The DOI matches its Crossref record; 192 of the 210 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 226 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions
Open accessAbstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) in oncology is advancing beyond algorithm development to integration into clinical practice. This review describes the current state of the field, with a specific focus on clinical integration. AI applications are structured according to cancer type and clinical domain, focusing on the four most common cancers and tasks of detection, diagnosis, and treatment. These applications encompass various data modalities, including imaging, genomics, and medical records. We conclude with a summary of existing challenges, evolving solutions, and potential future directions for the field. Significance: AI is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology, where several applications are maturing beyond research and development to direct clinical integration. This review summarizes the current state of the field through the lens of clinical translation along the clinical care continuum. Emerging areas are also highlighted, along with common challenges, evolving solutions, and potential future directions for the field.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
0 of 226 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology, where several applications are maturing beyond research and development to direct clinical integration.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Abstract
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes? Based: unclearNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“FDA-cleared AI algorithms have also been developed to aid in the interpretation of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI; DEN1700, RRID:SCR_012945) and breast ultrasound exams (K190442, K210670, P150043 RRID:SCR_012945).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites DEN1700
- Not checked yetcites K190442
- Not checked yetcites K210670
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“the use of AI for breast cancer detection in X-ray mammography is one of the most active areas of development and clinical translation.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A subsequent study presented an AI approach that encompasses both 2D and 3D mammography, with evidence of detecting breast cancer 1 to 2 years earlier than standard radiographic review for some cases (10).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [10] Lotter, 2021, Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies have also examined the use of AI to predict future breast cancer risk.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“A later study led by Google in 2020 garnered much attention in reporting evidence of expertlevel breast cancer detection by an AI system (9).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [9] McKinney, 2020, International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesThe paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI is being heavily applied all along the cancer care continuum using different types of data (Fig. 2).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“An early catalyst in this space was the Digital Mammography DREAM Challenge, an open AI competition where groups were able to benchmark and compare different AI approaches (8).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Schaffter, 2020, Evaluation of combined artificial intelligence and radiologist assessment to interpret screening mammograms, JAMA Netw Open source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIn the paper
“Raciti and colleagues (60) reported on Paige Prostate Alpha, a commercial decision support system trained to detect prostate cancer from core-needle biopsies.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Raciti, 2020, Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies, Mod Pathol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesNone of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the context of colorectal cancer screening, deep learning has been applied extensively to colonoscopy images and video.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Colorectal Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passes
- It may state two separate claims as one. 82
- Probably not a substantial claim. 52
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A search of ClinicalTrials.gov of”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This includes the storage of patient data in electronic medical record (EMR) systems, the digitization of radiology and pathology imaging (3), and the increasing adoption of routine genomic profiling (4).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the review focuses on the four most common cancer types: breast, prostate, lung, and colorectal, accounting for 50% of all new cancer cases in 2023 (7).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER): cancer stat facts: common cancer sites
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly being applied to all aspects of oncology.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In particular, advances in deep learning (1) over the past decade have made it feasible to learn complex patterns directly from real-world data, making it the core driver of AI advances in and out of healthcare (2).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In the case of mammography, there are now multiple commercial AI devices cleared by the U.S. Federal Drug Administration (FDA) and/or the European Union (EU) that are designed to aid radiologists in breast cancer detection.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although not yet uniformly adopted across imaging providers or cancer hospitals, there are multiple FDAcleared and/or EU-certified commercial devices in the cancer detection domain and multiple reported clinical trials.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER DETECTION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There are also multiple ongoing clinical trials evaluating the real-world effectiveness of such systems.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the Mirai system developed by Yala and colleagues ( 12) is designed to predict 5-year cancer risk directly from mammograms and has been retrospectively evaluated across multiple hospitals.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [12] Yala, 2022, Multi-institutional validation of a mammography-based breast cancer risk model, J Clin Oncol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“These data can be used to build and train AI models, and critically, the real-time availability of these data can enable individualized, clinically relevant AI predictions to further the goal of precision oncology (5).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [5] Garraway, 2013, Precision oncology: an overview, J Clin Oncol source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI applications for these cancer types serve as a good representation of the current state of the field, especially as their prevalence facilitates large-scale data collection and encourages clinical application.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > INTRODUCTION
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“a longer-term, prospective clinical trial is now seeking to assess the connection between colonoscopy CADe systems and incidence and mortality from colorectal cancer after a 10-year follow-up period (25).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Colorectal Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Mori, 2022, Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy, Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“groups have reported on the use of deep learning for breast cancer diagnosis and subtyping from H&E slides (49)(50)(51), and quantifying other clinically relevant features such as mitotic cell counting (52,53).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [49] Sui, 2021, A pyramid architecture-based deep learning framework for breast cancer detection, BioMed Res Int source
- Not checked yetcites [50] Sandbank, 2022, Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies, NPJ Breast Cancer source
- Not checked yetcites [51] Couture, 2018, Image analysis with deep learning to predict breast cancer grade, ER status, histologic subtype, and intrinsic subtype, NPJ Breast Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The CAMELYON16/17 data have subsequently become a standard benchmark for deep learning models in pathology.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“In a retrospective study, pathologists demonstrated improved sensitivity in diagnosing prostate cancer when using the AI platform, along with a reduction in review time and no statistically significant change in specificity.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [60] Raciti, 2020, Novel artificial intelligence system increases the detection of prostate cancer in whole slide images of core needle biopsies, Mod Pathol source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Since 2013, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force has recommended low-dose computed tomography to screen for lung cancer in high-risk populations (26).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [26] US Preventive Services Task Force, 2021, Screening for lung cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement, JAMA source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The AI company Paige has also recently been granted FDA Breakthrough Device Designation status for Paige Lymph Node, providing a path for accelerated FDA clearance (48).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [48] U.S. FDA grants Paige breakthrough device designation for cancer detection in breast lymph nodes
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“There have been many AI efforts in this domain, including those aimed at directly classifying clinically significant prostate cancer and approaches to quantify clinically relevant features such as segmenting and measuring the volume of the prostate gland (35).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [35] Li, 2022, Machine learning in prostate MRI for prostate cancer: current status and future opportunities, Diagnostics source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The platform was subsequently validated in an external cohort (61) and eventually cleared by the FDA (DEN200080, RRID:SCR_012945).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [61] da Silva, 2021, Independent real-world application of a clinical-grade automated prostate cancer detection system, J Pathol source
- Not checked yetcites DEN200080
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Google developed LYmph Node Assistant (LYNA; ref. 46) and reported that pathologists who used the system were able to detect significantly more micrometastases with shorter review time.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [46] Steiner, 2018, Impact of deep learning assistance on the histopathologic review of lymph nodes for metastatic breast cancer, Am J Surg Pathol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Treatment decisions in breast cancer frequently hinge on the detection of such lesions (44), but pathology review remains labor intensive and subject to significant interreader variability (arXiv:1703.02442).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [44] Giuliano, 2018, Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer, Ann Surg Oncol source
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:1703.02442
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Sandbank and colleagues (50) have recently presented a deep learning model for classifying invasive and noninvasive breast cancer subtypes and generating 51 predicted clinical and morphologic features.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [50] Sandbank, 2022, Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies, NPJ Breast Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI has been applied to each of these tasks, though these applications are generally further from clinical adoption with fewer FDA or EU clearances than the imaging-based detection applications described above.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER DIAGNOSIS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Ardila and colleagues (29) developed an approach to localize lung nodules and predict their likelihood of malignancy, where this model is now licensed by the AI company Aidence (30).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] Ardila, 2019, End-to-end lung cancer screening with three-dimensional deep learning on low-dose chest computed tomography, Nat Med source
- Not checked yetcites [30] 2022, Aidence and Google Health enter into collaboration to help improve lung cancer screening with AI
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the Prostate Imaging-Cancer AI (PI-CAI) challenge enables participants to train on a multicenter, multivendor data set of 1,500 MRI prostate exams (36).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [36] Sunoqrot, 2022, Artificial intelligence for prostate MRI: open datasets, available applications, and grand challenges, Eur Radiol Exp source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Much of this work has now been integrated into Stratipath (59), a Swedishbased AI start-up focused on digital pathology.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] Stratipath Breast
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Radiotherapy is a critical therapeutic approach for multiple cancer types, and an intense area of AI research, development, and commercialization.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These efforts include histology (102) and CT-based (103) models for survival prediction, and the correlation of CT imaging features with histology risk factors (104).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [102] Yu, 2016, Predicting non-small cell lung cancer prognosis by fully automated microscopic pathology image features, Nat Commun source
- Not checked yetcites [103] Saad, 2023, Predicting benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer by CT-based ensemble deep learning: a retrospective study, Lancet Digit Health source
- Not checked yetcites [104] Nam, 2022, Histopathologic basis for a chest CT deep learning survival prediction model in patients with lung adenocarcinoma, Radiology source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This includes the use of AI at all steps of radiotherapy, including image segmentation, treatment planning, outcome prediction, quality assurance, and AIguided radiosurgery (116).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [116] Li, 2022, Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy, Semin Cancer Biol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, CEmarked products exist for quantifying PD-L1 expression from IHC slides (109-111).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [109] Aiforia achieves CE-IVD mark for clinical PD-L1 AI model in lung cancer diagnostics
- Not checked yetcites [110] Mindpeak Solutions: plug-and-play AI solution to detect and quantify PD-L1 (SP263) within predefined ROIs in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC)
- Not checked yetcites [111]
