The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 2,001–2,100 of 12,257
Seeing the human behind the research: Strengthening emerging African disability researchers
Botha, M., & Ohajunwa, C. O. (2024) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v13i0.1494 · Cited by 14
Stigmatization and Marginalization of Forensic Psychiatric Patients
Markham, S. (2024) · Illness Crisis & Loss · doi:10.1177/10541373241268095 · Cited by 14
Néron, P. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780197774151.001.0001 · Cited by 14
Boland, M., Higgins, A., Beecher, C., Bracken, P., Burn, W., Cody, A., Framer, A., Gronlund, T., Horowitz, M., Huff, C., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088266 · Cited by 14
Kläver, A., Rösner, V., Becker, S., & Scheidler, V. (2024) · Mobilities · doi:10.1080/17450101.2024.2426554 · Cited by 17
Guzula, X., & Abdulatief, S. (2024) · Reading & Writing · doi:10.4102/rw.v15i1.503 · Cited by 14
Detecting energy injustices: Climbing the ladder of “hidden morality”
van Uffelen, N., & ten Caat, S. (2024) · Energy Policy · doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2024.114465 · Cited by 14
Towards the Recognition of Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Researchers
Salmela, M., Baptista, B. V., & Cheas, K. (2025) · Minerva · doi:10.1007/s11024-025-09578-y · Cited by 14
Moral Learning in Organizations: An Integrative Framework for Organizational Ethics
Kornberger, M., & Leixnering, S. (2025) · Journal of Business Ethics · doi:10.1007/s10551-025-05984-0 · Cited by 14
Towards Participatory River Governance Through Citizen Science
Alvarado-Arias, N., Soria-Delgado, J., Staines, J., & Moya-Almeida, V. (2025) · Water · doi:10.3390/w17091358 · Cited by 14
Schweiger, G. (2025) · Social Sciences · doi:10.3390/socsci14060326 · Cited by 14
Wikström, H. (2014) · Nordic Journal of Migration Research · doi:10.2478/njmr-2014-0024 · Cited by 14
Disability and torture: exception, epistemology and ‘black sites’
Wadiwel, D. J. (2017) · Continuum · doi:10.1080/10304312.2016.1275134 · Cited by 14
Caretta, M. A. (2017) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2016.1261686 · Cited by 14
‘I‐as‐We’ – Powerful boundaries within the field of mental health coproduction
von Peter, S., & Schulz, G. (2018) · International Journal of Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/inm.12469 · Cited by 14
Mental health advocacy outcomes from service user perspectives
Ridley, J., Newbigging, K., & Street, C. (2018) · Mental Health Review Journal · doi:10.1108/mhrj-10-2017-0049 · Cited by 14
Narrative Fiction and Epistemic Injustice
Cunliffe, Z. A. (2019) · Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.1111/jaac.12633 · Cited by 14
Shame, silence and resistance: How my narratives of academia and kidney disease entwine
Richards, R. (2019) · Feminism & Psychology · doi:10.1177/0959353518786757 · Cited by 14
Framing, Filtering and Hermeneutical Injustice in the Public Conversation about Mental Health
Harper, D. J. (2020) · Journal of Constructivist Psychology · doi:10.1080/10720537.2020.1773360 · Cited by 14
Davis, C., & Parmenter, L. (2020) · Educational Action Research · doi:10.1080/09650792.2020.1792958 · Cited by 14
A Injustiça Epistêmica na violência obstétrica
Gabriel, A. D. B., & Santos, B. R. G. (2020) · Revista Estudos Feministas · doi:10.1590/1806-9584-2020v28n260012 · Cited by 14
Theory–Praxis Gap: Social Studies Teaching and Critically Transformational Dialogue
Magill, K. R., & Blevins, B. E. (2020) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146812012200702 · Cited by 14
