The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,901–2,000 of 12,257
Shah, A. H., Catalano, A., Bhatia, U., Gupta, D., Daruwalla, N., Osrin, D., & Nadkarni, A. (2024) · Health & Social Care in the Community · doi:10.1155/2024/6839787 · Cited by 15
Walker, M. (2024) · Journal of Human Development and Capabilities · doi:10.1080/19452829.2023.2297917 · Cited by 15
Dunne, G., & Kotsonis, A. (2024) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2023.62 · Cited by 15
Social work beyond the pandemic: Exploring social work values for a new eco-social world
Banks, S., Bertotti, T., Cairns, L. O., Shears, J., Shum, M. H. Y., Sobočan, A. M., Strom, K., & Pemán, M. J. Ú. (2024) · International Social Work · doi:10.1177/00208728241227062 · Cited by 15
Neutrality, Cultural Literacy, and Arts Funding
Hume, J. (2024) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.5192 · Cited by 15
Balarin, M., & Rodríguez, M. F. (2024) · Global Social Challenges Journal · doi:10.1332/27523349y2024d000000007 · Cited by 15
Faissner, M., Kuhn, E. M., Müller, R., & Laacke, S. (2024) · Ethics and Information Technology · doi:10.1007/s10676-024-09765-7 · Cited by 15
Benton, M. A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009127103 · Cited by 15
Bradley, D. L., Kramer, C. T., Sufrin, C., Scott, K. A., & Hayes, C. M. (2024) · Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities · doi:10.1007/s40615-024-02042-9 · Cited by 19
Lopes, D. M. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198930983.001.0001 · Cited by 16
Individual Vices and Institutional Failings as Drivers of Vulnerabilisation
Carel, H., & Kidd, I. J. (2024) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2024.2400083 · Cited by 15
Long COVID patients’ reconstruction of medical gaslighting discourse in online epistemic communities
Plastina, A. F. (2025) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2025.108665 · Cited by 15
Cureton, A. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780191960253.001.0001 · Cited by 15
Salje, L. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198914211.001.0001 · Cited by 15
Jos, P. H., & Watson, A. (2016) · Administration & Society · doi:10.1177/0095399715623316 · Cited by 15
Ethical Internationalization, Neo-liberal Restructuring and “Beating the Bounds” of Higher Education
Khoo, S.-M., Taylor, L., & Andreotti, V. (2016) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-52261-0_6 · Cited by 15
Hermeneutical Injustice and the Problem of Authority
Romdenh‐Romluc, K. (2017) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2017.3.1 · Cited by 15
Simpson, A., Coffey, M., Hannigan, B., Barlow, S. H., Cohen, R., Jones, A., Faulkner, A., Thornton, A., Všetečková, J., Haddad, M., et al. (2017) · Health Services and Delivery Research · doi:10.3310/hsdr05260 · Cited by 16
Bearing witness in nursing practice: More than a moral obligation?