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“There have additionally been several validation studies of histopathology-based prognostic models (95,96), including a study demonstrating that a prognostic feature previously identified through AI analysis can be learned and used by pathologists (95).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Colorectal Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [95] L'Imperio, 2023, Pathologist validation of a machine learning–derived feature for colon cancer risk stratification, JAMA Netw Open source
- Not checked yetcites [96] Skrede, 2020, Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study, Lancet Lond Engl source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although there are some clinically available devices for these tasks, they tend to be further from clinical maturity than cancer detection and diagnosis tasks.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER TREATMENT
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Nagpal and colleagues (62) used a deep learning model to predict Gleason scores using H&E images from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and reported significantly higher diagnostic accuracy compared with a cohort of 29 board-certified pathologists.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Nagpal, 2019, Development and validation of a deep learning algorithm for improving Gleason scoring of prostate cancer, NPJ Digit Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“P-NET (112) is a sparse deep learning model that processes molecular profiling data in a biologically informed, pathway-driven fashion to predict prostate disease states such as metastases, where the resulting prediction scores were shown to independently correlate with prognosis.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Prostate Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [112] Elmarakeby, 2021, Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Significant efforts have also been made in using AI for histopathologic diagnosis in lung and colorectal cancers, though FDA-cleared devices for these tasks do not exist at the time of writing.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Lung and Colorectal Cancers
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The approach included weakly supervised training to predict response from H&E whole slide images, with subsequent application of interpretability approaches to identify features that correlate with higher response predictions, such as the presence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and necrosis.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [83] Ogier du Terrail, 2023, Federated learning for predicting histological response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer, Nat Med source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Models such as BERT (80), GPT (81), and ChatGPT (arXiv:2303.08774)are rapidly diffusing into industry, and healthcare-specific models are also being developed (ref.82; arXiv:2106.03598,arXiv:1904.05342).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CANCER TREATMENT
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [80] Devlin, 2019, Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding
- Not checked yetcites [81] Brown, 2020, Language models are few-shot learners
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2303.08774
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Amgad and colleagues (84) explicitly enforce interpretability by using deep learning to extract human-interpretable features, and subsequently use these features to generate a risk score for breast cancer prognosis.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Breast Cancer
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [84] Amgad, 2024, A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although the LLMs generated a wider range of treatment options compared with human experts, their recommendations often deviated from expert consensus.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [151] Benary, 2023, Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology, JAMA Netw Open source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“CancerVar (131) is an AI platform that uses a deep learning framework to predict the oncogenicity of somatic variants using both functional and clinical features and may provide a robust alternative to manually curated databases, such as CiVIC (132) and OncoKB ( 133).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [131] Li, 2022, CancerVar: an artificial intelligence-empowered platform for clinical interpretation of somatic mutations in cancer, Sci Adv source
- Not checked yetcites [132] Griffith, 2017, CIViC is a community knowledgebase for expert crowdsourcing the clinical interpretation of variants in cancer, Nat Genet source
- Not checked yetcites [133] Chakravarty, 2017, OncoKB: a precision oncology knowledge base, JCO Precis Oncol
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“personalized cancer vaccines are being tested in a wide variety of clinical indications, and recent trial data indicate their potential role in combination with existing immune-checkpoint blockade (139).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [139] Khattak, 2023, Abstract CT001: a personalized cancer vaccine, mRNA-4157, combined with pembrolizumab versus pembrolizumab in patients with resected high-risk melanoma: efficacy and safety results from the randomized, open-label Phase 2 mRNA-4157-P201/Keynote-942 trial, Cancer Res source
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Applied to 37 cancer types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes data set (128), Dig identified several potential cryptic splice sites, recurrent variants in noncoding regions, as well as mutations in rarely mutated genes.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [128] ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, 2020, Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes, Nature source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These challenges include obtaining and sharing robust medical data, risks to patient privacy, and ensuring fairness in AI performance across all patients.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“AI applications are also now advancing in the fields of image-guided radiotherapy, adaptive radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery (119), and surgery in general, where autocontouring is similarly helpful (120).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A 2022 meta-analysis reported on 10 published studies across multiple commercial and academic platforms and found that most applications offered comparable, if not superior performance to manual screening, with dramatic improvements in efficiency (149).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [149] Chow, 2023, Use of artificial intelligence for cancer clinical trial enrollment: a systematic review and meta-analysis, J Natl Cancer Inst source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recent study by Radici and colleagues (117) evaluated the FDAcleared and CE-marked Limbus Contour (LC) AI platform for autocontouring within a single European tertiary cancer hospital and found that the technology significantly reduced the procedure time and interobserver variability.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [117] Radici, 2022, Implementation of a commercial deep learning-based auto segmentation software in radiotherapy: evaluation of effectiveness and impact on workflow, Life Basel Switz
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“only 6% of patients with cancer enroll in clinical trials (144) and there continue to be race-, sex-, and age-based disparities within clinical trials (145, 146).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [144] Unger, 2021, Nationally representative estimates of the participation of cancer patients in clinical research studies according to the commission on cancer, J Clin Oncol source
- Not checked yetcites [145] Murthy, 2004, Participation in cancer clinical trials: race-, sex-, and age-based disparities, JAMA source
- Not checked yetcites [146] Kwiatkowski, 2013, Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: have we improved?, Cancer source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Transcriptomic-based algorithms have also been developed (136, 137), although these approaches will require expansion of clinical transcriptome profiling for assessments of generalizability.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [136] Grewal, 2019, Application of a neural network whole transcriptome-based pan-cancer method for diagnosis of primary and metastatic cancers, JAMA Netw Open source
- Not checked yetcites [137] Divate, 2022, Deep learning-based pan-cancer classification model reveals tissue-of-origin specific gene expression signatures, Cancers source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As more AI models reach the clinic, there are also challenges in effectively integrating AI applications into clinical workflows and assessing the ultimate impact on patients and healthcare systems.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > CHALLENGES AND OPPORTUNITIES
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Despite these limitations, LLMs were able to correctly identify several important treatment strategies and even suggested some reasonable options that were not readily apparent to experts (151).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [151] Benary, 2023, Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology, JAMA Netw Open source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The method outperformed multiple other methods for driver identification in accuracy and power and ran multiple orders of magnitude faster.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [127] Sherman, 2022, Genome-wide mapping of somatic mutation rates uncovers drivers of cancer, Nat Biotechnol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“multiple groups have now reported on the use of LLMs to effectively extract structured data from clinical notes (150) and to match patients to clinical trials (arXiv:2303.16756,arXiv:2306.02077,arXiv:2304.07396, and arXiv:2308.02180).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [150] Agrawal, Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors source
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2303.16756
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2306.02077
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is particularly important in cancer, where each site is limited in patient size, patient diversity, and its own set of embedded clinical practices.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The interpretation of germline and somatic mutations observed in cancer continues to be a challenge, and new AI tools are also emerging to automatically annotate and interpret variants.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Performance was generally promising, though there were cases in which the model arguably provided outdated information, such as investigational drug names (152).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [152] Schulte, 2023, Capacity of ChatGPT to identify guideline-based treatments for advanced solid tumors, Cureus
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“that risks driving providers away from clinical practice and impairing access to care.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Optimizing Administrative Workflows and Patient Engagement
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The clinical trial system also suffers from overall inefficiencies, where 20% of trials are prematurely terminated, many due to insufficient accrual of patients (147).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [147] Stensland, 2014, Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?, J Natl Cancer Inst source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“MD Anderson Cancer Center is also creating a comprehensive AI-based Radiation Planning Assistant for autocontouring and radiotherapy planning, and will primarily target low-and middleincome countries, where AI can provide scalable assistance (118).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Radiotherapy
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [118] MD Anderson Cancer Center: Radiation Planning Assistant
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This includes genomics-based algorithms, where targeted NGS algorithms have been rigorously evaluated and are currently being deployed and assessed for clinical utility (134, 135).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [134] Penson, 2020, Development of genome-derived tumor type prediction to inform clinical cancer care, JAMA Oncol source
- Not checked yetcites [135] Moon, 2023, Machine learning for genetics-based classification and treatment response prediction in cancer of unknown primary, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Beyond training, AI models must also be tested across multiple independent sites and evaluated for overall accuracy and potential bias (162).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [162] Karargyris, 2023, Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf, Nat Mach Intell source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rich molecular data are increasingly critical for personalized cancer treatment across cancer types.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An additional long-standing diagnostic challenge is cell-oforigin prediction, which is particularly relevant for cancers of unknown primary where accurate origin information could significantly affect treatment strategy.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Molecular Oncology
Load-bearingStrength:hedged· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Properly deployed, AI could increase efficiencies and patient diversity within the clinical trial system and assist physicians in matching patients to clinical trials.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Clinical Trial Matching and Automated Prescreening
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The third option is federated learning (FL), where data remain private at each institution, but machine learning models are jointly updated and shared in a distributed fashion (166, 167).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These different data modalities are likely to contain distinct and complementary information; thus, multimodal AI is an active area of research in oncology (168, 169).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Importantly, given this classification, randomized controlled clinical trials are not typically required by the FDA, though this can depend on the device's intended use.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neither the United States nor the EU currently has AI-specific regulatory approval pathways for AI-based medical tools.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although clinical trials in AI oncology remain rare, we are now starting to see an uptick in such trials.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A particularly evolving and debated topic is the regulation of LLMs, and in which contexts and intended uses do they qualify as medical devices (191,192).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These efforts further emphasize the need for robust data sets, as the same data set and even model architecture can be used to support multiple clinical tasks.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, both regulate AI healthcare applications as medical devices and categorize such devices based on the level of risk posed to individual patients.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Both of these considerations certainly apply in oncology, where potential sources of bias span the full patient care and AI life-cycle continuums.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In clinical practice, there are known disparities in access to newer imaging technologies and patient outcomes for underserved populations, such as Black women (176-178).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [176] Christensen, 2023, Relationship between race and access to newer mammographic technology in women with medicare insurance, Radiology source
