The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing
Abstract
Justice is one of the oldest and most central themes of philosophy, but sometimes we would do well to focus instead on injustice. In epistemology, the very idea that there is a first-order ethical dimension to our epistemic practices — the idea that there is such a thing as epistemic justice — remains obscure until we adjust the philosophical lens so that we see through to the negative space that is epistemic injustice. This book argues that there is a distinctively epistemic genus of injustice, in which someone is wronged specifically in their capacity as a knower, wronged therefore in a capacity essential to human value. The book identifies two forms of epistemic injustice: testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice. In doing so, it charts the ethical dimension of two fundamental epistemic practices: gaining knowledge by being told and making sense of our social experiences. As the account unfolds, the book travels through a range of philosophical problems. Thus, the book finds an analysis of social power; an account of prejudicial stereotypes; a characterization of two hybrid intellectual-ethical virtues; a revised account of the State of Nature used in genealogical explanations of the concept of knowledge; a discussion of objectification and ‘silencing’; and a framework for a virtue epistemological account of testimony. The book reveals epistemic injustice as a potent yet largely silent dimension of discrimination, analyses the wrong it perpetrates, and constructs two hybrid ethical-intellectual virtues of epistemic justice which aim to forestall it.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Epistemic forms of exclusion and injustice are of course politically relevant and impact democracy.”
From Democracy, epistemic agency, and AI: political epistemology in times of artificial intelligence (2023) · cites this paper as [20]
In the citing paper
“Indigenous knowledge undervalued in formal accreditation and rankings.”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker (2007)
In the citing paper
“Epistemic justice frameworks emphasize the moral imperative of ensuring that Indigenous scholars and institutions are afforded credibility and interpretive recognition, allowing for the meaningful inclusion of alternative knowledge systems (Fricker, 2007; Ajmani et al., 2024).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The marginalization of Indigenous epistemologies represents not only a structural inequity but also an epistemic injustice, encompassing both testimonial and hermeneutical dimensions, which undermines the visibility, credibility, and legitimacy of Indigenous scholars and institutions (Fricker, 2007; Duria, 2025).”
From Whose Knowledge Counts? Western Accreditation, University Rankings, and the Marginalization of Indigenous Institutions (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“show how algorithmic profiling can prevent individuals from accessing and meaningfully interpreting important aspects of their experiences (Fricker, 2007; Medina, 2017; Pohlhaus, 2017).”
From Algorithmic profiling as a source of hermeneutical injustice (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice, by contrast, concerns the interpretive conditions under which experience becomes intelligible: it occurs when a gap in collective interpretive resources places someone at an unfair disadvantage in making sense of their social experience, and thus in making themselves understood within shared discourse (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Fricker's framework begins from a simple but far-reaching claim, namely that credibility is not merely a cognitive estimate but also a moral relation, because to treat another as unworthy of belief on grounds that track social prejudice is to deny them a form of respect owed to rational agency (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Testimonial injustice, on this account, arises when the hearer's reception of a speaker's word is corrupted by identity prejudice, such that the speaker is assigned a credibility deficit not because the reasons are weak, but because the person is socially marked as less authoritative (ibid.).”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“The injustice becomes visible when this displacement interacts with testimonial injustice, understood as the assignment of credibility deficits that track prejudice or status hierarchies rather than reasons [10].”
From Hallucination as epistemic pollution: epistemic injustice and credibility in futures-oriented science education (2026) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“This exploration has great potential and it suggests, for example, that contemporary concerns with epistemic trust in political communication (Dahlgren, 2018) pay insufficient attention to issues of social power and to the idea that 'social disadvantage can produce unjust epistemic disadvantage' (Fricker, 2007, p. 2).”
From Epistemic injustice and education in the digital age: Introduction (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Arguably, these women experience what Miranda Fricker (2007) calls a 'hermeneutical injustice', that is, an inability to make sense of their own experiences due to marginalization from the collective framework of understanding-in particular, I claim, due to a color-blind ideology that centers White experience and ignores racial dynamics salient from other points of view.”
From Why Yellow Fever Isn't Flattering: A Case Against Racial Fetishes (2016) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“The foundational insight of this literature is that trust must be dynamically calibrated against a source's reliability, the stakes of the claim and the availability of independent verification.”
