The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,701–1,800 of 12,257
Disability as solidarity: political not (only) metaphysical
Dougherty, T. (2020) · Philosophy and Phenomenological Research · doi:10.1111/phpr.12666 · Cited by 17
Buitelaar, M. W. (2020) · Religions · doi:10.3390/rel11070373 · Cited by 17
From political philosophy to messy empirical reality
Zala, M., Rippon, S., Theuns, T., de Maagt, S., & van den Brink, B. (2020) · Edward Elgar Publishing eBooks · doi:10.4337/9781839108488.00010 · Cited by 17
Rape Myths: What are They and What can We do About Them?
Jenkins, K. (2021) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246121000126 · Cited by 20
Spewak, D. C. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1968063 · Cited by 19
Listening to Strangers, or: Three Arguments for Bounded Solidarity
Pippenger, N. (2021) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12671 · Cited by 18
Harper, A., & Pratt, B. (2021) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/15562646211058253 · Cited by 17
Embodied Institutions and Epistemic Exclusions: Affect in the Academy
Churcher, M. (2022) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-021-09793-8 · Cited by 18
Leadership for equality in education: 50 years marching forward or marching on the spot?
Lumby, J., & Moorosi, P. (2022) · Educational Management Administration & Leadership · doi:10.1177/17411432211064425 · Cited by 17
Edwards, W., & Magill, K. R. (2022) · Policy Futures in Education · doi:10.1177/14782103221101762 · Cited by 22
Contracting out public participation to external consultants: Observations on epistemic justice
Levin, L. (2022) · Public Administration Review · doi:10.1111/puar.13517 · Cited by 17
Stigma, epistemic injustice, and “looked after children”: The need for a new language
Fieller, D., & Loughlin, M. (2022) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13700 · Cited by 17
Pandey, D. K., Adhiguru, P., Momin, K. C., & Kumar, P. (2022) · Biodiversity and Conservation · doi:10.1007/s10531-022-02440-7 · Cited by 18
An Introduction to Engaged Phenomenology
Stanier, J. (2022) · Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology · doi:10.1080/00071773.2022.2081533 · Cited by 22
A stigmatizing dilemma in the labour room: Irrationality or selfishness?
Ballesteros, V. (2022) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13747 · Cited by 17
Looking beyond values: The legitimacy of social perspectives, opinions and interests in science
Hilligardt, H. (2022) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-022-00490-w · Cited by 17
Song, Y. (2022) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2022-0020 · Cited by 17
Equitable Urban Planning for Climate Change
Pratt, B. (2022) · Journal of Planning Literature · doi:10.1177/08854122221138125 · Cited by 17
Epistemic sabotage: The production and disqualification of evidence in disability benefit claims
Porter, T., Watson, N., & Pearson, C. (2022) · Sociology of Health & Illness · doi:10.1111/1467-9566.13593 · Cited by 17
A paradigm-based explanation of trust
Bieber, F., & Viehoff, J. (2022) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-022-03993-4 · Cited by 17
Exclusion and Erasure: Two Types of Ontological Opression
Richardson, K. (2023) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.2279 · Cited by 17
Nsah, K. T. (2023) · Humanities · doi:10.3390/h12030038 · Cited by 17
A Feminist Postdigital Analysis of Misogyny, Patriarchy and Violence Against Women and Girls Online
MacKenzie, A. (2023) · Postdigital science and education · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-35411-3_14 · Cited by 17
Jackson, K., Kaner, E., Hanratty, B., Gilvarry, E. A., Yardley, L., & O'Donnell, A. J. (2023) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.16350 · Cited by 17
Health ICTs and transgender health equity: a research agenda
Wyers, K. (2024) · Information Technology for Development · doi:10.1080/02681102.2023.2292740 · Cited by 19
McClimans, L. M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197572078.001.0001 · Cited by 17
Hunt, J., & Blease, C. (2024) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-109837 · Cited by 18
Henderson, R. S., & McCready, E. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780191994319.001.0001 · Cited by 17
Fabry, R. E. (2024) · Philosophical Psychology · doi:10.1080/09515089.2024.2373284 · Cited by 17
Harcourt, B. E. (2024) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-024-00715-y · Cited by 17
Why does Duress Undermine Consent?