- Not checked yetcites [177] Rauscher, 2012, Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance, J Womens Health source
- Not checked yetcites [178] Martini, 2022, Breast cancer disparities in outcomes; unmasking biological determinants associated with racial and genetic diversity, Clin Exp Metastasis source
Strength:boosted· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“An aspect that is closely tied to regulation is the evaluation of devices to ensure safe and effective performance, where clinical trials remain the gold standard in assessing new clinical interventions.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The same study also found that breast cancer was the most commonly cited cancer type (31%), most commonly associated with radiology, providing further evidence of the advancing maturity of AI in mammography.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [194] Luchini, 2022, Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives, Br J Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A critical component of AI evaluation and development more generally is ensuring transparency and reproducibility, allowing independent research groups to review and build on prior scientific progress (196).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [196] Haibe-Kains, 2020, Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence, Nature source
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The requirements for FDA clearance depend largely on the class and intended use of the device, with device classes ranging from I (lowest risk) to III (highest risk).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:correlational· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Fairness and diversity have especially important considerations in such applications given that genetic ancestry may be causally related to some genetic traits and diseases (178, 183-186), as opposed to the social construct of race (173).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [178] Martini, 2022, Breast cancer disparities in outcomes; unmasking biological determinants associated with racial and genetic diversity, Clin Exp Metastasis source
- Not checked yetcites [183] Zhang, 2019, Characterization of frequently mutated cancer genes in Chinese breast tumors: a comparison of Chinese and TCGA cohorts, Ann Transl Med source
- Not checked yetcites [184] Mahal, 2020, Racial differences in genomic profiling of prostate cancer, N Engl J Med source
- Not checked yetcites [185] Gusev, 2016, Atlas of prostate cancer heritability in European and African-American men pinpoints tissue-specific regulation, Nat Commun source
- Not checked yetcites [186] Nassar, 2022, Ancestry-driven recalibration of tumor mutational burden and disparate clinical outcomes in response to immune checkpoint inhibitors, Cancer Cell source
- Not checked yetcites [173] Chen, 2023, Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare, Nat Biomed Eng source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although FL introduces a number of logistical and algorithmic complexities, progress has been made in narrowing the gap in model performance between FL and centralized learning (160), where FL has now been successfully applied to multiple cancer applications.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [160] Sheller, 2020, Federated learning in medicine: facilitating multi-institutional collaborations without sharing patient data, Sci Rep source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The vast majority of AI devices thus far, including those in oncology, fall under Class II, for which the FDA 510(k) pathway applies and requires the device to be”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [187] Harvey, 2020, How the FDA regulates AI, Acad Radiol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These algorithms are largely designed to assist clinicians in making diagnoses and/or quantify image-based properties (e.g., lesion size), but the clinician makes the final call.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Altogether, there is growing awareness of the fairness of AI algorithms, including guidance from regulatory bodies, but there remains much room for improvement in reducing bias in AI and healthcare more broadly.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The second option is deidentification and public release of data, usually via a consortium model.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [45] Ehteshami Bejnordi, 2017, Diagnostic assessment of deep learning algorithms for detection of lymph node metastases in women with breast cancer, JAMA source
- Not checked yetcites [165] Mullainathan, 2022, Solving medicine's data bottleneck: Nightingale Open Science, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“For example, Luchini and colleagues (194) summarized 71 FDA-cleared devices in oncology (up to 2021) and found that radiology accounted for the majority of approved devices (54.9%), followed by pathology (19.7%).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [194] Luchini, 2022, Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives, Br J Cancer source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This work leverages the TCGA database, which has become a critical multimodal data set to advance AI efforts.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Data Curation and Sharing
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Such”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Treatment Decision Support
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites arXiv:2108.07258
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✗ Asserted: fails✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The authors may not put it forward as true. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Within the EU, there is no one central agency that performs device assessments; rather, assessments are handled by accredited organizations, which are empowered to issue CE marks.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conversely, there are efforts to generate more diverse public data sets, such as EMBED (180), and instances where AI performance has generalized well across different patient populations (9,10,12).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Bias and Fairness
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [180] Jeong, 2023, The EMory BrEast imaging Dataset (EMBED): a racially diverse, granular dataset of 3.4 million screening and diagnostic mammographic images, Radiol Artif Intell source
- Not checked yetcites [9] McKinney, 2020, International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening, Nature source
- Not checked yetcites [10] Lotter, 2021, Robust breast cancer detection in mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis using an annotation-efficient deep learning approach, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most of the described AI applications fall under the purview of regulatory agencies, depending on regional regulations and the intended use of the device.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The precise form of the AI results requires careful consideration of the clinical end goal and the intended use of the device.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This is especially important for assessing potential biases in data sets and generalizability across different clinical settings.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Critically, although AI will ideally improve healthcare outcomes, its biggest impact may ultimately be in improving resource allocation and access to quality care.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, the healthcare value of AI deployment needs to be rigorously assessed and combined with aligned payment structures.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such workflows require integration into clinical systems, which can be especially challenging for proprietary systems with limited customization.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This will require a greater investment in real-world studies and ideally randomized clinical trials, with an emphasis on critically evaluating AI generalizability across patient populations and clinical sites.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nonetheless, the future of AI oncology will not be driven by technology innovation alone.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Rather, we see several fundamental requirements that will drive the future of AI in oncology (Fig. 4).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one. The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, there is a strong need for an objective assessment of AI's impact on patient outcomes, defined in cancer-specific, clinically meaningful metrics.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:boosted· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, stakeholders must adopt objective processes for continuously monitoring AI impact and measuring patient safety.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Realizing these benefits may require structural changes and new clinical workflows.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Arguably, the greatest strength of data-driven, deep learning approaches is the ability to continually improve over time.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:direct· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Healthcare value is defined as the health outcome achieved per dollar spent (214) and is a critical metric for making informed healthcare investments.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [214] Porter, 2010, What is value in health care?, N Engl J Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“However, realizing these benefits requires well-defined regulatory processes and joint efforts to continuously monitor AI devices over the long-term.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✗ Checkable: fails✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Beyond initial hardware considerations, data pipelines must also be developed to efficiently route data to AI systems and subsequently make the AI results available to clinicians.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Common approaches to XAI involve post hoc explanations, such as generating saliency maps that highlight aspects of the input that most contribute to the model's prediction (204).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [204] van der Velden, 2022, Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis, Med Image Anal source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The field of AI in oncology is developing at a rapid pace.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✗ Based: failsProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Even with effective infrastructure and AI outputs, monetization and liability questions can hinder widespread adoption, where the vast majority of commercially available AI devices are not currently reimbursed (210).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [210] Parikh, 2022, Paying for artificial intelligence in medicine, NPJ Digit Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additional guidelines include SPIRIT-AI (Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials-Artificial Intelligence), which provides an extended set of 15 items for AI-focused protocol documents (199), and CONSORT-AI (Consolidated Standards of Reporting of Trials-Artificial Intelligence), which provides an extended set of 14 items for reporting on AI-focused clinical trials (200).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Authors' Disclosures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [199] Rivera, 2020, Guidelines for clinical trial protocols for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the SPIRIT-AI extension, Lancet Digit Health source
- Not checked yetcites [200] Liu, 2020, Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension, Nat Med source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“This includes MINIMAR (MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting), which defines a minimal set of reporting elements covering study population and setting, patient demographics, model architecture, and model evaluation (198)”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Regulation and Evaluation
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [198] Hernandez-Boussard, 2020, MINimum Information for Medical AI Reporting): developing reporting standards for artificial intelligence in health care, J Am Med Inform Assoc source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Finally, there is an increasing use of AI in analyzing real-world data (RWD), and the European Society for Medical Oncology Guidance for Reporting Oncology Real-World Evidence (ESMO-GROW) now provides publication guidelines regarding the use of RWD in oncology, along with specific AIfocused reporting guidelines (201).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Authors' Disclosures
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [201] Castelo-Branco, 2023, ESMO guidance for reporting oncology real-world evidence (GROW), Ann Oncol source
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This necessity applies even to”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > FUTURE DIRECTIONS AND CONCLUSIONS
Load-bearingStrength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Realizing the potential of AI in oncology requires effective integration into clinical workflows, which presents both logistical and scientific challenges (202).”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [202] Chua, 2021, Artificial intelligence in oncology: path to implementation, Cancer Med source
Tests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✓ Load-bearing: passes✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“As such, explainable AI (XAI) is a highly active area of research focused on conveying how an AI model arrived at its prediction.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:plain· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes✗ Load-bearing: fails✓ Based: passesProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“AI applications require significant computational infrastructure (either on-premise or cloud-based) and highly skilled engineers-both of which are likely to extend already stretched healthcare information technology (IT) budgets.”
§ Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions > Integrating into Clinical Workflows
Strength:hedged· not yet calibratedCausal:conditional· not yet calibratedTests✓ Asserted: passes✓ Checkable: passes? Load-bearing: unclear✓ Based: passesIt may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
AI applications are accelerating from development to clinical use.
“This focus is motivated by the accelerated advancement of AI applications from development to clinical use.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Clinical trials are the primary mechanism for evaluating and advancing new cancer therapeutics.
