Cited by 299Gastrointestinal motility and disordersGut microbiota and healthNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research

The microbiome is essential for normal gut intrinsic primary afferent neuron excitability in the mouse

McVey Neufeld, K. A., Mao, Y. K., Bienenstock, J., Foster, J. A., Kunze, W. A.·2013·Neurogastroenterology & Motility

Abstract

Background The role of intestinal microbiota in the development and function of host physiology is of high interest, especially with respect to the nervous system. While strong evidence has accrued that intestinal bacteria alter host nervous system function, mechanisms by which this occurs have remained elusive. For this reason, we have carried out experiments examining the electrophysiological properties of neurons in the myenteric plexus of the enteric nervous system (ENS) in germ-free (GF) mice compared with specific pathogen-free (SPF) control mice and adult germ-free mice that have been conventionalized (CONV-GF) with intestinal bacteria. Methods Segments of jejunum from 8 to 12 week old GF, SPF, and CONV-GF mice were dissected to expose the myenteric plexus. Intracellular recordings in current-clamp mode were made by impaling cells with sharp microelectrodes. Action potential (AP) shapes, firing thresholds, the number of APs fired at 2× threshold, and passive membrane characteristics were measured. Key results In GF mice, excitability was decreased in myenteric afterhyperpolarization (AH) neurons as measured by a lower resting membrane potential and by the number of APs generated at 2× threshold. The post AP slow afterhyperpolarization (sAHP) was prolonged for GF compared with SPF and CONV-GF animals. Passive membrane characteristics were also altered in GF mice by a decrease in input resistance. Conclusions & inferences Here, we report the novel finding that commensal…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/nmo.12049

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Germ-free status is accompanied by significant alterations in the electrophysiology and characteristic profile of after-hyperpolarization-type enteric neurons (intrinsic primary afferent neurons), reflected as decreased excitability and discharge.

    “GF status is accompanied by significant alterations in the electrophysiology and characteristic profile of after-hyperpolarization-type enteric neurons (intrinsic primary afferent neurons) reflected as decreased excitability and discharge (McVey Neufeld et al., 2013)”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as McVey Neufeld et al., 2013

  • GF animals have decreased basal neural excitability and altered intrinsic primary afferent neuron excitability compared to SPF and conventionally re-colonized GF controls.

    “as well as decreased basal neural excitability, as evidenced by an augmented post action potential, as well as altered intrinsic primary afferent neuron excitability, as measured in the form of an enhanced slow afterhyperpolarization, when compared to SPF and conventionally re-colonized GF control animals (McVey Neufeld et al., 2013).”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as McVey Neufeld et al., 2013

  • Network activity of host physiology in myenteric sensory neurons differs greatly in GF mice from conventional and SPF strains.

    “Furthermore, network activity of host physiology in myenteric sensory neurons differed greatly in GF mice from conventional and SPF strains in a study examining jejunum intracellular current-clamp recordings (McVey Neufeld et al., 2013), indicating a fundamental shift in synaptic efficacy in the absence of microbiota.”

    From The Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis (2019) · cites this paper as McVey Neufeld et al., 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McVey Neufeld, K. A., Mao, Y. K., Bienenstock, J., Foster, J. A., & Kunze, W. A.
Affiliations
St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton (CA)
Venue
Neurogastroenterology & Motility
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-11-27
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
183
ISSN
  • 1350-1925 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2982
OpenAlex
W1566099765
Cited by
299
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 23 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 33 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 14
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurogastroenterology & Motility (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Gastroenterology › Gastrointestinal motility and disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
Keywords
gut microbiota, enteric nervous system, myenteric plexus, primary afferent neurons, neuronal excitability, germ-free mice, conventionalization, slow afterhyperpolarization, action potential, input resistance, gut-brain axis, jejunum
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Germ-Free Life, Jejunum, Male, Membrane Potentials, Myenteric Plexus, Neurons, Afferent, Patch-Clamp Techniques, Mice, Metagenome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review