017) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/687569 · Cited by 269
The effects of low income housing tax credit developments on neighborhoods
Baum-Snow, N., & Marion, J. (2009) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.01.001 · Cited by 264
The Decline of the Death Penalty and the Discovery of Innocence
Baumgartner, F. R., De Boef, S. L., & Boydstun, A. E. (2001) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790638 · Cited by 242
Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2015) · Political Geography · doi:10.1016/j.polgeo.2014.11.003 · Cited by 228
Biased Assimilation, Homophily, and the Dynamics of Polarization
Dandekar, P., Goel, A., & Lee, D. (2012) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-35311-6_47 · Cited by 201
Syndemics: a theory in search of data or data in search of a theory?
Tsai, A. C. (2018) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.03.040 · Cited by 197
FISMAN, R., IYENGAR, S. S., KAMENICA, E., & SIMONSON, I. (2008) · Review of Economic Studies · doi:10.1111/j.1467-937x.2007.00465.x · Cited by 189
Social influence and unfollowing accelerate the emergence of echo chambers
Sasahara, K., Chen, W., Peng, H., Ciampaglia, G. L., Flammini, A., & Menczer, F. (2021) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00084-7 · Cited by 211
Understanding World or Predicting Future? A Comprehensive Survey of World Models
Ding, J., Zhang, Y., Shang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zong, Z., Feng, J., Yuan, Y., Su, H., Li, N., Sukiennik, N., et al. (2026) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3746449 · Cited by 169
“Traditionally, such systems have been constructed using expert-defined rules [20, 222], which encode domain knowledge into explicit behavior specifications, or through reinforcement learning [331], which optimizes agent strategies via trial-and-error in simulated environments.”
BDI agents in social simulations: a survey
Adam, C., & Gaudou, B. (2016) · The Knowledge Engineering Review · doi:10.1017/s0269888916000096 · Cited by 165
The emergence of consensus: a primer
Baronchelli, A. (2018) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.172189 · Cited by 161
On agent-based modeling and computational social science
Conte, R., & Paolucci, M. (2014) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00668 · Cited by 160
“Examples of this application of ABM abound and are among the best cited works so far worked out in this field. phenomena trace back to as early as 1971, when the famous (Schelling, 1971) model of segregation was published in the Journal of Mathematical Sociology.”
BackgroundBridwell-Mitchell, E. N. (2015) · Sociology of Education · doi:10.1177/0038040715575559 · Cited by 136
Introduction to Random Boolean Networks
Gershenson, C. (2004) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.nlin/0408006 · Cited by 125
Modeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society
Törnberg, P., Andersson, C., Lindgren, K., & Banisch, S. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258259 · Cited by 118
Complex Dynamical Systems in Social and Personality Psychology: Theory, Modeling, and Analysis
Richardson, M. J., Dale, R., & Marsh, K. L. (2014) · Handbook of Research Methods in Social and Personality Psychology · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511996481.015 · Cited by 104
Pink work: Same-sex marriage, employment and discrimination
Sansone, D. (2019) · Journal of Public Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.104086 · Cited by 94
Darrah, J., & DeLuca, S. (2014) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.21758 · Cited by 93
Open Problems in Cooperative AI
Dafoe, A., Hughes, E., Bachrach, Y., Collins, T., McKee, K. R., Leibo, J. Z., Larson, K., & Graepel, T. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2012.08630 · Cited by 93
Leech, B. L. (2010) · The Oxford Handbook of American Political Parties and Interest Groups · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199542628.003.0028 · Cited by 91
The burden of social proof: Shared thresholds and social influence
MacCoun, R. J. (2012) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0027121 · Cited by 84
A new sociology of humans and machines
Tsvetkova, M., Yasseri, T., Pescetelli, N., & Werner, T. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2402.14410 · Cited by 83
Tobacco’s Tipping Point: The Master Settlement Agreement as a Focusing Event
Wood, R. S. (2006) · Policy Studies Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00180.x · Cited by 60
Emergence of metapopulations and echo chambers in mobile agents
Starnini, M., Frasca, M., & Baronchelli, A. (2016) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep31834 · Cited by 56
Optimized connectome architecture for sensory-motor integration
Worrell, J. C., Rumschlag, J., Betzel, R. F., Sporns, O., & Mišić, B. (2017) · Network Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/netn_a_00022 · Cited by 32
A Spatial Model of Internal Displacement and Forced Migration
Echevarria-Coco, J., & Gardeazabal, J. (2021) · Journal of Conflict Resolution · doi:10.1177/0022002720958470 · Cited by 19
Dense and influential core promotion of daily viral information spread in political echo chambers
Asatani, K., Yamano, H., Sakaki, T., & Sakata, I. (2021) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-021-86750-w · Cited by 18
Nair, K., Anderson, R. A., Spelman, T., Mosleh, M., & Kouchaki, M. (2026) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspi0000495 · Cited by 15
Flache, A., Mäs, M., & Keijzer, M. A. (2022) · Handbook of Sociological Science · doi:10.4337/9781789909432.00011 · Cited by 10
Demographic models of the reproductive process: Past, interlude, and future
Ciganda, D., & Todd, N. (2022) · Population Studies · doi:10.1080/00324728.2021.1959943 · Cited by 6
Xiao, B., Yin, Z., & Shan, Z. (2023) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.06957 · Cited by 4
“• Used text-based Json files to input different character settings and public events, enabling the simulation of any time-based event and changed the homogeneity of the traditional ABM mathematical model [22, 23].”
MethodDai, G., Zhang, W., Li, J., Yang, S., lbe, C. O., Rao, S., Caetano, A., & Sra, M. (2024) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2406.14373 · Cited by 2
Emergence of Biased Consensus in Multi-Agent LLM Debates
Okawa, M. (2026) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.02827
“Agent-based models have been widely employed to study organizational segregation (Martell et al., 2012), discrimination (Yasar, 2025), dissemination dynamics (Axelrod, 1997), migration (Schelling, 1971), and the emergence of cultural conventions (Centola & Baronchelli, 2015).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Schelling, T. C.
- Venue
- The Journal of Mathematical Sociology
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 1971-07
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 143-186
- ISSN
- 0022-250X (ISSN-L)
- 1545-5874
- OpenAlex
- W1977578104
- Cited by
- 4,915
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 12.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
