CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 124

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 52 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Protective Microglial Subset in Development, Aging, and Disease: Lessons From Transcriptomic Studies

Benmamar-Badel, Anouk, Owens, Trevor, Wlodarczyk, Agnieszka·2020·Frontiers in Immunology
DOI 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00430PMC PMC7147523
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fimmu.2020.00430

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 CD11c+ microglia signature in developmental stages. During development, CD11c+ microglia have an amoeboid morphology and localize close to white matter tracts, essentially in the corpus callous and cerebellum. They are present early during embryonic development and their numbers peak between P3 and P7. Comparison of genes upregulated in four studies (24, 35, 36, 70) reveals a common signature for developmental CD11c+ microglia of 39 genes upregulated in at least three of the studies (bold dark outline). Genes shared with the disease signature in Figure 2 are in bold. The Venn diagram was generated using the online tool Venny (72).
Figure 1 CD11c+ microglia signature in developmental stages. During development, CD11c+ microglia have an amoeboid morphology and localize close to white matter tracts, essentially in the corpus callous and cerebellum. They are present early during embryonic development and their numbers peak between P3 and P7. Comparison of genes upregulated in four studies (24, 35, 36, 70) reveals a common signature for developmental CD11c+ microglia of 39 genes upregulated in at least three of the studies (bold dark outline). Genes shared with the disease signature in Figure 2 are in bold. The Venn diagram was generated using the online tool Venny (72).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 CD11c+ microglia signature in disease states. In diseased CNS, CD11c+ microglia adopt an amoeboid, reactive morphology. In AD, they are found surrounding Aβ plaques. Similarly, in MS and ALS models and in injury, they are found around and in the lesions. In glioma, they are found mixed with tumor cells. CD11c+ microglia numbers in diseased CNS vary considerably, ranging from 10 to 50% of all microglia. Comparison of genes upregulated in four studies (35, 73–75) reveals a common signature for CD11c+ disease microglia of 89 genes upregulated in at least three of the studies (bold dark outline). Genes shared with the developmental signature in Figure 1 are in bold. Raw data for the Krasemann study were obtained using the Gene Expression Omnibus Database and the differential gene expression analysis was performed using the DEBrowser package in R (153). The Venn diagram was generated using the online tool Venny (72).
Figure 2 CD11c+ microglia signature in disease states. In diseased CNS, CD11c+ microglia adopt an amoeboid, reactive morphology. In AD, they are found surrounding Aβ plaques. Similarly, in MS and ALS models and in injury, they are found around and in the lesions. In glioma, they are found mixed with tumor cells. CD11c+ microglia numbers in diseased CNS vary considerably, ranging from 10 to 50% of all microglia. Comparison of genes upregulated in four studies (35, 73–75) reveals a common signature for CD11c+ disease microglia of 89 genes upregulated in at least three of the studies (bold dark outline). Genes shared with the developmental signature in Figure 1 are in bold. Raw data for the Krasemann study were obtained using the Gene Expression Omnibus Database and the differential gene expression analysis was performed using the DEBrowser package in R (153). The Venn diagram was generated using the online tool Venny (72).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Core CD11c+ microglia signature. Considering similarities between the transcriptomic signatures and functions in the CD11c+ microglia subset in development and in disease, we compared both signatures to obtain a core of genes upregulated in this subset across all conditions. We observe overlap of 20% of the genes between both signatures, corresponding to 22 shared genes. Upon interrogating the STRING database (Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Doncheva NT, Morris JH, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Nov; 47:D607–613.), we observed that the network formed by the proteins corresponding to the genes in the core signature had significantly more interactions than expected from a similar set of random proteins, indicating that these proteins related to the genes in the core signature are at least partially biologically connected. The thickness of the edges linking the different genes is proportional to the strength of the evidence linking the two proteins. The Venn diagram was generated using the online tool Venny (72).