From Beyond prompt literacy: Towards a critical epistemological framework for artificial intelligence literacy in higher education (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“They seemed to have prospective concerns for what philosopher Miranda Fricker calls ‘hermeneutical injustice’”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker warns that hermeneutical injustice can leave a person ‘deeply troubled, confused and isolated’ (ibid:151).”
From Is it Still Ok to be Ok? Mental Health Labels as a Campus Technology (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Perceived credibility is an important source of epistemic power (Archer et al., 2020; Fricker, 2007);”
From The epistemic power of the police (2024) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“As for dimensions, this can take place in a relationship between two knowers (interpersonal), or entire classes of knowers (systemic), while being an exception (incidental) or pertaining to the organization of society (structural).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Miranda Fricker's characterization of epistemic injustice as encompassing testimonial injustice and hermeneutical injustice will be taken as starting points”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“In Fricker's major work Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing, she distinguishes two kinds of epistemic injustice.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Its 'background condition', hermeneutical marginalization, precedes the 'eruption' of hermeneutical injustice itself.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Like testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice can have an equally structural dimension.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“The testimonial injustices that are mainly of interest to the political philosopher are those which are systematic: structural patterns of prejudice that lead the credibility of a social group (e.g., women, immigrants, elderly people) to be structurally doubted [11], pp.21; 28).”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“Hermeneutical injustice can thus occur in societies where some social groups' experiences are structurally marginalized, that is: where an inequality exists in how their experiences are made intelligible to society as a whole, or when the means the society presents as dominant are inadequate for rendering sensible what one lives through.”
From A taxonomy of epistemic injustice in the context of AI and the case for generative hermeneutical erasure (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
In the citing paper
“This, in brief, is the injustice that occurs when some significant area of a person's social experience--that is, an area of social experience that it is in their interests to grasp clearly--is subject to failures of collective understanding, owing to the prior exclusion of certain groups from the social practices that determine our shared conceptual and terminological resources.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Fricker notes that we shape our shared hermeneutical resources through participation in practices of social meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“These practices are often conducted in ways that exclude or subordinate members of certain social groups; the sites where concepts, terms, and narratives are developed and disseminated--sites like journalism, politics, law, academia, or medicine-tend to be dominated by those with greater social power (2007 : 148).”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“it misrepresents the systematic ways in which men can struggle to develop and convey adequate understandings of some of their gendered experiences”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“at the same time it dilutes the concept of hermeneutical marginalization, making the concept so expansive as to include members of groups who do not face structural barriers to sites of public meaning-making.”
From Agency and authority: A differentiated model of hermeneutical power (2025) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007
In the citing paper
“Epistemic injustice scholarship shows that power affects who is heard as a knower and what interpretive resources are available for making sense of experience (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Pohlhaus, 2012).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“The epistemic injustice literature shows why collective sense-making matters for experiences that are difficult to name within dominant categories (Fricker, 2007;Medina, 2013;Milano & Prunkl, 2025).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“Formal opportunities to speak do not guarantee fair interpretive uptake (Dotson, 2011;Fricker, 2007).”
From Hermeneutic Sovereignty under Generative AI: A Humanities Framework for Protecting Human Meaning-Making from Interpretive Foreclosure (2026) · cites this paper as Fricker, 2007
In the citing paper
“his attempt to undermine her own assessment of herself as a credible epistemic agent surely is an attempt to wrong her ' speci fi cally in her capacity as a knower ' , and so is an epistemic injustice in Miranda Fricker ' s sense of this term (Fricker 2007, 20).”
From Epistemic dimensions of gaslighting: peer-disagreement, self-trust, and epistemic injustice (2023) · cites this paper as Fricker 2007, 20
Citations
Cites
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124 · Cited by 28,810
Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective
Haraway, D. (1988) · Feminist Studies · doi:10.2307/3178066 · Cited by 18,364
Searle, J. R. (1969) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139173438 · Cited by 11,718
Lukes, S. (1974) · Power · doi:10.1007/978-0-230-80257-5_2 · Cited by 6,654
On the psychology of prediction.
