The DOI matches its Crossref record; 44 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 14 of the 25 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
Hypomorphic ASGR1 modulates lipid homeostasis via INSIG1-mediated SREBP signaling suppression
Open accessAbstract
A population genetic study identified that the asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 ( ASGR1 ) mutation carriers had substantially lower non–HDL-cholesterol (non–HDL-c) levels and reduced risks of cardiovascular diseases. However, the mechanism behind this phenomenon remained unclear. Here, we established Asgr1 -knockout mice that represented a plasma lipid profile with significantly lower non–HDL-c and triglyceride (TG) caused by decreased secretion and increased uptake of VLDL/LDL. These 2 phenotypes were linked with the decreased expression of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein and proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9, 2 key targeted genes of sterol regulatory element–binding proteins (SREBPs). Furthermore, there were fewer nuclear SREBPs (nSREBPs) on account of more SREBPs being trapped in endoplasmic reticulum, which was caused by an increased expression of insulin-induced gene 1 (INSIG1), an anchor of SREBPs. Overexpression and gene knockdown interventions, in different models, were conducted to rescue the ASGR1-deficient phenotypes, and we found that INSIG1 knockdown independently reversed the ASGR1-mutated phenotypes with increased serum total cholesterol, LDL-c, TG, and liver cholesterol content accompanied by restored SREBP signaling. ASGR1 rescue experiments reduced INSIG1 and restored the SREBP network defect as manifested by improved apolipoprotein B secretion and reduced LDL uptake. Our observation demonstrated that increased INSIG1 is a critical factor responsible for ASGR1 deficiency–associated lipid profile changes and nSREBP suppression. This finding of an ASGR1/INSIG1/SREBP axis regulating lipid hemostasis may provide multiple potential targets for lipid-lowering drug development.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
ASGR1 deficiency lowers plasma non-HDL cholesterol and triglycerides in mice by reducing VLDL/LDL secretion and increasing LDL uptake, through increased INSIG1 and suppressed nuclear SREBP signaling. Knockdown of INSIG1 or restoration of ASGR1 reverses these lipid and SREBP phenotypes, defining an ASGR1/INSIG1/SREBP axis.
Key findings
- In male Asgr1-knockout mice, serum TC was 3.8 ± 0.50, 2.9 ± 0.43, and 2.7 ± 0.37 mM in WT, Asgr1+/−, and Asgr1−/− mice; non–HDL-c was 2.3 ± 0.45, 1.7 ± 0.3, and 1.63 ± 0.19 mM, respectively. Female ASGR1-deficient mice also had lower TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, and non–HDL-c, with the exception of TG.
- VLDL/LDL secretion was reduced: after tyloxapol, serum TG at 3 hours decreased by 19% in Asgr1+/− and 21% in Asgr1−/− mice; serum APOB100 and APOB48 decreased by 40% and 60% in Asgr1-null mice, with reduced MTTP and APOB at mRNA and protein levels.
- LDL uptake increased by 20% and 90% in Asgr1+/− and Asgr1−/− primary hepatocytes, by 45% in ASGR1−/− HepG2 cells, and by 50% in hu-HLC-ASGR1−/− cells; PCSK9 was downregulated and LDLR protein increased.
- Mechanistically, nSREBP1/2 were lower and INSIG1 was higher; INSIG1 knockdown reversed serum TC, LDL-c, TG, and liver cholesterol and restored nSREBP1/2, MTTP, LDLR, and PCSK9, while ASGR1 restoration increased nSREBP1/2, decreased INSIG1, increased APOB secretion by 50%, and normalized LDL uptake.
Methods
- Generated Asgr1-knockout mice by CRISPR/Cas9 on a C57BL/6 background; used male mice about 10–13 weeks old, primary hepatocytes, HepG2 cells, and H1-derived hepatocyte-like cells; performed RNA-Seq on WT and Asgr1−/− livers (GSE178370).
- Measured serum and hepatic lipids, FPLC, oral lipid tolerance, tyloxapol secretion, LDL-dil uptake, APOB ELISA, qPCR, Western blot, immunofluorescence, and nuclear/ER fractionation; used siRNA knockdown and ASGR1/PCSK9 overexpression rescue experiments.
- Statistics used unpaired 2-tailed t tests for 2 groups and 1-way ANOVA for 3 or more groups; data are means ± SEM, with significance at *P < 0.05, P < 0.01, and *P < 0.001.
Limitations
- Stated: the deep mechanistic roots of the ASGR1/INSIG1 linkage remain to be clarified, and the authors suggest further investigation into whether ASGR1 mediates insulin receptor degradation and regulates Insig1.
- Stated/evident: the findings come from mouse models and cell lines (HepG2, H1-derived hepatocytes, primary mouse hepatocytes), not from human ASGR1 mutation carriers or human intervention studies.
- Evident: sex differences were observed—female ASGR1-deficient mice did not show the TG decrease seen in males—and subsequent experiments used male mice to avoid hormonal effects, so sex-specific mechanisms are not fully resolved.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
14 of 25 cited sources checked · 5 supported · 1 flagged · accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
The gene expression of PCSK9 is negatively regulated by SREBPs.
“The gene expression of PCSK9 is negatively regulated by SREBPs, and PCSK9 protein is a key mediator for LDLR internalization and degradation by ubiquitination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [34] source
The section “Regulation of the promoter activity of PCSK9 by overexpression of SREBPs” reports that nuclear SREBPs dramatically increased PCSK9 promoter transcription. The paper describes SREBP-1 and SREBP-2 as activators of PCSK9 expression, contrary to the claimed negative regulation. (LLM, conf=0.94)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Premisecitation
LDLR and PCSK9 are downstream genes of SREBPs.
“LDLR and PCSK9 are downstream genes of SREBPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] source
The Discussion concludes that SREBP-1 is involved in LDL receptor gene activation, supporting the LDLR part of the claim. Our copy does not address PCSK9, so it does not support the claim that PCSK9 is also downstream of SREBPs (searched: PCSK9, proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin 9). (LLM, conf=0.89)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [34] source
- Premisecitation
ASGR1 mutation carriers have reduced risks of cardiovascular diseases.
“A human population genetic study provided evidence that variant asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGR1) is associated with lower non–HDL-c content and reduced risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), indicating a potential target for CVD prevention and treatment (3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
- Premisecitation
PCSK9 protein is a key mediator for LDLR degradation by ubiquitination.
“The PCSK9 protein is a key mediator for LDLR degradation by ubiquitination, and its inhibitors have been applied to clinical trials for hypocholesterolemia (33, 34).”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
“The gene expression of PCSK9 is negatively regulated by SREBPs, and PCSK9 protein is a key mediator for LDLR internalization and degradation by ubiquitination.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim2 of 2 sources checked- cites [33] source
The introduction and Discussion describe SREBP-1 regulation of LDL receptor gene transcription, not degradation of the receptor protein. Searches for PCSK9, ubiquitination, and PCSK9 inhibitors found no passage addressing the attributed claim; page numbers were unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.78)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [34] source
The Abstract says PCSK9 promotes LDLR internalization and degradation, and describes prevention of LDLR recycling or targeting it for lysosomal degradation. Neither that passage nor the Discussion identifies ubiquitination as the mechanism, so the mechanistic part of the claim is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Also stated in: § Discussion · plain
- Premisecitation
Previously established Asgr1-knockout mice by replacing exons 2-3 were unable to clear asialofetuin and asialo-orosomucoid.
“Previously, Asgr1-knockout mice were established by replacing exons 2–3, which contain the ATG translational initiation codon and transmembrane domain (27). These ASGR1-knockout mice were unable to clear asialofetuin and asialo-orosomucoid.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] source
The Experimental Procedures describe replacing the fragment containing exons 2–3 to generate MHL-1 knockout mice. The Results report severely impaired clearance of both asialofetuin and asialo-orosomucoid, but not an inability to clear them: at 30 minutes, 40% and 65% of the respective doses remained in knockout mice. (LLM, conf=0.91)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
- Findingown data
mRNA expression of Mttp and Apob is significantly decreased in null Asgr1-null mice compared with WT counterparts.
“the mRNA expression of Mttp and Apob was significantly decreased in null Asgr1-null mice compared with that of WT counterparts (Figure 2C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no direct interaction between ASGR1 and LDLR.
“Our data from colocalization and co-IP assays indicated that there was no direct interaction between ASGR1 and LDLR.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Cholesterol content in livers of Asgr1-/- mice is significantly lower than that of WT mice.