Dougherty, T. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780198922360.003.0003 · Cited by 17
Ramsey, L., Hughes, J., Hazeldine, D., Seddon, S., Gould, M., Wailling, J., Murray, J., McHugh, S., Simms‐Ellis, R., Halligan, D., et al. (2024) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2024.1473296 · Cited by 17
Amanah and umma: Eco-Islam and epistemological diversity in environmental communication
Alhinai, M., & Ringer, A. (2025) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2025.1568627 · Cited by 17
Do Squirrels Eat Hamburgers?: Intellectual Empathy as a Remedy for Residual Prejudice
Linker, M. (2011) · Informal Logic · doi:10.22329/il.v31i2.3063 · Cited by 18
Dembroff, R., & Wodak, D. (2018) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.12405314.0005.014 · Cited by 17
Panikkar, B., & Tollefson, J. J. (2018) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/0306312718803453 · Cited by 17
Butchering Benevolence Moral Progress beyond the Expanding Circle
Sauer, H. (2019) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-019-09983-9 · Cited by 17
The multiple faces of practical wisdom in complex clinical practices: An empirical exploration
Bontemps-Hommen, M. C. M. M. L., Vosman, F. J. H., & Baart, A. (2019) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13119 · Cited by 17
The Teaching Excellence Framework, Epistemic Insensibility and the Question of Purpose
Forstenzer, J. (2018) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12319 · Cited by 17
Allen, B. L., Lees, J., Cohen, A. K., & Jeanjean, M. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16183352 · Cited by 17
Interactive interviewing and imaging: engaging Dutch PVE-students in dialogue
Boonekamp, G., Dierx, J. A. J., Hove, P. V., & Jansen, E. (2019) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2019.1693410 · Cited by 17
Whiteford, G. E. (2019) · Australian Occupational Therapy Journal · doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12628 · Cited by 17
Testimonial injustice: discounting women’s voices in health care priority setting
Gallagher, S., Little, J. M., & Hooker, C. (2020) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2019-105984 · Cited by 21
Can Real Social Epistemic Networks Deliver the Wisdom of Crowds?
Sullivan, E., Sondag, M., Rutter, I., Meulemans, W., Cunningham, S. W., Speckmann, B., & Alfano, M. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198852407.003.0003 · Cited by 17
Continuous Glucose Monitoring as a Matter of Justice
Kraaijeveld, S. R. (2020) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1007/s10730-020-09413-9 · Cited by 19
Pritchard, D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404.010 · Cited by 17
Knowledge Democracy and Epistemic In/Justice: Reflections on a Conversation
Hall, B. L., Godrie, B., & Heck, I. (2020) · The Canadian Journal of Action Research · doi:10.33524/cjar.v21i1.516 · Cited by 17
Medina, J. (2020) · Critical Philosophy of Race · doi:10.5325/critphilrace.8.1-2.0212 · Cited by 17
Feminismo, género e injusticias epistémicas
Chaparro, A. (2021) · Debate Feminista · doi:10.22201/cieg.2594066xe.2021.62.2269 · Cited by 17
Sonn, C. C., & Stevens, G. (2021) · Community psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-72220-3_1 · Cited by 17
Griffioen, A. L. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108699952 · Cited by 17
Groot, B. C., Haveman, A., Buree, M., van Zuijlen, R., van Zuijlen, J., & Abma, T. (2022) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph19041927 · Cited by 17
What does decolonising education mean to us? Educator reflections
Agherdien, N., Pillay, R., Dube, N., & Masinga, P. (2022) · Scholarship of Teaching and Learning in the South · doi:10.36615/sotls.v6i1.204 · Cited by 17
Zack, N. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-78729-9 · Cited by 19
Jiménez, L. G., Morales, S. T., & Tomás, J. M. D. (2022) · Revista de Comunicación · doi:10.26441/rc21.2-2022-a5 · Cited by 24
Harming by Deceit: Epistemic Malevolence and Organizational Wrongdoing
Meyer, M., & Choo, C. W. (2023) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-023-05370-8 · Cited by 17
Murris, K. (2013) · Children s Literature in Education · doi:10.1007/s10583-013-9205-8 · Cited by 18
The Engaged University: Where Rhetorical Theory Matters
Hikins, J. W., & Cherwitz, R. A. (2010) · Journal of Applied Communication Research · doi:10.1080/00909881003639551 · Cited by 17
An Interview with Miranda Fricker
Dieleman, S. (2012) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2011.652216 · Cited by 17
Ghiso, M. P. (2015) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1177/1086296x15618479 · Cited by 17
Spaulding, S. (2016) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12070 · Cited by 17
Butz, D., & Cook, N. (2018) · Studies in Social Justice · doi:10.26522/ssj.v11i2.1629 · Cited by 17
The Criminal Is Political: Policing Politics in Real Existing Liberalism
Duff, K. (2017) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2017.39 · Cited by 17
The Nature of Silence and Its Democratic Possibilities
Vieira, M. B., Jung, T., Gray, S. W. D., & Rollo, T. (2019) · Contemporary Political Theory · doi:10.1057/s41296-019-00330-2 · Cited by 17
Greco, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404.006 · Cited by 17
Epistemological failures: everyday terrorism in the West