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1973) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0034747 · Cited by 6,202
Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/bf02322211 · Cited by 3,878
Lukes, S. (1974) · doi:10.1007/978-1-349-02248-9 · Cited by 3,382
Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980
Williams, B. (1981) · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · Cited by 3,068
Shapin, S. (1994) · University of Chicago Press eBooks · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226148847.001.0001 · Cited by 2,443
Zagzebski, L. T. (1996) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139174763 · Cited by 2,303
Research works printed but not linked: 62
- Alcoff,, 2000, Women of Color and Philosophy
- Aristotle, 1976, The Ethics of Aristotle: The Nicomachean Ethics
- Bartky,, 1990, Femininity and Domination: Studies in the Phenomenology of Oppression
- Broadie,, 1991, Ethics with Aristotle
- Brownmiller,, 1990, In Our Time: Memoir of a Revolution
- Craig,, 1990, Knowledge and the State of Nature: An Essay in Conceptual Synthesis
- Driver,, 2003, Moral and Epistemic Virtues
- 1980, Michel Foucault; Power/Knowledge; Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972–1977
- 1982, Michel Foucault: Beyond Structuralism and Hermeneutics
- Second‐hand Knowledge, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research
- 2000, Morality, Reflection, and Ideology
- 2000, The Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy
- 2003, The Cambridge Companion to Simone de Beauvoir
- Gatens,, 1996, Imaginary Bodies: Ethics, Power and Corporeality
- Gifford,, 1960, Elizabethan Lyrics
- Gilligan,, 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
- Goldie,, 2000, The Emotions: A Philosophical Exploration
- Green,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Hartsock,, 1998, The Feminist Standpoint Revisited and Other Essays
- Haslanger,, 1993, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- 1995, Ontology and Social Construction, Philosophical Topics: Feminist Perspectives on Language, Knowledge, and Reality
- Hobbes,, 1991, Leviathan
- Hornsby,, 1995, The Problem of Pornography
- 1975, A Treatise of Human Nature
- Jaggar,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations in Feminist Philosophy
- James,, 2002, Visible Women: Essays on Feminist Legal Theory and Political Philosophy
- 2002, A Mind of One's Own: Feminist Essays on Reason and Objectivity
- Jussim,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- Langton,, 1998, Censorship and Silencing: Practices of Cultural Regulation
- Lee,, 1960, To Kill a Mockingbird
- Leyens,, 1994, Stereotypes and Social Cognition
- Lovibond,, 1983, Realism and Imagination in Ethics
- 2002, Ethical Formation
- MacIntyre,, 1981, After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory
- Macrae,, 1996, Stereotypes and Stereotyping
- McDowell,, 1994, Mind and World
- McEwan,, 1998, Enduring Love
- Minghella,, 2000, The Talented Mr Ripley—Based on Patricia Highsmith's Novel
- 1993, Epistemic Virtue and Doxastic Responsibility
- Murdoch,, 1970, The Sovereignty of Good
- Nagel,, 1979, Mortal Questions
- Nisbett,, 1980, Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgement
- Nussbaum,, 1990, Love's Knowledge: Essays on Philosophy and Literature
- 1999, Sex and Social Justice
- 2003, Upheavals of Thought: The Intelligence of the Emotions
- 1992, The Cambridge Companion to Kant
- 1970, Inquiry into the Human Mind
- Ruddick,, 1990, Maternal Thinking: Towards a Politics of Peace
- Shklar,, 1990, The Faces of Injustice
- Spelman,, 1989, Women, Knowledge, and Reality: Explorations In Feminist Philosophy
- Stangor,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Steele,, 2000, Stereotypes and Prejudice: Essential Readings
- Taylor,, 1982, Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases
- Wartenberg,, 1992, Rethinking Power
- 2001, Knowledge
- White,, 1983, A Boy's Own Story
- Williams,, 1972, Morality: An Introduction to Ethics
- 1981, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, 10.1017/cbo9781139165860 · DOI · Paper page
- 1993, Shame and Necessity
- 2002, Truth and Truthfulness: An Essay in Genealogy
- Williamson,, 2000, Knowledge and its Limits
- Young,, 1992, Rethinking Power
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 1,801–1,900 of 12,257
Davies, A. (2023) · Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood · doi:10.1177/14639491231155555 · Cited by 16
Avoiding failure in academia: strategies from non-Western early career researchers in the UK