Djkowich, M., Ceci, C., & Petrovskaya, O. (2018) · Nursing Philosophy · doi:10.1111/nup.12232 · Cited by 20
The epistemic benefits of religious disagreement
Dormandy, K. (2019) · Religious Studies · doi:10.1017/s0034412518000847 · Cited by 15
Skepticism: Impractical, therefore implausible
Hannon, M. (2019) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12145 · Cited by 15
Casalini, B. (2019) · International Journal of Care and Caring · doi:10.1332/239788219x15730452949174 · Cited by 16
In sickness and in filth: Developing a disdain for dirty people
Rottman, J., Johnston, A. M., Bierhoff, S., Pelletier, T., Grigoreva, A. D., & Benitez, J. (2020) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2020.104858 · Cited by 15
Explanatory Injustice and Epistemic Agency
Mitova, V. (2020) · Ethical Theory and Moral Practice · doi:10.1007/s10677-020-10094-z · Cited by 17
Klevan, T., Jonassen, R., Sælør, K. T., & Borg, M. (2020) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/1609406920967868 · Cited by 15
Silencing by Not Telling: Testimonial Void as a New Kind of Testimonial Injustice
Carmona, C. (2021) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2021.1887395 · Cited by 15
“Epistemic injustice” in the administration of mental health legislation
Todd, T. (2021) · Psychosis · doi:10.1080/17522439.2020.1853204 · Cited by 15
The “All Lives Matter” response: QUD-shifting as epistemic injustice
Keiser, J. (2021) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-021-03171-y · Cited by 17
Margaret MacDonald’s scientific common-sense philosophy
Vlasits, J. (2021) · British Journal for the History of Philosophy · doi:10.1080/09608788.2021.1924615 · Cited by 15
Patin, B. J. H., Oliphant, T., Allard, D., Gray, L., Clarke, R. I., Tacheva, Z., & Lar‐Son, K. (2021) · Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology · doi:10.1002/pra2.515 · Cited by 18
Educating for intellectual pride and ameliorating servility in contexts of epistemic injustice
Battaly, H. D. (2022) · Educational Philosophy and Theory · doi:10.1080/00131857.2022.2033212 · Cited by 15
Collective Experiences, Lessons, and Reflections About Blue Justice
Chuenpagdee, R., Isaacs, M., Said, A. B., & Jentoft, S. (2022) · MARE publication series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89624-9_34 · Cited by 15
Hidalgo, E. S., Ball, M. P., Opoix, M., & Tzovaras, B. G. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01199-0 · Cited by 15
Epistemic Equality: Distributive Epistemic Justice in the Context of Justification
Miller, B., & Pinto, M. (2022) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2022.0011 · Cited by 15
Deepfakes, Intellectual Cynics, and the Cultivation of Digital Sensibility
Matthews, T. (2022) · Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement · doi:10.1017/s1358246122000224 · Cited by 15
Decolonising the cultural policy and management curriculum – reflections from practice
Gaio, A., Joffe, A., Hernández-Acosta, J. J., & Šešić, M. D. (2023) · Cultural Trends · doi:10.1080/09548963.2023.2168515 · Cited by 15
Knowing the Ocean: Epistemic Inequalities in Patterns of Science Collaboration
Hornidge, A., Partelow, S., & Knopf, K. (2023) · MARE publication series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-20740-2_2 · Cited by 18
Tapping into the unimpossible: Philosophical health in lives with spinal cord injury
de Miranda, L., Levi, R., & Divanoglou, A. (2023) · Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice · doi:10.1111/jep.13874 · Cited by 15
Tuominen, T., Koponen, M., Vitikainen, K., Sulubacak, U., & Tiedemann, J. (2023) · The Journal of Specialised Translation · doi:10.26034/cm.jostrans.2023.067 · Cited by 15
Morality is necessary for happiness
Bloomfield, P. (2016) · Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1007/s11098-016-0729-9 · Cited by 15
Leaving the field: (de‐)linked lives of the researcher and research assistant
Caretta, M. A., & Cheptum, F. J. (2017) · Area · doi:10.1111/area.12342 · Cited by 15
‘Different isn’t free’: Gender @ work in a digital world
Carrigan, C. M. (2017) · Ethnography · doi:10.1177/1466138117728737 · Cited by 15
Ethical complexities in assessing patients’ insight
Guidry-Grimes, L. K. (2019) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/medethics-2018-105109 · Cited by 15
Finding ways (and words) to move: Mad student politics and practices of loneliness
de Bie, A. (2019) · Disability & Society · doi:10.1080/09687599.2019.1609910 · Cited by 15
Trolls maintained: baiting technological infrastructures of informational justice
Kerr, E. T., & Lee, C. A. L. (2019) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2019.1623903 · Cited by 15
Mary Astell on Bad Custom and Epistemic Injustice
Forbes, A. S. (2019) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12495 · Cited by 15
Groot, B. C., & Abma, T. (2019) · Forum qualitative Sozialforschung · doi:10.17169/fqs-21.1.3302 · Cited by 15
Different Knowings and the Indigenous Humanities
Coleman, D., Battiste, M., Henderson, S., Findlay, I. M., & Findlay, L. M. (2012) · English studies in Canada · doi:10.1353/esc.2012.0009 · Cited by 15
Cook, A. L., Hayden, L. A., Bryan, J. A., & Belford, P. (2016) · International Journal of Research on Service-Learning and Community Engagement · doi:10.37333/001c.29609 · Cited by 15
On justifying the norms underlying decision support
Meinard, Y., & Cailloux, O. (2020) · European Journal of Operational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2020.02.022 · Cited by 15
Jones, K. (2015) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-097086-8.63088-x · Cited by 15
A Feminist Bioethics Approach to Diagnostic Uncertainty
Swartz, A. K. (2018) · The American Journal of Bioethics · doi:10.1080/15265161.2018.1447046 · Cited by 15
Postdevelopmental Conceptions of Child and Childhood in Education
Murris, K., Smalley, K., & Allan, B. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190264093.013.1425 · Cited by 15
Hauan, L. S., & Anker, T. (2021) · Universitetsforlaget eBooks · doi:10.18261/9788215037417-2021-04 · Cited by 15
Grill, G. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/zekqv · Cited by 15
What really is nontokenistic fully inclusive patient and public involvement/engagement in research?
