Cited by 37Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Mindfulness, Mechanisms and Meaning: Perspectives From the Cognitive Neuroscience of Addiction

Open access
McConnell, Patrick A., Froeliger, Brett·2015·Psychological Inquiry

Abstract

The mindfulness-to-meaning theory (MMT; Garland, Farb, Goldin, & Fredrickson, this issue) is a process model for explaining how mindfulness might facilitate an upward spiral of positive psychologic...

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/1047840x.2015.1076701

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Delle Fave A Massimini F Bassi M 2011 Psychological Selection and Optimal Experience Psychological Selection and Optimal Experience Across Cultures Springer 39 58
  2. Garland EL Fredrickson B Kring AM Johnson DP Meyer PS Penn DL 2010 Upward spirals of positive emotions counter downward spirals of negativity: insights from the broaden-and-build theory and affective neuroscience on the treatment of emotion dysfunctions and deficits in psychopathology Clin Psychol Rev 30 7 849 864 20363063 PMC2908186
  3. Garland EL Froeliger B Howard MO 2015 Neurophysiological evidence for remediation of reward processing deficits in chronic pain and opioid misuse following treatment with Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement: exploratory ERP findings from a pilot RCT J Behav Med 38 2 327 336 25385024 PMC4355224
  4. Hölzel B Ott U 2006 Relationships between meditation depth, absorption, meditation practice, and mindfulness: A latent variable approach Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 38 2 179 199
  5. Kang Y Gruber J Gray JR 2013 Mindfulness and de-automatization Emotion review 5 2 192 201

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McConnell, P. A., & Froeliger, B.
Affiliations
Medical University of South Carolina (US)
Corresponding author
Froeliger, Brett
Venue
Psychological Inquiry
Published
2015-10-02
Volume
26
Issue
4
Pages
349-357
ISSN
  • 1047-840X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7965
OpenAlex
W2185288311
Cited by
37
References
79
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychological Inquiry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA033459)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA138313)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
mindfulness, addiction, meaning in life, positive psychology, mechanisms of mindfulness, upward spiral

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review