Cited by 13Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringTactile and Sensory InteractionsPain Management and Treatment

Factors affecting two-point discrimination in argus II patients

Open access
Yücel, Ezgi I., Sadeghi, Roksana, Kartha, Arathy, Montezuma, Sandra Rocio, Dagnelie, Gislin, Rokem, Ariel, Boynton, Geoffrey M., Fine, Ione +1 more·2022·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Two of the main obstacles to the development of epiretinal prosthesis technology are electrodes that require current amplitudes above safety limits to reliably elicit percepts, and a failure to consistently elicit pattern vision. Here, we explored the causes of high current amplitude thresholds and poor spatial resolution within the Argus II epiretinal implant. We measured current amplitude thresholds and two-point discrimination (the ability to determine whether one or two electrodes had been stimulated) in 3 blind participants implanted with Argus II devices. Our data and simulations show that axonal stimulation, lift and retinal damage all play a role in reducing performance in the Argus 2, by either limiting sensitivity and/or reducing spatial resolution. Understanding the relative role of these various factors will be critical for developing and surgically implanting devices that can successfully subserve pattern vision.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2022.901337

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several factors might limit the spatial resolution of prosthetic vision, including retinal damage, electrode-retina distance, and inadvertent stimulation of nerve fiber bundles.

    “Most recently, Yücel et al (2022) identified several factors that might limit the spatial resolution of prosthetic vision, which included retinal damage, electrode-retina distance, and the inadvertent stimulation of nerve fiber bundles.”
  • Phosphenes tended to appear larger and rounder as stimulus amplitude increased.

    “We found that phosphenes tended to appear larger and rounder as stimulus amplitude increased (table 4), which is consistent with previous considerations about the current spread in the retina (de Balthasar et al 2008, Granley and Beyeler 2021, Yücel et al 2022).”
  • The probability of perceiving two distinct phosphenes increases with inter-electrode distance.

    “Yücel et al (2022) previously demonstrated that the probability of perceiving two distinct phosphenes increases with inter-electrode distance.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yücel, E. I., Sadeghi, R., Kartha, A., Montezuma, S. R., Dagnelie, G., Rokem, A., Boynton, G. M., Fine, I., & Beyeler, M.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Fine, Ione
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2022-08-24
Volume
16
Pages
901337-901337
ISSN
1662-453X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4292860335
Cited by
13
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • National Eye Institute (R01-62-5032, R00 EY02932)
  • Washington Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
Argus II, epiretinal prosthesis, two-point discrimination, spatial resolution, retinal damage, pattern vision, visual prosthesis, blind patients

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review