Figure 3 Core CD11c+ microglia signature. Considering similarities between the transcriptomic signatures and functions in the CD11c+ microglia subset in development and in disease, we compared both signatures to obtain a core of genes upregulated in this subset across all conditions. We observe overlap of 20% of the genes between both signatures, corresponding to 22 shared genes. Upon interrogating the STRING database (Szklarczyk D, Gable AL, Lyon D, Junge A, Wyder S, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Doncheva NT, Morris JH, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019 Nov; 47:D607–613.), we observed that the network formed by the proteins corresponding to the genes in the core signature had significantly more interactions than expected from a similar set of random proteins, indicating that these proteins related to the genes in the core signature are at least partially biologically connected. The thickness of the edges linking the different genes is proportional to the strength of the evidence linking the two proteins. The Venn diagram was generated using the online tool Venny (72).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 CD11c+ microglia as a subset of microglia present through life and across conditions. Our investigation leads us to believe that CD11c+ microglia represent a subset of microglia characterized by a robust signature of 22 genes expressed by this subset at any age and in various disease states. Emergence of this subset is induced by various factors including signaling through the TREM2–APOE pathway, cell death, IL-4 signaling, and cytokine signaling through CSF1R inducing CCL2, and is inhibited by CD47/SIRPα signaling. In physiological conditions, CD11c+ microglia account for around 15% of all microglia, before contracting to 2% in adulthood and being re-induced by aging at levels similar to development. In disease states, their numbers oscillate between 10 and 50%. We argue that despite the numerous names given to this subset across conditions, it is unique and should be referred to as “CD11c+ microglia”.
Figure 4 CD11c+ microglia as a subset of microglia present through life and across conditions. Our investigation leads us to believe that CD11c+ microglia represent a subset of microglia characterized by a robust signature of 22 genes expressed by this subset at any age and in various disease states. Emergence of this subset is induced by various factors including signaling through the TREM2–APOE pathway, cell death, IL-4 signaling, and cytokine signaling through CSF1R inducing CCL2, and is inhibited by CD47/SIRPα signaling. In physiological conditions, CD11c+ microglia account for around 15% of all microglia, before contracting to 2% in adulthood and being re-induced by aging at levels similar to development. In disease states, their numbers oscillate between 10 and 50%. We argue that despite the numerous names given to this subset across conditions, it is unique and should be referred to as “CD11c+ microglia”.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. del, El “tercer elemento” de los centros nerviosos. I. La microglía en estado normal. II. Intervención de la microglía en los procesos patológicos (células en bastoncito y cuerpos gránulo-adiposos). III. Naturaleza probable de la microglía, Bol Soc Esp Biol, 69
  2. Alliot, 1999, Microglia derive from progenitors, originating from the yolk sac, and which proliferate in the brain, Dev Brain Res, 117, 145, 10.1016/S0165-3806(99)00113-3 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Monier, 2007, Entry and distribution of microglial cells in human embryonic and fetal cerebral cortex, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 66, 372, 10.1097/nen.0b013e3180517b46 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Menassa, 2018, Microglial dynamics during human brain development, Front Immunol, 9, 1014, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01014 · DOI
  5. Parkhurst, 2013, Microglia promote learning-dependent synapse formation through brain-derived neurotrophic factor, Cell, 155, 1596, 10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.030 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Weinhard, 2018, Microglia remodel synapses by presynaptic trogocytosis and spine head filopodia induction, Nat Commun, 9, 1228, 10.1038/s41467-018-03566-5 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Squarzoni, 2014, Microglia modulate wiring of the embryonic forebrain, Cell Rep, 8, 1271, 10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.042 · DOI
  8. Pont-Lezica, 2014, Microglia shape corpus callosum axon tract fasciculation: functional impact of prenatal inflammation, Eur J Neurosci, 39, 1551, 10.1111/ejn.12508 · DOI
  9. Arnò, 2014, Neural progenitor cells orchestrate microglia migration and positioning into the developing cortex, Nat Commun, 5, 1, 10.1038/ncomms6611 · DOI
  10. Cunningham, 2013, Microglia regulate the number of neural precursor cells in the developing cerebral cortex, J Neurosci, 33, 4216, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3441-12.2013 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Liu, 2019, Neuronal network activity controls microglial process surveillance in awake mice via norepinephrine signaling, Nat Neurosci, 22, 1771, 10.1038/s41593-019-0511-3 · DOI
