Cited by 125

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Ancient human parallel lineages within North America contributed to a coastal expansion

Scheib, C. L., Li, Hongjie, Desai, Tariq, Link, Vivian, Kendall, Christopher, Dewar, Genevieve, Griffith, Peter William, Mörseburg, Alexander, Johnson, John R., Potter, Amiee, Kerr, Susan L., Endicott, Phillip, Lindo, John, Haber, Marc, Xue, Yali, Tyler-Smith, Chris, Sandhu, Manjinder S., Lorenz, Joseph G., Randall, Tori D., Faltyskova, Zuzana, Pagani, Luca, Danecek, Petr, O’Connell, Tamsin C., Martz, Patricia, Boraas, Alan S., Byrd, Brian F., Leventhal, Alan, Cambra, Rosemary, Williamson, Ronald, Lesage, Louis, Holguin, Brian, Ygnacio-De Soto, Ernestine, Rosas, JohnTommy, Metspalu, Mait, Stock, Jay T., Manica, Andrea, Scally, Aylwyn, Wegmann, Daniel, Malhi, Ripan S., Kivisild, Toomas·2018·Science

Abstract

Founder effects in modern populations: The genomes of ancient humans can reveal patterns of early human migration (see the Perspective by Achilli et al. ). Iceland has a genetically distinct population, despite relatively recent settlement (∼1100 years ago). Ebenesersdóttir et al. examined the genomes of ancient Icelandic people, dating to near the colonization of Iceland, and compared them with modernday Icelandic populations. The ancient DNA revealed that the founders had Gaelic and Norse origins. Genetic drift since the initial settlement has left modern Icelanders with allele frequencies that are distinctive, although still skewed toward those of their Norse founders. Scheib et al. sequenced ancient genomes from the Channel Islands of California, USA, and Ontario, Canada. The ancient Ontario population was similar to other ancient North Americans, as well as to modern Algonquian-speaking Native Americans. In contrast, the California individuals were more like groups that now live in Mexico and South America. It appears that a genetic split and population isolation likely occurred during the Ice Age, but the peoples remixed at a later date. Science , this issue p. 1028 , p. 1024 ; see also p. 964

