The DOI matches its Crossref record; 192 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 226 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology is advancing beyond algorithm development to integration into clinical practice. This review describes the current state of the field, with a specific focus on clinical integration. AI applications are structured according to cancer type and clinical domain, focusing on the four most common cancers and tasks of detection, diagnosis, and treatment. These applications encompass various data modalities, including imaging, genomics, and medical records. We conclude with a summary of existing challenges, evolving solutions, and potential future directions for the field. Significance: AI is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology, where several applications are maturing beyond research and development to direct clinical integration. This review summarizes the current state of the field through the lens of clinical translation along the clinical care continuum. Emerging areas are also highlighted, along with common challenges, evolving solutions, and potential future directions for the field.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 226 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology, where several applications are maturing beyond research and development to direct clinical integration.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“FDA-cleared AI algorithms have also been developed to aid in the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; DEN1700, RRID:SCR_012945) and breast ultrasound exams (K190442, K210670, P150043 RRID:SCR_012945).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DEN1700
- Not checked yetcites K190442
- Not checked yetcites K210670
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the use of AI for breast cancer detection in X-ray mammography is one of the most active areas of development and clinical translation.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A subsequent study presented an AI approach that encompasses both 2D and 3D mammography, with evidence of detecting breast cancer 1 to 2 years earlier than standard radiographic review for some cases (10).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Lotter, 2021, Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies have also examined the use of AI to predict future breast cancer risk.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A later study led by Google in 2020 garnered much attention in reporting evidence of expertlevel breast cancer detection by an AI system (9).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] McKinney, 2020, International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI is being heavily applied all along the cancer care continuum using different types of data (Fig. 2).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“An early catalyst in this space was the Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge, an open AI competition where groups were able to benchmark and compare different AI approaches (8).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Schaffter, 2020, Evaluation of combined artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to interpret screening mammograms, JAMA Netw Open source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Raciti and colleagues (60) reported on Paige Prostate Alpha, a commercial decision support system trained to detect prostate cancer from core-needle biopsies.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Raciti, 2020, Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies, Mod Pathol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the context of colorectal cancer screening, deep learning has been applied extensively to colonoscopy images and video.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Colorectal Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 82
- Probably not a substantial claim. 52
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A search of ClinicalTrials.gov of”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This includes the storage of patient data in electronic medical record (EMR) systems, the digitization of radiology and pathology imaging (3), and the increasing adoption of routine genomic profiling (4).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the review focuses on the four most common cancer types: breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal, accounting for 50% of all new cancer cases in 2023 (7).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER): cancer stat facts: common cancer sites
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, advances in deep learning (1) over the past decade have made it feasible to learn complex patterns directly from real-world data, making it the core driver of AI advances in and out of healthcare (2).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of mammography, there are now multiple commercial AI devices cleared by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Union (EU) that are designed to aid radiologists in breast cancer detection.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although not yet uniformly adopted across imaging providers or cancer hospitals, there are multiple FDAcleared and/or EU-certified commercial devices in the cancer detection domain and multiple reported clinical trials.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER DETECTION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are also multiple ongoing clinical trials evaluating the real-world effectiveness of such systems.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the Mirai system developed by Yala and colleagues ( 12) is designed to predict 5-year cancer risk directly from mammograms and has been retrospectively evaluated across multiple hospitals.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Yala, 2022, Multi-institutional validation of a mammography-based breast cancer risk model, J Clin Oncol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These data can be used to build and train AI models, and critically, the real-time availability of these data can enable individualized, clinically relevant AI predictions to further the goal of precision oncology (5).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Garraway, 2013, Precision oncology: an overview, J Clin Oncol source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI applications for these cancer types serve as a good representation of the current state of the field, especially as their prevalence facilitates large-scale data collection and encourages clinical application.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a longer-term, prospective clinical trial is now seeking to assess the connection between colonoscopy CADe systems and incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer after a 10-year follow-up period (25).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Colorectal Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Mori, 2022, Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“groups have reported on the use of deep learning for breast cancer diagnosis and subtyping from H&E slides (49)(50)(51), and quantifying other clinically relevant features such as mitotic cell counting (52,53).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Sui, 2021, A pyramid architecture-based deep learning framework for breast cancer detection, BioMed Res Int source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Sandbank, 2022, Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies, NPJ Breast Cancer source