“Fed with a normal diet without cholesterol addition, Asgr1–/– mice’s cholesterol content in livers was significantly lower than that of WT mice (Figure 1H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Restoring ASGR1 expression in ASGR1−/− HepG2 cells increases expression levels of MTTP and PCSK9.
“Consequently, the expression levels of MTTP and PCSK9 were also increased in ASGR1−/−-ASGR1-tg cells (Figure 8B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
We screened all known related proteins and only identified INSIG1 to be increased.
“We screened all the known related proteins and only identified INSIG1 to be increased (Figure 6).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Functions of SREBPs depend on their activation by double proteolytic cleavage.
- Rests on an assumption: Transportation of SREBPs from the ER to the Golgi and to the nucleus is the key event involved with many factors for trafficking and cleavage.
- Findingown data
Only INSIG1 is increased in ASGR1-knockout mice among proteins involved in the SREBP activation process.
“We found that only INSIG1 was increased in ASGR1-knockout mice, which might contribute to the retention of SREBPs in the ER (Figure 6A and Supplemental Figure 5B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cholesterol and protein chaperones affect the activation of SREBPs.
- Findingown data
Non-HDL-c content is 2.3 (±0.45) mM, 1.7 (±0.3) mM, and 1.63 (±0.19) mM in WT, Asgr1+/−, and Asgr1−/− mice, respectively.
“The non–HDL-c content of the WT, Asgr1+/−, and Asgr1−/− mice was 2.3 (± 0.45) mM, 1.7 (± 0.3) mM, and 1.63 (± 0.19) mM, respectively (Figure 1F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Pcsk9 was reduced by 50% in ASGR1-deficient hepatocytes.
“Another SREBP-targeted gene, Pcsk9, was reduced by 50% in ASGR1-deficient hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Transcriptome analysis suggests that Asgr1 knockout only leads to decreased expression of a group of genes related to lipid metabolism.
“The Asgr1-knockout mice showed normal growth and development, and transcriptome analysis suggested that Asgr1 knockout only led to decreased expression of a group of genes related to lipid metabolism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingcitation
ASGR1 deficiency in mice reduces cholesterol and triglyceride contents.
“In line with human genetic findings, ASGR1 deficiency in mice reduced cholesterol and triglyceride (TG) contents.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
FPLC confirms that the content of lipids carried by lipoproteins is decreased in ASGR1-deficient mice.
“Consistent with the trends and changes of biochemical analysis, the FPLC assay confirmed that the content of lipids carried by lipoproteins was decreased (Figure 1, J and K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Within the short experimental period, measured secretion of total cholesterol did not show a significant difference among ASGR1-knockout and WT mice.
“Within this short experimental period, the measured secretion of TC did not show a significant difference among the groups of ASGR1-knockout and WT mice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
LDL uptake rate is increased by 45% in ASGR1-/- HepG2 cells compared with control WT cells.
“Likewise, the LDL uptake rate was increased by 45% in ASGR1–/– HepG2 cells compared with control WT cells (Figure 3, A and D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is less APOB in the liver and serum of ASGR1-deficient mice.
“Western blot analyses also revealed less APOB in the liver and serum of ASGR1-deficient mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Immunofluorescence indicates less nSREBP1/2 is distributed in nuclei of ASGR1-/- cells.
“The immunofluorescence data further indicated that less nSREBP1/2 was distributed in the nuclei of ASGR1–/– cells (Figure 5D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Ldlr mRNA decreased in the liver of ASGR1-deficient mice.
“Ldlr mRNA decreased in the liver of ASGR1-deficient mice because of decreased nSREBPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The reduction of APOB is paralleled by a similar trend of reduction of MTTP.
“The decrease was paralleled with the similar trend of reduction of MTTP (the key protein for LDL assembly and secretion).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Increased LDLR protein was revealed in all ASGR1-deficient conditions.
“In contrast, increased LDLR protein was revealed in all ASGR1-deficient conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
INSIG1 knockdown reverses protein levels of SREBP-targeted genes MTTP, LDLR, and PCSK9 in Asgr1-/- mice.
“Likewise, the protein levels of SREBP-targeted genes, MTTP, LDLR, and PCSK9, displayed reversed states (Figure 7J).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Full-length SREBP1/2 and INSIG1 are predominantly accumulated in the ER of ASGR1-deficient cells.
“Furthermore, Western blot analysis, which was performed specifically on ER proteins, showed that the full-length SREBP1/2 and INSIG1 were predominantly accumulated in the ER of ASGR1-deficient cells (Figure 6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingreasoning
Genes involved in lipogenesis and lipoprotein metabolism, particularly MTTP and PCSK9, are markedly inhibited under ASGR1-deficient conditions.
“Genes involved in lipogenesis and lipoprotein metabolism, particularly the expression of 2 SREBP-targeted genes, MTTP and PCSK9, were markedly inhibited under ASGR1-deficient conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
APOB content is reduced in fractions containing CM and VLDL/LDL particles in serum of Asgr1−/− mice.
“the deep analysis of apolipoprotein B (APOB, the core factor of VLDL/LDL) with FPLC confirmed that the APOB content was reduced in fractions containing CM and VLDL/LDL particles in serum of the Asgr1−/− mice”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Expression of MTTP and PCSK9 related to LDL assembling and endocytosis is significantly decreased in ASGR1-deficient conditions.
“All of those inspected genes were transcriptionally downregulated, indicating that lipogenesis was inhibited in the absence of ASGR1 (Figure 5, E and F); in addition, the expression of MTTP and PCSK9 related to LDL assembling and endocytosis was also significantly decreased (Figure 2, C and F; and Figure 3, B and E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
LDLR protein levels markedly increased 1.5-fold in the liver tissues of Asgr1−/− mice.
“By contrast, the LDLR protein levels markedly increased 1.5-fold in the liver tissues of Asgr1−/− mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
ASGR1 deficiency does not affect dietary fat absorption.
“after 4 hours, we found that the serum TG and cholesterol content were similar among WT and ASGR1-deficient mice, indicating that ASGR1 deficiency did not affect dietary fat absorption (Supplemental Figure 3, A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
INSIG1 knockdown in Asgr1-/- mice reverses phenotypic features as manifested by decreased serum TC, LDL-c, and TG and liver cholesterol content.
“the phenotypic features were reversed in Asgr1–/– mice as manifested by decreased serum TC, LDL-c, and TG and liver cholesterol content (Figure 7, C, D, F, and G), while there were no obvious changes in serum HDL-c and liver TG content (Figure 7, E and H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
INSIG1 knockdown in ASGR1-deficient mice reverses increased INSIG1 protein levels to near WT levels.
“Whereas knockdown of Insig1 mRNA resulted in the reversal of the increased INSIG1 protein levels to near the WT levels (Figure 7, A and B)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Asgr1-knockout mice show normal growth and development.
“The Asgr1-knockout mice showed normal growth and development, and transcriptome analysis suggested that Asgr1 knockout only led to decreased expression of a group of genes related to lipid metabolism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Dysregulated genes are substantially enriched into the metabolic pathway.
“Those dysregulated genes were substantially enriched into the metabolic pathway, indicating that the physiological functions of ASGR1 were relevant to metabolism (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In ASGR1-null HepG2 cells, secreted APOB in the supernatant is significantly decreased.
“The secreted APOB in the supernatant was significantly decreased in ASGR1-null HepG2 cells, corresponding to the animal results (Figure 2H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
MTTP is decreased significantly at both mRNA and protein levels in ASGR1-deficient cells.
“Similarly, MTTP was decreased significantly at both mRNA and protein levels in ASGR1-deficient cells (Figure 2, F and G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Increased LDLR protein is observed in all cases of ASGR1-deficient mice and HepG2 cells.
“In contrast to the mRNA expression pattern, increased LDLR protein was observed in all cases of ASGR1-deficient mice and HepG2 cells (Figure 3, C and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The whole spectrum of lipids in serum and liver tissues is decreased in ASGR1-deficient male mice.
“Notably, biochemical analysis of the lipid profile indicated that the whole spectrum of lipids in serum and liver tissues were decreased in ASGR1-deficient male mice (Figure 1, C–I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
mRNA level of Insig1 and Insig2 shows no significant changes among mice.
“However, the mRNA level of Insig1 and Insig2 showed no significant changes among mice (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Serum total cholesterol levels are 3.8 (±0.50) mM, 2.9 (±0.43) mM, and 2.7 (±0.37) mM in WT, Asgr1+/−, and Asgr1−/− mice, respectively.
