Cited by 226Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionSexual Differentiation and Disorders

Sex differences in the parental behavior of rodents

Lonstein, Joseph S., De Vries, Geert J.·2000·Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews

Abstract

The reproductive strategy of many mammalian species that give birth to altricial young involves intense and prolonged care of their offspring. In most cases, the mother provides all nurturance, but in some cases fathers, older siblings, or unrelated conspecifics participate in parental care. The display of these behaviors by animals other than mothers is affected by numerous factors, including their sex. We herein review the literature on similarities and/or differences between male and female laboratory rodents (rats, mice, voles, gerbils, and hamsters) in their parental responsiveness and discuss how the parental behavior of males and females is influenced by hormones, developmental processes, and prior social experiences. Understanding the mechanisms that generate sex differences in the parental responsiveness of rodents may indicate how similar sex differences in parental care are generated in other mammals.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0149-7634(00)00036-1

Cites

268 of 268 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Because AVP/OT and the dopaminergic pathways they feed into are heavily influenced by sex steroids across the lifespan, their sexually dimorphic ontogeny and function may be particularly vulnerable to endocrine disruption.

    “Because AVP/OT and the dopaminergic pathways they feed into are heavily influenced by sex steroids across the lifespan (50–59), it is highly plausible that their sexually dimorphic ontogeny and function may be particularly vulnerable to endocrine disruption.”
  • The father-specific repertoire is marked by high positive arousal, stimulatory contact, and exploratory focus.

    “the father-specific repertoire is marked by high positive arousal, stimulatory contact, and exploratory focus (39,40)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lonstein, J. S., & De Vries, G. J.
Affiliations
University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
Corresponding author
Lonstein, Joseph S.
Venue
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
669-686
ISSN
0149-7634 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2035785773
Cited by
226
References
264
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 12 · 2012: 8
FWCI
1.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • U.S. Public Health Service (08392, 47538)
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
Keywords
sex differences, parental care, paternal behavior, rodents, rats, mice, voles, gerbils, hamster, hormones, developmental processes, social experience
MeSH terms
Animals, Female, Male, Maternal Behavior, Paternal Behavior, Rodentia, Sex Characteristics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review