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.aar6851

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 69

  1. 10.1126/science.1153569 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.1137166 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1073/pnas.1420650112 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1126/science.1255832 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1038/nature11258 · DOI · Paper page
  6. 10.1073/pnas.1620410114 · DOI
  7. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1004530 · DOI
  8. 10.1038/nature14895 · DOI · Paper page
  9. J. R. Johnson T. W. Stafford Jr. H. O. Ajie D. P. Morris Arlington Springs Revisited. in Proceedings of the Fifth California Islands Symposium (Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 2002) pp. 541–545.
  10. J. R. Johnson, J. G. Lorenz, Genetics, Linguistics, and Prehistoric Migrations: An Analysis of California Indian Mitochondrial DNA Lineages. J. Calif. Gt. Basin Anthropol. 26, 33–64 (2006).
  11. 10.1101/gr.094052.109 · DOI · Paper page
  12. 10.1126/science.1188021 · DOI · Paper page
  13. S. L. Kerr G. M. Hawley Population Replacement on the Southern Channel Islands: New Evidence from San Nicolas Island. in Fifth California Islands Symposium D. R. Browne K. L. Mitchell H. W. Chaney Eds. (Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 1999) pp. 546–554.
  14. P. Martz Prehistoric Settlement and Subsistence on San Nicolas Island. in Proceedings of the Sixth California Islands Symposium (Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 2008) pp. 65–82.
  15. 10.1534/genetics.116.187567 · DOI
  16. S. Kerr thesis University of California Santa Barbara (2004).
  17. P. C. Orr “Return to San Nicolas” (Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History 1945) pp. 75–79.
  18. F. M. Reinman, S. J. Townsend, Six Burial Sites on San Nicolas Island. Archaeol. Surv. Annu. Rep. 2, 101–106 (1960).
  19. S. Valentin thesis California State University Los Angeles (2010).
  20. 10.2307/275539 · DOI
  21. R. Williamson, The Archaeological history of the Wendat to AD 1651: An overview. Ontario Archaeol. 94, 3–64 (2014).
  22. 10.1016/j.jas.2010.03.022 · DOI
  23. C. S. Speal, The social implications of Younge Complex mortuary ritual: A survey of post-mortem skeletal modifications from Riviere au Vase, Michigan. Archaeol. East. North Am. 34, 1–28 (2006).
  24. 10.1017/S0033822200033865 · DOI · Paper page
  25. 10.1017/S0033822200056344 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/S0278-4165(03)00037-0 · DOI
  27. 10.1017/S0033822200057878 · DOI
  28. 10.2458/azu_rc.57.18389 · DOI
  29. 10.1016/j.jas.2003.06.003 · DOI
  30. 10.1002/ajpa.1330710107 · DOI
  31. 10.2307/2694835 · DOI
  32. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  33. 10.1101/pdb.prot5448 · DOI
  34. 10.1371/journal.pone.0014004 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.cub.2012.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · DOI · Paper page
  37. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp352 · DOI · Paper page
  38. 10.1086/519795 · DOI · Paper page
  39. 10.1016/j.cub.2016.12.060 · DOI
  40. 10.1038/nature12323 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1016/j.jas.2013.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
  42. 10.1038/13779 · DOI · Paper page
  43. 10.1093/bib/bbs012 · DOI
  44. 10.1016/j.fsigss.2015.09.155 · DOI
  45. 10.1002/humu.21382 · DOI
  46. 10.1093/nar/gkw233 · DOI
  47. 10.1002/humu.22356 · DOI
  48. 10.1038/ncomms3928 · DOI
  49. 10.1101/gr.143198.112 · DOI
  50. 10.1101/gr.186684.114 · DOI
  51. 10.1126/science.1251688 · DOI · Paper page
  52. 10.1126/science.1153717 · DOI
  53. 10.1126/science.296.5566.261b · DOI
  54. 10.1038/nature25173 · DOI · Paper page
  55. A. S. Dyke A. Moore L. Robertson Deglaciation of North America Open File 1574 (Natural Resources Canada 2003). · DOI
  56. A. Dyke in Quaternary Glaciations—Extent and Chronology—Part II: North America (Elsevier vol. 2 2004) pp. 373–424. · DOI
  57. 10.1002/1099-1417(200005)15:4<409::AID-JQS539>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  58. 10.1093/nar/gks1092 · DOI · Paper page
  59. 10.1016/j.fsigen.2014.09.014 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/jhg.2016.26 · DOI
  61. 10.3378/027.085.0313 · DOI
  62. 10.1073/pnas.1321860111 · DOI
  63. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098076 · DOI
  64. 10.1038/nature09103 · DOI
  65. 10.1186/1471-2148-13-127 · DOI
  66. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1005068 · DOI
  67. 10.1126/science.1217849 · DOI
  68. 10.1093/molbev/msr221 · DOI
  69. 10.1038/ng.3559 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Scheib, C. L., Li, H., Desai, T., Link, V., Kendall, C., Dewar, G., Griffith, P. W., Mörseburg, A., Johnson, J. R., Potter, A., Kerr, S. L., Endicott, P., Lindo, J., Haber, M., Xue, Y., Tyler-Smith, C., Sandhu, M. S., Lorenz, J. G., Randall, T. D., Faltyskova, Z., Pagani, L., Danecek, P., O’Connell, T. C., Martz, P., Boraas, A. S., Byrd, B. F., Leventhal, A., Cambra, R., Williamson, R., Lesage, L., Holguin, B., Ygnacio-De Soto, E., Rosas, J., Metspalu, M., Stock, J. T., Manica, A., Scally, A., Wegmann, D., Malhi, R. S., & Kivisild, T.
Affiliations
  • Department of Archaeology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DZ, UK.
  • Department of Anthropology and Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
  • Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EH, UK.
  • Department of Biology, Université de Fribourg, Fribourg, Switzerland.
  • Department of Anthropology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario M5S 2S2, Canada.
  • Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA 93105, USA.
  • Department of Anthropology, Portland State University, Portland, OR 97232, USA.
  • Department of Anthropology, Modesto Junior College, Modesto, CA 95350, USA.
  • Department Hommes Natures Societies, Musée de l’Homme, Paris 75016, France.
  • Department of Anthropology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
  • Wellcome Sanger Institute, Wellcome Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SA, UK.
  • Department of Anthropology and Museum Studies, Central Washington University, Ellensburg, WA 98926, USA.
  • Department of Anthropology, San Diego City College, San Diego, CA 92101, USA.
  • Estonian Biocentre, Institute of Genomics, University of Tartu, Tartu 51010, Estonia.
  • Department of Anthropology, California State University, Los Angeles, CA 90032, USA.
  • Kenai Peninsula College, Soldotna, AK 99669, USA.
  • Far Western Anthropological Research Group Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA.
  • Muwekma Ohlone Tribe of the San Francisco Bay Area, P.O. Box 360791, Milpitas, CA 95036, USA.
  • Archaeological Services Inc., Toronto, Canada.
  • Huron-Wendat Nation, Canada.
  • Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA.
  • Barbareño Chumash, California Indian Advisory Committee, Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, Santa Barbara, CA 93105, USA.
  • Tongva Nation, CA, USA.
  • Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
Venue
Science
Published
2018-06
Volume
360
Issue
6392
Pages
1024-1027
ISSN
  • 0036-8075
  • 1095-9203
Cited by
125
References
25
Language
en
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (BCS-1518026, SMA-1620239)
  • Wellcome Trust (098051)
  • Economic and Social Research Council (RG75702)
  • Natural Environment Research Council (NF/2016/1/6)
  • European Research Council (098051, FP7-261213, FP7 - 617627, 647787)
  • European Regional Development Fund (2014-2020.4.01.16-0024, MOBTT53)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review