Cited by 695Early Childhood Education and DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild and Adolescent Health

Building a New Biodevelopmental Framework to Guide the Future of Early Childhood Policy

Shonkoff, Jack P·2010·Child Development

Abstract

Four decades of early childhood policy and program development indicate that evidence-based interventions can improve life outcomes, and dramatic advances in the biological and behavioral sciences now provide an opportunity to augment those impacts. The challenge of reducing the gap between what we know and what we do to promote the healthy development of young children is to view current best practices as a starting point and to leverage scientific concepts to inspire fresh thinking. This article offers an integrated, biodevelopmental framework to promote greater understanding of the antecedents and causal pathways that lead to disparities in health, learning, and behavior in order to inform the development of enhanced theories of change to drive innovation in policies and programs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01399.x

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A bio-developmental framework is a plausible theory to explain emotion dysregulation, due to biological changes within the body, however, none of the included studies provided empirical evidence for these changes across generations and their causal impact or association with violence perpetration.

    “For example, a bio-developmental framework (Shonkoff, 2010) is a plausible theory to explain emotion dysregulation, due to biological changes within the body, however, none of the included studies provided empirical evidence for these changes across generations and their causal impact or association with violence perpetration.”
  • The most vulnerable families are often least impacted by existing intervention strategies.

    “In particular, novel approaches are needed to reach the most vulnerable families often least impacted by existing strategies [102].”
  • High-quality early family experiences can partially mitigate the impact of adversity on neurocognitive development.

    “Adversity within low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) poses severe threats to neurocognitive development, which can be partially mitigated by high-quality early family experiences.”
  • High-quality early family experiences may partially buffer the impact of wider adversity on brain development, thus protecting the cognitive skills that will be essential for later academic achievement.

    “High-quality early family experiences may partially buffer the impact of wider adversity on brain development, thus protecting the cognitive skills that will be essential for later academic achievement (Britto et al. 2017;Shonkoff 2010).”
  • Stressful life events produce the most 'toxic' effect on children's stress system, raising the risk of subsequent development of stress-related mental difficulties, when experienced in the absence of a stable and supporting environment.

    “stressful life events produce the most ‘toxic’ effect on children’s stress system, raising the risk of subsequent development of stress-related mental difficulties, when experienced in the absence of a stable and supporting environment [34]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shonkoff, J. P.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Shonkoff, Jack P
Venue
Child Development
Published
2010-01-01
Volume
81
Issue
1
Pages
357-367
ISSN
  • 0009-3920 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8624
OpenAlex
W2089418395
Cited by
695
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 50 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 58 · 2018: 51 · 2017: 50 · 2016: 54 · 2015: 59 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 45 · 2012: 30
FWCI
155.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Child Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Child and Adolescent Health
Keywords
early childhood education policy, early childhood programs, evidence-based interventions, health disparities, learning disparities, behavioral effects, theory of change, causal pathways, policy innovation
MeSH terms
Child, Child Development, Health Policy, Health Promotion, Humans, Psychological Theory, Practice Guidelines as Topic, Health Status Disparities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review