Hilton, A., Megson, M., Aryankhesal, A., Blake, J., Rook, G., Irvine, A., Um, J., Killett, A., Maidment, I., Loke, Y. K., et al. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.14012 · Cited by 15
The Information Environment and Blameworthy Beliefs
Millar, B. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1676840 · Cited by 14
Collaborative Ethnography and Matters of Care in Counterspaces
Carrigan, C. M., Yen, J. W., Margherio, C., Grant, C., Horner‐Devine, M. C., Riskin, E. A., Ivy, J. S., & Peil, B. (2024) · Engaging Science Technology and Society · doi:10.17351/ests2023.2049 · Cited by 14
Pozzi, G., & Proost, M. D. (2024) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-024-00523-5 · Cited by 14
“A Spider on Your Shoulder”: Workplace Sexual Harassment Through a Narrative Lens
Vossler, C., Presser, L., & Mulder, E. (2024) · Feminist Criminology · doi:10.1177/15570851241281082 · Cited by 14
Dual-roles and beyond: values, ethics, and practices in forensic mental health decision-making
Pedersen, S. H., Radovic, S., Nilsson, T., & Eriksson, L. (2025) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-024-10247-2 · Cited by 14
Downs, J. L., & Adams, M. (2025) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-025-01271-5 · Cited by 14
Fisher, E., MacLennan, K., Mullally, S. L., Rodgers, J., & Tzemou, E. (2025) · Neurodiversity · doi:10.1177/27546330251385325 · Cited by 14
Martinho, D., Sobreiro, P., Domingues, A., Martinho, F. I. F., & Nogueira, N. F. R. (2026) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare14030287 · Cited by 14
Decolonising the ivory tower: confronting systemic barriers and epistemic injustice in academia
Ball, C. (2026) · International Journal of Inclusive Education · doi:10.1080/13603116.2025.2612119 · Cited by 14
Sethy, M. (2026) · AI & Society · doi:10.1007/s00146-026-02936-8 · Cited by 18
The Epistemic Goods of Higher Education
Kotzee, B. (2020) · Philosophical Inquiry in Education · doi:10.7202/1070737ar · Cited by 14
The Epistemic Value of Partisanship
Cerovac, I. (2019) · Croatian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.5840/croatjphil20191917 · Cited by 14
Wrongful ways to raise the epistemic standard
Grindrod, J. (2020) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2020.39 · Cited by 14
Epistemic Degradation and Testimonial Injustice
Pynn, G. (2021) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198833659.003.0007 · Cited by 14
Implicit Bias and Epistemic Oppression in Confronting Racism
Holroyd, J., & Puddifoot, K. (2022) · Journal of the American Philosophical Association · doi:10.1017/apa.2021.12 · Cited by 14
Reflections on Neurofeminism and Intersectionality Using Insights From Psychology
Duchesne, A., & Kaiser, A. (2021) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2021.684412 · Cited by 17
van Elswyk, P. (2022) · Noûs · doi:10.1111/nous.12411 · Cited by 16
We're Here, We're … Queer? On the Enduring Harms of Bisexual Erasure
Stewart, H. (2021) · Dialogue · doi:10.1017/s0012217321000287 · Cited by 14
Whose diversity? Race, space and the European city
Beebeejaun, Y. (2022) · Journal of Urban Affairs · doi:10.1080/07352166.2022.2075269 · Cited by 14
Weidmann‐Hügle, T., & Monteverde, S. (2022) · HEC Forum · doi:10.1007/s10730-022-09494-8 · Cited by 14
