Cited by 46,209Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesFractal and DNA sequence analysisRNA and protein synthesis mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability

Open access
Katoh, K., Standley, D. M.·2013·Molecular Biology and Evolution

Abstract

We report a major update of the MAFFT multiple sequence alignment program. This version has several new features, including options for adding unaligned sequences into an existing alignment, adjustment of direction in nucleotide alignment, constrained alignment and parallel processing, which were implemented after the previous major update. This report shows actual examples to explain how these features work, alone and in combination. Some examples incorrectly aligned by MAFFT are also shown to clarify its limitations. We discuss how to avoid misalignments, and our ongoing efforts to overcome such limitations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/molbev/mst010

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Fig. 1. Assumptions on the phylogenetic relationship in different options of MAFFT. (A) mafft-profile, (B) ––addprofile, (C), misuse of mafft-profile, and (D) ––add or ––addprofile.
Fig. 1. Assumptions on the phylogenetic relationship in different options of MAFFT. (A) mafft-profile, (B) ––addprofile, (C), misuse of mafft-profile, and (D) ––add or ––addprofile.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2. ITS alignments by different options of MAFFT, displayed on Jalview (Waterhouse et al. 2009). (A, B) Incorrect alignments by the FFT-NS-2 and L-INS-i algorithms, respectively. (C) An incorrect alignment by mafft-profile. The full-length sequences were aligned with the L-INS-i algorithm and then each new sequence was separately added to the full-length alignment, using mafft-profile. (D) Reasonable alignment by a two-step strategy. The ––6merpair ––addfragments option was used at the second step. (E) Reordered version of D; sequences are ordered such that similar sequences are placed closely. All calculations were performed using 16 cores on a Linux PC with 2.67 GHz Intel Xeon E7-8837/256 GB RAM.
Fig. 2. ITS alignments by different options of MAFFT, displayed on Jalview (Waterhouse et al. 2009). (A, B) Incorrect alignments by the FFT-NS-2 and L-INS-i algorithms, respectively. (C) An incorrect alignment by mafft-profile. The full-length sequences were aligned with the L-INS-i algorithm and then each new sequence was separately added to the full-length alignment, using mafft-profile. (D) Reasonable alignment by a two-step strategy. The ––6merpair ––addfragments option was used at the second step. (E) Reordered version of D; sequences are ordered such that similar sequences are placed closely. All calculations were performed using 16 cores on a Linux PC with 2.67 GHz Intel Xeon E7-8837/256 GB RAM.CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 3. (A) A part of output of the ––treeout option showing the phylogenetic positions of new sequences (new#) in the tree of the existing alignment (backbone#), estimated before the alignment calculation. This file also shows a Newick format tree of the existing alignment (not shown in this figure). For each new sequence, the nearest sequence in the existing alignment (nearest sequence), approximate distance to the nearest sequence (approximate distance), and the members of the sister group (sister group) are shown. (B) Graphical representation of (A).
Fig. 3. (A) A part of output of the ––treeout option showing the phylogenetic positions of new sequences (new#) in the tree of the existing alignment (backbone#), estimated before the alignment calculation. This file also shows a Newick format tree of the existing alignment (not shown in this figure). For each new sequence, the nearest sequence in the existing alignment (nearest sequence), approximate distance to the nearest sequence (approximate distance), and the members of the sister group (sister group) are shown. (B) Graphical representation of (A).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 4. (A) Superposition of 3v33, 2qip, and 1taq structures visualized by PyMOL (Schrödinger LLC 2010). (B) MAFFT-L-INS-i sequence alignment displayed on jalview (Waterhouse et al. 2009). Misaligned Ds are highlighed in red. (C) Structure-informed MSA with correctly aligned Ds; Alpha helices and beta sheets are shown in blue and yellow, respectively, in (A–C).
Fig. 4. (A) Superposition of 3v33, 2qip, and 1taq structures visualized by PyMOL (Schrödinger LLC 2010). (B) MAFFT-L-INS-i sequence alignment displayed on jalview (Waterhouse et al. 2009). Misaligned Ds are highlighed in red. (C) Structure-informed MSA with correctly aligned Ds; Alpha helices and beta sheets are shown in blue and yellow, respectively, in (A–C).CC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 49 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. 2012, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing. Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing, 17, 247

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Katoh, K., & Standley, D. M.
Affiliations
Immunology Frontier Research Center, The University of Osaka (JP)
Corresponding author
Katoh, K.
Venue
Molecular Biology and Evolution
Published
2013-01-16
Volume
30
Issue
4
Pages
772-780
ISSN
  • 0737-4038 (ISSN-L)
  • 1537-1719
OpenAlex
W2160378127
Cited by
46,209
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 5174 · 2025: 5549 · 2024: 5538 · 2023: 4824 · 2022: 5005 · 2021: 5291 · 2020: 4177 · 2019: 3143 · 2018: 2383 · 2017: 1916 · 2016: 1503 · 2015: 981 · 2014: 574 · 2013: 112
FWCI
473.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Molecular Biology and Evolution (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology
  • Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology
  • Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
Keywords
MAFFT, multiple sequence alignment, DNA sequence alignment, parallel computing, alignment errors, alignment software
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Amino Acid Sequence, Base Sequence, DNA, Fungal, DNA, Ribosomal, Fungi, Humans, Models, Genetic, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Ribonucleases, RNA, Bacterial, Software, Transcription Factors, Sequence Alignment, Protein Structure, Tertiary, DNA, Ribosomal Spacer, Ribosome Subunits, Small, Bacterial, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review