“In detail, the serum TC level showed significant changes among groups, which were 3.8 (± 0.50) mM, 2.9 (± 0.43) mM, and 2.7 (± 0.37) mM in WT, Asgr1+/−, and Asgr1−/− mice, respectively, followed by the reduced level of LDL-c, HDL-c, and TG in similar trends.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mice with different Asgr1 genotypes take in a similar amount of food per day.
“the amount of food intake per day for mice was measured, and the results suggested that mice with different genotypes took in a similar amount of food (Supplemental Figure 1D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
34 genes are changed in the metabolic pathway, involved in lipid metabolism, oxidoreductase, carbohydrate metabolism, and kinase.
“A total of 34 genes were found to be changed in the metabolic pathway, which were involved in lipid metabolism, oxidoreductase, carbohydrate metabolism, and kinase (Figure 4E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
PCSK9 is significantly downregulated both on mRNA and on protein levels in ASGR1-deficient conditions.
“Furthermore, PCSK9, the mediator for LDLR degradation (25), was found to be significantly downregulated both on mRNA and on protein levels in ASGR1-deficient conditions, which contributed to stability of LDLR (Figure 3, B, C, E, and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Increased LDL uptake is observed in hu-HLC-ASGR1-/- cells by 50%.
“Consequently, increased LDL uptake was observed in the hu-HLC-ASGR1–/– cells by 50% (Supplemental Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There was no significant difference between the two groups in the PCSK9 rescue experiment.
“However, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (Supplemental Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Hepatic cholesterol was decreased in ASGR1-depleted mice.
“Although uptake of LDL-c was increased, the hepatic cholesterol was decreased in ASGR1-depleted mice, indicating that sterols were not the critical factor in inhibiting SREBPs’ translocation in our model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given
Uptake of LDL-c was increased in ASGR1-depleted mice.
“Although uptake of LDL-c was increased, the hepatic cholesterol was decreased in ASGR1-depleted mice, indicating that sterols were not the critical factor in inhibiting SREBPs’ translocation in our model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationown data
The hypomorphic phenotype of ASGR1 is predominantly caused by reduced production of nSREBPs.
“The mechanistic study revealed that the hypomorphic phenotype of ASGR1 was predominantly caused by reduced production of nSREBPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
PCSK9 downregulation contributes to stability of LDLR in ASGR1-deficient conditions.
“Furthermore, PCSK9, the mediator for LDLR degradation (25), was found to be significantly downregulated both on mRNA and on protein levels in ASGR1-deficient conditions, which contributed to stability of LDLR (Figure 3, B, C, E, and F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ASGR1 may play a physiological role in the regulatory network of lipid homeostasis.
“Overall, this finding indicates that ASGR1 may play a physiological role in the regulatory network of lipid homeostasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Reduction of processed nSREBPs is primarily caused by increased INSIG1 under ASGR1-deficient conditions.
“Overall, these results indicated that the reduction of processed nSREBPs was primarily caused by increased INSIG1 under ASGR1-deficient conditions.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Restoration of ASGR1 expression in ASGR1-null cells rescues higher INSIG1-mediated SREBP network defects and related phenotypes.
“Overall, these results indicate that restoration of ASGR1 expression in ASGR1-null cells rescued higher INSIG1-mediated SREBP network defects and the related phenotypes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The decrease in Ldlr mRNA in ASGR1-deficient mice was due to decreased nSREBPs.
“Ldlr mRNA decreased in the liver of ASGR1-deficient mice because of decreased nSREBPs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The phenotype of ASGR1-deficient mice closely mimics the feature found in human carriers with ASGR1 mutations.
“This phenotype closely mimics the feature found in those human carriers with ASGR1 mutations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ASGR1 deficiency might lead to defects in SREBPs' activation and signaling.
“These data suggested that ASGR1 deficiency might lead to defects in SREBPs’ activation and signaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Protein stability and degradation of LDLR should be considered causes of increased LDLR in the ASGR1-deficient condition.
“Therefore, protein stability and degradation of LDLR should be considered causes of increased LDLR in the ASGR1-deficient condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Hypomorphic ASGR1 modulates lipid homeostasis via INSIG1-mediated SREBP signaling suppression.
“This suggests that there is a signaling axis, ASGR1/INSIG1/SREBP, in which INSIG1 is the primary change factor and independent of SREBP under ASGR1 deficiency, and hypomorphic ASGR1 modulates lipid homeostasis via INSIG1-mediated SREBP signaling suppression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
ASGR1 mutation carriers have substantially lower non-HDL-cholesterol levels.
“A human population genetic study provided evidence that variant asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGR1) is associated with lower non–HDL-c content and reduced risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), indicating a potential target for CVD prevention and treatment (3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
- Interpretationown data
Increased LDL uptake under ASGR1-deficient conditions might be due to the low PCSK9 level leading to more stable LDLR on hepatocytes.
“Collectively, the increased LDL uptake under ASGR1-deficient conditions might be due to the low PCSK9 level leading to more stable LDLR on hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The uptake of LDL-c by the liver is the predominant way to clear it from plasma.
- Interpretationreasoning
The higher INSIG1 protein is independent of the SREBP signaling suppression in the ASGR1-deficient condition.
“However, the higher INSIG1 protein is independent of the SREBP signaling suppression in the ASGR1-deficient condition.”
- Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
“More importantly, the higher INSIG1 protein was independent of the SREBP signaling suppression in the ASGR1-deficient condition.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § Discussion · boosted
- Interpretationreasoning
The high level of LDLR in ASGR1-deficient mice is independent of its transcriptional regulation.
“The high level of LDLR is independent of its transcriptional regulation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
Reduced nSREBP production seems to explain most of the phenotypes observed under ASGR1 deficiency conditions, except for the increased INSIG1 protein.
“Reduced nSREBP production seems to explain most of the phenotypes observed under ASGR1 deficiency conditions, except for the increased INSIG1 protein.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ASGR1 substantially participates in the regulatory network of serum lipid homeostasis through INSIG1-mediated SREBP signaling.
“In this complicated network, we have demonstrated that ASGR1 substantially participates in the regulatory network of serum lipid homeostasis through INSIG1-mediated SREBP signaling.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Increased INSIG1 protein might be responsible for ER retention of SREBPs in ASGR1 deficiency.
“In summary, these results suggest that the increased INSIG1 protein might be responsible for the ER retention of SREBPs in ASGR1 deficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Cholesterol and protein chaperones affect the activation of SREBPs.
- Interpretationown data
ASGR1 deficiency promotes SREBPs' retention in the endoplasmic reticulum through upregulating INSIG1 and inhibiting SREBPs' activation.
“Mechanistic studies revealed that ASGR1 deficiency promoted SREBPs’ retention in ER through upregulating INSIG1 and inhibiting SREBPs’ activation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Sterols were not the critical factor in inhibiting SREBPs' translocation in our model.
“Although uptake of LDL-c was increased, the hepatic cholesterol was decreased in ASGR1-depleted mice, indicating that sterols were not the critical factor in inhibiting SREBPs’ translocation in our model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Probably not a substantial claim. 16
- It may state two separate claims as one. 44
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationLDLR recycling plays a critical role in the endocytosis of LDL, and hepatic uptake of serum LDL-c facilitates serum lipid homeostasis.
“LDLR recycling plays a critical role in the endocytosis of LDL, and hepatic uptake of serum LDL-c facilitates serum lipid homeostasis (32).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [32] source
It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationHeterozygous ASGR1 mutation carriers have lower non-HDL-c and TG, and ASGR1 haploinsufficiency is associated with lower risk of CAD.
“The heterozygous mutation carriers had a lower level of non–HDL-c and TG, and the ASGR1 haploinsufficiency was associated with a lower risk of CAD (3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationMTTP is transcriptionally regulated by SREBPs, and lack of MTTP results in APOB cotranslational degradation.
“MTTP is transcriptionally regulated by SREBPs, and the lack of MTTP results in APOB cotranslational degradation (29–31).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim3 of 3 sources checked- cites [29] source
The Introduction says that adding lipids to apo B as it is translated is thought to help it avoid degradation, and the results section reports substantially reduced apo B-100 secretion from Mttp-deficient hepatocytes. Neither passage establishes that the loss causes cotranslational degradation; the paper also reports little change in apo B-48 secretion. The passages do not support the claim that SREBPs transcriptionally regulate MTTP (section labels available; page numbers not provided). (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [30] source
The section on SREBP1a binding states that SREBP negatively regulates MTTP expression, supporting the transcriptional-regulation claim. The Introduction says MTTP stabilizes newly synthesized apoB, but does not state that lack of MTTP causes its cotranslational degradation. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured - cites [31] source
The section on cotranslational production of ApoB48-like protein proposes that insufficient MTP activity can interrupt apoB translocation and leave apoB susceptible to degradation during translation. This supports the degradation part, though the mechanism is proposed from experiments in transfected COS-7 cells. No passage found supports the separate claim that SREBPs transcriptionally regulate MTTP (searched for SREBP and sterol regulatory element-binding proteins). (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationINSIG1 is ubiquitinated and degraded by GP78 when oxysterols are depleted, while oxysterols stabilize it by binding within its transmembrane domains.
