Cited by 812Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorEpigenetics and DNA MethylationGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting

Epigenetic mechanisms and the transgenerational effects of maternal care

Open access
Champagne, Frances A.·2008·Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology

Abstract

The transmission of traits across generations has typically been attributed to the inheritance by offspring of genomic information from parental generations. However, recent evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms are capable of mediating this type of transmission. In the case of maternal care, there is evidence for the behavioral transmission of postpartum behavior from mothers to female offspring. The neuroendocrine and molecular mediators of this transmission have been explored in rats and implicate estrogen-oxytocin interactions and the differential methylation of hypothalamic estrogen receptors. These maternal effects can influence multiple aspects of neurobiology and behavior of offspring and this particular mode of inheritance is dynamic in response to environmental variation. In this review, evidence for the generational transmission of maternal care and the mechanisms underlying this transmission will be discussed as will the implications of this inheritance system for offspring development and for the transmission of environmental information from parents to offspring.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yfrne.2008.03.003

Cites

149 of 149 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Maternal licking and grooming of rat pups during the postpartum period has been associated with greater OT receptor binding or increased activity in brain areas critical for the development of parenting in mammals, including the medial preoptic area, lateral septum, the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, and the nucleus accumbens.

    “For instance, maternal licking and grooming of rat pups during the postpartum period has been associated with greater OT receptor binding or increased activity in brain areas critical for the development of parenting in mammals, including the medial preoptic area, lateral septum, the paraventricular nucleus of the hypothalamus, and the nucleus accumbens (13–16).”

    From Oxytocin and the development of parenting in humans (2010) · cites this paper as [14]

  • The links between maternal OT and maternal affectionate contact are consistent with studies in animal models that pointed to the involvement of central OT in regulating the degree of "licking-and-grooming" maternal behaviors in female rats.

    “The links between maternal OT and maternal affectionate contact are consistent with studies in animal models (13,14,47) that pointed to the involvement of central OT in regulating the degree of “licking-and-grooming” maternal behaviors in female rats.”

    From Oxytocin and the development of parenting in humans (2010) · cites this paper as [14]

  • Research in rodents and other mammals has highlighted the importance of OT (on a background of changing levels of estrogen and progesterone during pregnancy and labor) to facilitate the onset and maintenance of maternal behavior.

    “Research in rodents and other mammals has highlighted the importance of OT (on a background of changing levels of estrogen and progesterone during pregnancy and labor) to facilitate the onset and maintenance of maternal behavior (Champagne et al., 2001; Champagne, 2008; Champagne et al., 2003; Insel and Young, 2001; Rosenblatt and Ceus, 1998).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [23]Berman C. Intergenerational transmission of maternal rejection rates among free-ranging rheus monkeys on Cayo Santiago. Animal Behavior. 1990;44:247–258. [Google Scholar]
  2. [76]Maestripieri D, Tomaszycki M, Carroll KA. Consistency and change in the behavior of rhesus macaque abusive mothers with successive infants. Dev Psychobiol. 1999;34:29–35. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Champagne, F. A.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Champagne, Frances A.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-06
Volume
29
Issue
3
Pages
386-397
ISSN
0091-3022 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2137189178
Cited by
812
References
149
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 90 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 58 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 40 · 2015: 58 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 50 · 2012: 40
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1dp2od001674-01)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Keywords
epigenetic inheritance, transgenerational effects, maternal care, hypothalamus, postpartum behavior, offspring development, rats
MeSH terms
Animals, Environment, Gene Expression Regulation, Maternal Behavior, Neurosecretory Systems, Stress, Psychological, Touch, Epigenesis, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review