CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

From the field to the laboratory: Controlling DNA contamination in human ancient DNA research in the high-throughput sequencing era

Llamas, Bastien, Valverde, Guido, Fehren-Schmitz, Lars, Weyrich, Laura S, Cooper, Alan, Haak, Wolfgang·2017·STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research
DOI 10.1080/20548923.2016.1258824
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/20548923.2016.1258824

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • mtDNA analyses rely upon amplification of ultratrace amounts of extant mtDNA using PCR, making the approach more sensitive and more susceptible to contamination.

    “mtDNA analyses rely upon amplification of ultratrace amounts of extant mtDNA using the PCR, thereby making such an approach not only more sensitive but also more susceptible to contamination (45).”

    From Pre-Clovis occupation of the Americas identified by human fecal biomarkers in coprolites from Paisley Caves, Oregon (2020) · cites this paper as [45]

    The brief technical overview says PCR was traditionally used to amplify specific DNA targets in ancient-DNA research, and the “Contaminating human DNA” section calls PCR amplification a potent source of contamination. The paper does not say that mtDNA analyses rely on PCR amplification of ultratrace amounts of extant mtDNA, or that this makes mtDNA analysis more sensitive and more susceptible to contamination. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 115

  1. 10.1038/ng.2536 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.7761840 · DOI
  3. 10.1098/rspb.2012.1745 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1016/S0169-5347(97)01102-6 · DOI
  5. 10.1038/srep00074 · DOI
  6. 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.03.013 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/ajpa.21647 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nature13591 · DOI · Paper page
  9. 10.1038/nature10549 · DOI · Paper page
  10. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.017 · DOI
  11. 10.1073/pnas.0704665104 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1093/nar/gkp1163 · DOI · Paper page
  13. 10.1038/ncomms2656 · DOI
  14. Brothwell D. R., 2001, Handbook of Archaeological Science
  15. 10.1017/S0003598X0008100X · DOI
  16. 10.1126/science.1188046 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.07.003 · DOI
  18. 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_6 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/j.ajhg.2013.10.002 · DOI
  20. 10.1073/pnas.1405138111 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1371/journal.pone.0013042 · DOI
  22. 10.1126/science.1252619 · DOI
  23. 10.1126/science.289.5482.1139b · DOI
  24. 10.1038/srep11184 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.02.010 · DOI
  26. 10.1111/mec.12690 · DOI
  27. 10.1056/NEJMoa1308663 · DOI
  28. 10.1038/srep04245 · DOI
  29. 10.1093/molbev/msu074 · DOI
  30. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.06.015 · DOI
  31. 10.1371/journal.pone.0127141 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2008.03.005 · DOI
  33. 10.1126/science.aad2879 · DOI
  34. 10.1126/science.aaf3945 · DOI
  35. 10.1111/1755-0998.12470 · DOI
  36. 10.1101/gr.174201.114 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1371/journal.pone.0024161 · DOI
  38. 10.1016/S1473-3099(14)70002-7 · DOI
  39. 10.1016/j.tree.2005.07.005 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1126/science.1154116 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.jas.2004.12.008 · DOI
  42. 10.1038/emboj.2009.222 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  44. 10.1038/nature05336 · DOI
  45. 10.1016/j.cell.2008.06.021 · DOI
  46. 10.1073/pnas.0807592105 · DOI
  47. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0371 · DOI
