Cited by 573Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeural dynamics and brain functionMemory and Neural Mechanisms

Pyramidal cell communication within local networks in layer 2/3 of rat neocortex.

Open access
Holmgren, C., Harkany, T., Svennenfors, B., Zilberter, Y.·2003·The Journal of Physiology

Abstract

The extent to which neocortical pyramidal cells function as a local network is determined by the strength and probability of their connections. By mapping connections between pyramidal cells we show here that in a local network of about 600 pyramidal cells located within a cylindrical volume of 200 microm x 200 microm of neocortical layer 2/3, an individual pyramidal cell receives synaptic inputs from about 30 other pyramidal neurons, with the majority of EPSP amplitudes in the 0.2-1.0 mV range. The probability of connection decreased from 0.09 to 0.01 with intercell distance (over the range 25-200 microm). Within the same volume, local interneuron (fast-spiking non-accommodating interneuron, FS)-pyramidal cell connections were about 10 times more numerous, with the majority of connections being reciprocal. The probability of excitatory and inhibitory connections between pyramidal cells and FS interneurons decreased only slightly with distance, being in the range 0.5-0.75. Pyramidal cells in the local network received strong synaptic input during stimulation of afferent fibres in layers 1 and 6. Minimal-like stimulation of layer 1 or layer 6 inputs simultaneously induced postsynaptic potentials in connected pyramidal cells as well as in pyramidal-FS cell pairs. These inputs readily induced firing of pyramidal cells, although synaptically connected cells displayed different firing patterns. Unitary EPSPs in pyramidal-pyramidal cell pairs did not detectably alter cell firing. FS interneurons fire simultaneously with pyramidal cells. In pyramidal-FS cell pairs, both unitary EPSPs and IPSPs efficiently modulated cell firing patterns. We suggest that computation in the local network may proceed not only by direct pyramidal-pyramidal cell communication but also via local interneurons. With such a high degree of connectivity with surrounding pyramidal cells, local interneurons are ideally poised to both coordinate and expand the local pyramidal cell network via pyramidal-interneuron-pyramidal communication.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1113/jphysiol.2003.044784

Cites

48 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Horizontal, trans-columnar connections target other layer 2/3 pyramidal cells and correspond to the sequence memory circuits described above.

    “The horizontal, trans-columnar connections target other layer 2/3 pyramidal cells [52],[53] and correspond to the sequence memory circuits that were described above.”

    From Towards a mathematical theory of cortical micro-circuits (2009) · cites this paper as [53]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Kaiser KMM, Zilberter Y, Sakmann B. Dendritic Ca2+ influx at single synaptic contacts in bitufted interneurons of rat neocortex. J Physiol. 1999;518.P:144P. [Google Scholar]
  2. Parnavelas JG. Physiological properties of identified cortical neurons. In: Peters A, Jones EG, editors. Cerebral Cortex. Vol. 2. New York: Plenum Press; 1984. pp. 205–239. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmgren, C., Harkany, T., Svennenfors, B., & Zilberter, Y.
Affiliations
Karolinska Institutet (SE)
Venue
The Journal of Physiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-08-14
Volume
551
Issue
1
Pages
139-153
ISSN
0022-3751 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041601616
Cited by
573
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 24
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Physiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Keywords
pyramidal neurons, fast-spiking interneurons, synaptic connectivity, reciprocal connections, afferent input, postsynaptic potentials, neuronal firing patterns, rat neocortex
MeSH terms
Action Potentials, Afferent Pathways, Animals, Axons, Cell Communication, Dendrites, Electric Stimulation, Interneurons, Nerve Net, Synapses, Signal Transduction, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Pyramidal Cells, Neocortex, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Rats, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review