Gentry, C. E. (2015) · Critical Studies on Terrorism · doi:10.1080/17539153.2015.1081754 · Cited by 19
Wylie, A., & Sismondo, S. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.85032-1 · Cited by 18
Chinn, C. A., & Rinehart, R. W. (2016) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9675-3 · Cited by 17
Paphitis, S. A. (2017) · Critical Public Health · doi:10.1080/09581596.2017.1418500 · Cited by 17
Virtue theory of mathematical practices: an introduction
Aberdein, A., Rittberg, C. J., & Tanswell, F. S. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03240-2 · Cited by 17
Vedam, S., Stoll, K. H., Tarasoff, L. A., Phillips-Beck, W., Lo, W., MacDonald, K., Metellus, A., Rost, M., Scott, M., Hodge, K., et al. (2024) · Journal of Participatory Research Methods · doi:10.35844/001c.94399 · Cited by 19
Jules, T. D., & Salajan, F. D. (2025) · Comparative Education Review · doi:10.1086/735019 · Cited by 17
Neuro-Normative Epistemic Injustice – Consequences for the UK Education Crisis and School Anxiety
Fisher, E., MacLennan, K., Mullally, S. L., & Rodgers, J. (2025) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330251353565 · Cited by 17
Edgoose, H. (2024) · Australasian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/00048402.2024.2351210 · Cited by 16
How far can genealogies affect the space of reasons? Vindication, justification and excuses
Testini, F. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2342026 · Cited by 16
Defending Democracy: Prioritizing the Study of Epistemic Inequalities
Gagrčin, E., & Moe, H. (2024) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2024.2377990 · Cited by 16
Suffering without Remedy: The Medically Unexplained Symptoms of Fibromyalgia Syndrome and Long COVID
Moretti, C., & Barker, K. K. (2024) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci13090450 · Cited by 17
Woman: Concept, Prototype and Stereotype
Coliva, A. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2400551 · Cited by 16
McGlynn, A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190949945.013.15 · Cited by 16
Subordination by Design: Rethinking Power, Policy, and Autonomy in Perioperative Nursing
Dunn, J. T. (2025) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1111/nin.70043 · Cited by 16
Vera, F. S. (2025) · Societies · doi:10.3390/soc15070198 · Cited by 20
Consent theory as hermeneutical injustice
Ichikawa, J. J. (2025) · The Philosophical Quarterly · doi:10.1093/pq/pqaf033 · Cited by 16
Evaluating and Enriching Online Knowledge Exchange: A Socio-epistemological Perspective
Matthews, P., & Simon, J. (2012) · Annals of information systems · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3634-8_3 · Cited by 16
Language, Politics, and “The Folk”
Haslanger, S. (2012) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199892631.003.0016 · Cited by 16
Social positions and institutional privilege as matters of justice
Brännmark, J. (2018) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/1474885118788973 · Cited by 16
Redrawing the Map: Medina on Epistemic Vices and Skepticism
McGlynn, A. (2019) · International Journal for the Study of Skepticism · doi:10.1163/22105700-20191386 · Cited by 16
Recognition, misrecognition and justice
Schweiger, G. (2019) · Ethics & Global Politics · doi:10.1080/16544951.2019.1693870 · Cited by 16
Against comfort: political implications of evading discomfort
Munch‐Jurišić, D. M. (2020) · Global Discourse · doi:10.1332/204378920x15844659544839 · Cited by 17
Invoking Work Knowledge: Exploring the Social Organization of Producing Gender Studies
Lund, R. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-54222-1_10 · Cited by 16
“The missing ‘I’ in drug research and the epistemic justice of disclosure”
Walker, I. (2021) · International Journal of Drug Policy · doi:10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103178 · Cited by 16
Kidd, I. J., & Carel, H. (2021) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246121000059 · Cited by 18
Stone, L. C., Avila, M., & Duran, B. (2021) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/10901981211010099 · Cited by 20
A New Metaphysics for Virtue Ethics
Swanton, C. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198861676.003.0002 · Cited by 16
Critical Democratic Education in Practice: Evidence from An Experienced Teacher's Classroom
Sibbett, L. (2021) · The Journal of Social Studies Research · doi:10.1016/j.jssr.2021.11.004 · Cited by 18
Art markets, epistemic authority, and the institutional curation of knowledge
Brown, K. (2022) · Cultural Studies · doi:10.1080/09502386.2022.2030777 · Cited by 16
Oyinloye, B. (2022) · Compare A Journal of Comparative and International Education · doi:10.1080/03057925.2022.2116929 · Cited by 16
A critical air quality science perspective on citizen science in action
Booker, D., Walker, G. P., Young, P. J., & Porroche‐Escudero, A. (2022) · Local Environment · doi:10.1080/13549839.2022.2118700 · Cited by 19
Mulcahy, L., & Tsalapatanis, A. (2022) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2022.2136713 · Cited by 16
Examining the knowledge work of person-centred care: Towards epistemic reciprocity
Dell’Olio, M., Whybrow, P., & Reeve, J. L. (2022) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2022.107575 · Cited by 16
Byrnes, D., Blum, L., & Walker, W. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su15010514 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