Khanijou, R., & Zakariah, A. (2023) · Journal of Marketing Management · doi:10.1080/0267257x.2023.2208597 · Cited by 16
Advancing feminist relationality in childhood studies
Bodén, L., & Joelsson, T. (2023) · Childhood · doi:10.1177/09075682231199363 · Cited by 20
Pluralist Ethnobiology: Between Philosophical Reflection and Transdisciplinary Action
Delgado, A. N., Ludwig, D., & El-Hani, C. N. (2023) · Journal of Ethnobiology · doi:10.1177/02780771231194774 · Cited by 16
Sarkadi, A., Thell, M., Fängström, K., Dahlberg, A., Fäldt, A. E., Pérez‐Aronsson, A., Warner, G., & Eriksson, M. (2023) · Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10567-023-00453-4 · Cited by 16
Barnawi, O. Z., & R’boul, H. (2023) · Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1093/applin/amad047 · Cited by 16
Modelling Scientific Communities
O’Connor, C. (2023) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009359535 · Cited by 16
On epistemic freedom and epistemic injustice
Landström, K. (2024) · Inquiry · doi:10.1080/0020174x.2024.2323561 · Cited by 20
Dockum, R., & Green, C. M. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197755303.003.0006 · Cited by 16
da Silva, A. A., da Silva, I. F. K., & Westerholt, R. (2024) · Habitat International · doi:10.1016/j.habitatint.2024.103040 · Cited by 18
Lam, V., & Rousselot, Y. (2024) · European Journal for Philosophy of Science · doi:10.1007/s13194-024-00579-4 · Cited by 16
Antipsychotic Discontinuation through the Lens of Epistemic Injustice
Speyer, H., Eplov, L. F., & Roe, D. (2024) · Community Mental Health Journal · doi:10.1007/s10597-024-01274-7 · Cited by 16
Unravelling epistemic injustice in medical education: The case of the underperforming learner
Luong, V., Ajjawi, R., Burm, S., Olson, R. E., & MacLeod, A. (2024) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.15410 · Cited by 16
Feminist Philosophy of Science
Bueter, A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108956055 · Cited by 17
Ethical implications of defining longstanding anorexia nervosa
Voswinkel, M. M., Hanegraaff, S. M., Mares, S. H. W., Wezenberg, E., van Delden, J. J. M., & Elburg, A. A. V. (2024) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-024-01040-w · Cited by 16
Pinfield, S. (2024) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781032679259 · Cited by 19
Parada, F. J., Grasso‐Cladera, A., Rossi, A., Soto‐Icaza, P., Arenas‐Pérez, M., & Errázuriz, M. C. (2024) · European Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1111/ejn.16463 · Cited by 16
Trust, entrusting and the role of trustworthiness for adult survivors of child sexual abuse
Alyce, S., Taggart, D., & Turton, J. (2024) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2024.2390366 · Cited by 16
Synthetic Media Detection, the Wheel, and the Burden of Proof
Harris, K. R. (2024) · Philosophy & Technology · doi:10.1007/s13347-024-00821-0 · Cited by 16
Ramsey, L., Sheard, L., Waring, J. J., McHugh, S., Simms‐Ellis, R., Louch, G., Ludwin, K., & O'Hara, J. K. (2025) · Frontiers in Health Services · doi:10.3389/frhs.2024.1473256 · Cited by 16
Gelly, M. A., Atgé-Delbays, S., & Sansfaçon, A. P. (2025) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-024-01079-z · Cited by 16
Rethinking Gender/Sex Identity
Fausto‐Sterling, A. (2025) · American Journal of Human Biology · doi:10.1002/ajhb.70044 · Cited by 16
The Construction of Epistemic Normativity
Hannon, M., & Woodard, E. (2025) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.70010 · Cited by 16
The rights and responsibilities of citizenship for service users: some terms and conditions apply
Hamer, H. P., & Finlayson, M. L. (2015) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.12258 · Cited by 16
Epistemic Privilege and Expertise in the Context of Meta-debate
Linker, M. (2013) · Argumentation · doi:10.1007/s10503-013-9299-6 · Cited by 16
Beyond Inadvertent Ventriloquism: Caring Virtues for Anti‐paternalist Development Practice
Khader, S. J. (2011) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/j.1527-2001.2011.01167.x · Cited by 16
Clinical Decision-Making, Gender Bias, Virtue Epistemology, and Quality Healthcare
Marcum, J. A. (2015) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-015-9343-2 · Cited by 17
Epistemic Injustice and Children’s Well-Being
Schües, C. (2016) · Philosophy and politics · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-27389-1_10 · Cited by 16
Roberts-Gregory, F., & Hawthorne, T. L. (2016) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.09.016 · Cited by 17
Contested evidence: a Dutch reimbursement decision taken to court
Moes, F., Houwaart, E. S., Delnoij, D. M. J., & Horstman, K. (2016) · Health Economics Policy and Law · doi:10.1017/s1744133116000281 · Cited by 16
