Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 5,995

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

2001 SCCM/ESICM/ACCP/ATS/SIS International Sepsis Definitions Conference

Levy, Mitchell M., Fink, Mitchell P., Marshall, John C., Abraham, Edward, Angus, Derek, Cook, Deborah, Cohen, Jonathan, Opal, Steven M., Vincent, Jean-Louis, Ramsay, Graham·2003·Critical Care Medicine
DOI 10.1097/01.ccm.0000050454.01978.3b
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In 1991, the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) and the Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) convened a "Consensus Conference," the goals of which were "to provide a conceptual and a practical framework to define the systemic inflammatory response to infection, which is a progressive injurious process that falls under the generalized term 'sepsis' and includes sepsis-associated organ dysfunction as well." The general definitions introduced as a result of that conference have been widely used in practice and have served as the foundation for inclusion criteria for numerous clinical trials of therapeutic interventions. Nevertheless, there has been an impetus from experts in the field to modify these definitions to reflect our current understanding of the pathophysiology of these syndromes. DESIGN: Several North American and European intensive care societies agreed to revisit the definitions for sepsis and related conditions. This conference was sponsored by the SCCM, The European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), The American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), the American Thoracic Society (ATS), and the Surgical Infection Society (SIS). METHODS: The conference was attended by 29 participants from Europe and North America. In advance of the conference, five subgroups were formed to evaluate the following areas: signs and symptoms of sepsis, cell markers, cytokines, microbiologic data, and coagulation parameters. The subgroups corresponded electronically before the conference and met in person during the conference. A spokesperson for each group presented the deliberation of each group to all conference participants during a plenary session. A writing committee was formed at the conference and developed the current article based on executive summary documents generated by each group and the plenary group presentations. The present article serves as the final report of the 2001 International Sepsis Definitions Conference. CONCLUSION: This document reflects a process whereby a group of experts and opinion leaders revisited the 1992 sepsis guidelines and found that apart from expanding the list of signs and symptoms of sepsis to reflect clinical bedside experience, no evidence exists to support a change to the definitions. This lack of evidence serves to underscore the challenge still present in diagnosing sepsis in 2003 for clinicians and researchers and also provides the basis for introducing PIRO as a hypothesis-generating model for future research.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/01.ccm.0000050454.01978.3b

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 1992, Crit Care Med, 20, 864, 10.1097/00003246-199206000-00025 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Marshall, 2000, Shock, 14, 586, 10.1097/00024382-200014060-00002 · DOI
  3. Vincent, 1997, Crit Care Med, 25, 372, 10.1097/00003246-199702000-00029 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Ramsay, 2003, Crit Care Med, 31, 1, 10.1097/00003246-200301000-00001 · DOI
  5. Falahati, 1999, Am Heart J, 137, 332, 10.1053/hj.1999.v137.92412 · DOI
  6. Antman, 2002, Am Heart J, 133, 596, 10.1016/S0002-8703(97)70156-X · DOI
  7. Puleo, 2002, N Engl J Med, 331, 561, 10.1056/NEJM199409013310901 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 2000, J Am Coll Cardiol, 36, 959, 10.1016/S0735-1097(00)00804-4 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Taniguchi, 1999, Crit Care Med, 27, 1262, 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00005 · DOI
  10. Ueda, 1999, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 160, 132, 10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9810006 · DOI
  11. Stoiser, 1998, Eur J Clin Invest, 28, 672, 10.1046/j.1365-2362.1998.00326.x · DOI
  12. Hietaranta, 2002, Pancreas, 18, 385, 10.1097/00006676-199905000-00009 · DOI
  13. Takala, 1999, Clin Sci Lond, 96, 287, 10.1042/cs0960287 · DOI
  14. Sablotzki, 2001, Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 49, 273, 10.1055/s-2001-17803 · DOI
  15. Harbarth, 2001, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 164, 396, 10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2009052 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Duflo, 2002, Anesthesiology, 96, 74, 10.1097/00000542-200201000-00018 · DOI
  17. Angus, 2001, Crit Care Med, 29, 1303, 10.1097/00003246-200107000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Marshall, 1995, Crit Care Med, 23, 1638, 10.1097/00003246-199510000-00007 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Ferreira, 2002, JAMA, 286, 1754, 10.1001/jama.286.14.1754 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Wilkinson, 1986, Crit Care Med, 14, 271, 10.1097/00003246-198604000-00002 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Proulx, 1996, Chest, 109, 1033, 10.1378/chest.109.4.1033 · DOI
  22. Doughty, 1996, Crit Care Med, 109, 1033
  23. Leteutre, 1997, Med Decis Making, &NA;, 1
  24. Carcillo, 2002, Crit Care Med, 30, 1, 10.1097/00003246-200206000-00040 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Denoix, 1946, Bull Inst Natl Hyg, 1, 70
  26. Gospodarowicz, 1998, Cancer Prev Cont, 2, 262
  27. Renaud, 2001, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 163, 1584, 10.1164/ajrccm.163.7.9912080 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Opal, 1999, Crit Care Med, 27, 1608, 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00039 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Ziegler, 1991, N Engl J Med, 324, 429, 10.1056/NEJM199102143240701 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Wortel, 1992, J Infect Dis, 166, 1367, 10.1093/infdis/166.6.1367 · DOI
  31. McCloskey, 1994, Ann Intern Med, 121, 1, 10.7326/0003-4819-121-1-199407010-00001 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Hausfater, 2002, Clin Infect Dis, 34, 895, 10.1086/339198 · DOI
  33. Damas, 1992, Ann Surg, 215, 356, 10.1097/00000658-199204000-00009 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Panacek, 1999, Sepsis, 3, 65, 10.1023/A:1009878726176 · DOI
  35. Bernard, 2001, N Engl J Med, 344, 699, 10.1056/NEJM200103083441001 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Annane, 2002, JAMA, 288, 862, 10.1001/jama.288.7.862 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Marshall, 2001, Crit Care Med, 28, A46
  38. Cook, 2001, Crit Care Med, 29, 2046, 10.1097/00003246-200111000-00002 · DOI

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Levy, M. M., Fink, M. P., Marshall, J. C., Abraham, E., Angus, D., Cook, D., Cohen, J., Opal, S. M., Vincent, J.-L., & Ramsay, G.
Venue
Critical Care Medicine
Publisher
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)
Published
2003-04
Volume
31
Issue
4
Pages
1250-1256
ISSN
0090-3493 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1097/01.ccm.0000050454.01978.3b
OpenAlex
W2087203965
Cited by
5,995
References
2
FWCI
86.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.