- Not checked yetcites [51] Couture, 2018, Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype, NPJ Breast Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CAMELYON16/17 data have subsequently become a standard benchmark for deep learning models in pathology.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In a retrospective study, pathologists demonstrated improved sensitivity in diagnosing prostate cancer when using the AI platform, along with a reduction in review time and no statistically significant change in specificity.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Raciti, 2020, Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies, Mod Pathol source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Since 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended low-dose computed tomography to screen for lung cancer in high-risk populations (26).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021, Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement, JAMA source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The AI company Paige has also recently been granted FDA Breakthrough Device Designation status for Paige Lymph Node, providing a path for accelerated FDA clearance (48).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] U.S. FDA grants Paige breakthrough device designation for cancer detection in breast lymph nodes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There have been many AI efforts in this domain, including those aimed at directly classifying clinically significant prostate cancer and approaches to quantify clinically relevant features such as segmenting and measuring the volume of the prostate gland (35).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Li, 2022, Machine learning in prostate MRI for prostate cancer: current status and future opportunities, Diagnostics source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The platform was subsequently validated in an external cohort (61) and eventually cleared by the FDA (DEN200080, RRID:SCR_012945).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] da Silva, 2021, Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system, J Pathol source
- Not checked yetcites DEN200080
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Google developed LYmph Node Assistant (LYNA; ref. 46) and reported that pathologists who used the system were able to detect significantly more micrometastases with shorter review time.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Steiner, 2018, Impact of deep learning assistance on the histopathologic review of lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer, Am J Surg Pathol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Treatment decisions in breast cancer frequently hinge on the detection of such lesions (44), but pathology review remains labor intensive and subject to significant interreader variability (arXiv:1703.02442).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Giuliano, 2018, Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer, Ann Surg Oncol source
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:1703.02442
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sandbank and colleagues (50) have recently presented a deep learning model for classifying invasive and noninvasive breast cancer subtypes and generating 51 predicted clinical and morphologic features.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Sandbank, 2022, Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies, NPJ Breast Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI has been applied to each of these tasks, though these applications are generally further from clinical adoption with fewer FDA or EU clearances than the imaging-based detection applications described above.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER DIAGNOSIS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ardila and colleagues (29) developed an approach to localize lung nodules and predict their likelihood of malignancy, where this model is now licensed by the AI company Aidence (30).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Ardila, 2019, End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography, Nat Med source
- Not checked yetcites [30] 2022, Aidence and Google Health enter into collaboration to help improve lung cancer screening with AI
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the Prostate Imaging-Cancer AI (PI-CAI) challenge enables participants to train on a multicenter, multivendor data set of 1,500 MRI prostate exams (36).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Sunoqrot, 2022, Artificial intelligence for prostate MRI: open datasets, available applications, and grand challenges, Eur Radiol Exp source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Much of this work has now been integrated into Stratipath (59), a Swedishbased AI start-up focused on digital pathology.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] Stratipath Breast
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Radiotherapy is a critical therapeutic approach for multiple cancer types, and an intense area of AI research, development, and commercialization.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These efforts include histology (102) and CT-based (103) models for survival prediction, and the correlation of CT imaging features with histology risk factors (104).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Yu, 2016, Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features, Nat Commun source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Saad, 2023, Predicting benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer by CT-based ensemble deep learning: a retrospective study, Lancet Digit Health source
- Not checked yetcites [104] Nam, 2022, Histopathologic basis for a chest CT deep learning survival prediction model in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, Radiology source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This includes the use of AI at all steps of radiotherapy, including image segmentation, treatment planning, outcome prediction, quality assurance, and AIguided radiosurgery (116).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Li, 2022, Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy, Semin Cancer Biol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, CEmarked products exist for quantifying PD-L1 expression from IHC slides (109-111).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Aiforia achieves CE-IVD mark for clinical PD-L1 AI model in lung cancer diagnostics
- Not checked yetcites [110] Mindpeak Solutions: plug-and-play AI solution to detect and quantify PD-L1 (SP263) within predefined ROIs in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)
- Not checked yetcites [111]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There have additionally been several validation studies of histopathology-based prognostic models (95,96), including a study demonstrating that a prognostic feature previously identified through AI analysis can be learned and used by pathologists (95).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Colorectal Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] L'Imperio, 2023, Pathologist validation of a machine learning–derived feature for colon cancer risk stratification, JAMA Netw Open source
- Not checked yetcites [96] Skrede, 2020, Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study, Lancet Lond Engl source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although there are some clinically available devices for these tasks, they tend to be further from clinical maturity than cancer detection and diagnosis tasks.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER TREATMENT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nagpal and colleagues (62) used a deep learning model to predict Gleason scores using H&E images from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and reported significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with a cohort of 29 board-certified pathologists.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Nagpal, 2019, Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer, NPJ Digit Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“P-NET (112) is a sparse deep learning model that processes molecular profiling data in a biologically informed, pathway-driven fashion to predict prostate disease states such as metastases, where the resulting prediction scores were shown to independently correlate with prognosis.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Elmarakeby, 2021, Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant efforts have also been made in using AI for histopathologic diagnosis in lung and colorectal cancers, though FDA-cleared devices for these tasks do not exist at the time of writing.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung and Colorectal Cancers