Young bisexual people’s experiences of microaggression: Implications for social work
Legge, M. M., Flanders, C. E., & Robinson, M. (2017) · Social Work in Mental Health · doi:10.1080/15332985.2017.1357669 · Cited by 17
Empathic Knowledge: The Import of Empathy’s Social Epistemology
Campelia, G. D. (2017) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2017.1383528 · Cited by 19
High-conflict divorce involving children: parents’ meaning-making and agency
Treloar, R. (2018) · Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law · doi:10.1080/09649069.2018.1493652 · Cited by 16
Dismissive Incomprehension: A Use of Purported Ignorance to Undermine Others
Cull, M. J. (2019) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2019.1625982 · Cited by 16
Whose Knowledge? Epistemic Injustice and Challenges in Hearing Children`s' Voices
Klyve, G. P. (2019) · Voices A World Forum for Music Therapy · doi:10.15845/voices.v19i3.2834 · Cited by 16
Justice through higher education: Revisiting White Paper 3 of 1997
Kumalo, S. H. (2020) · Higher Education Quarterly · doi:10.1111/hequ.12253 · Cited by 16
Lazrus, H., Wilhelmi, O. V., Morss, R. E., Henderson, J., & Dietrich, A. S. (2020) · International Journal of Mass Emergencies & Disasters · doi:10.1177/028072702003800106 · Cited by 16
Adherence and the Moral Construction of the Self: A Narrative Analysis of Anticoagulant Medication
Hawking, M. K. D., Robson, J. P., Taylor, S. J., & Swinglehurst, D. (2020) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732320951772 · Cited by 18
Knudson‐Martin, C., Kim, L., Gibbs, E., & Harmon, R. (2021) · Family Process · doi:10.1111/famp.12635 · Cited by 16
Chikoko, V. (2021) · South African Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.20853/35-1-4420 · Cited by 16
Daly, T. P., Houot, M., Barberousse, A., Petit, A., & Epelbaum, S. (2021) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease Reports · doi:10.3233/adr-210030 · Cited by 16
Rowlands, J., & Cook, E. A. (2021) · Journal of Family Violence · doi:10.1007/s10896-021-00309-x · Cited by 16
Beyond empowerment: student self-assessment as a form of resistance
Nieminen, J. H. (2021) · British Journal of Sociology of Education · doi:10.1080/01425692.2021.1993787 · Cited by 16
Catala, A. (2022) · Journal of Social Philosophy · doi:10.1111/josp.12465 · Cited by 16
Blue Justice in Three Governance Orders
Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2022) · MARE publication series · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-89624-9_2 · Cited by 16
Destrooper, T. (2022) · Journal of Human Rights · doi:10.1080/14754835.2022.2042220 · Cited by 16
Battaly, H. D. (2010) · Metaphilosophy · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9973.2009.01633.x · Cited by 16
Are there limits to scientists’ obligations to seek and engage dissenters?
Intemann, K. K., & de Melo‐Martín, I. (2014) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-014-0414-5 · Cited by 16
When rights collide: land grabbing, force and injustice in Uganda
Murphy, S. P., Carmody, P., & Okawakol, J. (2017) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2016.1259616 · Cited by 16
In Search of Tanzania: Are Effective Epistemic Practices Sufficient for Just Epistemic Practices?
Dotson, K. (2008) · The Southern Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1111/j.2041-6962.2008.tb00153.x · Cited by 16
Race and Religion in the Political Problematization of the American Muslim
Akhtar, I. S. (2011) · PS Political Science & Politics · doi:10.1017/s1049096511001272 · Cited by 16
Baghramian, M. (2019) · Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume · doi:10.1093/arisup/akz013 · Cited by 16
Persuasion And Epistemic Paternalism
McKenna, R. (2020) · Rowman & Littlefield Publishers eBooks · doi:10.5040/9798881810580.ch-006 · Cited by 16
Gender, Neoliberalism, and Corporatized Higher Education
Burke, P. J. (2020) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119257639.ch4 · Cited by 16
Introduction: Scaffolding Bad - Varieties of Situated Cognitive Harm
Spurrett, D., Colombetti, G., & Sutton, J. D. (2025) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-025-10167-7 · Cited by 16
Zachry, C. E., & Jayawickreme, E. (2022) · Lifelong learning book series · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-15290-0_4 · Cited by 15
Culture, Partisanship, and Signaling: The Social Nature of Political Belief Systems
Williams, D., & Miyazono, K. (2023) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2023.2274412 · Cited by 15
What is Philosophy of the Geosciences?
