Cited by 288Suicide and Self-Harm StudiesPersonality Disorders and PsychopathologyChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 132 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evidence-Based Psychosocial Treatments for Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors in Youth

Open access
Glenn, Catherine R., Franklin, Joseph C., Nock, Matthew K.·2015·Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to review the current evidence base of psychosocial treatments for suicidal and nonsuicidal self-injurious thoughts and behaviors (SITBs) in youth. We reviewed major scientific databases (HealthSTAR, MEDLine, PsycINFO, PubMed) for relevant studies published prior to June 2013. The search identified 29 studies examining interventions for suicidal or nonsuicidal SITBs in children or adolescents. No interventions currently meet the Journal of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology standards for Level 1: well-established treatments. Six treatment categories were classified as Level 2: probably efficacious or Level 3: possibly efficacious for reducing SITBs in youth. These treatments came from a variety of theoretical orientations, including cognitive-behavioral, family, interpersonal, and psychodynamic theories. Common elements across efficacious treatments included family skills training (e.g., family communication and problem solving), parent education and training (e.g., monitoring and contingency management), and individual skills training (e.g., emotion regulation and problem solving). Several treatments have shown potential promise for reducing SITBs in children and adolescents. However, the probably/possibly efficacious treatments identified each have evidence from only a single randomized controlled trial. Future research should focus on replicating studies of promising treatments, identifying active treatment ingredients, examining mediators and moderators of treatment effects, and developing brief interventions for high-risk periods (e.g., following hospital discharge).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/15374416.2014.945211

Cites

132 of 132 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. 10.1176/appi.ps.62.11.1303 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 2012, MMWR, Surveillance Summaries, 61, SS-4
  3. Chambless D. L., 1993, Task force on promotion and dissemination of psychological procedures: A report adoped by the Division 12 Board
  4. Chambless D. L., 1998, Clinical Psychologist, 51, 3
  5. 10.1097/00004583-201002000-00006 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1037//0022-0006X.64.2.264 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 288

Metadata

Authors
Glenn, C. R., Franklin, J. C., & Nock, M. K.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Glenn, Catherine R.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology
Published
2014-09-25
Volume
44
Issue
1
Pages
1-29
ISSN
  • 1537-4416 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-4424
OpenAlex
W2081568229
Cited by
288
References
133
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 56 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 6
FWCI
17.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
The research was supported, in part, by a grant from the National Institute of Mental Health (F32 MH097354) awarded to Catherine R. Glenn and a MacArthur Fellowship awarded to Matthew K. Nock. We thank Daniel Coppersmith, Sima Shabaneh, and Suzanne Shdo for their assistance reviewing the relevant literature for this manuscript.
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
self-injurious thoughts and behaviors, suicidal ideation, non-suicidal self-injury, youth, psychosocial interventions, treatment efficacy, family skills training, parent training, contingency management, emotion regulation, problem solving, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Behavior Therapy, Child, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Self-Injurious Behavior, Treatment Outcome, Evidence-Based Medicine, Suicidal Ideation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review