Cited by 143Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatmentsNeuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 55 of the 58 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender Differences in Alzheimer Disease: Brain Atrophy, Histopathology Burden, and Cognition

Open access

Abstract

Multiple studies suggest that females are affected by Alzheimer disease (AD) more severely and more frequently than males. Other studies have failed to confirm this and the issue remains controversial. Difficulties include differences in study methods and male versus female life expectancy. Another element of uncertainty is that the majority of studies have lacked neuropathological confirmation of the AD diagnosis. We compared clinical and pathological AD severity in 1028 deceased subjects with full neuropathological examinations. The age of dementia onset did not differ by gender but females were more likely to proceed to very severe clinical and pathological disease, with significantly higher proportions having a Mini-Mental State Examination score of 5 or less and Braak stage VI neurofibrillary degeneration. Median neuritic plaque densities were similar in females and males with AD but females had significantly greater tangle density scores. In addition, we found that AD-control brain weight differences were significantly greater for females, even after adjustment for age, disease duration, and comorbid conditions. These findings suggest that when they are affected by AD, females progress more often to severe cognitive dysfunction, due to more severe neurofibrillary degeneration, and greater loss of brain parenchyma.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/jnen/nlw047

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

FIGURE 1 Distribution of neurofibrillary degeneration severity by Braak stage. A higher proportion of females (black) were classified as having the highest (stage VI) Braak neurofibrillary stage (**p < 0.001). A higher proportion of males (gray) were classified as having the lowest (stage I) nonzero stage (*p < 0.05).
FIGURE 1 Distribution of neurofibrillary degeneration severity by Braak stage. A higher proportion of females (black) were classified as having the highest (stage VI) Braak neurofibrillary stage (**p < 0.001). A higher proportion of males (gray) were classified as having the lowest (stage I) nonzero stage (*p < 0.05).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
FIGURE 2 Brain weights in males and females, subdivided by having Alzheimer disease (AD) or no dementia, by age. The differences between AD and control brain weights, within females and males, are maintained in a fairly uniform way across different ages. There is no suggestion of an increasing gap between AD and controls with increasing age, as might be expected if there were an AD-aging synergy acting upon brain atrophy.
FIGURE 2 Brain weights in males and females, subdivided by having Alzheimer disease (AD) or no dementia, by age. The differences between AD and control brain weights, within females and males, are maintained in a fairly uniform way across different ages. There is no suggestion of an increasing gap between AD and controls with increasing age, as might be expected if there were an AD-aging synergy acting upon brain atrophy.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
FIGURE 3 Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores distribution. A higher proportion of females (black) had very severe cognitive impairment as defined by MMSE scores of 5 or less (*p < 0.05). All other paired comparisons are not significantly different.
FIGURE 3 Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores distribution. A higher proportion of females (black) had very severe cognitive impairment as defined by MMSE scores of 5 or less (*p < 0.05). All other paired comparisons are not significantly different.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Gallyas, 1981, An argyrophil III method for the demonstration of fibrous neuroglia, Acta Morphol Acad Sci Hung, 29, 185
  2. Hyman, 1997, Consensus recommendations for the postmortem diagnosis of Alzheimer disease from the National Institute on Aging and the Reagan Institute Working Group on diagnostic criteria for the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer disease, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 56, 1095, 10.1097/00005072-199710000-00002 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 143

Metadata

Authors
Filon, J. R., Intorcia, A. J., Sue, L. I., Vazquez Arreola, E., Wilson, J., Davis, K. J., Sabbagh, M. N., Belden, C. M., Caselli, R. J., Adler, C. H., Woodruff, B. K., Rapscak, S. Z., Ahern, G. L., Burke, A. D., Jacobson, S., Shill, H. A., Driver-Dunckley, E., Chen, K., Reiman, E. M., Beach, T. G., & Serrano, G. E.
Affiliations
University of Arizona (US)
Corresponding author
Serrano, Geidy E.
Venue
Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology
Published
2016-06-11
Volume
75
Issue
8
Pages
748-754
ISSN
  • 0022-3069 (ISSN-L)
  • 1554-6578
OpenAlex
W2418237732
Cited by
143
References
58
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuropathology & Experimental Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • NIH
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (U24 NS072026)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30 AG19610)
  • Arizona Department of Health Services (211002)
  • Arizona Biomedical Research Commission (4001, 0011, 05-901, 1001)
  • Michael J. Fox Foundation for Parkinson's Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
Keywords
Alzheimer's disease, sex differences, brain atrophy, neurofibrillary tangles, Braak stages, neuritic plaques, cognitive impairment, dementia severity, neuropathology, brain weight, Mini-Mental State Examination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review