Ohnesorge, M., & Watkins, A. (2024) · Philosophy Compass · doi:10.1111/phc3.12962 · Cited by 15
Epistemic (in)justice, social identity and the Black Box problem in patient care
Khan, M., & Ewuoso, C. (2024) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-024-10194-y · Cited by 15
Kaeslin, I. (2024) · Topoi · doi:10.1007/s11245-024-10040-z · Cited by 15
Ademolu, E. (2024) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-024-01314-x · Cited by 15
Hall, J. W., van Wijck, F., Kroll, T., & Bassil‐Morozow, H. (2024) · Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences · doi:10.3389/fresc.2024.1477414 · Cited by 15
Critically Unpacking the Concept of Equity for Open Science
Bezuidenhout, L. M. (2025) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2025.2475460 · Cited by 15
Kellner, E. (2025) · Energy Research & Social Science · doi:10.1016/j.erss.2025.104097 · Cited by 15
Estadieu, L., Klauer, K. C., Voßkuhle, A., & Thomaschke, R. (2025) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.70073 · Cited by 15
Fatima, S. (2013) · Hypatia · doi:10.1111/hypa.12020 · Cited by 15
Pedagogies Of Intellectual Equality for Connecting with Non-Western Theories
Singh, M. J. (2012) · SensePublishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-6091-894-0_13 · Cited by 15
Pornography's Divine Command? Response to Judith Butler
Langton, R. (2009) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199247066.003.0006 · Cited by 15
What we owe each other, epistemologically speaking: ethico-political values in social epistemology
Goldberg, S. C. (2018) · Synthese · doi:10.1007/s11229-018-01928-6 · Cited by 16
“Clinician Knows Best”? Injustices in the Medicalization of Mental Illness
Gosselin, A. (2019) · Feminist Philosophy Quarterly · doi:10.5206/fpq/2019.2.7285 · Cited by 18
The Failure of Judgment: Disgust in Arendt's Theory of Political Judgment
Aavitsland, V. L. (2019) · The Journal of Speculative Philosophy · doi:10.5325/jspecphil.33.3.0537 · Cited by 15
Does Nationhood Promote Egalitarian Justice?
Holtug, N. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198842545.003.0005 · Cited by 16
Fra hverdagspraksis til strukturell urettferdighet
Fjørtoft, K. (2020) · Tidsskrift for kjønnsforskning · doi:10.18261/issn.1891-1781-2020-01-04 · Cited by 15
Tang, J. K., & Andriamanalina, N. (2020) · Utah State University Press eBooks · doi:10.7330/9781607329589.c008 · Cited by 15
Lees, S. S., Marchant, M., Selestine, V., Mshana, G. H., Kapiga, S., & Harvey, S. E. (2020) · Culture Health & Sexuality · doi:10.1080/13691058.2020.1779347 · Cited by 18
Missing links between intercultural education and anthropogenic climate change?