“Clinical trials are the primary mechanism for evaluating and advancing new cancer therapeutics.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Modern clinical oncology faces an unprecedented data complexity that exceeds human analytical capacity”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
In the citing paper
“As of 2024, the FDA had cleared or approved approximately 700 AI/ML-enabled medical devices, 76% of which are related to radiology.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Clinical Oncology: From Productivity Enhancement to Creative Discovery (2025) · cites this paper as [1]
Citations
Cites
LeCun, Y., Bengio, Y., & Hinton, G. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14539 · Cited by 84,126
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Language Models are Few-Shot Learners
Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., et al. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2005.14165 · Cited by 23,372
Advances in neural information processing systems 7
(1996) · Computers & Mathematics with Applications · doi:10.1016/s0898-1221(96)90463-0 · Cited by 14,759
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening
The National Lung Screening Trial Research Team (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1102873 · Cited by 11,064
Rudin, C. (2019) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x · Cited by 10,561
High-performance medicine: the convergence of human and artificial intelligence
Topol, E. J. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0300-7 · Cited by 10,450
Proceedings of the 25th international conference on Machine learning
Cohen, W. W., McCallum, A., & Roweis, S. T. (2008) · Cited by 5,691
Porter, M. E. (2010) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmp1011024 · Cited by 5,084
Large language models encode clinical knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2 · Cited by 4,083
Large Language Models Encode Clinical Knowledge
Singhal, K., Azizi, S., Tu, T., Mahdavi, S. S., Wei, J., Chung, H. W., Scales, N., Tanwani, A., Cole-Lewis, H., Pfohl, S., et al. (2022) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2212.13138 · Cited by 4,083
The future of digital health with federated learning
Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., et al. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-00323-1 · Cited by 4,015
Ehteshami Bejnordi, B., Veta, M., Johannes van Diest, P., van Ginneken, B., Karssemeijer, N., Litjens, G., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., and the CAMELYON16 Consortium, Hermsen, M., Manson, Q. F., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2017.14585 · Cited by 3,293
International evaluation of an AI system for breast cancer screening
McKinney, S. M., Sieniek, M., Godbole, V., Godwin, J., Antropova, N., Ashrafian, H., Back, T., Chesus, M., Corrado, G. S., Darzi, A., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1799-6 · Cited by 3,287
Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes
The ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes Consortium, Aaltonen, L. A., Abascal, F., Abeshouse, A., Aburatani, H., Adams, D. J., Agrawal, N., Ahn, K. S., Ahn, S.-M., Aikata, H., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-1969-6 · Cited by 3,064
Self-citationCoudray, N., Ocampo, P. S., Sakellaropoulos, T., Narula, N., Snuderl, M., Fenyö, D., Moreira, A. L., Razavian, N., & Tsirigos, A. (2018) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0177-5 · Cited by 2,930
OncoKB: A Precision Oncology Knowledge Base
Chakravarty, D., Gao, J., Phillips, S. M., Kundra, R., Zhang, H., Wang, J., Rudolph, J. E., Yaeger, R. D., Soumerai, T. E., Nissan, M. H., et al. (2017) · JCO Precision Oncology · doi:10.1200/po.17.00011 · Cited by 2,783
Self-citationTurkbey, B., Rosenkrantz, A. B., Haider, M. A., Padhani, A. R., Villeirs, G., Macura, K. J., Tempany, C. M., Choyke, P. L., Cornud, F., Margolis, D. J., et al. (2019) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2019.02.033 · Cited by 2,544
Data-efficient and weakly supervised computational pathology on whole-slide images
Lu, M. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Chen, R. J., Barbieri, M., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-020-00682-w · Cited by 2,282
Ardila, D., Kiraly, A. P., Bharadwaj, S., Choi, B., Reicher, J. J., Peng, L., Tse, D., Etemadi, M., Ye, W., Corrado, G., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0447-x · Cited by 2,167
Accurate proteome-wide missense variant effect prediction with AlphaMissense
Cheng, J., Novati, G., Pan, J., Bycroft, C., Žemgulytė, A., Applebaum, T., Pritzel, A., Wong, L. H., Zielinski, M., Sargeant, T., et al. (2023) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.adg7492 · Cited by 2,163
Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials: Race-, Sex-, and Age-Based Disparities
Murthy, V. H., Krumholz, H. M., & Gross, C. P. (2004) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.291.22.2720 · Cited by 2,078
Foundation models for generalist medical artificial intelligence
Moor, M., Banerjee, O., Abad, Z. S. H., Krumholz, H. M., Leskovec, J., Topol, E. J., & Rajpurkar, P. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-05881-4 · Cited by 2,028
AACR Project GENIE: Powering Precision Medicine through an International Consortium
The AACR Project GENIE Consortium, The AACR Project GENIE Consortium, André, F., Arnedos, M., Baras, A. S., Baselga, J., Bedard, P. L., Berger, M. F., Bierkens, M., Calvo, F., et al. (2017) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-17-0151 · Cited by 1,964
Self-citationScreening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
US Preventive Services Task Force, Krist, A. H., Davidson, K. W., Mangione, C. M., Barry, M. J., Cabana, M., Caughey, A. B., Davis, E. M., Donahue, K. E., Doubeni, C. A., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1117 · Cited by 1,816
Sheller, M. J., Edwards, B., Reina, G. A., Martin, J., Pati, S., Kotrotsou, A., Milchenko, M., Xu, W., Marcus, D., Colen, R. R., et al. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-69250-1 · Cited by 1,646
Jurtz, V. I., Paul, S., Andreatta, M., Marcatili, P., Peters, B., & Nielsen, M. (2017) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.1700893 · Cited by 1,476
Kather, J. N., Pearson, A. T., Halama, N., Jäger, D., Krause, J., Loosen, S. H., Marx, A., Boor, P., Tacke, F., Neumann, U. P., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0462-y · Cited by 1,458
Liu, X., Cruz Rivera, S., Moher, D., Calvert, M. J., Denniston, A. K., The SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Working Group, SPIRIT-AI and CONSORT-AI Steering Group, Chan, A.-W., Darzi, A., Holmes, C., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-1034-x · Cited by 1,421
Explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) in deep learning-based medical image analysis
van der Velden, B. H. M., Kuijf, H. J., Gilhuijs, K. G. A., & Viergever, M. A. (2022) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2022.102470 · Cited by 1,328
Digital pathology and artificial intelligence
Niazi, M. K. K., Parwani, A. V., & Gurcan, M. N. (2019) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30154-8 · Cited by 1,232
Patients’ expectations about effects of chemotherapy for advanced cancer
Weeks, J. C., Catalano, P. J., Cronin, A., Finkelman, M. D., Mack, J. W., Keating, N. L., & Schrag, D. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1204410 · Cited by 1,149
Predicting cancer outcomes from histology and genomics using convolutional networks
Mobadersany, P., Yousefi, S., Amgad, M., Gutman, D. A., Barnholtz-Sloan, J. S., Velázquez Vega, J. E., Brat, D. J., & Cooper, L. A. D. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1717139115 · Cited by 1,084
Kather, J. N., Krisam, J., Charoentong, P., Luedde, T., Herpel, E., Weis, C.-A., Gaiser, T., Marx, A., Valous, N. A., Ferber, D., et al. (2019) · PLOS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1002730 · Cited by 1,082
The imperative for regulatory oversight of large language models (or generative AI) in healthcare
Meskó, B., & Topol, E. J. (2023) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-023-00873-0 · Cited by 1,047
Saltz, J., Gupta, R., Hou, L., Kurc, T., Singh, P., Nguyen, V., Samaras, D., Shroyer, K. R., Zhao, T., Batiste, R., et al. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.086 · Cited by 1,027
Self-citationYu, K.-H., Zhang, C., Berry, G. J., Altman, R. B., Ré, C., Rubin, D. L., & Snyder, M. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12474 · Cited by 972
Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2121 · Cited by 972
Hollon, T. C., Pandian, B., Adapa, A. R., Urias, E., Save, A. V., Khalsa, S. S. S., Eichberg, D. G., D’Amico, R. S., Farooq, Z. U., Lewis, S., et al. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0715-9 · Cited by 790
Artificial Intelligence in Cancer Research and Precision Medicine
Bhinder, B., Gilvary, C., Madhukar, N. S., & Elemento, O. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0090 · Cited by 781
Artificial intelligence for multimodal data integration in oncology
Lipkova, J., Chen, R. J., Chen, B., Lu, M. Y., Barbieri, M., Shao, D., Vaidya, A. J., Chen, C., Zhuang, L., Williamson, D. F. K., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.09.012 · Cited by 777
Algorithmic fairness in artificial intelligence for medicine and healthcare
Chen, R. J., Wang, J. J., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Lu, M. Y., Sahai, S., & Mahmood, F. (2023) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-023-01056-8 · Cited by 750
Bulten, W., Pinckaers, H., van Boven, H., Vink, R., de Bel, T., van Ginneken, B., van der Laak, J., Hulsbergen-van de Kaa, C., & Litjens, G. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30739-9 · Cited by 705
A visual–language foundation model for pathology image analysis using medical twitter
Huang, Z., Bianchi, F., Yuksekgonul, M., Montine, T. J., & Zou, J. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02504-3 · Cited by 693
Pan-cancer image-based detection of clinically actionable genetic alterations
Kather, J. N., Heij, L. R., Grabsch, H. I., Loeffler, C. M. L., Echle, A., Muti, H. S., Krause, J., Niehues, J., Sommer, K. A. J., Bankhead, P., et al. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0087-6 · Cited by 686
Eighth edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual: breast cancer
Giuliano, A. E., Edge, S. B., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2018) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-018-6486-6 · Cited by 678
Muehlematter, U. J., Daniore, P., & Vokinger, K. N. (2021) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30292-2 · Cited by 665
Harnessing multimodal data integration to advance precision oncology