  12. Torres, 2016, Dynamic microglial modulation of spatial learning and social behavior, Brain Behav Immun, 55, 6, 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.09.001 · DOI
  13. Greenhalgh, 2020, Immune cell regulation of glia during CNS injury and disease, Nat Rev Neurosci, 21, 139, 10.1038/s41583-020-0263-9 · DOI
  14. Ransohoff, 2016, A polarizing question: do M1 and M2 microglia exist?, Nat Neurosci, 19, 987, 10.1038/nn.4338 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Stratoulias, 2019, Microglial subtypes: diversity within the microglial community, EMBO J, 38, e101997, 10.15252/embj.2019101997 · DOI
  16. Amici, 2017, Molecular mechanisms modulating the phenotype of macrophages and microglia, Front Immunol, 8, 1520, 10.3389/fimmu.2017.01520 · DOI
  17. Bennett, 2016, New tools for studying microglia in the mouse and human CNS, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 113, E1738, 10.1073/pnas.1525528113 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Haage, 2019, Comprehensive gene expression meta-analysis identifies signature genes that distinguish microglia from peripheral monocytes/macrophages in health and glioma, Acta Neuropathol Commun, 7, 1, 10.1186/s40478-019-0665-y · DOI
  19. Ulvestad, 1994, Phenotypic differences between human monocytes/macrophages and microglial cells studied in situ and in vitro, J Neuropathol Exp Neurol, 53, 492, 10.1097/00005072-199409000-00008 · DOI
  20. Butovsky, 2006, Glatiramer acetate fights against Alzheimer's disease by inducing dendritic-like microglia expressing insulin-like growth factor 1, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 103, 11784, 10.1073/pnas.0604681103 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Ford, 1995, Normal adult ramified microglia separated from other central nervous system macrophages by flow cytometric sorting. Phenotypic differences defined and direct ex vivo antigen presentation to myelin basic protein-reactive CD4+ T cells compared, J Immunol, 154, 4309, 10.4049/jimmunol.154.9.4309 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Remington, 2007, Microglial recruitment, activation, and proliferation in response to primary demyelination, Am J Pathol, 170, 1713, 10.2353/ajpath.2007.060783 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Wlodarczyk, 2015, Pathologic and protective roles for microglial subsets and bone marrow- and blood-derived myeloid cells in central nervous system inflammation, Front Immunol, 6, 463, 10.3389/fimmu.2015.00463 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Wlodarczyk, 2017, A novel microglial subset plays a key role in myelinogenesis in developing brain, EMBO J, 36, 3292, 10.15252/embj.201696056 · DOI · Paper page
  25. Hristova, 2010, Activation and deactivation of periventricular white matter phagocytes during postnatal mouse development, Glia, 58, 11, 10.1002/glia.20896 · DOI
  26. Fischer, 2001, Brain dendritic cells and macrophages/microglia in central nervous system inflammation, J Immunol, 166, 2717, 10.4049/jimmunol.166.4.2717 · DOI
  27. Reichmann, 2002, Dendritic cells and dendritic-like microglia in focal cortical ischemia of the mouse brain, J Neuroimmunol, 129, 125, 10.1016/S0165-5728(02)00184-4 · DOI
  28. Bulloch, 2008, CD11c/EYFP transgene illuminates a discrete network of dendritic cells within the embryonic, neonatal, adult, and injured mouse brain, J Comp Neurol, 508, 687, 10.1002/cne.21668 · DOI
  29. Prodinger, 2011, CD11c-expressing cells reside in the juxtavascular parenchyma and extend processes into the glia limitans of the mouse nervous system, Acta Neuropathol, 121, 445, 10.1007/s00401-010-0774-y · DOI
  30. Immig, 2015, CD11c-positive cells from brain, spleen, lung, and liver exhibit site-specific immune phenotypes and plastically adapt to new environments, Glia, 63, 611, 10.1002/glia.22771 · DOI
  31. Saunders, 2010, Modulation of immune cell signalling by the leukocyte common tyrosine phosphatase, CD45, Cell Signal, 22, 339, 10.1016/j.cellsig.2009.10.003 · DOI
  32. Arnoux, 2015, Fractalkine signaling and microglia functions in the developing brain, Neural Plast, 2015, 1, 10.1155/2015/689404 · DOI
  33. Ohsawa, 2004, Microglia/macrophage-specific protein Iba1 binds to fimbrin and enhances its actin-bundling activity, J Neurochem, 88, 844, 10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.02213.x · DOI
  34. Erdei, 2019, Non-identical twins: different faces of CR3 and CR4 in myeloid and lymphoid cells of mice and men, Semin Cell Dev Biol, 85, 110, 10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.11.025 · DOI
  35. Icer, 2018, The multiple functions and mechanisms of osteopontin, Clin Biochem, 59, 17, 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2018.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Hayem, 1868, Études Sur Les Diverses Formes D'encéphalite: (Anatomie Et Physiologie Pathologiques)
  37. Jastrowitz, 1870, Studien über die encephalitis und myelitis des ersten kindesalters, Arch Für Psychiatr Nervenkrankh, 2, 389, 10.1007/BF02046645 · DOI