“INSIG1 is ubiquitinated and degraded by GP78 when oxysterols are depleted, while oxysterols stabilize it by binding within its transmembrane domains (37, 38).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim1 of 2 sources checked- cites [37] source
- cites [38] source
The Abstract reports that oxysterols bind Insigs and that the third and fourth transmembrane helices are important for binding. The Discussion says the binding experiments used Insig-2, though the authors believe the conclusions also apply to Insig-1. Our copy does not say that oxysterol binding stabilizes Insig-1 or that GP78 ubiquitinates and degrades it upon oxysterol depletion; its Discussion instead describes ubiquitination and degradation of HMGR. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationINSIG1 is a protein promoting ER retention of SREBPs, and it is the targeted gene that exerts negative feedback control of SREBPs.
“INSIG1 is a protein promoting ER retention of SREBPs, while it is the targeted gene that exerts negative feedback control of SREBPs (35, 36).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim1 of 2 sources checkedIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown datamRNA expression of SREBP target genes in lipogenesis (ACC, FASN, SCD1) and cholesterol synthesis (HMGCS, HMGCR) is downregulated in mouse livers and HepG2 cells, indicating lipogenesis is inhibited in the absence of ASGR1.
“All of those inspected genes were transcriptionally downregulated, indicating that lipogenesis was inhibited in the absence of ASGR1 (Figure 5, E and F); in addition, the expression of MTTP and PCSK9 related to LDL assembling and endocytosis was also significantly decreased (Figure 2, C and F; and Figure 3, B and E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn Asgr1-null mice, serum contents of APOB100 and APOB48 are decreased by 40% and 60%, respectively.
“Particularly, in the null Asgr1-nullmice, the serum contents of APOB100 and APOB48 were decreased by 40% and 60% (Figure 2, D and E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataUpon overexpression of PCSK9 in HepG2-ASGR1-/- cells and WT HepG2 cells, LDLR protein content decreases in both cell lines, leading to no substantial difference of LDLR between HepG2-ASGR1-/- and WT cells.
“Upon overexpression of PCSK9 in HepG2-ASGR1–/– cells and WT HepG2 cells, respectively, the LDLR protein content decreased in both cell lines, leading to no substantial difference of the LDLR between HepG2-ASGR1–/– and WT cells (Supplemental Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataLDLR mRNA expression declines in ASGR1-deficient livers, and a slight increase is observed in HepG2 cells.
“The LDLR mRNA expression declined in ASGR1-deficient livers, and a slight increase was observed in HepG2 cells.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataINSIG1 knockdown reverses reduction of nSREBP1/2 proteins in Asgr1-/- mice; scramble siRNA groups have no marked effects on lipid profile or nSREBP levels.
“while the protein level of INSIG1 in Asgr1–/– mice was reduced to the level similar to the one in WT mice, the reduction of nSREBP1/2 proteins was also reversed, and the scramble siRNA groups (WT-NC and Asgr1–/–-NC) had no marked effects on lipid profile or on nSREBP levels (Figure 7I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataThe majority of transcriptomes of Asgr1-/- mouse liver are similar to those of WT counterparts, and the significantly altered genes are very limited.
“The majority of transcriptomes of Asgr1–/– mouse liver were similar to those of WT counterparts, and the significantly altered genes were very limited (Figure 4A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataPCSK9 overexpression reduced LDLR levels and increased PCSK9 protein levels in HepG2 and HepG2-ASGR1-/- cells.
“we conducted a rescue experiment through overexpression of PCSK9 in HepG2 and HepG2-ASGR1–/– cells and found out that the LDLR levels were reduced while the PCSK9 protein levels were increased either in HepG2 or in HepG2-ASGR1–/– cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAfter tyloxapol administration, serum TG levels of ASGR1-deficient mice are less than those of WT mice, with the most significant difference at 3 hours (Asgr1+/− decreased by 19%; Asgr1−/− decreased by 21%).
“we measured serum lipid level after administration of lipoprotein lipase inhibitor tyloxapol and found serum TG levels of ASGR1-deficient mice were comparatively less than those of WT mice. The most significant difference was observed at 3 hours after intravenous injection (Asgr1+/−, decreased by 19%; Asgr1−/−, decreased by 21%; Figure 2, A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataBile acid content in liver and feces, as well as expressions of bile acid synthesis-related genes in liver, have no significant difference among mice with or without ASGR.
“In addition, bile acid content in the liver and feces, as well as the expressions of bile acid synthesis-related genes in liver, had no significant difference among mice with or without ASGR (Supplemental Figure 3, D–F).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataAmong altered genes, 12 are associated with lipid metabolism, of which 11 are downregulated and 1 is upregulated.
“Among those genes with altered expression, 12 of them were associated with lipid metabolism, in which 11 genes were downregulated and 1 gene was upregulated, as shown in the heatmap.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn HepG2 cells, INSIG1 knockdown reverses phenotypic features with 40% increase of APOB secretion and LDL uptake down to WT level.
“Then phenotypic features were reversed with 40% increase of APOB secretion and LDL uptake down to the level of WT (Figure 7, L and M).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown data181 genes are significantly changed (fold change > 1.5, q value < 0.05), among which 104 genes are downregulated and 77 genes are upregulated.
“Further analysis of the differentially expressed genes showed that 181 genes were significantly changed (fold change > 1.5, q value < 0.05), among which 104 genes were downregulated and 77 genes were upregulated (Figure 4C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataBody weight and hepatic histology show no significant difference among mice with different Asgr1 genotypes.
“The body weight of mice and hepatic histology showed no significant difference among mice with different genotypes (Supplemental Figure 1, C and E).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataLDL uptake rates are increased by 20% and 90% in Asgr1+/- and Asgr1-/- primary hepatocytes, respectively, compared with WT counterparts.
“In detail, the uptake rates increased by 20% and 90% in Asgr1+/– and Asgr1–/– primary hepatocytes, respectively, compared with the WT counterparts.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataASGR1 is highly expressed in liver tissues of WT mice but is substantially decreased or undetectable in Asgr1+/− or Asgr1−/− mice, respectively.
“ASGR1 was highly expressed in liver tissues of WT mice but was substantially decreased or undetectable in Asgr1+/− or Asgr1−/− mice, respectively (Figure 1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataNuclear and cytoplasmic protein separation confirms that nSREBP1/2 level is reduced in nuclei of ASGR1-/- cells, while more full-length SREBP1/2 is accumulated in cytoplasm.
“Next, we separated nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins from HepG2 cells and confirmed that the level of nSREBP1/2 was reduced in the nuclei of ASGR1–/– cells, while more full-length SREBP1/2 was accumulated in the cytoplasm (Figure 5C and Supplemental Figure 5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown datanSREBP1 and nSREBP2 protein content is lower in ASGR1-deficient mouse livers and HepG2 cells, while full-length SREBP proteins are increased in mice, indicating that SREBP activation is inhibited.
“By detecting SREBP1 and SREBP2, we found that the protein content of nSREBP1 and nSREBP2 was lower in ASGR1-deficient mouse livers and HepG2 cells, while the content of full-length proteins was increased in mice, indicating that the activation was inhibited (Figure 5, A and B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataINSIG1 knockdown or ASGR1 restoration reversed the ASGR1 deficiency-associated lipid profile and SREBP suppression in ASGR1-deficient mice and cells.
“we performed knockdown or restored expression of key factors in the ASGR1-deficient mice and cells and found that INSIG1 knockdown or ASGR1 restoration reversed the ASGR1 deficiency–associated lipid profile and SREBP suppression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataGSEAs show improved metabolic signaling and reduced cholesterol-related signaling in Asgr1-/- mouse livers.
“Gene set enrichment analyses (GSEAs) showed improved metabolic signaling and reduced cholesterol-related signaling in Asgr1–/– mouse livers (Figure 4B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn female mice, serum TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, and non-HDL-c levels are decreased in ASGR1-deficient mice, with the exception of TG.