Boehm, K. M., Khosravi, P., Vanguri, R., Gao, J., & Shah, S. P. (2022) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-021-00408-3 · Cited by 662
Pan-cancer integrative histology-genomic analysis via multimodal deep learning
Chen, R. J., Lu, M. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Chen, T. Y., Lipkova, J., Noor, Z., Shaban, M., Shady, M., Williams, M., Joo, B., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.07.004 · Cited by 660
Pan-cancer computational histopathology reveals mutations, tumor composition and prognosis
Fu, Y., Jung, A. W., Viñas, R., González, S., Vöhringer, H. S., Shmatko, A., Yates, L. R., Jimenez‐Liñan, M., Moore, L., & Gerstung, M. (2020) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-020-0085-8 · Cited by 655
Efficacy of real-time computer-aided detection of colorectal neoplasia in a randomized trial
Repici, A., Badalamenti, M., Maselli, R., Correale, L., Radaelli, F., Rondonotti, E., Ferrara, E., Spadaccini, M., Alkandari, A., Fugazza, A., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.04.062 · Cited by 646
Deep learning based tissue analysis predicts outcome in colorectal cancer
Bychkov, D., Linder, N., Turkki, R., Nordling, S., Kovanen, P. E., Verrill, C., Walliander, M., Lundin, M., Haglund, C., & Lundin, J. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-21758-3 · Cited by 644
AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary
Lu, M. Y., Chen, T. Y., Williamson, D. F. K., Zhao, M., Shady, M., Lipkova, J., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03512-4 · Cited by 636
Griffith, M., Spies, N. C., Krysiak, K., McMichael, J. F., Coffman, A. C., Danos, A. M., Ainscough, B. J., Ramirez, C. A., Rieke, D. T., Kujan, L., et al. (2017) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.3774 · Cited by 628
Deep learning for prediction of colorectal cancer outcome: a discovery and validation study
Skrede, O.-J., De Raedt, S., Kleppe, A., Hveem, T. S., Liestøl, K., Maddison, J., Askautrud, H. A., Pradhan, M., Nesheim, J. A., Albregtsen, F., et al. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(19)32998-8 · Cited by 627
Ström, P., Kartasalo, K., Olsson, H., Solorzano, L., Delahunt, B., Berney, D. M., Bostwick, D. G., Evans, A. J., Grignon, D. J., Humphrey, P. A., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30738-7 · Cited by 620
Lång, K., Josefsson, V., Larsson, A.-M., Larsson, S., Högberg, C., Sartor, H., Hofvind, S., Andersson, I., & Rosso, A. (2023) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00298-x · Cited by 598
Simera, I., Moher, D., Hirst, A., Hoey, J., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2010) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/1741-7015-8-24 · Cited by 590
Transparency and reproducibility in artificial intelligence
Haibe-Kains, B., Adam, G. A., Hosny, A., Khodakarami, F., Massive Analysis Quality Control (MAQC) Society Board of Directors, Shraddha, T., Kusko, R., Sansone, S.-A., Tong, W., Wolfinger, R. D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2766-y · Cited by 540
Microsatellite instability: a review of what the oncologist should know
Li, K., Luo, H., Huang, L., Luo, H., & Zhu, X. (2020) · Cancer Cell International · doi:10.1186/s12935-019-1091-8 · Cited by 509
Nagpal, K., Foote, D., Liu, Y., Chen, P.-H. C., Wulczyn, E., Tan, F., Olson, N., Smith, J. L., Mohtashamian, A., Wren, J. H., et al. (2019) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-019-0112-2 · Cited by 495
Steiner, D. F., MacDonald, R., Liu, Y., Truszkowski, P., Hipp, J. D., Gammage, C., Thng, F., Peng, L., & Stumpe, M. C. (2018) · American Journal of Surgical Pathology · doi:10.1097/pas.0000000000001151 · Cited by 489
Sarkizova, S., Klaeger, S., Le, P. M., Li, L. W., Oliveira, G., Keshishian, H., Hartigan, C. R., Zhang, W., Braun, D. A., Ligon, K. L., et al. (2019) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-019-0322-9 · Cited by 488
Cruz Rivera, S., Liu, X., Chan, A.-W., Denniston, A. K., Calvert, M. J., Ashrafian, H., Beam, A. L., Collins, G. S., Darzi, A., Deeks, J. J., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(20)30219-3 · Cited by 486
Biologically informed deep neural network for prostate cancer discovery
Elmarakeby, H. A., Hwang, J., Arafeh, R., Crowdis, J., Gang, S., Liu, D., AlDubayan, S. H., Salari, K., Kregel, S., Richter, C., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03922-4 · Cited by 456
Artificial intelligence in radiation oncology
Huynh, E., Hosny, A., Guthier, C. V., Bitterman, D. S., Petit, S., Haas-Kogan, D. A., Kann, B. H., Aerts, H. J. W. L., & Mak, R. H. (2020) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-020-0417-8 · Cited by 454
Lotter, W., Diab, A. R., Haslam, B., Kim, J. G., Grisot, G., Wu, E., Wu, K., Onieva, J. O., Boyer, Y., Boxerman, J. L., et al. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01174-9 · Cited by 423
Wang, P., Liu, X., Berzin, T. M., Glissen Brown, J. R., Liu, P., Zhou, C., Lei, L., Li, L., Guo, Z., Lei, S., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30411-x · Cited by 415
Hernandez-Boussard, T., Bozkurt, S., Ioannidis, J. P. A., & Shah, N. H. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocaa088 · Cited by 410
Schaffter, T., Buist, D. S. M., Lee, C. I., Nikulin, Y., Ribli, D., Guan, Y., Lotter, W., Jie, Z., Du, H., Wang, S., et al. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.0265 · Cited by 409
Self-citationPrecision oncology: an overview
Garraway, L. A., Verweij, J., & Ballman, K. V. (2013) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.49.4799 · Cited by 405
Multimodal Co-Attention Transformer for Survival Prediction in Gigapixel Whole Slide Images
Chen, R. J., Lu, M. Y., Weng, W.-H., Chen, T. Y., Williamson, D. F., Manz, T., Shady, M., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · 2021 IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV) · doi:10.1109/iccv48922.2021.00398 · Cited by 398
Vanguri, R. S., Luo, J., Aukerman, A. T., Egger, J. V., Fong, C. J., Horvat, N., Pagano, A., Araujo-Filho, J. D. A. B., Geneslaw, L., Rizvi, H., et al. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00416-8 · Cited by 395
Federated learning enables big data for rare cancer boundary detection
Pati, S., Baid, U., Edwards, B., Sheller, M., Wang, S.-H., Reina, G. A., Foley, P., Gruzdev, A., Karkada, D., Davatzikos, C., et al. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-33407-5 · Cited by 394
Clinical-Grade Detection of Microsatellite Instability in Colorectal Tumors by Deep Learning
Echle, A., Grabsch, H. I., Quirke, P., van den Brandt, P. A., West, N. P., Hutchins, G. G. A., Heij, L. R., Tan, X., Richman, S. D., Krause, J., et al. (2020) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2020.06.021 · Cited by 376
Racial/ethnic disparities in genomic sequencing
Spratt, D. E., Chan, T., Waldron, L., Speers, C., Feng, F. Y., Ogunwobi, O. O., & Osborne, J. R. (2016) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.1854 · Cited by 375
Gerke, S., Babic, B., Evgeniou, T., & Cohen, I. G. (2020) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-020-0262-2 · Cited by 359
Large language models are few-shot clinical information extractors
Agrawal, M., Hegselmann, S., Lang, H., Kim, Y., & Sontag, D. (2022) · Proceedings of the 2022 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing · doi:10.18653/v1/2022.emnlp-main.130 · Cited by 358
Boehm, K. M., Aherne, E. A., Ellenson, L., Nikolovski, I., Alghamdi, M., Vázquez-García, I., Zamarin, D., Long Roche, K., Liu, Y., Patel, D., et al. (2022) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-022-00388-9 · Cited by 357
Deep learning for classification of colorectal polyps on whole-slide images
Korbar, B., Olofson, A. M., Miraflor, A. P., Nicka, C. M., Suriawinata, M. A., Torresani, L., Suriawinata, A. A., & Hassanpour, S. (2017) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_34_17 · Cited by 349
Koh, P. W., Nguyen, T., Tang, Y. S., Mussmann, S., Pierson, E., Kim, B., & Liang, P. (2020) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.04612 · Cited by 338
Couture, H. D., Williams, L. A., Geradts, J., Nyante, S. J., Butler, E. N., Marron, J. S., Perou, C. M., Troester, M. A., & Niethammer, M. (2018) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-018-0079-1 · Cited by 327
Leveraging large language models for decision support in personalized oncology
Benary, M., Wang, X. D., Schmidt, M., Soll, D., Hilfenhaus, G., Nassir, M., Sigler, C., Knödler, M., Keller, U., Beule, D., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.43689 · Cited by 306
DeepTCR is a deep learning framework for revealing sequence concepts within T-cell repertoires
Sidhom, J.-W., Larman, H. B., Pardoll, D. M., & Baras, A. S. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-21879-w · Cited by 296
Deep learning-based prediction of the T cell receptor–antigen binding specificity
Lu, T., Zhang, Z., Zhu, J., Wang, Y., Jiang, P., Xiao, X., Bernatchez, C., Heymach, J. V., Gibbons, D. L., Wang, J., et al. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00383-2 · Cited by 295
Johnson, S. B., King, A. J., Warner, E. L., Aneja, S., Kann, B. H., & Bylund, C. L. (2023) · JNCI Cancer Spectrum · doi:10.1093/jncics/pkad015 · Cited by 289
Mikhael, P. G., Wohlwend, J., Yala, A., Karstens, L., Xiang, J., Takigami, A. K., Bourgouin, P. P., Chan, P., Mrah, S., Amayri, W., et al. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.01345 · Cited by 288
Artificial intelligence in oncology: current applications and future perspectives
Luchini, C., Pea, A., & Scarpa, A. (2022) · British Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41416-021-01633-1 · Cited by 281
Park, S., Ock, C.-Y., Kim, H., Pereira, S., Park, S., Ma, M., Choi, S., Kim, S., Shin, S., Aum, B. J., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.02010 · Cited by 280
AI-based pathology predicts origins for cancers of unknown primary
Lu, M. Y., Chen, T., Williamson, D. F. K., Zhao, M. M., Shady, M., Lipková, J., & Mahmood, F. (2021) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 263
Multistain deep learning for prediction of prognosis and therapy response in colorectal cancer
Foersch, S., Glasner, C., Woerl, A.-C., Eckstein, M., Wagner, D.-C., Schulz, S., Kellers, F., Fernandez, A., Tserea, K., Kloth, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02134-1 · Cited by 251
ESMO guidance for reporting oncology real-world evidence (GROW)
Castelo-Branco, L., Pellat, A., Martins-Branco, D., Valachis, A., Derksen, J. W. G., Suijkerbuijk, K. P. M., Dafni, U., Dellaporta, T., Vogel, A., Prelaj, A., et al. (2023) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2023.10.001 · Cited by 247
Visual Classification via Description from Large Language ModelsPreprint
Menon, S., & Vondrick, C. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2210.07183 · Cited by 247
Inclusion of minorities and women in cancer clinical trials, a decade later: have we improved?