“Doing justice” in psychological methodology: From science and experiments to anecdotes
Teo, T. (2021) · New Ideas in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2021.100854 · Cited by 15
Understanding What It's Like To Be (Dis)Privileged
Wiltsher, N. (2021) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12338 · Cited by 15
Was kann das Konzept der Diskriminierung für die Medizinethik leisten? – Eine Analyse
Hädicke, M., & Wiesemann, C. (2021) · Ethik in der Medizin · doi:10.1007/s00481-021-00631-4 · Cited by 16
Notes on not knowing: male ignorance after #MeToo
O’Neill, R. (2021) · Feminist Theory · doi:10.1177/14647001211014756 · Cited by 16
The medical practice of silencing
Dhairyawan, R. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)01659-7 · Cited by 14
Cross-cultural practice frameworks in correctional settings
Day, A., Tamatea, A. J., & Geia, L. K. (2021) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2021.101674 · Cited by 14
Revisiting the past: human rights education and epistemic justice
Adami, R. (2021) · Human Rights Education Review · doi:10.7577/hrer.4486 · Cited by 14
Enactivism and the Paradox of Moral Perception
van Grunsven, J. (2021) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-021-09767-w · Cited by 14
Ásta (2019) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12318 · Cited by 14
“Emancipatory Circuits of Knowledge” for Urban Equality: Experiences From Havana, Freetown, and Asia
Butcher, S., Cociña, C., Frediani, A. A., Acuto, M., Pérez‐Castro, B., Díaz, J. P., Macías, J. C., Koroma, B. M., & Macarthy, J. M. (2022) · Urban Planning · doi:10.17645/up.v7i3.5319 · Cited by 15
Towards a Feminist Metaethics of AI
Siapka, A. (2022) · Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI Ethics and Society · doi:10.1145/3514094.3534197 · Cited by 18
Ko, D., Bal, A., Bear, A. B., Orie, L., & Mawene, D. (2022) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2022.2119488 · Cited by 16
Decolonizing translanguaging research methodologies: A commentary and self-reflection
Phyak, P. B. (2022) · Research Methods in Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1016/j.rmal.2022.100032 · Cited by 14
Peace scholarship and the local turn: Hierarchies in the production of knowledge about peace
Johnson, A. K., Lechartre, J., Mart, Ş. G., Robison, M., & Hughes, C. (2022) · Journal of Peace Research · doi:10.1177/00223433221088035 · Cited by 14
Urban Living Lab for Local Regeneration
Aernouts, N., Cognetti, F., & Maranghi, E. (2022) · The urban book series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-19748-2 · Cited by 21
Groenevelt, I., & de Boer, M. L. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.115951 · Cited by 14
Thompson, C. M., Babu, S., Gerlikovski, E. R., McGuire, M., Makos, S., Ranallo, A., & Robieson, I. (2023) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2023.2257941 · Cited by 14
Amico-Korby, D., Harrell, M., & Danks, D. J. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04504-3 · Cited by 14
Education as justice: articulating the epistemic core of education to enable just futures
Balarin, M., & Milligan, L. O. (2024) · Global Social Challenges Journal · doi:10.1332/27523349y2024d000000013 · Cited by 19
Bohman, J. F. (2015) · Citizenship Studies · doi:10.1080/13621025.2015.1074343 · Cited by 14
When journal editors play favorites
Heesen, R. (2017) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-017-0895-4 · Cited by 14
What Is the Relevance of Procedural Fairness to Making Determinations about Medical Evidence?