  38. Merzbacher, 1909, Untersuchungen über die Morphologie und Biologie der Abraümzellen im Zentralnervesystem.
  39. Parrot, 1868, Étude de la stéatose interstitielle diffuse de l'encéphale chez le nouveau-né, Arch Physiol Norm Pathol., 1, 530
  40. Boll, 1874, Die histologie und histogenese der nervösen centralorgane, Arch Psychiatr, 4, 1, 10.1007/BF02346085 · DOI
  41. Eichhorst, 1875, Über die entwicklung des menschlichen rückenmarks und seiner Formelemente, Virchows Arch., 64, 425, 10.1007/BF01991422 · DOI
  42. Fleichsig, 1876, Die Leitungsbahnen im Gehirn und Rückenmark des Menschen auf Grund Entwicklungsgeschichtlicher Untersuchungen Dargestellt
  43. Penfield, 1932, Cytology & Cellular Pathology of the Nervous System.
  44. Penfield, 1925, Microglia and the process of phagocytosis in gliomas, Am J Pathol, 1, 77
  45. Stensaas, 1971, Round and amoeboid microglial cells in the neonatal rabbit brain, Z Für Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat, 119, 147, 10.1007/BF00324517 · DOI
  46. Ling, 1974, Amoeboid microglial cells in the corpus callosum of neonatal rats, Arch Histol Jpn Nihon Soshikigaku Kiroku, 36, 265, 10.1679/aohc1950.36.265 · DOI
  47. Cuadros, 1993, First appearance, distribution, and origin of macrophages in the early development of the avian central nervous system, J Comp Neurol, 330, 113, 10.1002/cne.903300110 · DOI · Paper page
  48. Rezaie, 1999, Colonisation of the developing human brain and spinal cord by microglia: a review, Microsc Res Tech, 45, 359, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0029(19990615)45:6<359::AID-JEMT4>3.0.CO;2-D · DOI
  49. Imamoto, 1978, Radioautographic investigation of gliogenesis in the corpus callosum of young rats II. Origin of microglial cells, J Comp Neurol, 180, 139, 10.1002/cne.901800109 · DOI
  50. Ling, 1979, Transformation of monocytes into amoeboid microglia in the corpus callosum of postnatal rats, as shown by labelling monocytes by carbon particles, J Anat, 128, 847
  51. Milligan, 1991, Differential immunochemical markers reveal the normal distribution of brain macrophages and microglia in the developing rat brain, J Comp Neurol, 314, 125, 10.1002/cne.903140112 · DOI
  52. Valentino, 1981, Morphological and immunocytochemical identification of macrophages in the developing corpus callosum, Anat Embryol., 163, 157, 10.1007/BF00320673 · DOI
  53. Myhre, 2019, Microglia express insulin-like growth factor-1 in the hippocampus of aged APPswe/PS1ΔE9 transgenic mice, Front Cell Neurosci, 13, 308, 10.3389/fncel.2019.00308 · DOI
  54. Anderson, 2019, Developmental apoptosis promotes a disease-related gene signature and independence from CSF1R signaling in retinal microglia, Cell Rep, 27, 2002, 10.1016/j.celrep.2019.04.062 · DOI
  55. Hirbec, 2017, Microglia responses in acute and chronic neurological diseases: what microglia-specific transcriptomic studies taught (and did not teach) us, Front Aging Neurosci., 9, 227, 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00227 · DOI
  56. Mrdjen, 2018, High-dimensional single-cell mapping of central nervous system immune cells reveals distinct myeloid subsets in health, aging, and disease, Immunity, 48, 380, 10.1016/j.immuni.2018.01.011 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Dando, 2016, A case of mistaken identity: CD11c-eYFP+ cells in the normal mouse brain parenchyma and neural retina display the phenotype of microglia, not dendritic cells, Glia, 64, 1331, 10.1002/glia.23005 · DOI
  58. Verkhratsky, 2017, Neuroglia in ageing, 181
  59. Hickman, 2013, The microglial sensome revealed by direct RNA sequencing, Nat Neurosci, 16, 1896, 10.1038/nn.3554 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Orre, 2014, Acute isolation and transcriptome characterization of cortical astrocytes and microglia from young and aged mice, Neurobiol Aging, 35, 1, 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.07.008 · DOI
  61. Sato-Hashimoto, 2019, Microglial SIRPα regulates the emergence of CD11c+ microglia and demyelination damage in white matter, eLife, 8, e42025, 10.7554/eLife.42025 · DOI
  62. Hart, 2012, Age related changes in microglial phenotype vary between CNS regions: grey versus white matter differences, Brain Behav Immun, 26, 754, 10.1016/j.bbi.2011.11.006 · DOI · Paper page