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The approach included weakly supervised training to predict response from H&E whole slide images, with subsequent application of interpretability approaches to identify features that correlate with higher response predictions, such as the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and necrosis.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Ogier du Terrail, 2023, Federated learning for predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer, Nat Med source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Models such as BERT (80), GPT (81), and ChatGPT (arXiv:2303.08774)are rapidly diffusing into industry, and healthcare-specific models are also being developed (ref.82; arXiv:2106.03598,arXiv:1904.05342).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER TREATMENT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Devlin, 2019, Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
- Not checked yetcites [81] Brown, 2020, Language models are few-shot learners
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2303.08774
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Amgad and colleagues (84) explicitly enforce interpretability by using deep learning to extract human-interpretable features, and subsequently use these features to generate a risk score for breast cancer prognosis.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Amgad, 2024, A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the LLMs generated a wider range of treatment options compared with human experts, their recommendations often deviated from expert consensus.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [151] Benary, 2023, Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology, JAMA Netw Open source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“CancerVar (131) is an AI platform that uses a deep learning framework to predict the oncogenicity of somatic variants using both functional and clinical features and may provide a robust alternative to manually curated databases, such as CiVIC (132) and OncoKB ( 133).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Li, 2022, CancerVar: an artificial intelligence-empowered platform for clinical interpretation of somatic mutations in cancer, Sci Adv source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Griffith, 2017, CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer, Nat Genet source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Chakravarty, 2017, OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base, JCO Precis Oncol
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“personalized cancer vaccines are being tested in a wide variety of clinical indications, and recent trial data indicate their potential role in combination with existing immune-checkpoint blockade (139).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] Khattak, 2023, Abstract CT001: a personalized cancer vaccine, mRNA-4157, combined with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in patients with resected high-risk melanoma: efficacy and safety results from the randomized, open-label Phase 2 mRNA-4157-P201/Keynote-942 trial, Cancer Res source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Applied to 37 cancer types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes data set (128), Dig identified several potential cryptic splice sites, recurrent variants in noncoding regions, as well as mutations in rarely mutated genes.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, 2020, Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These challenges include obtaining and sharing robust medical data, risks to patient privacy, and ensuring fairness in AI performance across all patients.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI applications are also now advancing in the fields of image-guided radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (119), and surgery in general, where autocontouring is similarly helpful (120).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A 2022 meta-analysis reported on 10 published studies across multiple commercial and academic platforms and found that most applications offered comparable, if not superior performance to manual screening, with dramatic improvements in efficiency (149).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [149] Chow, 2023, Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent study by Radici and colleagues (117) evaluated the FDAcleared and CE-marked Limbus Contour (LC) AI platform for autocontouring within a single European tertiary cancer hospital and found that the technology significantly reduced the procedure time and interobserver variability.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Radici, 2022, Implementation of a commercial deep learning-based auto segmentation software in radiotherapy: evaluation of effectiveness and impact on workflow, Life Basel Switz
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“only 6% of patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials (144) and there continue to be race-, sex-, and age-based disparities within clinical trials (145, 146).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Unger, 2021, Nationally representative estimates of the participation of cancer patients in clinical research studies according to the commission on cancer, J Clin Oncol source
- Not checked yetcites [145] Murthy, 2004, Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities, JAMA source
- Not checked yetcites [146] Kwiatkowski, 2013, Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: have we improved?, Cancer source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Transcriptomic-based algorithms have also been developed (136, 137), although these approaches will require expansion of clinical transcriptome profiling for assessments of generalizability.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Grewal, 2019, Application of a neural network whole transcriptome-based pan-cancer method for diagnosis of primary and metastatic cancers, JAMA Netw Open source
- Not checked yetcites [137] Divate, 2022, Deep learning-based pan-cancer classification model reveals tissue-of-origin specific gene expression signatures, Cancers source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As more AI models reach the clinic, there are also challenges in effectively integrating AI applications into clinical workflows and assessing the ultimate impact on patients and healthcare systems.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite these limitations, LLMs were able to correctly identify several important treatment strategies and even suggested some reasonable options that were not readily apparent to experts (151).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [151] Benary, 2023, Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology, JAMA Netw Open source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The method outperformed multiple other methods for driver identification in accuracy and power and ran multiple orders of magnitude faster.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [127] Sherman, 2022, Genome-wide mapping of somatic mutation rates uncovers drivers of cancer, Nat Biotechnol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“multiple groups have now reported on the use of LLMs to effectively extract structured data from clinical notes (150) and to match patients to clinical trials (arXiv:2303.16756,arXiv:2306.02077,arXiv:2304.07396, and arXiv:2308.02180).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [150] Agrawal, Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors source
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2303.16756
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2306.02077