“Consistent with male mice, the serum TC, LDL-c, HDL-c, and non–HDL-c levels were decreased in ASGR1-deficient female mice, with the exception of TG (Supplemental Figure 2, A–E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataLDL-c, HDL-c, and TG levels are reduced in ASGR1-deficient male mice in similar trends to total cholesterol.
“In detail, the serum TC level showed significant changes among groups, which were 3.8 (± 0.50) mM, 2.9 (± 0.43) mM, and 2.7 (± 0.37) mM in WT, Asgr1+/−, and Asgr1−/− mice, respectively, followed by the reduced level of LDL-c, HDL-c, and TG in similar trends.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningMTTP is reduced along with lower levels of APOB when ASGR1 is deficient, resulting in decreased VLDL/LDL secretion.
“We observed that the MTTP was reduced along with lower levels of APOB, when ASGR1 was deficient, resulting in decreased VLDL/LDL secretion.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataRestoring ASGR1 expression in ASGR1−/− HepG2 cells increases nSREBP1/2 and decreases INSIG1.
“Compared with the control cells (ASGR1−/−-EGFP-tg), nSREBP1/2 were increased, while INSIG1 was decreased (Figure 8A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataINSIG1 knockdown in Asgr1-/- mice causes no obvious changes in serum HDL-c and liver TG content.
“the phenotypic features were reversed in Asgr1–/– mice as manifested by decreased serum TC, LDL-c, and TG and liver cholesterol content (Figure 7, C, D, F, and G), while there were no obvious changes in serum HDL-c and liver TG content (Figure 7, E and H).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
FindingreasoningThe mRNA of both Ldlr and Pcsk9 declined in ASGR1-deficient conditions.
“While nSREBPs were decreased, the mRNA of both genes declined.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataImmunofluorescence staining shows INSIG1 level is markedly increased and predominantly located on the ER of ASGR1−/− HepG2 cells.
“Immunofluorescence staining of INSIG1 in HepG2 cells showed that the level of INSIG1 was markedly increased and predominantly located on the ER of ASGR1−/−-HepG2 cells (Figure 6C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Findingown dataIn ASGR1−/−-ASGR1-tg cells, APOB secretion increases by 50% and LDL uptake returns to WT level.
“Correspondingly, the related phenotype of APOB secretion increased by 50%, and LDL uptake returned to the WT level in ASGR1−/−-ASGR1-tg cells (Figure 8, C and D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataASGR1 deficiency leads to a defect in LDL secretion that might be caused by less MTTP and APOB for the construction of the LDL complex and its secretion from hepatocytes.
“In summary, ASGR1 deficiency led to a defect in LDL secretion that might be caused by less MTTP and APOB for the construction of the LDL complex and its secretion from hepatocytes.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationThe first report of ASGR1 mutation found a 12 bp deletion in ASGR1, leading to loss of function.
“The first report of ASGR1 mutation was based on a population genetic study and found a 12 bp deletion in ASGR1, which led to a loss of function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [3] source
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningBoth nSREBP1 and nSREBP2 are decreased in ASGR1 deficiencies, which led to the physiological benefits of the plasma lipid profile.
“Both nSREBP1 and nSREBP2 were decreased in ASGR1 deficiencies, which led to the physiological benefits of the plasma lipid profile.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
InterpretationreasoningSREBP suppression is responsible for the higher LDLR level in ASGR1 deficiency.
“It seems plausible that the SREBP suppression is responsible for the higher LDLR level in ASGR1 deficiency.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
InterpretationreasoningOther mechanisms might play a major role in the increased INSIG1 in ASGR1 deficiency.
“Thus, it seems that other mechanisms might play a major role in the increased INSIG1 in ASGR1 deficiency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe hypomorphic effect of ASGR1 results in a healthy and favorable lipid profile, primarily generated from differential turnover of plasma lipoproteins.
“The hypomorphic effect of ASGR1 results in a healthy and favorable lipid profile, which is primarily generated from the differential turnover of the plasma lipoproteins.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningThe failure to observe significant changes of lipid profile in previous Asgr1-knockout mice may be due to particular knockout mouse lines, limited analyzed group samples, and sex-influenced variation.
“The failure to observe significant changes of lipid profile may be due to conditions including those particular knockout mouse lines, limited analyzed group samples, and the sex-influenced variation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationVLDL/LDL particles mediate lipid secretion from the liver, and two steps are generally involved in VLDL/LDL assembly: MTTP transports lipids onto APOB to form precursor particles, then precursor particles and TG droplets combine to form mature VLDL/LDL.
“VLDL/LDL particles mediated lipid secretion from the liver, and there are 2 steps generally involved in VLDL/LDL assembly. First, the MTTP transports the lipids onto APOB to form precursor particles. Then, the precursor particles and TG droplets combine to form mature VLDL/LDL (28).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [28] source
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationIn 104 patients, ASGR1 expression in peripheral blood monocytes is positively correlated with serum TC and LDL-c levels at ages younger than 60.
“Moreover, a recent study on 104 patients revealed that the expression level of ASGR1 in peripheral blood monocytes was positively correlated with serum TC and LDL-c levels at ages younger than 60 (26).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [26] Zhao, 2020, Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 gene expression in peripheral blood monocytes associates with serum total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, Chin Med J (Engl) source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
It may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningSuppression of SREBP accounted for low PCSK9 and less degradation of LDLR, which may result in higher LDLR level and LDL endocytosis.
“Collectively, the suppression of SREBP accounted for low PCSK9 and less degradation of LDLR that may result in higher LDLR level and LDL endocytosis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
InterpretationreasoningIn a dose-dependent manner, hypomorphic manipulations lead to more LDLR on cell membrane and less assembled VLDL in hepatocytes, resulting in more LDL uptake and less VLDL secretion in cell and mouse models, which represents substantially lower serum lipid content.
“In a dose-dependent manner, hypomorphic manipulations led to more LDLR on cell membrane and less assembled VLDL in hepatocytes, resulting in more LDL uptake and less VLDL secretion in cell and mouse models, which represented a substantially lower serum lipid content.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataThere is a signaling axis, ASGR1/INSIG1/SREBP, in which INSIG1 is the primary change factor and independent of SREBP under ASGR1 deficiency.
“This suggests that there is a signaling axis, ASGR1/INSIG1/SREBP, in which INSIG1 is the primary change factor and independent of SREBP under ASGR1 deficiency, and hypomorphic ASGR1 modulates lipid homeostasis via INSIG1-mediated SREBP signaling suppression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
PremisecitationIn previously established Asgr1-knockout mice, measurements of LDL and VLDL revealed a decreased trend with large standard deviations without a statistical difference, and serum TC and TG contents had no significant difference.
“However, the measurements of LDL and VLDL revealed a decreased trend with large standard deviations without a statistical difference, and the serum TC and TG contents also had no significant difference.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites [27] source
Checked before — its earlier verdict is held back until a new check runs.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenGenome-edited F0 Asgr1+/- mice were bred with C57BL/6 mice for 2 rounds to dilute off-target effects.
“Genome-edited F0 Asgr1+/– mice (Cyagen) were bred with C57BL/6 mice for 2 rounds to dilute the off-target effects.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimIt may state two separate claims as one.
Interpretationown dataIncreased INSIG1 was a primary change factor and responsible for the ASGR1 deficiency-associated lipid profile changes and nSREBP suppression.
“Overall, our observation clearly demonstrated that the increased INSIG1 was a primary change factor and responsible for the ASGR1 deficiency–associated lipid profile changes and nSREBP suppression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
Study design and conductnone givenMice used for experiments were aged about 10-13 weeks, and the age difference of the mice was no more than 1 week for the same experiment.
“Mice aged about 10–13 weeks were used for experiments, and the age difference of the mice was no more than 1 week for the same experiment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenExperiments were repeated 3 times individually at least.
“Experiments were repeated 3 times individually at least.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenFor each sample, no less than 5 representative images were analyzed to quantify fluorescence intensity values and calculate an average.
“For each sample, no less than 5 representative images were analyzed to quantify the fluorescence intensity values and calculate an average.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal studies were performed in accordance with the experimental animal ethics committee of Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health.
“All animal studies, including mouse feeding and operation experiments, were performed in accordance with the experimental animal ethics committee of Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductnone givenWT and Asgr1-/- littermates were generated by breeding Asgr1+/- mice.
“WT and Asgr1–/– littermates were generated by breeding Asgr1+/– mice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
PremisecitationInsig1 is remarkably induced by insulin.
“Moreover, Insig1 is remarkably induced by insulin (39, 40).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationDesialylation of the insulin receptor (IR) induces its activation and insulin signal transduction.