Persad, G. (2017) · The AMA Journal of Ethic · doi:10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.2.pfor1-1702 · Cited by 14
Frega, R. (2017) · European Journal of Political Theory · doi:10.1177/1474885116684760 · Cited by 14
Descolonización del conocimiento: una mise en place epistemográfica
Wood, D. (2017) · Tabula rasa · doi:10.25058/20112742.453 · Cited by 17
Lee, E., Herschman, J., & Johnstone, M. (2018) · Social Work Education · doi:10.1080/02615479.2018.1539070 · Cited by 14
Davies, C. E., & Arnold, J. E. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198791768.013.6 · Cited by 15
Hutchinson, A., Galvin, K., & Johnson, M. J. (2020) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.03.014 · Cited by 14
Lamboy, L., Taylor, A., & Thompson, W. C. (2020) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/1477878520912510 · Cited by 17
Epistemic Injustice in Health Care Professionals and Male Breast Cancer Patients Encounters
Younas, A. (2020) · Ethics & Behavior · doi:10.1080/10508422.2020.1756819 · Cited by 14
Conflict in Political Liberalism: Judith Shklar’s Liberalism of Fear
Kaufmann, K. (2020) · Res Publica · doi:10.1007/s11158-020-09475-z · Cited by 14
‘We haven’t even buried the dead yet’: Ethics of discursive contestation in a crisis situation
Curato, N. (2016) · Current Sociology · doi:10.1177/0011392116651662 · Cited by 14
Towards a tinkering participatory research method in mental health
Tangvald-Pedersen, O., & Bongaardt, R. (2016) · Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research · doi:10.1080/15017419.2016.1222305 · Cited by 14
Listening to Long COVID: Epistemic Injustice and COVID-19 morbidityPreprint
Jesus, V. V. A. D., Alwan, N. A., Callard, F. J., & Berger, Z. D. (2021) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/tfbnd · Cited by 14
Countering Epistemic Injustice: The Work of Intergenerational LGBTQ+ Dialogues
Greteman, A. J., Morris, K. A., & Weststrate, N. M. (2021) · Studies in Art Education · doi:10.1080/00393541.2021.1975492 · Cited by 14
Philosophy of Protest and Epistemic Activism
Medina, J. (2022) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119635253.ch13 · Cited by 14
Dunne, G. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-287-532-7_697-1 · Cited by 14
The Role of Epistemic Injustice in Abortion Access Disparities
Matthews, M. M., Lal, A., & Pacia, D. M. (2022) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2022.2089288 · Cited by 14
Oxford Studies in Semantics and Pragmatics
Henderson, R. S., & McCready, E. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/9780191994319.003.0009 · Cited by 14
Deepfakes: a survey and introduction to the topical collection
Cavedon‐Taylor, D. (2024) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-024-04634-8 · Cited by 14
Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology
Armstrong, N., Beswick, L., & Vega, M. O. (2023) · Culture, Medicine, and Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s11013-023-09819-3 · Cited by 13
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’ that is, of important areas of experience being inexpress-ible or impossible to understand or communicate (Fricker 2007).”
BackgroundThe epistemic power of the police
Boutros, M. (2024) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806241263916 · Cited by 13
Dougherty, T. (2024) · doi:10.1093/9780198922360.001.0001 · Cited by 13
Safir, A. H., McInerney, K., Blackwell, A. F., & Debnath, R. (2025) · ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAccT) · doi:10.1145/3715275.3732136 · Cited by 14
LeBar, M. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780197801482.001.0001 · Cited by 13
Inclusive research in tourism: are we enabling or disabling people with disability?