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is particularly important in cancer, where each site is limited in patient size, patient diversity, and its own set of embedded clinical practices.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interpretation of germline and somatic mutations observed in cancer continues to be a challenge, and new AI tools are also emerging to automatically annotate and interpret variants.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Performance was generally promising, though there were cases in which the model arguably provided outdated information, such as investigational drug names (152).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [152] Schulte, 2023, Capacity of ChatGPT to identify guideline-based treatments for advanced solid tumors, Cureus
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“that risks driving providers away from clinical practice and impairing access to care.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Optimizing Administrative Workflows and Patient Engagement
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The clinical trial system also suffers from overall inefficiencies, where 20% of trials are prematurely terminated, many due to insufficient accrual of patients (147).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Stensland, 2014, Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?, J Natl Cancer Inst source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“MD Anderson Cancer Center is also creating a comprehensive AI-based Radiation Planning Assistant for autocontouring and radiotherapy planning, and will primarily target low-and middleincome countries, where AI can provide scalable assistance (118).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] MD Anderson Cancer Center: Radiation Planning Assistant
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This includes genomics-based algorithms, where targeted NGS algorithms have been rigorously evaluated and are currently being deployed and assessed for clinical utility (134, 135).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] Penson, 2020, Development of genome-derived tumor type prediction to inform clinical cancer care, JAMA Oncol source
- Not checked yetcites [135] Moon, 2023, Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Beyond training, AI models must also be tested across multiple independent sites and evaluated for overall accuracy and potential bias (162).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [162] Karargyris, 2023, Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf, Nat Mach Intell source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rich molecular data are increasingly critical for personalized cancer treatment across cancer types.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An additional long-standing diagnostic challenge is cell-oforigin prediction, which is particularly relevant for cancers of unknown primary where accurate origin information could significantly affect treatment strategy.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Properly deployed, AI could increase efficiencies and patient diversity within the clinical trial system and assist physicians in matching patients to clinical trials.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The third option is federated learning (FL), where data remain private at each institution, but machine learning models are jointly updated and shared in a distributed fashion (166, 167).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These different data modalities are likely to contain distinct and complementary information; thus, multimodal AI is an active area of research in oncology (168, 169).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, given this classification, randomized controlled clinical trials are not typically required by the FDA, though this can depend on the device's intended use.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neither the United States nor the EU currently has AI-specific regulatory approval pathways for AI-based medical tools.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although clinical trials in AI oncology remain rare, we are now starting to see an uptick in such trials.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A particularly evolving and debated topic is the regulation of LLMs, and in which contexts and intended uses do they qualify as medical devices (191,192).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These efforts further emphasize the need for robust data sets, as the same data set and even model architecture can be used to support multiple clinical tasks.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, both regulate AI healthcare applications as medical devices and categorize such devices based on the level of risk posed to individual patients.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both of these considerations certainly apply in oncology, where potential sources of bias span the full patient care and AI life-cycle continuums.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In clinical practice, there are known disparities in access to newer imaging technologies and patient outcomes for underserved populations, such as Black women (176-178).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [176] Christensen, 2023, Relationship between race and access to newer mammographic technology in women with medicare insurance, Radiology source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Rauscher, 2012, Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance, J Womens Health source
- Not checked yetcites [178] Martini, 2022, Breast cancer disparities in outcomes; unmasking biological determinants associated with racial and genetic diversity, Clin Exp Metastasis source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An aspect that is closely tied to regulation is the evaluation of devices to ensure safe and effective performance, where clinical trials remain the gold standard in assessing new clinical interventions.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The same study also found that breast cancer was the most commonly cited cancer type (31%), most commonly associated with radiology, providing further evidence of the advancing maturity of AI in mammography.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [194] Luchini, 2022, Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives, Br J Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A critical component of AI evaluation and development more generally is ensuring transparency and reproducibility, allowing independent research groups to review and build on prior scientific progress (196).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [196] Haibe-Kains, 2020, Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence, Nature source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The requirements for FDA clearance depend largely on the class and intended use of the device, with device classes ranging from I (lowest risk) to III (highest risk).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fairness and diversity have especially important considerations in such applications given that genetic ancestry may be causally related to some genetic traits and diseases (178, 183-186), as opposed to the social construct of race (173).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Martini, 2022, Breast cancer disparities in outcomes; unmasking biological determinants associated with racial and genetic diversity, Clin Exp Metastasis source
- Not checked yetcites [183] Zhang, 2019, Characterization of frequently mutated cancer genes in Chinese breast tumors: a comparison of Chinese and TCGA cohorts, Ann Transl Med source
- Not checked yetcites [184] Mahal, 2020, Racial differences in genomic profiling of prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
- Not checked yetcites [185] Gusev, 2016, Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation, Nat Commun source
