CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 558

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Before and below ‘theory of mind’: embodied simulation and the neural correlates of social cognition

Gallese, Vittorio·2007·Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
DOI 10.1098/rstb.2006.2002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The automatic translation of folk psychology into newly formed brain modules specifically dedicated to mind-reading and other social cognitive abilities should be carefully scrutinized. Searching for the brain location of intentions, beliefs and desires— as such —might not be the best epistemic strategy to disclose what social cognition really is. The results of neurocognitive research suggest that in the brain of primates, mirror neurons, and more generally the premotor system, play a major role in several aspects of social cognition, from action and intention understanding to language processing. This evidence is presented and discussed within the theoretical frame of an embodied simulation account of social cognition. Embodied simulation and the mirror neuron system underpinning it provide the means to share communicative intentions, meaning and reference, thus granting the parity requirements of social communication.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1098/rstb.2006.2002

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 77

  1. 10.1017/S0140525X99002149 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.05.007 · DOI
  3. Bickerton D Language and human behavior. 1995 Seattle WA:University of Washington Press.
  4. 10.1146/annurev.neuro.25.112701.142946 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.3758/BF03196865 · DOI
  6. Bruner J Actual minds possible worlds. 1986 Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bruner J Acts of meaning. 1990 Cambridge MA:Harvard University Press.
  8. Buccino G, 2001, Action observation activates premotor and parietal areas in a somatotopic manner: an fMRI study, Eur. J. Neurosci, 13, 400, 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2001.01385.x · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1162/089892904322755601 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00181-3 · DOI · Paper page
  11. 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2005.02.020 · DOI
  12. 10.1093/cercor/bhi007 · DOI
  13. Chambers C.G, 2004, Actions and affordances in syntactic ambiguity resolution, J. Mem. Lang, 30, 687
  14. Corballis M.C From hand to mouth: the origins of language. 2002 Princeton NJ:Princeton University Press. · DOI
  15. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.01.007 · DOI
  16. 10.1046/j.0953-816x.2001.01874.x · DOI
  17. 10.1016/S0093-934X(03)00355-9 · DOI · Paper page
  18. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02601.x · DOI · Paper page
  19. 10.1016/j.bbr.2005.01.009 · DOI
  20. Fodor J Concepts. 1998 Oxford UK:Oxford University Press.
  21. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.013 · DOI
  22. Gallese V, 2001, The “shared manifold” hypothesis: from mirror neurons to empathy, J. Conscious. Stud, 8, 33
  23. 10.1098/rstb.2002.1234 · DOI
  24. 10.1098/rstb.2003.1315 · DOI
  25. 10.1007/s11097-005-4737-z · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gallese V. 2005 “Being like me”: self-other identity mirror neurons and empathy. In Perspectives on imitation: from cognitive neuroscience to social science vol. 1 (eds S. Hurley & N. Chater) pp.101–118. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  27. 10.1016/j.brainres.2006.01.054 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S1364-6613(98)01262-5 · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.1080/02643290442000310 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1162/biot.2006.1.1.25 · DOI
  31. 10.1093/brain/119.2.593 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Gallese V, 2002, Attention and performance XIX, 247
  33. 10.1046/j.1460-9568.2003.02438.x · DOI
  34. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.02.004 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1152/jn.2001.86.4.1685 · DOI
  36. 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2004.03104.x · DOI
  37. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.03.002 · DOI
  38. 10.1162/jocn.2006.18.7.1059 · DOI
  39. 10.1017/S0140525X97000010 · DOI
  40. 10.3758/BF03196313 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1006/jmla.2000.2714 · DOI
  42. 10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01397-2 · DOI
  43. 10.1017/S0140525X00071235 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.tics.2005.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  45. 10.1002/hbm.10157 · DOI
  46. 10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00838-9 · DOI
  47. 10.1126/science.1089401 · DOI
  48. 10.1111/j.0268-1064.2004.00272.x · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.tics.2004.11.003 · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.1070311 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Lakoff G Women fire and dangerous things: what categories reveal about the mind. 1987 Chicago IL; London UK:University of Chicago Press. · DOI
  52. Lakoff G& Johnson M Metaphors we live by. 1980 Chicago IL; London UK:University of Chicago Press.
  53. 10.1111/1467-7687.00161 · DOI
  54. 10.3758/BF03206329 · DOI
  55. McGuigan F.J, 1989, Patterns of covert speech behavior and phonetic coding, Pavlovian J. Biol. Sci, 24, 19, 10.1007/BF02964527 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/nn1077 · DOI
  57. 10.1152/physiol.00043.2004 · DOI
  58. 10.1126/science.1107621 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1098/rsbl.2004.0291 · DOI
  60. 10.1016/j.cognition.2004.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Pulvermüeller F The neuroscience of language. 2002 Cambridge UK:Cambridge University Press.
  62. 10.1097/00001756-200008210-00036 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00356-2 · DOI
  64. Pylyshyn Z.W Computation and cognition: toward a foundation for cognitive science. 1984 Cambridge MA:MIT Press. · DOI
  65. 10.1016/S0166-2236(98)01260-0 · DOI · Paper page
  66. 10.1016/0926-6410(95)00038-0 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1126/science.277.5323.190 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1038/35090060 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1169-04.2004 · DOI
  70. 10.1126/science.1099136 · DOI
  71. 10.1006/nimg.2002.1201 · DOI
  72. 10.1162/0898929053124965 · DOI
  73. 10.1017/S0140525X05000129 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Umiltà M.A, 2001, “I know what you are doing”: a neurophysiological study, Neuron, 32, 91
  75. 10.1162/0898929041502616 · DOI
  76. 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00316-0 · DOI
  77. 10.1097/00001756-199611040-00077 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 558

Metadata

Authors
Gallese, V.
Affiliations
Department of Neuroscience, Section of Physiology, University of Parma43100 Parma, Italy
Venue
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Publisher
The Royal Society
Published
2007-02-13
Volume
362
Issue
1480
Pages
659-669
ISSN
  • 0962-8436
  • 1471-2970
DOI
10.1098/rstb.2006.2002
Cited by
558
References
18
Language
en
Licence
royalsociety.org/journals/ethics-policies/data-sharing-mining/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review