  63. Füger, 2017, Microglia turnover with aging and in an Alzheimer's model via long-term in vivo single-cell imaging, Nat Neurosci, 20, 1371, 10.1038/nn.4631 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Askew, 2017, Coupled proliferation and apoptosis maintain the rapid turnover of microglia in the adult brain, Cell Rep, 18, 391, 10.1016/j.celrep.2016.12.041 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Réu, 2017, The lifespan and turnover of microglia in the human brain, Cell Rep, 20, 779, 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.004 · DOI · Paper page
  66. Wolf, 2017, Microglia in physiology and disease, Annu Rev Physiol, 79, 619, 10.1146/annurev-physiol-022516-034406 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Feng, 2017, Microglia mediate postoperative hippocampal inflammation and cognitive decline in mice, JCI Insight, 2, e91229, 10.1172/jci.insight.91229 · DOI
  68. Varvel, 2012, Microglial repopulation model reveals a robust homeostatic process for replacing CNS myeloid cells, Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 109, 18150, 10.1073/pnas.1210150109 · DOI
  69. Han, 2019, Enforced microglial depletion and repopulation as a promising strategy for the treatment of neurological disorders, Glia, 67, 217, 10.1002/glia.23529 · DOI
  70. McQuade, 2019, Microglia in alzheimer's disease: exploring how genetics and phenotype influence risk, J Mol Biol, 431, 1805, 10.1016/j.jmb.2019.01.045 · DOI · Paper page
  71. Manczak, 2009, Neutralization of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor decreases amyloid beta 1-42 and suppresses microglial activity in a transgenic mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, Hum Mol Genet, 18, 3876, 10.1093/hmg/ddp331 · DOI · Paper page
  72. Mathys, 2017, Temporal tracking of microglia activation in neurodegeneration at single-cell resolution, Cell Rep, 21, 366, 10.1016/j.celrep.2017.09.039 · DOI · Paper page
  73. O'Koren, 2019, Microglial function is distinct in different anatomical locations during retinal homeostasis and degeneration, Immunity, 50, 723, 10.1016/j.immuni.2019.02.007 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Kan, 2015, Arginine deprivation and immune suppression in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, J Neurosci, 35, 5969, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4668-14.2015 · DOI
  75. Wang, 2015, TREM2 lipid sensing sustains the microglial response in an Alzheimer's disease model, Cell, 160, 1061, 10.1016/j.cell.2015.01.049 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Yuan, 2016, TREM2 haplodeficiency in mice and humans impairs the microglia barrier function leading to decreased amyloid compaction and severe axonal dystrophy, Neuron, 90, 724, 10.1016/j.neuron.2016.05.003 · DOI · Paper page
  77. Jay, 2017, Disease progression-dependent effects of TREM2 deficiency in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, J Neurosci, 37, 637, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2110-16.2016 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Hall, 1998, Relationship of microglial and astrocytic activation to disease onset and progression in a transgenic model of familial ALS, Glia, 23, 249, 10.1002/(SICI)1098-1136(199807)23:3<249::AID-GLIA7>3.0.CO;2-# · DOI
  79. McGeer, 2002, Inflammatory processes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, Muscle Nerve, 26, 459, 10.1002/mus.10191 · DOI · Paper page
  80. Henkel, 2009, Microglia in ALS: the good, the bad, and the resting, J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 4, 389, 10.1007/s11481-009-9171-5 · DOI · Paper page
  81. Gowing, 2008, Ablation of proliferating microglia does not affect motor neuron degeneration in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis caused by mutant superoxide dismutase, J Neurosci, 28, 10234, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3494-08.2008 · DOI
  82. Chiu, 2013, A neurodegeneration-specific gene-expression signature of acutely isolated microglia from an amyotrophic lateral sclerosis mouse model, Cell Rep, 4, 385, 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.06.018 · DOI · Paper page
  83. David, 2011, Repertoire of microglial and macrophage responses after spinal cord injury, Nat Rev Neurosci, 12, 388, 10.1038/nrn3053 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Denes, 2010, Inflammation and brain injury: acute cerebral ischaemia, peripheral and central inflammation, Brain Behav Immun, 24, 708, 10.1016/j.bbi.2009.09.010 · DOI