- Not checked yetcites [186] Nassar, 2022, Ancestry-driven recalibration of tumor mutational burden and disparate clinical outcomes in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, Cancer Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [173] Chen, 2023, Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare, Nat Biomed Eng source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although FL introduces a number of logistical and algorithmic complexities, progress has been made in narrowing the gap in model performance between FL and centralized learning (160), where FL has now been successfully applied to multiple cancer applications.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [160] Sheller, 2020, Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data, Sci Rep source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The vast majority of AI devices thus far, including those in oncology, fall under Class II, for which the FDA 510(k) pathway applies and requires the device to be”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [187] Harvey, 2020, How the FDA regulates AI, Acad Radiol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These algorithms are largely designed to assist clinicians in making diagnoses and/or quantify image-based properties (e.g., lesion size), but the clinician makes the final call.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Altogether, there is growing awareness of the fairness of AI algorithms, including guidance from regulatory bodies, but there remains much room for improvement in reducing bias in AI and healthcare more broadly.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The second option is deidentification and public release of data, usually via a consortium model.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Ehteshami Bejnordi, 2017, Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer, JAMA source
- Not checked yetcites [165] Mullainathan, 2022, Solving medicine's data bottleneck: Nightingale Open Science, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, Luchini and colleagues (194) summarized 71 FDA-cleared devices in oncology (up to 2021) and found that radiology accounted for the majority of approved devices (54.9%), followed by pathology (19.7%).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [194] Luchini, 2022, Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives, Br J Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This work leverages the TCGA database, which has become a critical multimodal data set to advance AI efforts.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Such”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2108.07258
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within the EU, there is no one central agency that performs device assessments; rather, assessments are handled by accredited organizations, which are empowered to issue CE marks.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conversely, there are efforts to generate more diverse public data sets, such as EMBED (180), and instances where AI performance has generalized well across different patient populations (9,10,12).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [180] Jeong, 2023, The EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED): a racially diverse, granular dataset of 3.4 million screening and diagnostic mammographic images, Radiol Artif Intell source
- Not checked yetcites [9] McKinney, 2020, International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Lotter, 2021, Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the described AI applications fall under the purview of regulatory agencies, depending on regional regulations and the intended use of the device.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The precise form of the AI results requires careful consideration of the clinical end goal and the intended use of the device.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is especially important for assessing potential biases in data sets and generalizability across different clinical settings.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Critically, although AI will ideally improve healthcare outcomes, its biggest impact may ultimately be in improving resource allocation and access to quality care.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, the healthcare value of AI deployment needs to be rigorously assessed and combined with aligned payment structures.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such workflows require integration into clinical systems, which can be especially challenging for proprietary systems with limited customization.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This will require a greater investment in real-world studies and ideally randomized clinical trials, with an emphasis on critically evaluating AI generalizability across patient populations and clinical sites.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the future of AI oncology will not be driven by technology innovation alone.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, we see several fundamental requirements that will drive the future of AI in oncology (Fig. 4).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, there is a strong need for an objective assessment of AI's impact on patient outcomes, defined in cancer-specific, clinically meaningful metrics.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, stakeholders must adopt objective processes for continuously monitoring AI impact and measuring patient safety.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Realizing these benefits may require structural changes and new clinical workflows.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Arguably, the greatest strength of data-driven, deep learning approaches is the ability to continually improve over time.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Healthcare value is defined as the health outcome achieved per dollar spent (214) and is a critical metric for making informed healthcare investments.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [214] Porter, 2010, What is value in health care?, N Engl J Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, realizing these benefits requires well-defined regulatory processes and joint efforts to continuously monitor AI devices over the long-term.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beyond initial hardware considerations, data pipelines must also be developed to efficiently route data to AI systems and subsequently make the AI results available to clinicians.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Common approaches to XAI involve post hoc explanations, such as generating saliency maps that highlight aspects of the input that most contribute to the model's prediction (204).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [204] van der Velden, 2022, Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis, Med Image Anal source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The field of AI in oncology is developing at a rapid pace.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Even with effective infrastructure and AI outputs, monetization and liability questions can hinder widespread adoption, where the vast majority of commercially available AI devices are not currently reimbursed (210).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [210] Parikh, 2022, Paying for artificial intelligence in medicine, NPJ Digit Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additional guidelines include SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence), which provides an extended set of 15 items for AI-focused protocol documents (199), and CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials-Artificial Intelligence), which provides an extended set of 14 items for reporting on AI-focused clinical trials (200).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Authors' Disclosures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [199] Rivera, 2020, Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension, Lancet Digit Health source