Lu, S. E., Yang, E. C. L., Moyle, B., & Reid, S. (2025) · Tourism Geographies · doi:10.1080/14616688.2025.2546533 · Cited by 13
Felder, F. (2025) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/14778785251379066 · Cited by 13
Repairing epistemic injustice and loss in the era of climate coloniality
Sultana, F. (2025) · Geo Geography and Environment · doi:10.1002/geo2.70029 · Cited by 13
Langmann, E., & Goldberg, D. S. (2026) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2026.2637062 · Cited by 13
Pragmatic encroachment and epistemically responsible action
Boyd, K. M. (2015) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-015-0878-y · Cited by 14
Breidahl, K. N. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0013 · Cited by 13
Hierarchy, American Identity, and Support for Anti-Poverty Efforts
Theiss‐Morse, E., Gonzalez, F. J., & O’Toole, A. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0006 · Cited by 14
The knowledge norm of assertion in dialectical context
Begby, E. (2020) · Ratio · doi:10.1111/rati.12261 · Cited by 13
Chimakonam, J. O. (2020) · Philosophy and poverty · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-31711-9_6 · Cited by 13
Moral responsibility for concepts, continued: Concepts as abstract objects
Fredericks, R. (2020) · European Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/ejop.12547 · Cited by 13
Intellectual trust and the marketplace of ideas
Hazlett, A. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429291395-8 · Cited by 13
Paganini, N., & Stöber, S. (2021) · The Journal of Agricultural Education and Extension · doi:10.1080/1389224x.2021.1873157 · Cited by 16
Martin, A. (2021) · Pacific philosophical quarterly · doi:10.1111/papq.12330 · Cited by 13
Knowledge Is Extrinsically Apt Belief
Meylan, A. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108666404.008 · Cited by 13
On epistemic justice in career guidance
Bengtsson, A. (2022) · British Journal of Guidance and Counselling · doi:10.1080/03069885.2021.2016614 · Cited by 14
‘I Know What It's Like’: Epistemic Arrogance, Disability, and Race
Liebow, N., & Ades, R. L. (2022) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2021.27 · Cited by 13
Forgiving and Ceasing to Blame
Milam, P. (2022) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-77807-1_8 · Cited by 13
Martino, W. (2022) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/01614681221121514 · Cited by 15
Equitable Design and Use of Digital Surveillance Technologies During COVID-19: Norms and Concerns
Pratt, B., Parker, M. J., & Bull, S. (2022) · Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics · doi:10.1177/15562646221118127 · Cited by 13
Why didn't you scream? Epistemic injustices of sexism, misogyny and rape myths
MacKenzie, A. (2022) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1111/1467-9752.12685 · Cited by 13
Measuring and mismeasuring the self
Battaly, H. D. (2022) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2022.2156921 · Cited by 13
Mössler, K. A., Halstead, J., Metell, M., Gottschewski, K., & Schmid, W. (2023) · Nordic Journal of Music Therapy · doi:10.1080/08098131.2022.2145346 · Cited by 16
Mental Health Experts as Objects of Epistemic Injustice—The Case of Autism Spectrum Condition
Wodziński, M. C., & Moskalewicz, M. (2023) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics13050927 · Cited by 13
Rape myth acceptance among Croatian and Cypriot police officers
Constantinou, A. G., & Butorac, K. (2023) · Criminology & Criminal Justice · doi:10.1177/17488958231160251 · Cited by 13
Wee, H. L., Karkkulainen, E. A., & Tateo, L. (2023) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci13040367 · Cited by 13
Doing epistemic justice in International Relations: women and the history of international thought
Hutchings, K. (2023) · European Journal of International Relations · doi:10.1177/13540661231169165 · Cited by 14
Opacity, Transparency, and the Ethics of Affective Computing
Kumar, M., Aijaz, A., Chattar, O., Shukla, J., & Mutharaju, R. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing · doi:10.1109/taffc.2023.3278230 · Cited by 13
Can fanaticism be a liberatory virtue?
Battaly, H. D. (2023) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-023-04174-7 · Cited by 13
Lajoie-O’Malley, A., Bronson, K., & Blue, G. (2023) · Social Studies of Science · doi:10.1177/03063127231177311 · Cited by 17
On the Nature of Faith and Its Relation to Trust and Belief
Faulkner, P. (2023) · The Monist · doi:10.1093/monist/onac023 · Cited by 13
The practical ethics of linguistic integration: Three challenges
Peled, Y. (2023) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/meta.12653 · Cited by 13
Trust, Distrust, and Testimonial Injustice
Carter, J. A., & Meehan, D. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003396789-11 · Cited by 13
Cin, F. M., Walker, C., KÜRÜM, R. S., Gunter, A., Doğan, N., Truter, L., Ahimbisibwe, F. B., & Olaniyan, T. C. (2023) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2023.2273346 · Cited by 15
Kuijper, S., Felder, M. M., Clegg, S. R., Bal, R. A., & Wallenburg, I. (2023) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2023.116482 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