“Notably, desialylation of the insulin receptor (IR) induces its activation and insulin signal transduction (41, 42).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
The paper relies on this without support.
Cholesterol and protein chaperones affect the activation of SREBPs.
“Cholesterol and protein chaperones are known to affect the activation of SREBPs.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The uptake of LDL-c by the liver is the predominant way to clear it from plasma.
“The uptake of LDL-c by the liver is the predominant way to clear it from plasma.”
The paper relies on this without support.
SREBPs are transported from the ER to the Golgi apparatus for proteolytic double cleavages and activation.
“SREBPs were transported from the ER to Golgi apparatus for proteolytic double cleavages and activation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Functions of SREBPs depend on their activation by double proteolytic cleavage.
“Functions of SREBPs depend on their activation by double proteolytic cleavage.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Transportation of SREBPs from the ER to the Golgi and to the nucleus is the key event involved with many factors for trafficking and cleavage.
“During the process, the transportation of SREBPs from the ER to the Golgi and to the nucleus is the key event that is involved with many factors for trafficking and cleavage.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Hepatic silencing of Asgr1 in mice proposed that ASGR1 attenuates hepatic SREBP2 signaling and reduces PCSK9 levels.
“This was similarly observed in a study employing hepatic silencing of Asgr1 in mice [87], which proposed that ASGR1 attenuates hepatic SREBP2 signaling and reduces PCSK9 levels.”
From The low-density lipoprotein receptor: Emerging post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [87]
The Results section on SREBP activation reports that ASGR1-deficient mouse livers had lower nuclear SREBP2, and the LDL-uptake Results section reports lower PCSK9 under ASGR1-deficient conditions. The Results section on restoring ASGR1 expression reports the opposite effect: SREBP1/2 and PCSK9 increased. The cited paper therefore attributes attenuation to loss of ASGR1, not to ASGR1 itself; our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.90)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
LDL uptake incubation duration differs between Results and Methods
MajorThe Results say labeled LDL was incubated with hepatic cells for 4 hours, whereas the LDL uptake method specifies 3 hours.
“dil-labeled LDL was incubated with hepatic cells for 4 hours after starvation of the cells overnight.”
“HepG2, primary hepatocytes and H1-derived hepatocytes were serum-starved for 12 hours before incubating with 10 μg/mL LDL-dil (Invitrogen) for 3 hours.”
Direction of SREBP regulation of PCSK9 is inconsistent
MinorThe Discussion calls PCSK9 negatively regulated by SREBPs, but the Results report that PCSK9 decreases when SREBP activation and signaling are suppressed.
“The gene expression of PCSK9 is negatively regulated by SREBPs”
“These data suggested that ASGR1 deficiency might lead to defects in SREBPs’ activation and signaling.”
INSIG1 knockdown reverses lipid changes in opposite directions
MinorThe abstract says INSIG1 knockdown reversed the ASGR1-deficient phenotype by increasing serum TC, LDL-c, TG, and liver cholesterol. The Results describe the same reversal as decreases in those measures.
“INSIG1 knockdown independently reversed the ASGR1-mutated phenotypes with increased serum total cholesterol, LDL-c, TG, and liver cholesterol content accompanied by restored SREBP signaling.”
“the phenotypic features were reversed in Asgr1–/– mice as manifested by decreased serum TC, LDL-c, and TG and liver cholesterol content (Figure 7, C, D, F, and G)”
Citations
Cites
SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver
Horton, J. D., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci15593 · Cited by 4,794
SREBPs: activators of the complete program of cholesterol and fatty acid synthesis in the liver
Horton, J. D., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (2002) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci0215593 · Cited by 4,092
Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1997) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(00)80213-5 · Cited by 3,834
Carbohydrate-Specific Receptors of the Liver
Ashwell, G., & Harford, J. (1982) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev.bi.51.070182.002531 · Cited by 1,914
Protein Sensors for Membrane Sterols
Goldstein, J. L., DeBose-Boyd, R. A., & Brown, M. S. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.12.022 · Cited by 1,517
Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (2009) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.108.179564 · Cited by 1,344
SREBP-regulated lipid metabolism: convergent physiology - divergent pathophysiology
Shimano, H., & Sato, R. (2017) · Nature Reviews Endocrinology · doi:10.1038/nrendo.2017.91 · Cited by 1,174
Crucial Step in Cholesterol Homeostasis
Yang, T., Espenshade, P. J., Wright, M. E., Yabe, D., Gong, Y., Aebersold, R., Goldstein, J. L., & Brown, M. S. (2002) · Cell · doi:10.1016/s0092-8674(02)00872-3 · Cited by 987
Shimano, H., Horton, J. D., Hammer, R. E., Shimomura, I., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1996) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci118951 · Cited by 817
Shimano, H., Horton, J. D., Shimomura, I., Hammer, R. E., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (1997) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci119248 · Cited by 730
Radhakrishnan, A., Ikeda, Y., Kwon, H. J., Brown, M. S., & Goldstein, J. L. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0700899104 · Cited by 556
The asialoglycoprotein receptor: relationships between structure, function, and expression
Stockert, R. J. (1995) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.1995.75.3.591 · Cited by 533
Safety and efficacy of statin therapy
Adhyaru, B. B., & Jacobson, T. A. (2018) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-018-0098-5 · Cited by 424
Maxwell, K. N., Fisher, E. A., & Breslow, J. L. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0409736102 · Cited by 415
Raabe, M., Véniant, M. M., Sullivan, M. A., Zlot, C. H., Björkegren, J., Nielsen, L. B., Wong, J. S., Hamilton, R. L., & Young, S. G. (1999) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci6576 · Cited by 395
The Ashwell receptor mitigates the lethal coagulopathy of sepsis
Grewal, P. K., Uchiyama, S., Ditto, D., Varki, N., Le, D. T., Nizet, V., & Marth, J. D. (2008) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1760 · Cited by 374
The Ashwell-Morell receptor regulates hepatic thrombopoietin production via JAK2-STAT3 signaling
Grozovsky, R., Begonja, A. J., Liu, K., Visner, G. A., Hartwig, J. H., Falet, H., & Hoffmeister, K. M. (2014) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3770 · Cited by 360
Jeong, H. J., Lee, H.-S., Kim, K.-S., Kim, Y.-K., Yoon, D., & Park, S. W. (2008) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.m700443-jlr200 · Cited by 331
The SREBP pathway — insights from insigs and insects
Rawson, R. B. (2003) · Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/nrm1174 · Cited by 323
Glucose-Mediated N-glycosylation of SCAP Is Essential for SREBP-1 Activation and Tumor Growth
Cheng, C., Ru, P., Geng, F., Liu, J., Yoo, J. Y., Wu, X., Cheng, X., Euthine, V., Hu, P., Guo, J. Y., et al. (2015) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2015.09.021 · Cited by 321
Very-low-density lipoprotein assembly and secretion
Shelness, G. S., & Sellers, J. A. (2001) · Current Opinion in Lipidology · doi:10.1097/00041433-200104000-00008 · Cited by 309
Repositioning of the global epicentre of non-optimal cholesterol
Taddei, C., Zhou, B., Bixby, H., Carrillo-Larco, R. M., Danaei, G., Jackson, R., Farzadfar, F., Sophiea, M. K., Cesare, M. D., Iurilli, M. L., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2338-1 · Cited by 308