Song, Y. (2022) · Applied Linguistics Review · doi:10.1515/applirev-2022-0140 · Cited by 14
Lovibond, S. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192856166.001.0001 · Cited by 14
Intra-Group Epistemic Injustice
Tobi, A. (2023) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2023.2182653 · Cited by 14
Epistemisk urettferdighet og motstand i livet til familier med barn med nedsatt funksjonsevne
van den Breemer, R. (2022) · doi:10.23865/noasp.167.ch1 · Cited by 15
Toward an expressive account of disrespect
Bratu, C. (2023) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2023.2211431 · Cited by 14
Carrigan, C. M. (2023) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/14883.001.0001 · Cited by 15
Palmer, C. G., Tanner, J., Akanmu, J., Alamirew, T., Bamutaze, Y., Banadda, N., Cleaver, F., Faye, S., Kabenge, I., Kane, A., et al. (2023) · River Research and Applications · doi:10.1002/rra.4178 · Cited by 14
Valoyes-Chávez, L., Andrade-Molina, M., & Montecino, A. (2023) · ZDM · doi:10.1007/s11858-023-01512-4 · Cited by 16
Arancio, J. (2023) · Environmental Science & Policy · doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2023.103576 · Cited by 14
Matiki, D. S., Chibambo, M. I., & Divala, J. J. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2023.1243573 · Cited by 14
Schubert, K. (2023) · Constellations · doi:10.1111/1467-8675.12715 · Cited by 8
Hysterically y-ours : Reclaiming academic writing as a hysterical practice
Kaasila‐Pakanen, A., & Mandalaki, E. (2023) · Organization · doi:10.1177/13505084231198436 · Cited by 16
Lara‐Steidel, H., & Thompson, W. C. (2023) · Journal of Philosophy of Education · doi:10.1093/jopedu/qhad069 · Cited by 14
Teuscher, D., Thissen, L., Horstman, K., & Meershoek, A. (2023) · Journal of Safety Research · doi:10.1016/j.jsr.2023.10.012 · Cited by 14
van Doorn, M. (2023) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2023.2289137 · Cited by 17
Machine learning in healthcare and the methodological priority of epistemology over ethics
Grote, T. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2312207 · Cited by 14
McLean, K. C. (2024) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197764640.001.0001 · Cited by 16
Davies, A., O’Leary, S., Prioletta, J., Shay, B., Bryan, M. K., Neustifter, O., & Abawi, Z. (2024) · Children & Society · doi:10.1111/chso.12843 · Cited by 14
Roennfeldt, H., Hill, N., Byrne, L., & Hamilton, B. E. (2024) · Health Expectations · doi:10.1111/hex.14045 · Cited by 14
Peters, A.-C., Larsson, D. G. J., Laxminarayan, R., & Munthe, C. (2024) · Global Health Action · doi:10.1080/16549716.2024.2343318 · Cited by 14
Ma, W., & Valton, V. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00762-8 · Cited by 18
Epistemic Injustice and Ideal Social Media: Enhancing X for Inclusive Global Engagement
Chavanayarn, S. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10070-7 · Cited by 14
“Divisive” Education Legislation in the Midwest: A Critical Epistemic Policy Analysis
Rodriguez, G., Chase, S., Tanchuk, N., & Gebhart, N. (2025) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/08959048241263844 · Cited by 14
Hamann, R., Nilsson, W. O., Drimie, S., & Freeth, R. (2024) · Strategic Organization · doi:10.1177/14761270241279132 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