Kwiatkowski, K., Coe, K., Bailar, J. C., & Swanson, G. M. (2013) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/cncr.28168 · Cited by 240
Treating health disparities with artificial intelligence
Chen, I. Y., Joshi, S., & Ghassemi, M. (2020) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-019-0649-2 · Cited by 235
Interpretable survival prediction for colorectal cancer using deep learning
Wulczyn, E., Steiner, D. F., Moran, M., Plass, M., Reihs, R., Tan, F., Flament-Auvigne, I., Brown, T., Regitnig, P., Chen, P.-H. C., et al. (2021) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-021-00427-2 · Cited by 231
Field, J. K., Vulkan, D., Davies, M. P. A., Baldwin, D. R., Brain, K. E., Devaraj, A., Eisen, T., Gosney, J., Green, B. A., Holemans, J. A., et al. (2021) · The Lancet Regional Health - Europe · doi:10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100179 · Cited by 230
Computer vision in surgery: from potential to clinical value
Mascagni, P., Alapatt, D., Sestini, L., Altieri, M. S., Madani, A., Watanabe, Y., Alseidi, A., Redan, J. A., Alfieri, S., Costamagna, G., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00707-5 · Cited by 228
Swarm learning for decentralized artificial intelligence in cancer histopathology
Saldanha, O. L., Quirke, P., West, N. P., James, J. A., Loughrey, M. B., Grabsch, H. I., Salto-Tellez, M., Alwers, E., Cifci, D., Ghaffari Laleh, N., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01768-5 · Cited by 227
Esteva, A., Feng, J., van der Wal, D., Huang, S.-C., Simko, J. P., DeVries, S., Chen, E., Schaeffer, E. M., Morgan, T. M., Sun, Y., et al. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00613-w · Cited by 217
Ogier du Terrail, J., Leopold, A., Joly, C., Béguier, C., Andreux, M., Maussion, C., Schmauch, B., Tramel, E. W., Bendjebbar, E., Zaslavskiy, M., et al. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-02155-w · Cited by 217
Improved breast cancer histological grading using deep learning
Wang, Y., Acs, B., Robertson, S., Liu, B., Solorzano, L., Wählby, C., Hartman, J., & Rantalainen, M. (2022) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1016/j.annonc.2021.09.007 · Cited by 211
Xu, H., Tang, R. S. Y., Lam, T. Y. T., Zhao, G., Lau, J. Y. W., Liu, Y., Wu, Q., Rong, L., Xu, W., Li, X., et al. (2023) · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.cgh.2022.07.006 · Cited by 209
Large language model AI chatbots require approval as medical devices
Gilbert, S., Harvey, H., Melvin, T., Vollebregt, E., & Wicks, P. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02412-6 · Cited by 207
Multi-institutional validation of a mammography-based breast cancer risk model
Yala, A., Mikhael, P. G., Strand, F., Lin, G., Satuluru, S., Kim, T., Banerjee, I., Gichoya, J., Trivedi, H., Lehman, C. D., et al. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.21.01337 · Cited by 204
Shamai, G., Livne, A., Polónia, A., Sabo, E., Cretu, A., Bar-Sela, G., & Kimmel, R. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-34275-9 · Cited by 193
Federated benchmarking of medical artificial intelligence with MedPerf
Karargyris, A., Umeton, R., Sheller, M. J., Aristizabal, A., George, J., Wuest, A., Pati, S., Kassem, H., Zenk, M., Baid, U., et al. (2023) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00652-2 · Cited by 188
Raciti, P., Sue, J., Ceballos, R., Godrich, R., Kunz, J. D., Kapur, S., Reuter, V., Grady, L., Kanan, C., Klimstra, D. S., et al. (2020) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1038/s41379-020-0551-y · Cited by 186
Context-aware convolutional neural network for grading of colorectal cancer histology images
Shaban, M., Awan, R., Fraz, M. M., Azam, A., Tsang, Y.-W., Snead, D., & Rajpoot, N. M. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2020.2971006 · Cited by 179
Artificial intelligence in oncology: path to implementation
Chua, I. S., Gaziel‐Yablowitz, M., Korach, Z. T., Kehl, K. L., Levitan, N. A., Arriaga, Y. E., Jackson, G. P., Bates, D. W., & Hassett, M. (2021) · Cancer Medicine · doi:10.1002/cam4.3935 · Cited by 179
Self-citationIndependent real‐world application of a clinical‐grade automated prostate cancer detection system
da Silva, L. M., Pereira, E. M., Salles, P. G., Godrich, R., Ceballos, R., Kunz, J. D., Casson, A., Viret, J., Chandarlapaty, S., Ferreira, C. G., et al. (2021) · The Journal of Pathology · doi:10.1002/path.5662 · Cited by 175
Robertson, S. L., Robinson, M. D., & Reid, A. (2017) · Journal of Graduate Medical Education · doi:10.4300/jgme-d-16-00123.1 · Cited by 170
Adult cancer clinical trials that fail to complete: an epidemic?
Stensland, K. D., McBride, R. B., Latif, A., Wisnivesky, J., Hendricks, R., Roper, N., Boffetta, P., Hall, S. J., Oh, W. K., & Galsky, M. D. (2014) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/dju229 · Cited by 161
Morphological and molecular breast cancer profiling through explainable machine learning
Binder, A., Bockmayr, M., Hägele, M., Wienert, S., Heim, D., Hellweg, K., Ishii, M., Stenzinger, A., Hocke, A., Denkert, C., et al. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00303-4 · Cited by 156
Wu, Z., Trevino, A. E., Wu, E., Swanson, K., Kim, H. J., D’Angio, H. B., Preska, R., Charville, G. W., Dalerba, P. D., Egloff, A. M., et al. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00951-w · Cited by 154
Artificial intelligence predictive model for hormone therapy use in prostate cancer
Spratt, D. E., Tang, S., Sun, Y., Huang, H.-C., Chen, E., Mohamad, O., Armstrong, A. J., Tward, J. D., Nguyen, P. L., Lang, J. M., et al. (2023) · NEJM Evidence · doi:10.1056/evidoa2300023 · Cited by 153
Shaukat, A., Lichtenstein, D. R., Somers, S. C., Chung, D. C., Perdue, D. G., Gopal, M., Colucci, D. R., Phillips, S. A., Marka, N. A., Church, T. R., et al. (2022) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2022.05.028 · Cited by 149
Accurate recognition of colorectal cancer with semi-supervised deep learning on pathological images
Yu, G., Sun, K., Xu, C., Shi, X.-H., Wu, C., Xie, T., Meng, R.-Q., Meng, X.-H., Wang, K.-S., Xiao, H.-M., et al. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-26643-8 · Cited by 147
Rakaee, M., Adib, E., Ricciuti, B., Sholl, L. M., Shi, W., Alessi, J. V., Cortellini, A., Fulgenzi, C. A. M., Viola, P., Pinato, D. J., et al. (2023) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4933 · Cited by 141
Nam, J. G., Hwang, E. J., Kim, J., Park, N., Lee, E. H., Kim, H. J., Nam, M., Lee, J. H., Park, C. M., & Goo, J. M. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.221894 · Cited by 141
A population-level digital histologic biomarker for enhanced prognosis of invasive breast cancer
Amgad, M., Hodge, J. M., Elsebaie, M. A. T., Bodelon, C., Puvanesarajah, S., Gutman, D. A., Siziopikou, K. P., Goldstein, J. A., Gaudet, M. M., Teras, L. R., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02643-7 · Cited by 137
Histopathology images predict multi-omics aberrations and prognoses in colorectal cancer patients
Tsai, P.-C., Lee, T.-H., Kuo, K.-C., Su, F.-Y., Lee, T.-L. M., Marostica, E., Ugai, T., Zhao, M., Lau, M. C., Väyrynen, J. P., et al. (2023) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-37179-4 · Cited by 136
Interactive explainable deep learning model informs prostate cancer diagnosis at MRI
Hamm, C. A., Baumgärtner, G. L., Biessmann, F., Beetz, N. L., Hartenstein, A., Savic, L. J., Froböse, K., Dräger, F., Schallenberg, S., Rudolph, M., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222276 · Cited by 133
Paying for artificial intelligence in medicine
Parikh, R. B., & Helmchen, L. A. (2022) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-022-00609-6 · Cited by 132
Sha, L., Osinski, B. L., Ho, I. Y., Tan, T. L., Willis, C., Weiss, H., Beaubier, N., Mahon, B. M., Taxter, T. J., & Yip, S. S. F. (2019) · Journal of Pathology Informatics · doi:10.4103/jpi.jpi_24_19 · Cited by 130
Disparities in screening mammography services by race/ethnicity and health insurance
Rauscher, G. H., Allgood, K. L., Whitman, S., & Conant, E. (2012) · Journal of Women s Health · doi:10.1089/jwh.2010.2415 · Cited by 128
Veta, M., van Diest, P. J., Jiwa, M., Al-Janabi, S., & Pluim, J. P. W. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0161286 · Cited by 127
An MRI deep learning model predicts outcome in rectal cancer
Jiang, X., Zhao, H., Saldanha, O. L., Nebelung, S., Kuhl, C., Amygdalos, I., Lang, S. A., Wu, X., Meng, X., Truhn, D., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222223 · Cited by 127