  48. 10.1093/molbev/msm016 · DOI
  49. 10.1016/j.tim.2005.03.010 · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.7761839 · DOI
  51. 10.1007/s00239-006-0259-8 · DOI
  52. 10.1126/science.7761841 · DOI
  53. 10.1007/978-1-4612-4318-2 · DOI
  54. 10.1016/j.scijus.2013.06.001 · DOI
  55. 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_13 · DOI
  56. 10.1038/35072071 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1126/science.1218443 · DOI · Paper page
  58. 10.1126/science.1261188 · DOI
  59. 10.1016/j.forsciint.2004.11.017 · DOI
  60. 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_23 · DOI · Paper page
  61. 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.11.002 · DOI
  62. 10.1016/j.aanat.2011.03.008 · DOI
  63. 10.3390/genes1020227 · DOI
  64. 10.1186/s13323-015-0020-4 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_19 · DOI
  66. 10.2144/000114320 · DOI · Paper page
  67. 10.1016/j.cub.2009.11.068 · DOI · Paper page
  68. 10.1016/j.jas.2006.10.023 · DOI
  69. 10.1126/sciadv.1501385 · DOI · Paper page
  70. 10.1093/molbev/msm015 · DOI
  71. 10.1038/nature03959 · DOI · Paper page
  72. 10.1007/978-1-61779-516-9_14 · DOI
  73. 10.1002/ajpa.22417 · DOI
  74. 10.1126/science.1113485 · DOI
  75. 10.1101/gr.122747.111 · DOI
  76. Ou C. Y., 1991, Biotechniques, 10, 442
  77. 10.1073/pnas.86.6.1939 · DOI
  78. 10.1146/annurev.genet.37.110801.143214 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1111/1755-0998.12420 · DOI
  80. 10.1186/s13059-016-0918-z · DOI · Paper page
  81. Pilli E., 2013, Directly Excavated Ancient Human Skeletal Remains’, 8, e52524
  82. 10.1371/journal.pone.0129102 · DOI · Paper page
  83. 10.1016/S0531-5131(02)00624-6 · DOI
  84. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.01.037 · DOI · Paper page
  85. 10.1126/science.1260617 · DOI
  86. 10.1073/pnas.0610257104 · DOI · Paper page
  87. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005972 · DOI · Paper page
  88. 10.1002/ajpa.21594 · DOI
  89. 10.1590/S0074-02762006001000005 · DOI
  90. 10.1073/pnas.0503718102 · DOI
  91. 10.1093/molbev/msl047 · DOI
  92. 10.1073/pnas.1105107108 · DOI
  93. 10.1126/science.1238286 · DOI · Paper page
  94. 10.1038/srep11826 · DOI · Paper page
  95. 10.1371/journal.pone.0078575 · DOI · Paper page
  96. 10.1126/science.1216304 · DOI · Paper page
  97. 10.1073/pnas.1524306113 · DOI
  98. 10.1038/35071177 · DOI
  99. 10.1016/S0047-2484(03)00106-4 · DOI
  100. 10.1002/ajpa.21185 · DOI
  101. 10.1073/pnas.1511903112 · DOI · Paper page
  102. 10.1371/journal.pone.0051146 · DOI
  103. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003703 · DOI
  104. 10.1371/journal.pone.0055950 · DOI
  105. 10.1186/s12864-015-2241-6 · DOI
  106. 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70323-2 · DOI
  107. 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030175 · DOI
  108. 10.1038/srep07104 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1038/ng.2906 · DOI · Paper page
  110. 10.1098/rstb.2013.0376 · DOI
  111. 10.1016/j.jhevol.2014.10.016 · DOI
  112. 10.1098/rspb.2004.2813 · DOI · Paper page
  113. 10.1126/science.7973705 · DOI
  114. 10.1016/j.jas.2004.09.008 · DOI
  115. 10.1126/science.7605504 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Llamas, B., Valverde, G., Fehren-Schmitz, L., Weyrich, L. S., Cooper, A., & Haak, W.
Affiliations
  • Australian Centre for Ancient DNA, School of Biological Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia 5005, Australia
  • Department of Anthropology, University of California Santa Cruz, CA, 95064, USA
ORCID
Venue
STAR: Science & Technology of Archaeological Research
Publisher
Informa UK Limited
Published
2016-11-30
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
1-14
ISSN
2054-8923
DOI
10.1080/20548923.2016.1258824
Cited by
160
References
28
Language
en
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review