- Not checked yetcites [200] Liu, 2020, Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This includes MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting), which defines a minimal set of reporting elements covering study population and setting, patient demographics, model architecture, and model evaluation (198)”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Hernandez-Boussard, 2020, MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care, J Am Med Inform Assoc source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Finally, there is an increasing use of AI in analyzing real-world data (RWD), and the European Society for Medical Oncology Guidance for Reporting Oncology Real-World Evidence (ESMO-GROW) now provides publication guidelines regarding the use of RWD in oncology, along with specific AIfocused reporting guidelines (201).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Authors' Disclosures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [201] Castelo-Branco, 2023, ESMO guidance for reporting oncology real-world evidence (GROW), Ann Oncol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This necessity applies even to”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Realizing the potential of AI in oncology requires effective integration into clinical workflows, which presents both logistical and scientific challenges (202).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [202] Chua, 2021, Artificial intelligence in oncology: path to implementation, Cancer Med source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, explainable AI (XAI) is a highly active area of research focused on conveying how an AI model arrived at its prediction.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI applications require significant computational infrastructure (either on-premise or cloud-based) and highly skilled engineers-both of which are likely to extend already stretched healthcare information technology (IT) budgets.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
AI applications are accelerating from development to clinical use.
“This focus is motivated by the accelerated advancement of AI applications from development to clinical use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical trials are the primary mechanism for evaluating and advancing new cancer therapeutics.
“Clinical trials are the primary mechanism for evaluating and advancing new cancer therapeutics.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Modern clinical oncology faces an unprecedented data complexity that exceeds human analytical capacity”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As of 2024, the FDA had cleared or approved approximately 700 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, 76% of which are related to radiology.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
(1996) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(96)90463-0 · Cited by 14,759
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102873 · Cited by 11,064
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning
Cohen, W. W., McCallum, A., & Roweis, S. T. (2008) · Cited by 5,691
Porter, M. E. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1011024 · Cited by 5,084
Large language models encode clinical knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 · Cited by 4,083
Flagged first, then by citations
18 of the 210 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Devlin, 2019, Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, 4171
- Kim, 2018, Interpretability beyond feature attribution: quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (TCAV), 2668
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–189 of 189
Kareem, S. (2025) · Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology · doi:10.32948/ajo.2025.05.25 · Cited by 1
Visual-action AI agents for medical diagnosis and treatment: advances and future outlook
Yao, Y., Luxue, Y., Chen, X., Shen, C., Yang, H., Lee, S., Chen, T., Ge, H., & Shen, J. (2025) · The Visual Computer · doi:10.1007/s00371-025-04153-8 · Cited by 2
Towards Causal Explainable AI in Cancer Diagnosis: Advances, Challenges, and Future Directions *
Tyrovolas, M., Tsompou, P. I., Tzouka, D., & Stylios, C. D. (2025) · Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC) · doi:10.1109/embc58623.2025.11253261 · Cited by 2
Song, Y., Zheng, N., Xu, Y., Tao, Z., Wang, Q., Cao, Z., Zhang, Y., Li, M., Mao, R., Chen, Y., et al. (2025) · Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.jpha.2025.101510 · Cited by 1
Artificial Intelligence in Colorectal Cancer Supportive Care: A Scoping Review
Kantabanlang, Y., Hwang, M., Krauss, J. C., & Jiang, Y. (2025) · Seminars in Oncology Nursing · doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2025.152079 · Cited by 1
AI and Machine Learning in Health
Pham, T. D., Holmes, S., Chatzopoulou, D., & Coulthard, P. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-11531-7_2 · Cited by 2
Application of artificial intelligence in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma
Wang, P., Tian, J., Zheng, G., Chen, Y., & Ren, X. (2026) · Annals of Medicine · doi:10.1080/07853890.2026.2620191 · Cited by 4
From Black Box to Biological Insight: AttentioFuse Unlocks Multi-Omics Dynamics in Lung Cancer
Huang, Y., He, Y., Zeng, L., Liu, L., & Zhong, F. (2026) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers18050878 · Cited by 1
Xiong, X., Xiao, M., Liu, H., Jiang, C., Li, M., Song, Y., Zhou, J., & Xu, B. (2026) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-026-08951-z · Cited by 2
Artificial intelligence in cancer diagnostics: a primer for clinicians and scientists
Rizwan, A. M., Makhlouf, H. R., Bharti, S., Dey, S. M., Ossandon, M. R., Robustelli, C. E., Samant, M., Robles, A. I., Sorg, B. S., & Harris, L. N. (2026) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djag143 · Cited by 2
Dwajan, A., PATRO, D. R., Agarwal, A., & Lalhmingmawii, M. (2026) · World Journal of Clinical Cases · doi:10.12998/wjcc.v14.i17.120192 · Cited by 1
Mehmood, S., Zubair, M., Abbas, S., Alharbi, R. M., Alduailij, M. A., Khan, M. A., & Ghazal, T. M. (2026) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2026.1787948 · Cited by 1
Hamid, M., Siddig, A. M. A., Suliman, R., Saeed, A., Mussa, A., & Al-Hatamleh, M. A. I. (2026) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2026.218665 · Cited by 2
Cancer immunotherapy: Current progress and future perspectives
Alu, A., Zhou, Y., Battaglia, G., Wei, Y., & Wei, X. (2026) · The Innovation Drug Discovery · doi:10.59717/j.xinn-drugdisc.2026.100031 · Cited by 1
Artificial intelligence derived virtual oncology
Lyu, C., Yao, D., Yin, F., Liu, Z., Liu, B., Ma, H., & Sun, T. (2026) · The Innovation Oncology · doi:10.59717/j.xinn-oncol.2026.100028 · Cited by 1
Corso, F., Zec, A., Favali, M., Ligero, M., Hilgers, L., Invernizzi, L. M., Mazzeo, L., Morales, A. M., Müller‐Franzes, G. A., Machado, I. P., et al. (2026) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2026.102966 · Cited by 2
AI Innovations in Global Health in the Context of Climate Change
Papadopoulou, P., Apostolaki, S., Lytras, M. D., & Konstantinopoulou, S. (2024) · Advances in healthcare information systems and administration book series · doi:10.4018/979-8-3693-4402-6.ch001 · Cited by 1
Editorial: Artificial intelligence and imaging for oncology
Zhou, Y., Li, Z., & Yadav, P. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1547968 · Cited by 1
A bibliometric analysis of the advance of artificial intelligence in medicine (Preprint)Preprint
lin, M., Lin, L., Lin, L., Lin, Z., & Yan, X. (2024) · doi:10.2196/preprints.65748
Sağlık Hizmetlerinde Yapay Zeka: Temel Kavramlar ve Sınıflandırmalar
Yönden, H. (2025) · Akademisyen Kitabevi eBooks · doi:10.37609/akya.3461
A Comparative Analysis of Startups Applying AI in Clinical Oncology
Meça, A., & Ali, M. (2024) · International Conference on Computing, Networking, Telecommunications & Engineering Sciences Applications (CoNTESA) · doi:10.1109/contesa64738.2024.10891291
How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizationsPreprint
Singh, R., Bapna, M., Diab, A. R., et al. (2025) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2025.03.13.25323924
Self-citationArtificial intelligence in the oncology residency training curriculum
Romero-Alfaro, A. (2025) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2025.115407
Sakuma, T., Otani, Y., & Shimizu, H. (2025) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.1101/2025.04.09.647947
The Need for Contemporary, Diverse, and Annotated Datasets to Advance AI in Lung Cancer Screening
Hsu, W. W. Y., & Prosper, A. E. (2025) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.250371
Quoi de neuf en chirurgie plastique oncologique en 2025 ?