Racial differences in genomic profiling of prostate cancer
Mahal, B. A., Alshalalfa, M., Kensler, K. H., Chowdhury-Paulino, I., Kantoff, P., Mucci, L. A., Schaeffer, E. M., Spratt, D., Yamoah, K., Nguyen, P. L., et al. (2020) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2000069 · Cited by 126
Diagnostic evaluation of a deep learning model for optical diagnosis of colorectal cancer
Zhou, D., Tian, F., Tian, X., Sun, L., Huang, X., Zhao, F., Zhou, N., Chen, Z., Zhang, Q., Yang, M., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16777-6 · Cited by 123
Moon, I., LoPiccolo, J., Baca, S. C., Sholl, L. M., Kehl, K. L., Hassett, M. J., Liu, D., Schrag, D., & Gusev, A. (2023) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02482-6 · Cited by 122
Nassar, A. H., Adib, E., Abou Alaiwi, S., El Zarif, T., Groha, S., Akl, E. W., Nuzzo, P. V., Mouhieddine, T. H., Perea-Chamblee, T., Taraszka, K., et al. (2022) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2022.08.022 · Cited by 121
Self-citationSaad, M. B., Hong, L., Aminu, M., Vokes, N. I., Chen, P., Salehjahromi, M., Qin, K., Sujit, S. J., Lu, X., Young, E., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Digital Health · doi:10.1016/s2589-7500(23)00082-1 · Cited by 121
Deep learning assisted mitotic counting for breast cancer
Balkenhol, M. C. A., Tellez, D., Vreuls, W., Clahsen, P. C., Pinckaers, H., Ciompi, F., Bult, P., & van der Laak, J. A. W. M. (2019) · Laboratory Investigation · doi:10.1038/s41374-019-0275-0 · Cited by 119
Winkel, D. J., Tong, A., Lou, B., Kamen, A., Comaniciu, D., Disselhorst, J. A., Rodríguez-Ruiz, A., Huisman, H., Szolar, D., Shabunin, I., et al. (2021) · Investigative Radiology · doi:10.1097/rli.0000000000000780 · Cited by 118
Development of genome-derived tumor type prediction to inform clinical cancer care
Penson, A., Camacho, N., Zheng, Y., Varghese, A. M., Al-Ahmadie, H., Razavi, P., Chandarlapaty, S., Vallejo, C. E., Vakiani, E., Gilewski, T., et al. (2020) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.3985 · Cited by 115
Self-citationHarvey, H. B., & Gowda, V. (2020) · Academic Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.acra.2019.09.017 · Cited by 112
Sandbank, J., Bataillon, G., Nudelman, A., Krasnitsky, I., Mikulinsky, R., Bien, L., Thibault, L., Albrecht Shach, A., Sebag, G., Clark, D. P., et al. (2022) · npj Breast Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41523-022-00496-w · Cited by 112
Echle, A., Ghaffari Laleh, N., Quirke, P., Grabsch, H. I., Muti, H. S., Saldanha, O. L., Brockmoeller, S. F., van den Brandt, P. A., Hutchins, G. G. A., Richman, S. D., et al. (2022) · ESMO Open · doi:10.1016/j.esmoop.2022.100400 · Cited by 111
Luo, P., Ding, Y., Lei, X., & Wu, F.-X. (2019) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2019.00013 · Cited by 107
Predicting tumour mutational burden from histopathological images using multiscale deep learning
Jain, M. S., & Massoud, T. F. (2020) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-020-0190-5 · Cited by 103
Characterizing the clinical adoption of medical AI devices through U.S. insurance claims
Wu, K., Wu, E., Theodorou, B., Liang, W., Mack, C., Glass, L., Sun, J., & Zou, J. (2024) · NEJM AI · doi:10.1056/aioa2300030 · Cited by 103
Arasu, V. A., Habel, L. A., Achacoso, N. S., Buist, D. S. M., Cord, J. B., Esserman, L. J., Hylton, N. M., Glymour, M. M., Kornak, J., Kushi, L. H., et al. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.222733 · Cited by 98
Jeong, J. J., Vey, B. L., Bhimireddy, A., Kim, T., Santos, T., Correa, R., Dutt, R., Mosunjac, M., Oprea-Ilies, G., Smith, G., et al. (2023) · Radiology Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1148/ryai.220047 · Cited by 92
Grewal, J. K., Tessier-Cloutier, B., Jones, M., Gakkhar, S., Ma, Y., Moore, R., Mungall, A. J., Zhao, Y., Taylor, M. D., Gelmon, K., et al. (2019) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2597 · Cited by 90
Role of Artificial Intelligence in Colonoscopy Detection of Advanced Neoplasias
Mangas‐Sanjuán, C., de–Castro, L., Cubiella, J., Díez‐Redondo, P., Suárez, A., Pellisé, M., Fernández, N., Zarraquiños, S., Núñez, H., Álvarez‐García, V., et al. (2023) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m22-2619 · Cited by 90
Ozyoruk, K. B., Can, S., Darbaz, B., Başak, K., Demir, D., Gokceler, G. I., Serin, G., Hacisalihoglu, U. P., Kurtuluş, E., Lu, M. Y., et al. (2022) · Nature Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1038/s41551-022-00952-9 · Cited by 86
Revolutionizing radiation therapy: the role of AI in clinical practice
Kawamura, M., Kamomae, T., Yanagawa, M., Kamagata, K., Fujita, S., Ueda, D., Matsui, Y., Fushimi, Y., Fujioka, T., Nozaki, T., et al. (2024) · Journal of Radiation Research · doi:10.1093/jrr/rrad090 · Cited by 86
Ahmad, A., Wilson, A., Haycock, A., Humphries, A., Monahan, K., Suzuki, N., Thomas-Gibson, S., Vance, M., Bassett, P., Thiruvilangam, K., et al. (2023) · Endoscopy · doi:10.1055/a-1966-0661 · Cited by 86
Genome-wide mapping of somatic mutation rates uncovers drivers of cancer
Sherman, M. A., Yaari, A. U., Priebe, O., Dietlein, F., Loh, P.-R., & Berger, B. (2022) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/s41587-022-01353-8 · Cited by 80
Guiding principles for the responsible development of artificial intelligence tools for healthcare
Badal, K., Lee, C. M., & Esserman, L. J. (2023) · Communications Medicine · doi:10.1038/s43856-023-00279-9 · Cited by 77
Sunoqrot, M. R. S., Saha, A., Hosseinzadeh, M., Elschot, M., & Huisman, H. (2022) · European Radiology Experimental · doi:10.1186/s41747-022-00288-8 · Cited by 76
Machine learning in prostate MRI for prostate cancer: current status and future opportunities
Li, H., Lee, C. H., Chia, D., Lin, Z., Huang, W., & Tan, C. H. (2022) · Diagnostics · doi:10.3390/diagnostics12020289 · Cited by 74
Regulating AI in medicine in the United States and Europe
Vokinger, K. N., & Gasser, U. (2021) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-021-00386-z · Cited by 68
Machine learning for cryosection pathology predicts the 2021 WHO classification of glioma
Nasrallah, M. P., Zhao, J., Tsai, C. C., Meredith, D., Marostica, E., Ligon, K. L., Golden, J. A., & Yu, K.-H. (2023) · Med · doi:10.1016/j.medj.2023.06.002 · Cited by 67
Zhang, G., Wang, Y., Chen, B., Guo, L., Cao, L., Ren, C., Wen, L., Li, K., Jia, M., Li, C., et al. (2019) · Annals of Translational Medicine · doi:10.21037/atm.2019.04.23 · Cited by 66
Li, Q., Ren, Z., Cao, K., Li, M. M., Wang, K., & Zhou, Y. (2022) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.abj1624 · Cited by 66
Hsu, W. W. Y., Hippe, D. S., Nakhaei, N., Wang, P., Zhu, B., Siu, N., Ahsen, M. E., Lotter, W. E., Sorensen, A. G., Naeim, A., et al. (2022) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.42343 · Cited by 65
Self-citationChallenges to Using Big Data in Cancer
Sweeney, S. M., Hamadeh, H. K., Abrams, N., Adam, S. J., Brenner, S., Connors, D. E., Davis, G. J., Fiore, L. D., Gawel, S. H., Grossman, R. L., et al. (2023) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-22-1274 · Cited by 65
Chow, R., Midroni, J., Kaur, J., Boldt, G., Liu, G., Eng, L., Liu, F.-F., Haibe-Kains, B., Lock, M., & Raman, S. (2023) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djad013 · Cited by 65
Karsenti, D., Tharsis, G., Perrot, B., Cattan, P., Percie du Sert, A., Venezia, F., Zrihen, E., Gillet, A., Lab, J.-P., Tordjman, G., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00104-8 · Cited by 62
Challa, B., Tahir, M., Hu, Y., Kellough, D., Lujan, G., Sun, S., Parwani, A. V., & Li, Z. (2023) · Modern Pathology · doi:10.1016/j.modpat.2023.100216 · Cited by 61
Pathologist validation of a machine learning–derived feature for colon cancer risk stratification
L’Imperio, V., Wulczyn, E., Plass, M., Müller, H., Tamini, N., Gianotti, L., Zucchini, N., Reihs, R., Corrado, G. S., Webster, D. R., et al. (2023) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.54891 · Cited by 57
Divate, M., Tyagi, A., Richard, D. J., Prasad, P. A., Gowda, H., & Nagaraj, S. H. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14051185 · Cited by 55
Gusev, A., Shi, H., Kichaev, G., Pomerantz, M., Li, F., Long, H. W., Ingles, S. A., Kittles, R. A., Strom, S. S., Rybicki, B. A., et al. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms10979 · Cited by 51
Khattak, A., Carlino, M., Meniawy, T., Ansstas, G., Medina, T., Taylor, M. H., Kim, K. B., McKean, M., Long, G. V., Sullivan, R. J., et al. (2023) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2023-ct001 · Cited by 51