Gong, Y., Lee, J. N., Lee, P. C. W., Goldstein, J. L., Brown, M. S., & Ye, J. (2006) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2005.11.014 · Cited by 262
Engelking, L. J., Kuriyama, H., Hammer, R. E., Horton, J. D., Brown, M. S., Goldstein, J. L., & Liang, G. (2004) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci20978 · Cited by 249
Variant ASGR1 Associated with a Reduced Risk of Coronary Artery Disease
Nioi, P., Sigurdsson, A., Thorleifsson, G., Helgason, H., Agustsdottir, A. B., Norddahl, G. L., Helgadottir, A., Magnusdottir, A., Jonasdottir, A., Gretarsdottir, S., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1508419 · Cited by 189
Han, Y., Hu, Z., Cui, A., Liu, Z., Ma, F., Xue, Y., Liu, Y., Zhang, F., Zhao, Z., Yu, Y., et al. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-08585-4 · Cited by 153
Self-citationStreicher, R., Kotzka, J., Müller-Wieland, D., Siemeister, G., Munck, M., Avci, H., & Krone, W. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.12.7128 · Cited by 136
Mohn, K. L., Laz, T. M., Hsu, J. C., Melby, A. E., Bravo, R., & Taub, R. (1991) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.11.1.381 · Cited by 111
A structure of human Scap bound to Insig-2 suggests how their interaction is regulated by sterols
Yan, R., Cao, P., Song, W., Qian, H., Du, X., Coates, H. W., Zhao, X., Li, Y., Gao, S., Gong, X., et al. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2224 · Cited by 100
Self-citationDiamond, R. H., Du, K., Lee, V. M., Mohn, K. L., Haber, B. A., Tewari, D. S., & Taub, R. (1993) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/s0021-9258(18)82454-1 · Cited by 88
A novel insulin receptor-signaling platform and its link to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes
Alghamdi, F., Guo, M., Abdulkhalek, S., Crawford, N., Amith, S. R., & Szewczuk, M. R. (2014) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.02.015 · Cited by 87
Wang, S., McLeod, R. S., Gordon, D. A., & Yao, Z. (1996) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.271.24.14124 · Cited by 84
Asialoglycoprotein Receptor Deficiency in Mice Lacking the Major Receptor Subunit
Tozawa, R.-I., Ishibashi, S., Osuga, J.-I., Yamamoto, K., Yagyu, H., Ohashi, K., Tamura, Y., Yahagi, N., Iizuka, Y., Okazaki, H., et al. (2001) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m011063200 · Cited by 78
Windler, E. E. T., Greeve, J. C., Levkau, B., Kolb-Bachofen, V., Daerr, W. H., & Greten, H. (1991) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj2760079 · Cited by 63
Zhang, L., Tian, Y., Wen, Z., Zhang, F., Qi, Y. C., Huang, W., Zhang, H., & Wang, Y. (2016) · Journal of Medical Virology · doi:10.1002/jmv.24570 · Cited by 57
Galactose-specific asialoglycoprotein receptor is involved in lipoprotein (a) catabolism
HRZENJAK, A., FRANK, S., WO, X., ZHOU, Y., van BERKEL, T., & KOSTNER, G. M. (2003) · Biochemical Journal · doi:10.1042/bj20030932 · Cited by 51
Gu, D., Jin, H., Jin, G., Wang, C., Wang, N., Hu, F., Luo, Q., Chu, W., Yao, M., & Qin, W. (2016) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2016.05.030 · Cited by 49
Structural basis for sterol sensing by Scap and Insig
Yan, R., Cao, P., Song, W., Li, Y., Wang, T., Qian, H., Yan, C., & Yan, N. (2021) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2021.109299 · Cited by 43
Self-citationHaxho, F., Haq, S., & Szewczuk, M. R. (2018) · Cellular Signalling · doi:10.1016/j.cellsig.2017.12.006 · Cited by 42
Hepatocyte cytotoxicity is facilitated by asialoglycoprotein receptor
Guy, C. S., Rankin, S. L., & Michalak, T. I. (2011) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24477 · Cited by 34
Zhang, X., Lin, S., Chen, T., Liu, M., Ye, F., Chen, Y., Shi, L., He, Y., Wu, L.-X., Zheng, S., et al. (2011) · Archives of Virology · doi:10.1007/s00705-010-0903-x · Cited by 31
Self-citationFunctional analysis of promoter variants in the microsomal triglyceride transfer protein (MTTP) gene
Rubin, D., Schneider-Muntau, A., Klapper, M., Nitz, I., Helwig, U., Fölsch, U. R., Schrezenmeir, J., & Döring, F. (2008) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.20615 · Cited by 26
Zhao, X., Tang, B., Shi, Z.-H., Deng, Z.-W., Deng, Y., Tan, L.-M., Jiang, S.-L., Shu, Y.-L., & Qiu, C.-F. (2020) · Chinese Medical Journal · doi:10.1097/cm9.0000000000000862 · Cited by 4
Generation of an ASGR1 homozygous mutant human embryonic stem cell line WAe001-A-6 using CRISPR/Cas9
Xu, Y., Wu, Y., Guo, D., Gao, G., Lai, K., Yang, F., Wang, K., Wu, H., Lai, L., Li, J., et al. (2017) · Stem Cell Research · doi:10.1016/j.scr.2017.05.006 · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inhibition of ASGR1 decreases lipid levels by promoting cholesterol excretion
Wang, J.-Q., Li, L.-L., Hu, A., Deng, G., Wei, J., Li, Y.-F., Liu, Y.-B., Lu, X.-Y., Qiu, Z.-P., Shi, X.-J., et al. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05006-3 · Cited by 188
Self-citationZhang, Z., Leng, X., Zhai, Y. Y., Zhang, X. L., Sun, Z. W., Xiao, J. Y., Lu, J. F., Liu, K., Xia, B., Gao, Q., et al. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-024-46135-9 · Cited by 58
Gao, J., Ma, L., Yin, J., Liu, G., Ma, J., Xia, S., Gong, S., Han, Q., Li, T., Chen, Y., et al. (2022) · Food & Function · doi:10.1039/d1fo04075h · Cited by 36
Self-citationBarthe, M., Hertereau, L., Lamghari, N., Osman‐Ponchet, H., & Braud, V. M. (2023) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms24076253 · Cited by 28
Drug development advances in human genetics‐based targets
Zhang, X., Yu, W., Li, Y., Wang, A., Cao, H., & Fu, Y. (2024) · MedComm · doi:10.1002/mco2.481 · Cited by 26
Self-citationCooked pork-derived exosome nanovesicles mediate metabolic disorder—microRNA could be the culprit
Shen, L., Ma, J., Yang, Y., Liao, T., Wang, J., Chen, L., Zhang, S., Zhao, Y., Niu, L., Hao, X., et al. (2023) · Journal of Nanobiotechnology · doi:10.1186/s12951-023-01837-y · Cited by 23
ASGR1 deficiency improves atherosclerosis but alters liver metabolism in ApoE-/- mice
Svecla, M., Moregola, A., Dalt, L. D., Nour, J., Baragetti, A., Uboldi, P., Idini, A., Wuhrer, M., Beretta, G., Falck, D., et al. (2024) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-024-02507-5 · Cited by 19
Yang, Y., Li, M., Ma, Y., Ye, W., Si, Y., Zheng, X., Liu, H., Cheng, L., Zhang, L., Zhang, H., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2022.849020 · Cited by 18
The low-density lipoprotein receptor: Emerging post-transcriptional regulatory mechanisms
Ndoj, K., Meurs, A., Papaioannou, D., Bjune, K., & Zelcer, N. (2025) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2024.119082 · Cited by 17
Beyond conventional treatment: ASGR1 Leading the new era of hypercholesterolemia management
Song, J., Fang, Y., Rao, X., Wu, L., Zhang, C., Ying, J., Hua, F., Lin, Y., & Wei, G. (2024) · Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1016/j.biopha.2024.117488 · Cited by 14
Recent progress in gene therapy for familial hypercholesterolemia treatment
Luo, Y., Hou, Y., Zhao, W., & Yang, B. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110641 · Cited by 13
Wang, Y., Yang, Z., Tang, H., Sun, X., Qu, J., Lu, S., & Rao, B. (2022) · Archives of Physiology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1080/13813455.2022.2080229 · Cited by 12
Yu, X., Tao, J., Wu, Y., Chen, Y., Li, P., Yang, F., Tang, M., Sammad, A., Yu, T., Xu, Y., et al. (2024) · Diabetes & Metabolism Journal · doi:10.4093/dmj.2023.0124 · Cited by 12
Self-citationLipoprotein sialylation in atherosclerosis: Lessons from mice
Yu, L., Peng, J., & Mineo, C. (2022) · Frontiers in Endocrinology · doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.953165 · Cited by 12
Asialoglycoprotein receptor 1: a multifaceted receptor in the liver and cardiovascular system
Xiao, X., Nie, Y., & Leng, Y. (2025) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2025.1653452 · Cited by 11
The emerging role of glycans and the importance of sialylation in cardiovascular disease
