The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Relationship of Individual Capabilities and Environmental Support with Different Facets of Designers' Innovative Behavior
Open accessAbstract
Theoretical perspectives on employee creativity have tended to focus on an individual's capability to generate original and potentially useful ideas, whereas definitions of innovation also include the process of putting those new ideas into practice. This field study therefore set out to test how theoretically distinct types of individual knowledge and skills are related to different aspects of employees' innovative behavior in terms of both their new idea generation and idea implementation. Using a sample of design engineers (n = 169) in a multinational engineering company, measures were taken of different aspects of innovative work behavior (patent submission, real‐time idea submission, idea implementation) and a range of individual capabilities (creativity‐relevant skills, job expertise, operational skills, contextual knowledge, and motivation) and environmental features (job control, departmental support for innovation). Analyses showed that creativity‐relevant skills were positively related to indices of idea generation but not to idea implementation. Instead, employees' job expertise, operational skills, and motivation to innovate demonstrated a stronger role in idea implementation. In terms of environmental factors, job control showed no positive relationship with innovative work behavior while departmental support for innovation was related to employees' idea generation but not idea implementation. The theoretical perspective that correlates of idea generation differ in certain aspects to those for idea implementation are confirmed by the study. Practical implications for organizations wishing to improve their innovativeness are discussed in terms of tailored training, development, motivational, and environmental interventions designed to improve the capabilities of individuals to engage in all parts of the innovation process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879 · Cited by 82,194
ASSESSING THE WORK ENVIRONMENT FOR CREATIVITY.
AMABILE, T. M., CONTI, R., COON, H., LAZENBY, J., & HERRON, M. (1996) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256995 · Cited by 6,029
The social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization.
Amabile, T. M. (1983) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · Cited by 4,034
Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206314527128 · Cited by 3,103
Measuring Innovative Work Behaviour
De Jong, J., & Den Hartog, D. (2010) · Creativity and Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00547.x · Cited by 1,644
The Effectiveness of Creativity Training: A Quantitative Review
Scott, G., Leritz, L. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2004) · Creativity Research Journal · doi:10.1080/10400410409534549 · Cited by 1,132
Perspectives on the Social Psychology of Creativity
Amabile, T. M., & Pillemer, J. (2012) · The Journal of Creative Behavior · doi:10.1002/jocb.001 · Cited by 619
Transformational Leadership, Conservation, and Creativity: Evidence From Korea
(2003) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/30040662 · Cited by 589
Enhancing the Benefits and Overcoming the Pitfalls of Goal Setting
LATHAM, G. P., & LOCKE, E. A. (2006) · Organizational Dynamics · doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2006.08.008 · Cited by 357
Research works printed but not linked: 78
- 10.1037/0021-9010.89.1.127 · DOI · Paper page
- Amabile T., 1988, Research in organizational behaviour, 123
- Amabile T., 2007, Handbook of organizational creativity, 33
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/13594329608414840 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317900167029 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.91.4.963 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/002188638502100104 · DOI
- 10.1016/0030-5073(82)90233-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/10400419009534331 · DOI
- 10.1108/02683940810869042 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2012.00686.x · DOI
- 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2007.tb01073.x · DOI
- 10.5465/amr.2008.34421969 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/a0012994 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.684 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317906X110250 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2012.00649.x · DOI
- Collins M., 1999, Handbook of creativity, 297
- 10.1207/s15326934crj0904_9 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00469.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3758/BF03196731 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00140139.2010.542833 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3069412 · doi:10.2307/3069412 · Paper page
- 10.1177/1523422305274527 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/job.543 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15326934crj1204_8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1540-5885.2012.00964.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amr.2008.31193235 · DOI · Paper page
- George J. M., 2007, The academy of management annals, 439
- 10.1037/0021-9010.86.3.513 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/AMJ.2007.25525934 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.1002 · DOI
- 10.1111/peps.12024 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/j.2162-6057.2006.tb01269.x · DOI
- 10.1037/a0018556 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.008 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1359432X.2010.524412 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753 · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.5.753 · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317905X25823 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10869-009-9094-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/02621711011039141 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.5465/amj.2006.22798171 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00552.x · DOI
- 10.1348/096317903321208871 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317907X202464 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15326934crj1601_12 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-8691.2007.00419.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/jocb.003 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/256657 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02007.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/9780470696392.ch4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.93.1.225 · DOI · Paper page
- Potočnik K., Recent and new developments in recruitment and selection
- 10.1111/caim.12045 · DOI
- 10.1002/jocb.31 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.91.1.83 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00985.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/00483480810891655 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141502 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15326934crj1103_4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.12.004 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1287/orsc.1070.0292 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0003-066X.51.7.677 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s10869-009-9147-8 · DOI
- Tabachnik B., 2001, Using multivariate statistics
- 10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00173.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1059601104267607 · doi:10.1177/1059601104267607
- 10.1348/096317908X398377 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1348/096317909X479394 · DOI
- Van de Ven A., 1989, Research on the management of innovation: The Minnesota studies
- Vroom V., 1964, Work and motivation
- Weisberg R., 1999, Handbook of creativity, 226
- West M., 1989, Innovation at work: Psychological perspectives, Social Behaviour, 4, 15
- 10.2307/258761 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15326934crj1704_3 · DOI
- 10.1037/0021-9010.88.3.413 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/3069410 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W.
- Venue
- Journal of Product Innovation Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2014-11-03
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 19-35
- ISSN
- 0737-6782 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-5885
- OpenAlex
- W1596899567
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 9
- FWCI
- 7.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- Funders
- Economic and Social Research Council
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Relationship of Individual Capabilities and Environmental Support with Different Facets of Designers' Innovative Behavior. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/jpim.12250
- The paper
- Birdi, K., Leach, D., & Magadley, W. (2016). The Relationship of Individual Capabilities and Environmental Support with Different Facets of Designers' Innovative Behavior. Journal of Product Innovation Management. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpim.12250
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.