Chouquet, L., Poissonnet, G., Picard, A., Camuzard, O., Gangloff, D., & Lupon, E. L. (2025) · Annales de Chirurgie Plastique Esthétique · doi:10.1016/j.anplas.2025.06.016
The impact of estrogen on benign breast tumors and exploration of recurrence mechanisms
Fan, Z., Wang, H., Liu, Y., et al. (2025) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1609832
Kumar, V. (2025) · International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Communication Technologies (CCICT) · doi:10.1109/ccict65753.2025.00017 · Cited by 1
Integrating tumor location into artificial intelligence-based prognostic models in cancer
Wang, C., Chen, M., Wang, Y., et al. (2025) · World Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.5306/wjco.v16.i8.109934
Application of artificial intelligence to overcome clinical information overload in cancer
Stenzl, A., Ghith, J., & Schijvenaars, B. J. A. (2025) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/med/9780192867636.003.0022
Adika, B. A. (2025) · African Journal of Business and Development Studies · doi:10.70641/ajbds.v2i1.152
Computational Methods in Oncology
Aishwarya, B., Priyanka, J., Reddy, M. S. K., Mohan, R., Saluja, R., Shivanna, D. B., & Rao, R. S. (2025) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-96-9346-7_2
PanCHealth: a machine learning framework for cancer stage prediction
Dube, T., Patil, S. S., & Ramteke, M. (2025) · Health and Technology · doi:10.1007/s12553-025-01022-1
Oncology’s ongoing struggle with evaluating quality of life limiting, treatment-related toxicity
O’Reilly, S., Gaynor, S., & Mayer, E. L. (2025) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-025-10017-7 · Cited by 2
Kharchenko, A., & Balabai, A. A. (2025) · Ukrainian Scientific Medical Youth Journal · doi:10.32345/usmyj.3(157).2025.72-81
Attard, J. A., Siviter, E., Millard, A., Issa, E., Garcea, G., Dennison, A. R., & Isherwood, J. (2025) · Clinical Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.cson.2025.100100
Use of Survival Analysis and Machine Learning in Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Gucema, A. C., Sosa‐Fajardo, P., Ortega, J. A., Casin, I. O., & Guerra, J. L. L. (2025) · Procedia Computer Science · doi:10.1016/j.procs.2025.10.064
Lotter, W. E., & Chapiro, J. (2025) · Hepatology · doi:10.1097/hep.0000000000001622
Self-citationThaker, N. G., Shetty, N., Kazmi, S., L’Official-German, I., & Flora, D. B. (2025) · AI in Precision Oncology · doi:10.1177/2993091x251396146
Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Symptom Assessment in People with Cancer
Beeler, D., Davis, M. P., Strobel, S. D., LeGrand, S. B., Aung, L., Atkas, A., Lasheen, W., & O’Connor, M. (2025) · Journal of Palliative Medicine · doi:10.1177/10966218251401793
Artificial intelligence in oncology: A physician’s perspective
Kong, F. (2025) · Intelligent Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.intonc.2025.12.004
A comparative study on DeepSeek and ChatGPT for bone and soft tissue tumor clinical practice
Yang, B., Li, Z., Zhang, X., Li, X., Zhao, G., Yongli, J., & Yu, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2025.1642880
From algorithms to meaningful biomarkers: anchoring AI in clinical oncology
de Vries, E. G., Garralda, E., & Litière, S. (2026) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2026.01.002
Sun, M., Yu, J., Long, Z., et al. (2025) · doi:10.2196/preprints.77699
Cavalieri, S., Cecco, L. D., Monzani, D., et al. (2026) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-026-01369-2
Beyond Incremental: Embracing Transformative Innovation in Women’s Health
Evans, M. I., Devoe, L. D., Ryan, G. F., Britt, D. W., & Macedonia, C. R. (2026) · Reproductive Medicine · doi:10.3390/reprodmed7010016 · Cited by 1
Zhang, B., Wang, Y., Fang, Y., Wang, Y., & Feng, M. (2026) · Cell Reports Physical Science · doi:10.1016/j.xcrp.2026.103222
Does artificial intelligence provide value for money in oncology care? A personal perspective
Annemans, L. (2026) · Academia oncology. · doi:10.20935/acadonco8235
Rahimi, P., Atighi, F., Rezaei, B., et al. (2026) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-026-04807-6
The future of AI in oncology: Trends and innovations
Gupta, N., & Khowal, S. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-45004-4.00007-4
Artificial intelligence in oncology: An introduction
Khan, N. A., Mahajan, A. A., Tendulkar, D., Das, N. R., Mondal, S., Dey, A., Ghosh, S., & Rashid, G. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-45004-4.00008-6
Kumar, V., Rajan, S., & Prakash, P. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-45004-4.00003-7
Mantena, R. V., Venkateswaran, S., Gold, D., et al. (2026) · Signals and communication technology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98036-7_21
Pittara, M., Kyriacou, A., Matsangidou, M., et al. (2026) · World Congress on Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, September 7 - 12, 2009, Munich, Germany · doi:10.1007/978-3-032-24724-7_58
Iyiade, A. V., Onuiri, E. E., & Durodola, O. F. (2026) · Cureus Journal of Computer Science. · doi:10.7759/s44389-026-00092-0
Bridging artificial intelligence and clinical decision-making in gastric cancer surgery
Ormeci, M. T., Kirkik, D., & Tulubaş, E. (2026) · World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery · doi:10.4240/wjgs.119402
Toward personalised cancer care: AI in precision and molecular oncology
Sinha, A., Anzar, D., Owusu-Boampong, A. B., Nkrumah-Boateng, P. A., Mannan, K. M., Ali, S. H., Roy, S., & Wireko, A. A. (2026) · European journal of medical research · doi:10.1186/s40001-026-04670-9
Hussain, A., Hussain, A., Hussain, A., et al. (2026) · AI in Precision Oncology · doi:10.1177/2993091x261459680
Consoli, S., Katsimpokis, D., Meloni, A., Recupero, D. R., & Sloep, M. (2026) · BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making · doi:10.1186/s12911-026-03619-6