Børhaug, F. B. (2021) · Intercultural Education · doi:10.1080/14675986.2021.1889984 · Cited by 15
The Limits of the Rights to Free Thought and Expression
Emerick, B. (2021) · Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal · doi:10.1353/ken.2021.0009 · Cited by 15
Interpersonal trust in children's testimonial learning
Koenig, M. A., Li, P. H., & McMyler, B. (2021) · Mind & Language · doi:10.1111/mila.12361 · Cited by 19
Proof Paradoxes, Agency, and Stereotyping
Webster, A. K. (2021) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12191 · Cited by 15
A Truth-minimalist Reading of Foucault
Buekens, F. (2021) · Le foucaldien · doi:10.16995/lefou.7989 · Cited by 15
Johnson, C. R. (2020) · International Journal of Philosophical Studies · doi:10.1080/09672559.2020.1796030 · Cited by 15
How to Undo (and Redo) Words with Facts: A Semio-enactivist Approach to Law, Space and Experience
Ricca, M. (2022) · International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique · doi:10.1007/s11196-022-09912-7 · Cited by 15
Making Sense of Shame in Response to Racism
Webster, A. K. (2021) · Canadian Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.1017/can.2021.41 · Cited by 15
Akonta: Examining the epistemology and ontology of Made in Africa Evaluation
Frehiwot, M. (2022) · African Evaluation Journal · doi:10.4102/aej.v10i1.615 · Cited by 15
Millar, E., Melles, S., Klug, J. L., & Rees, T. (2022) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2022.2112888 · Cited by 15
Jenkin, Z. (2022) · Mind · doi:10.1093/mind/fzac030 · Cited by 16
Outlaw epistemologies: Resisting the viciousness of country music's settler ignorance
Meissner, S. N., & Huebner, B. (2022) · Philosophical Issues · doi:10.1111/phis.12229 · Cited by 17
Testimonial Injustice: The Facts of the Matter
Arcila-Valenzuela, M., & Páez, A. (2022) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-022-00662-w · Cited by 17
Stones, A., & Pearce, J. (2022) · Journal of Religious Education · doi:10.1007/s40839-022-00187-5 · Cited by 15
On the Uses and Abuses of Celebrity Epistemic Power
Archer, A., Alfano, M., & Dennis, M. (2022) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691728.2022.2153351 · Cited by 19
Global excellence in rheumatology in Latin America: The case of systemic lupus erythematosus
Ugarte-Gil, M. F., Fuentes-Silva, Y., Pimentel-Quiroz, V. R., Pons‐Estel, G., Quintana, R., Pons‐Estel, B. A., & Alarcón, G. S. (2023) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.988191 · Cited by 15
Restricted participation: Drivers, experiences and implications of disability stigma in Ethiopia
Breffka, E., Jagoe, C., Murphy, S. P., & Tsegaw, B. B. (2023) · African Journal of Disability · doi:10.4102/ajod.v12i0.1085 · Cited by 15
Mehdi, N. (2023) · Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy · doi:10.3998/ergo.2281 · Cited by 15
van Anders, S. M., Schudson, Z. C., Beischel, W. J., & Chadwick, S. B. (2023) · Psychology of Sexual Orientation and Gender Diversity · doi:10.1037/sgd0000646 · Cited by 16
Barker, C., Ford, S. J. W., Eglinton, R., Quail, S., & Taggart, D. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1128451 · Cited by 15
Serota, K., Atkinson, M., & Buchman, D. Z. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Pain · doi:10.1080/24740527.2023.2231046 · Cited by 15
Research Outputs as Testimony & the APC as Testimonial Injustice in the Global South
Cox, E. (2023) · College & Research Libraries · doi:10.5860/crl.84.4.513 · Cited by 15
MacGill, B. (2023) · International Journal of Art & Design Education · doi:10.1111/jade.12479 · Cited by 18
First-person disavowals of digital phenotyping and epistemic injustice in psychiatry
Slack, S. K., & Barclay, L. (2023) · Medicine Health Care and Philosophy · doi:10.1007/s11019-023-10174-8 · Cited by 15
‘Taking knowledge on a journey’: Creating conditions for epistemic justice
Skelton, D., Coyne, B., Baron, B. M., & Ackermann, M.-R. B. (2023) · Action Research · doi:10.1177/14767503231205235 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Fricker, M.
- Affiliations
- University of London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Fricker, Miranda
- ORCID
- Fricker, Miranda
- Publisher
- Oxford University PressOxford
- Published
- 2007-06-01
- OpenAlex
- W4252633962
- Cited by
- 9,198
- References
- 41
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2488 · 2025: 1853 · 2024: 1152 · 2023: 800 · 2022: 627 · 2021: 593 · 2020: 547 · 2019: 291 · 2018: 244 · 2017: 160 · 2016: 105 · 2015: 79 · 2014: 61 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 28.81
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Feminist Epistemology and Gender Studies
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Philosophical Ethics and Theory
- Keywords
- epistemic injustice, testimonial injustice, hermeneutical injustice, epistemic justice, social power, intellectual virtues, moral virtues, state of nature, genealogy of knowledge, objectification, silencing, discrimination, human values
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