  85. Shechter, 2013, Recruitment of beneficial M2 macrophages to injured spinal cord is orchestrated by remote brain choroid plexus, Immunity, 38, 555, 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.02.012 · DOI · Paper page
  86. Miró-Mur, 2016, Immature monocytes recruited to the ischemic mouse brain differentiate into macrophages with features of alternative activation, Brain Behav Immun, 53, 18, 10.1016/j.bbi.2015.08.010 · DOI
  87. Wattananit, 2016, Monocyte-derived macrophages contribute to spontaneous long-term functional recovery after stroke in mice, J Neurosci, 36, 4182, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4317-15.2016 · DOI
  88. Rajan, 2018, Dissecting functional phenotypes of microglia and macrophages in the rat brain after transient cerebral ischemia, Glia, 67, 232, 10.1002/glia.23536 · DOI
  89. Kaiser, 2019, The spinal transcriptome after cortical stroke: in search of molecular factors regulating spontaneous recovery in the spinal cord, J Neurosci, 39, 4714, 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2571-18.2019 · DOI
  90. Tay, 2018, Unique microglia recovery population revealed by single-cell RNAseq following neurodegeneration, Acta Neuropathol Commun, 6, 87, 10.1186/s40478-018-0584-3 · DOI
  91. Noristani, 2017, RNA-seq analysis of microglia reveals time-dependent activation of specific genetic programs following spinal cord injury, Front Mol Neurosci, 10, 90, 10.3389/fnmol.2017.00090 · DOI
  92. Izzy, 2019, Time-dependent changes in microglia transcriptional networks following traumatic brain injury, Front Cell Neurosci, 13, 307, 10.3389/fncel.2019.00307 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Almolda, 2011, Antigen presentation in EAE: role of microglia, macrophages and dendritic cells, Front Biosci, 16, 1157, 10.2741/3781 · DOI
  94. Lewis, 2014, RNA sequencing of microglia and monocyte-derived macrophages from mice with experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis illustrates a changing phenotype with disease course, J Neuroimmunol, 277, 26, 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2014.09.014 · DOI
  95. Laflamme, 2018, mCSF-Induced microglial activation prevents myelin loss and promotes its repair in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, Front Cell Neurosci, 12, 178, 10.3389/fncel.2018.00178 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Elliott, 2013, Analysis of the host transcriptome from demyelinating spinal cord of murine coronavirus-infected mice, PLoS ONE, 8, e75346, 10.1371/journal.pone.0075346 · DOI
  97. Charles, 2011, The brain tumor microenvironment, Glia, 59, 1169, 10.1002/glia.21136 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Li, 2012, The molecular profile of microglia under the influence of glioma, Neuro-Oncol, 14, 958, 10.1093/neuonc/nos116 · DOI
  99. Szulzewsky, 2015, Glioma-Associated microglia/macrophages display an expression profile different from M1 and M2 polarization and highly express Gpnmb and spp1, PLoS ONE, 10, e0116644, 10.1371/journal.pone.0116644 · DOI
  100. Kucukural, 2019, DEBrowser: interactive differential expression analysis and visualization tool for count data, BMC Genomics, 20, 6, 10.1186/s12864-018-5362-x · DOI
  101. Dubbelaar, 2018, The kaleidoscope of microglial phenotypes, Front Immunol, 9, 1753, 10.3389/fimmu.2018.01753 · DOI · Paper page
  102. Gonzalez-Pena, 2016, Microglia transcriptome changes in a model of depressive behavior after immune challenge, PLoS ONE, 11, e0150858, 10.1371/journal.pone.0150858 · DOI
  103. Sousa, 2018, Single-cell transcriptomics reveals distinct inflammation-induced microglia signatures, EMBO Rep, 19, e46171, 10.15252/embr.201846171 · DOI · Paper page
  104. Butovsky, 2007, Microglia can be induced by IFN-γ or IL-4 to express neural or dendritic-like markers, Mol Cell Neurosci, 35, 490, 10.1016/j.mcn.2007.04.009 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 124

Metadata

Authors
Benmamar-Badel, A., Owens, T., & Wlodarczyk, A.
Venue
Frontiers in Immunology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2020-04-03
Volume
11
ISSN
1664-3224
DOI
10.3389/fimmu.2020.00430
PMC
PMC7147523
Cited by
124
References
52
Licence
creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (vor)
Funders
  • Lundbeckfonden (R209-2015-2724)
  • Gangstedfonden

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review