Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 172

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Relationship of Individual Capabilities and Environmental Support with Different Facets of Designers' Innovative Behavior

Open access
Birdi, Kamal, Leach, Desmond, Magadley, Wissam·2016·Journal of Product Innovation Management

Abstract

Theoretical perspectives on employee creativity have tended to focus on an individual's capability to generate original and potentially useful ideas, whereas definitions of innovation also include the process of putting those new ideas into practice. This field study therefore set out to test how theoretically distinct types of individual knowledge and skills are related to different aspects of employees' innovative behavior in terms of both their new idea generation and idea implementation. Using a sample of design engineers (n = 169) in a multinational engineering company, measures were taken of different aspects of innovative work behavior (patent submission, real‐time idea submission, idea implementation) and a range of individual capabilities (creativity‐relevant skills, job expertise, operational skills, contextual knowledge, and motivation) and environmental features (job control, departmental support for innovation). Analyses showed that creativity‐relevant skills were positively related to indices of idea generation but not to idea implementation. Instead, employees' job expertise, operational skills, and motivation to innovate demonstrated a stronger role in idea implementation. In terms of environmental factors, job control showed no positive relationship with innovative work behavior while departmental support for innovation was related to employees' idea generation but not idea implementation. The theoretical perspective that correlates of idea generation differ in certain aspects to those for idea implementation are confirmed by the study. Practical implications for organizations wishing to improve their innovativeness are discussed in terms of tailored training, development, motivational, and environmental interventions designed to improve the capabilities of individuals to engage in all parts of the innovation process.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/jpim.12250

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Research works printed but not linked: 78

  1. 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Amabile T., 1988, Research in organizational behaviour, 123
  3. Amabile T., 2007, Handbook of organizational creativity, 33
  4. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1080/13594329608414840 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1348/096317900167029 · DOI · Paper page
  7. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1177/002188638502100104 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/0030-5073(82)90233-1 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1080/10400419009534331 · DOI
  11. 10.1108/02683940810869042 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00686.x · DOI
  13. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01073.x · DOI
  14. 10.5465/amr.2008.34421969 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1037/a0012994 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1002/job.684 · DOI · Paper page
  17. 10.1348/096317906X110250 · DOI
  18. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00649.x · DOI
  19. Collins M., 1999, Handbook of creativity, 297
  20. 10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00469.x · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.3758/BF03196731 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1080/00140139.2010.542833 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.2307/3069412 · doi:10.2307/3069412 · Paper page
  25. 10.1177/1523422305274527 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1002/job.543 · DOI · Paper page
  27. 10.1207/s15326934crj1204_8 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00964.x · DOI · Paper page
  29. 10.5465/amr.2008.31193235 · DOI · Paper page
  30. George J. M., 2007, The academy of management annals, 439
  31. 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
  32. 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525934 · DOI · Paper page
  33. 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1002 · DOI
  34. 10.1111/peps.12024 · DOI · Paper page
  35. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01269.x · DOI
  36. 10.1037/a0018556 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1080/1359432X.2010.524412 · DOI
  39. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753 · Paper page
  40. 10.1348/096317905X25823 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1007/s10869-009-9094-4 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1108/02621711011039141 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.5465/amj.2006.22798171 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00552.x · DOI
  45. 10.1348/096317903321208871 · DOI · Paper page
  46. 10.1348/096317907X202464 · DOI · Paper page
  47. 10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1002/jocb.003 · DOI · Paper page
  50. 10.2307/256657 · DOI · Paper page
  51. 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1002/9780470696392.ch4 · DOI
  53. 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.225 · DOI · Paper page
  54. Potočnik K., Recent and new developments in recruitment and selection
  55. 10.1111/caim.12045 · DOI
  56. 10.1002/jocb.31 · DOI
  57. 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.83 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00985.x · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1108/00483480810891655 · DOI
  60. 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1207/s15326934crj1103_4 · DOI · Paper page
  62. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1287/orsc.1070.0292 · DOI · Paper page
  64. 10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677 · DOI · Paper page
  65. 10.1007/s10869-009-9147-8 · DOI
  66. Tabachnik B., 2001, Using multivariate statistics
  67. 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1177/1059601104267607 · doi:10.1177/1059601104267607
  69. 10.1348/096317908X398377 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1348/096317909X479394 · DOI
  71. Van de Ven A., 1989, Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies
  72. Vroom V., 1964, Work and motivation
  73. Weisberg R., 1999, Handbook of creativity, 226
  74. West M., 1989, Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives, Social Behaviour, 4, 15
  75. 10.2307/258761 · DOI · Paper page
  76. 10.1207/s15326934crj1704_3 · DOI
  77. 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.413 · DOI · Paper page
  78. 10.2307/3069410 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W.
Venue
Journal of Product Innovation Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-11-03
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
19-35
ISSN
  • 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
  • 1540-5885
OpenAlex
W1596899567
Cited by
172
References
9
FWCI
7.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship of Individual Capabilities and Environmental Support with Different Facets of Designers' Innovative Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jpim.12250
The paper
Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2016). The Relationship of Individual Capabilities and Environmental Support with Different Facets of Designers' Innovative Behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12250

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.