Wattchow, N., Pullen, B. J., Indraratna, A. D., Nankivell, V. A., Everest‐Dass, A., Psaltis, P. J., Kolarich, D., Nicholls, S. J., Packer, N. H., & Bursill, C. A. (2025) · Atherosclerosis · doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2025.119172 · Cited by 9
Li, X., Zheng, T., Zhang, Y., Zhao, Y., Liu, F., Dai, S., Liu, X., & Zhang, M. (2023) · The FASEB Journal · doi:10.1096/fj.202300295r · Cited by 9
Design, Synthesis, and Anticancer Evaluation of Novel MGBs with Alkyne-Linked Thiazole Moieties
Msallam, Y. A., Ramadan, W. S. H., Al-Jubeh, H. M., Ravi, A., Alhamidi, R. S., İlçe, B. Y., Menon, V., Hersi, F., Altaie, A. M., Kumar, P., et al. (2025) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5c01216 · Cited by 7
Zhang, Y., Dong, W., Zhao, M., Zhang, J., Li, L., Ma, Y., Meng, X., & Wang, Y. (2024) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods13213438 · Cited by 6
Self-citationModeling MEN1 with Patient-Origin iPSCs Reveals GLP-1R Mediated Hypersecretion of Insulin
Cheng, Z., Guo, D., Ruzi, A., Pan, T., You, K., Chen, Y., Huang, X., Zhang, J., Yang, F., Niu, L., et al. (2022) · Cells · doi:10.3390/cells11152387 · Cited by 6
Self-citationYY1/INSIG1 enhances atherosclerosis progression by regulating AMPK-mTOR signaling
Yang, M., Zhang, J., Xu, Z., Li, Y., & Tang, S. (2025) · Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.molimm.2025.08.003 · Cited by 5
Self-citationLiu, Y., PANG, J.-H., Ma, M., Xu, P., Tang, Z.-F., Guo, Y., Liu, R., Peng, X., Lou, H.-X., Wang, K., et al. (2026) · Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.metabol.2026.156511 · Cited by 4
Zhou, X., Ning, J., Cai, R., Liu, J., Yang, H., & Bai, Y. (2024) · Journal of Inflammation Research · doi:10.2147/jir.s492875 · Cited by 5
Wang, G., Tian, L., Zhang, S. H., He, Z., Zhao, F., Chang, M., Han, W., Ye, D., Gao, J., Li, S., et al. (2026) · Biology · doi:10.3390/biology15020179 · Cited by 3
Zhu, H., Zhong, Z., Zhao, G., Cao, Y., Liu, W., Guo, Y., & Jin, J. (2025) · Diabetes Metabolic Syndrome and Obesity · doi:10.2147/dmso.s511208 · Cited by 2
ASGR1 inhibitors, inflammation, and heart failure: A Mendelian randomization analysis
Ye, X., Yang, M., Hong, Y., Lin, Z., Peng, J., & He, L. (2025) · Lipids · doi:10.1002/lipd.12446 · Cited by 2
Forsythoside B and Its Derivatives as Novel ASGR1 Inhibitors for Enhanced Cholesterol Efflux
Ma, M., Liu, R., Liu, Y., Xu, P., Guo, Y., He, Z., Zhang, Z., Wang, K., & Wang, L. (2025) · Chemistry & Biodiversity · doi:10.1002/cbdv.202501119 · Cited by 2
Lim, J. J., Suh, Y. P., Li, X., Wilson, R. J., Lehmler, H., Lein, P. J., & Cui, J. Y. (2025) · Drug Metabolism and Disposition · doi:10.1016/j.dmd.2025.100174 · Cited by 1
Liu, X., Xie, R., Cai, Y., Lan, H., Mu, J., Zhang, C., & Li, B. (2026) · Reproductive Sciences · doi:10.1007/s43032-025-02039-7 · Cited by 1
Wang, J.-M., Jiang, L.-Y., Deng, Y.-T., Li, J.-Y., Sun, H., Ran, L., & Xiao, X. (2026) · BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care · doi:10.1136/bmjdrc-2025-005638 · Cited by 1
Insights Into circRNA ‐Mediated Lipid Metabolism in Cancer Progression
Miao, Z., Cao, J., Wang, X., Zhang, C., & Shi, T. (2026) · Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine · doi:10.1111/jcmm.71052 · Cited by 1
The asialoglycoprotein receptor 1 (ASGR1): emerging new roles in health and disease
Geremew, D., Tan, J. T. M., Psaltis, P. J., & Bursill, C. A. (2026) · Biomarker Research · doi:10.1186/s40364-026-00954-8 · Cited by 1
Hou, Y., Luo, Y., Chen, J., Shang, X., Chang, Y., Zhang, X., Ding, Y., Zhao, W., Ding, C., Feng, X., et al. (2026) · Molecular Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.ymthe.2026.07.036 · Cited by 1
Zhu, H., Huang, X., You, K., Chen, Y., Li, P., Tao, J., Yu, X., Jie-Hui, X., Xu, G., & Li, Y. (2026) · Immunity Inflammation and Disease · doi:10.1002/iid3.70496 · Cited by 1
Self-citationLi, X., Wu, Y., Wang, Y., Yang, X., Gao, R., Lu, Q., Lv, X., & Chen, Z. (2024) · Agriculture · doi:10.3390/agriculture14040538 · Cited by 1
Self-citationAdding a New Piece to the ASGR1 Puzzle: ANGPTL3
García‐Arcos, I. (2024) · Arteriosclerosis Thrombosis and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.124.321882
Insig1 deficiency protects against acute kidney injury via targeting Dapk3
Cao, S., Wang, Q., Zhou, M., Sun, Z., Sun, L., Zhu, W., Wang, X., Huang, S., Zhang, A., Hua, H., et al. (2026) · Journal of Advanced Research · doi:10.1016/j.jare.2026.05.036
Zhou, R., Fang, H., Li, H., Zhang, Y., & Su, X. (2026) · Shock · doi:10.1097/shk.0000000000002867
Derrick, J. T., Moll, T. O. C., Sweeney, D. W., Shin, J., Svecla, M., Norata, G. D., & Farber, S. A. (2026) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.jbc.2026.113239
Bellesis, A., Li, X., Moore-Frederick, D., Xu, D., Delbridge, K., Ma, J., Vaccaro, G., Edward, B. A. A., Kellogg, M., Creeger, Y., et al. (2026) · bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · doi:10.64898/2026.06.05.730479
Azizi, Z., Gupte, T. P., Kho, P. F., Zhou, J., Nzenkue, K., Guarischi‐Sousa, R., Panyard, D. J., Chen, M., Abbasi, F., Clarke, S. L., et al. (2026) · Circulation Genomic and Precision Medicine · doi:10.1161/circgen.125.005465
ASGR1: an emerging therapeutic target in hypercholesterolemia
Zhao, W., Xu, S., & Weng, J. (2023) · Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy · doi:10.1038/s41392-023-01319-5 · Cited by 23
Zhang, Y., Jiang, X., Wang, W., Lei, L., Sheng, R., Li, S., Luo, J., Liu, H., Zhang, J., Han, X., et al. (2024) · Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis, and Vascular Biology · doi:10.1161/atvbaha.124.321076 · Cited by 27
Self-citationASGR1 is a promising target for lipid reduction in pigs with PON2 as its inhibitor
Yin, Y., Liu, J., Yu, J., Dong, D., Gao, F., Yu, L., Du, X., & Wu, S. (2024) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2024.110288 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Xu, Y., Tao, J., Yu, X., Wu, Y., Chen, Y., You, K., Zhang, J., Getachew, A., Pan, T., Zhuang, Y., Yuan, F., Yang, F., Lin, X., & Li, Y.-X.
- Affiliations
- Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
- University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
- Center for Health Research, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Biocomputing, Guangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou, China.
- ORCID
- Venue
- JCI Insight
- Published
- 2021-10-08
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 19
- ISSN
- 2379-3708 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8525641
- OpenAlex
- W3203214670
- Semantic Scholar
- cd41ec78332b3b070560f4aa88b0faa2fc80a9cc
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 45
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6
- FWCI
- 2.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- JCI Insight (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0111300)
- the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871379,31900539)
- Guangzhou City Science and Technology Plan (202102020223)
- Guangdong Province Science and Technology Plan (2018A050506070)
- Frontier Research Program of Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory (2018GZR110105011)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biochemistry › Cholesterol and Lipid Metabolism
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipid metabolism and disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
- Keywords
- ASGR1, INSIG1, SREBP signaling, lipid homeostasis, non-HDL cholesterol, triglycerides, LDL cholesterol, VLDL secretion, LDL uptake, microsomal triglyceride transfer protein, PCSK9, apolipoprotein B, endoplasmic reticulum, cardiovascular risk
- MeSH terms
- Proprotein Convertase 9, Animals, Carrier Proteins, Cell Nucleus, Endoplasmic Reticulum, Homeostasis, Cholesterol, HDL, Cholesterol, LDL, Membrane Proteins, Triglycerides, Cholesterol, VLDL, Signal Transduction, Mice, Knockout, Asialoglycoprotein Receptor, Lipid Metabolism, Mice, Sterol Regulatory Element Binding Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-11-09, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-11-09 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review