Fredriksdotter, K., Kuratomi, A., & Quintero, L. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.104490
Subramanian, P., Shyamsunder, S., Eshaghi, K., et al. (2026) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci-26-00114
Hoz-M, J. D. L., Escobar, K. M., Salas-Macías, C. A., Fors, M. M., & Ballaz, S. (2026) · Array · doi:10.1016/j.array.2026.101020
Bhat, S. A., Chen, M.-C., & Huang, N.-F. (2026) · Artificial Intelligence in Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.artmed.2026.103481
Shi, Q., Xuan, M., Lv, C., Zhang, Z., Geng, X., Huang, D., & Hu, X. (2026) · Frontiers in Immunology · doi:10.3389/fimmu.2026.1776472 · Cited by 1
Divekar, G., & Bhosale, B. (2026) · Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology · doi:10.1055/s-0046-1824589
Woodford, R. G., Lord, S., Lin, F. P. Y., Papenfuss, A. T., Marschner, I., Thomas, D., Friedlander, M. L., Scott, C. L., Simes, R. J., & Lee, C. K. (2026) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci-26-00014
Skoulidis, F., Jabbour, S. K., Garon, E. B., Iyengar, P., Scagliotti, G. V., Ferrer, L., Etchepare, G., Gallinato, O., Faure, J., Bernard, P., et al. (2026) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-25-3729
The Quest to Cure Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer With Immunotherapy
Boiarsky, D., & Vokes, N. I. (2026) · The Cancer Journal · doi:10.1097/ppo.0000000000000838
Wu, H., Yin, X., Cheng, J., Zhang, J., Zheng, L., Zhang, L., Wu, F., Zhao, Q., Yang, J., & Wang, H. (2026) · Insights into Imaging · doi:10.1186/s13244-026-02359-5
Ahmed, E. N., Ahmed, M. S., & Mushtaq, A. H. (2026) · Precision Oncology · doi:10.3390/precisoncol1030011
Wu, W., Sr., Li, J., Wu, T., Liu, P., He, B., Han, Z., Xu, Q., & Qiu, Y. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.108572
Personalized Medicine in Cancer: Challenges and Future Perspectives
Kumari, S., Gupta, R., Dhurve, G., Jia, X., & Chaudhary, N. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-92-0477-9_23
Jammoul, D., Ajibuwa, F., Jammoul, M., Schlosser‐Hupf, S., Müller, M., & El‐Najjar, N. (2026) · Frontiers in Pharmacology · doi:10.3389/fphar.2026.1784272
PanoraOnc: A pan-cancer clinico-genomic AI model for transferable outcome predictionsPreprint
Schuerch, M., Geisberg, J., Flower, C. T., Bektaş, A. B., McDonald, T. O., Mishra, S., Graser, C. J., Altreuter, J., Ananda, G., Boland, G. M., et al. (2026) · medRxiv · doi:10.64898/2026.08.17.26354679
Self-citationRole of health digital twins in oncology drug development - a primer
Requesens, M. G., Mankan, A. K., Cantini, L., Calabresi, M., Vidal, L., Brown, J., Lang, S., Kaura, B., Veselkov, K., Xénarios, I., et al. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1885797
Paliogiannis, P., Zinellu, A., Palmieri, G., & Fois, A. G. (2026) · Journal of Molecular Pathology · doi:10.3390/jmp7030031
Artificial Intelligence: Shaping Next Generation Oncotherapy
Tejashwini, K., Thota, S., Himabindu, V., Maneesha, N., & Bhukya, B. (2026) · Cancer Bioscience · doi:10.1016/j.cbs.2026.100007
İsmayılov, R., Oğuz, A., Zenger, G. Y., Boluk, S. M., Farzaliyeva, A., Ramazanoğlu, M. N., Akçalı, Z., & Altundağ, Ö. (2026) · Supportive Care in Cancer · doi:10.1007/s00520-026-11051-9 · Cited by 2
Zhang, W., Feng, Z., Liu, Y., Zhong, R., Chen, S., Li, Z., 李冰燕, Liu, D., Gao, L., & Hu, K. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1915669
Nikitaras, A., Tsoti, S. M., & Pramateftakis, M.-G. (2026) · Frontiers in Oncology · doi:10.3389/fonc.2026.1909120
Digital twins in medicine: Future horizons
Mengbi, S. H. E. N., Du, S., & He, J. (2026) · The Innovation Informatics · doi:10.59717/j.tii.2027.100078
Yang, L., Shan, L., Yao, X., et al. (2026) · doi:10.2196/preprints.103545
Yang, L., Shan, L., Yao, X., Zhao, R., Li, Z., Feng, S., & Wang, Y. (2026) · JMIR Cancer · doi:10.2196/103545 · Cited by 1
AlSamhori, J. F., AlSamhori, A. R. F., Amourah, R. M., Aldweik, H., AlSamhori, A. F., Holy, L. M., Zakraoui, R., Alomari, S. H., & Shahait, A. D. (2026) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.116502
Lee, Y.-S., & Youn, B.-Y. (2026) · Digital Health · doi:10.1177/20552076261491822
Posterior segment imaging clues to systemic malignancy: a phenotype-to-confirmation narrative review
Denda, N., Davidović, S., Maletin, N., Veljkov, K., Raskovic, A., Jovančević, L., & Babović, S. (2026) · Frontiers in Ophthalmology · doi:10.3389/fopht.2026.1917738
Moldt, J.-A., Wietek, T. F., Nieselt, K., Zabel, S., Claassen, M., Wagner, S., Keim, U., & Herrmann‐Werner, A. (2026) · JMIR Medical Education · doi:10.2196/104151
Guardians of Integrity: Establishing an Independent Artificial Intelligence Monitoring Board
Charvadeh, Y. K., Chen, Y., & Panageas, K. S. (2026) · JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics · doi:10.1200/cci-26-00036
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotter, W., Hassett, M. J., Schultz, N., Kehl, K. L., Van Allen, E. M., & Cerami, E.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Corresponding author
- Cerami, Ethan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2024-03-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 711-726
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC11131133
- OpenAlex
- W4394695940
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 17
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Mark Foundation For Cancer Research (Emerging Leader Award)
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748, P50CA272390)
- Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
- Ellison Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in oncology, clinical implementation of AI, cancer detection, cancer diagnosis, cancer therapy, diagnostic imaging, genomics, electronic health records, clinical translation
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review