Capacity of ChatGPT to Identify Guideline-Based Treatments for Advanced Solid Tumors
Schulte, B. C. (2023) · Cureus · doi:10.7759/cureus.37938 · Cited by 48
Radici, L., Ferrario, S., Borca, V. C., Cante, D., Paolini, M., Piva, C., Baratto, L., Franco, P., & Porta, M. R. L. (2022) · Life · doi:10.3390/life12122088 · Cited by 48
AlDubayan, S., Conway, J., Camp, S., Witkowski, L., Kofman, E., Reardon, B., Han, S., Moore, N. S., Elmarakeby, H. A., Salari, K., et al. (2020) · Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) · doi:10.1001/jama.2020.20457 · Cited by 47
Self-citationUnger, J. M., & Fleury, M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2020.39.28_suppl.74 · Cited by 47
Real-time intraoperative diagnosis by deep neural network driven multiphoton virtual histology
You, S., Sun, Y., Yang, L., Park, J., Tu, H., Marjanovic, M., Sinha, S., & Boppart, S. A. (2019) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-019-0104-3 · Cited by 46
Martini, R., Newman, L., & Davis, M. (2022) · Clinical & Experimental Metastasis · doi:10.1007/s10585-021-10087-x · Cited by 46
Artificial intelligence in radiotherapy
Li, G., Wu, X., & Ma, X. (2022) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2022.08.005 · Cited by 46
Chuang, Y.-N., Tang, R., Jiang, X., & Hu, X. (2024) · Journal of Biomedical Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2024.104606 · Cited by 46
Solving medicine's data bottleneck: Nightingale Open Science
Mullainathan, S., & Obermeyer, Z. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01804-4 · Cited by 43
Long-term performance of an image-based short-term risk model for breast cancer
Eriksson, M., Czene, K., Vachon, C., Conant, E. F., & Hall, P. (2023) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.22.01564 · Cited by 43
Racial and ethnic disparities in a real-world precision oncology data registry
Cheung, A. T. M., Palapattu, E. L., Pompa, I. R., Aldrighetti, C. M., Niemierko, A., Willers, H., Huang, F., Vapiwala, N., Van Allen, E., & Kamran, S. C. (2023) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-023-00351-6 · Cited by 39
Application of Information Technology to Clinical Trial Evaluation and Enrollment: A Review
von Itzstein, M. S., Hullings, M., Mayo, H., Beg, M. S., Williams, E. L., & Gerber, D. E. (2021) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1165 · Cited by 36
Post-hoc Concept Bottleneck ModelsPreprint
Yüksekgönül, M., Wang, M. H., & Zou, J. (2022) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2205.15480 · Cited by 35
Nam, J. G., Park, S., Park, C. M., Jeon, Y. K., Chung, D. H., Goo, J. M., Kim, Y. T., & Kim, H. (2022) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.213262 · Cited by 32
DeNovoCNN: a deep learning approach to de novo variant calling in next generation sequencing data
Khazeeva, G., Sablauskas, K., van der Sanden, B., Steyaert, W., Kwint, M., Rots, D., Hinne, M., van Gerven, M., Yntema, H., Vissers, L., et al. (2022) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkac511 · Cited by 30
Detection of perineural invasion in prostate needle biopsies with deep neural networks
Kartasalo, K., Ström, P., Ruusuvuori, P., Samaratunga, H., Delahunt, B., Tsuzuki, T., Eklund, M., & Egevad, L. (2022) · Virchows Archiv · doi:10.1007/s00428-022-03326-3 · Cited by 29
A pyramid architecture-based deep learning framework for breast cancer detection
Sui, D., Liu, W., Chen, J., Zhao, C., Ma, X., Guo, M., & Tian, Z. (2021) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2021/2567202 · Cited by 29
The impact of GDPR on data sharing for European cancer research
Lawlor, R. T. (2022) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(22)00653-2 · Cited by 29
Sahraeian, S. M. E., Fang, L. T., Karagiannis, K., Moos, M., Smith, S., Santana-Quintero, L., Xiao, C., Colgan, M., Hong, H., Mohiyuddin, M., et al. (2022) · Genome biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-021-02592-9 · Cited by 27
Christensen, E. W., Waid, M., Scott, J., Patel, B. K., Bello, J. A., & Rula, E. Y. (2023) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.221153 · Cited by 20
Clinical trial designs for artificial intelligence in gastrointestinal endoscopy
Mori, Y., Kaminski, M. F., Hassan, C., & Bretthauer, M. (2022) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(22)00232-1 · Cited by 18
Deep learning for colorectal polyp detection: time for clinical implementation?
Ahmad, O. F. (2020) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30431-5 · Cited by 9
Jongbloed, E. M., Jansen, M. P. H. M., de Weerd, V., Helmijr, J. A., Beaufort, C. M., Reinders, M. J. T., van Marion, R., van IJcken, W. F. J., Sonke, G. S., Konings, I. R., et al. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-37409-1 · Cited by 6
Computer-aided detection in real-world colonoscopy: enhancing detection or offering false hope?
Misawa, M., Kudo, S.-E., & Mori, Y. (2023) · The Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · doi:10.1016/s2468-1253(23)00166-8 · Cited by 6
Representing visual classification as a linear combination of wordsPreprint
Agarwal, S. K., Semenov, Y. R., & Lotter, W. E. (2023) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.10933 · Cited by 1
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
18 of the 210 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Devlin, 2019, Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding, 4171
- Kim, 2018, Interpretability beyond feature attribution: quantitative testing with concept activation vectors (TCAV), 2668
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hsu, C.-Y., Askar, S., Alshkarchy, S. S., Nayak, P. P., Attabi, K. A. L., Khan, M. A., Mayan, J. A., Sharma, M. K., Islomov, S., & Soleimani Samarkhazan, H. (2025) · Clinical and Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10238-025-01965-9 · Cited by 140
“Emerging solutions include the development of “fed - erated regulatory sandboxes” that permit provisional model validation under harmonized international guidelines [ 73].”
AI-driven biomarker discovery: enhancing precision in cancer diagnosis and prognosis
Alum, E. U. (2025) · Discover Oncology · doi:10.1007/s12672-025-02064-7 · Cited by 159
Current Bioinformatics Tools in Precision Oncology
Wolde, T., Bhardwaj, V., & Pandey, V. (2025) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.70243 · Cited by 67
Using mathematical modelling and AI to improve delivery and efficacy of therapies in cancer
Harkos, C., Hadjigeorgiou, A. G., Voutouri, C., Kumar, A. S., Stylianopoulos, T., & Jain, R. K. (2025) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-025-00796-w · Cited by 62
“Over the past decade, AI has emerged as a powerful tool in oncology, leveraging vast datasets to improve cancer detection, prognosis and drug discovery 34 (Fig.”
How AI is used in FDA-authorized medical devices: a taxonomy across 1,016 authorizations
Singh, R., Bapna, M., Diab, A. R., Ruiz, E. S., & Lotter, W. (2025) · npj Digital Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41746-025-01800-1 · Cited by 61
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Lotter, W., Hassett, M. J., Schultz, N., Kehl, K. L., Van Allen, E. M., & Cerami, E.
- Affiliations
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- 3Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
- Corresponding author
- Cerami, Ethan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cancer Discovery
- Published
- 2024-03-21
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 711-726
- ISSN
- 2159-8274 (ISSN-L)
- 2159-8290
- PMC
- PMC11131133
- OpenAlex
- W4394695940
- Cited by
- 196
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 87 · 2025: 92 · 2024: 17
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Cancer Discovery (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- Mark Foundation For Cancer Research (Emerging Leader Award)
- National Cancer Institute (P30 CA008748, P50CA272390)
- Nancy Lurie Marks Family Foundation
- Ellison Foundation
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- artificial intelligence in oncology, clinical implementation of AI, cancer detection, cancer diagnosis, cancer therapy, diagnostic imaging, genomics, electronic health records, clinical translation
- MeSH terms
- Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Medical Oncology, Neoplasms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-07, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-07 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review