Cited by 120Nutritional Studies and DietMetabolomics and Mass Spectrometry StudiesDiet, Metabolism, and Disease

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 54 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 48 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

Amino acids, lipid metabolites, and ferritin as potential mediators linking red meat consumption to type 2 diabetes

Open access

Abstract

Background Habitual red meat consumption was consistently related to a higher risk of type 2 diabetes in observational studies. Potentially underlying mechanisms are unclear.Objective This study aimed to identify blood metabolites that possibly relate red meat consumption to the occurrence of type 2 diabetes.Design Analyses were conducted in the prospective European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Potsdam cohort (n = 27,548), applying a nested case-cohort design (n = 2681, including 688 incident diabetes cases). Habitual diet was assessed with validated semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaires. Total red meat consumption was defined as energy-standardized summed intake of unprocessed and processed red meats. Concentrations of 14 amino acids, 17 acylcarnitines, 81 glycerophospholipids, 14 sphingomyelins, and ferritin were determined in serum samples from baseline. These biomarkers were considered potential mediators of the relation between total red meat consumption and diabetes risk in Cox models. The proportion of diabetes risk explainable by biomarker adjustment was estimated in a bootstrapping procedure with 1000 replicates.Results After adjustment for age, sex, lifestyle, diet, and body mass index, total red meat consumption was directly related to diabetes risk [HR for 2 SD (11 g/MJ): 1.26; 95% CI: 1.01, 1.57]. Six biomarkers (ferritin, glycine, diacyl phosphatidylcholines 36:4 and 38:4, lysophosphatidylcholine 17:0, and hydroxy-sphingomyelin 14:1) were associated with red meat consumption and diabetes risk. The red meat-associated diabetes risk was significantly (P < 0.001) attenuated after simultaneous adjustment for these biomarkers [biomarker-adjusted HR for 2 SD (11 g/MJ): 1.09; 95% CI: 0.86, 1.38]. The proportion of diabetes risk explainable by respective biomarkers was 69% (IQR: 49%, 106%).Conclusion In our study, high ferritin, low glycine, and altered hepatic-derived lipid concentrations in the circulation were associated with total red meat consumption and, independent of red meat, with diabetes risk. The red meat-associated diabetes risk was largely attenuated after adjustment for selected biomarkers, which is consistent with the presumed mediation hypothesis.

Overview

AI snapshot

Written from the paper’s full text.

TL;DR

In the EPIC-Potsdam prospective cohort, higher total red meat consumption was associated with higher type 2 diabetes risk, and this association was largely attenuated after adjustment for selected serum biomarkers. Ferritin, glycine, and specific lipid metabolites were identified as potential mediators linking red meat intake to diabetes risk.

Key findings

  • After adjustment for age, sex, lifestyle, diet, and BMI, total red meat consumption was directly related to diabetes risk: HR for 2 SD (11 g/MJ) = 1.26 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.57).
  • Six biomarkers were associated with both red meat consumption and diabetes risk: ferritin, glycine, diacyl phosphatidylcholines 36:4 and 38:4, lysophosphatidylcholine 17:0, and hydroxy-sphingomyelin 14:1.
  • Simultaneous adjustment for selected biomarkers attenuated the red meat–diabetes association to HR 1.09 (95% CI: 0.86, 1.38); the proportion of diabetes risk explainable by biomarkers was 69% (IQR: 49%, 106%) in the BMI-adjusted model.
  • In sensitivity analyses, the explainable proportion was 49% (IQR: 29%, 89%) for unprocessed red meat and 71% (IQR: 45%, 115%) for processed meat.

Methods

  • Prospective EPIC-Potsdam cohort (n = 27,548) with a nested case-cohort design (n = 2681, including 688 incident type 2 diabetes cases; mean follow-up 7.0 y).
  • Habitual diet was assessed by validated semiquantitative food-frequency questionnaires; total red meat was energy-standardized summed intake of unprocessed and processed red meat.
  • Serum concentrations of 14 amino acids, 17 acylcarnitines, 81 glycerophospholipids, 14 sphingomyelins, and ferritin were measured; Cox models with Prentice weighting and a bootstrapping procedure with 1000 replicates estimated mediation/attenuation.

Limitations

  • The paper states that residual confounding cannot be ruled out because of the observational design, and that the results cannot prove causality.
  • The paper notes dietary information relied on FFQ estimates and metabolites were measured at a single time point; the targeted metabolite set was not exhaustive, and selection was somewhat sensitive for lysophosphatidylcholine 17:0 and hydroxy-sphingomyelin 14:1.
  • Evident from the text: the study population was middle-aged adults from Potsdam, Germany, so generalizability to other populations is not established.

Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3945/ajcn.114.099150

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

36 Not checked yet · 21 Own result · 10 Own interpretation · 9 Own method

Verify all 48 references — free account
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 15
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 28
40 of 40
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Mechanisms underlying the relation of red meat consumption with diabetes risk remain largely unknown.

    “Yet, mechanisms underlying the relation of red meat consumption with diabetes risk remain largely unknown.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    Lipid metabolites, amino acids, and ferritin are likely influenced by total red meat consumption in a relatively direct manner based on its nutrient composition.

    “Lipid metabolites, amino acids, and ferritin were included as potential mediators of the red meat-associated diabetes risk because these biomarkers were assumed to be likely influenced by total red meat consumption in a relatively direct manner based on its nutrient composition (Supplemental Figure 1B).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Circulating lipid metabolites reflect synthesis activity of lipid classes as well as availability and metabolism of specific fatty acids in the liver.

    “Circulating lipid metabolites reflect synthesis activity of lipid classes as well as availability and metabolism of specific FAs in the liver.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Total red meat as defined in the study is a large and heterogeneous food group.

    “Total red meat as defined in our study is a large and heterogeneous food group.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Estrogen is a modulator of mitochondrial function.

    “Furthermore, estrogen is a modulator of mitochondrial function, and associations of red meat consumption with acylcarnitines might be sex specific.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    This is the first study evaluating a large set of metabolites as potential mediators of the association between red meat intake and diabetes risk, including several lipid metabolites, amino acids, and ferritin.

    “To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating a large set of metabolites as potential mediators of the association between red meat intake and diabetes risk, including several lipid metabolites, amino acids, and ferritin.”
6 of 6

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

2 of 2

Citations

Cites

Show all 54 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 120

Metadata

Authors
Wittenbecher, C., Mühlenbruch, K., Kröger, J., Jacobs, S., Kuxhaus, O., Floegel, A., Fritsche, A., Pischon, T., Prehn, C., Adamski, J., Joost, H.-G., Boeing, H., & Schulze, M. B.
Affiliations
Max Delbrück Center (DE)
Corresponding author
Schulze, Matthias B
Venue
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-06
Volume
101
Issue
6
Pages
1241-1250
ISSN
0002-9165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2128199390
Cited by
120
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 6
FWCI
14.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • MDC Repository (Max-Delbrueck-Center for Molecular Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • Site cant be reached (submittedVersion)
  • PuSH - Publication Server of Helmholtz Zentrum München (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Federal Ministry of Science and Research (01 EA 9401)
  • European Union (SOC 95201408 05 F02)
  • EPIC–Potsdam Study
  • German Cancer Aid (70-2488-Ha I)
  • European Community (SOC 98200769 05 F02)
  • German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  • German Center for Diabetes Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Metabolomics and Mass Spectrometry Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diet, Metabolism, and Disease
Keywords
consumption, type 2 diabetes, amino acids, glycine, lipid metabolites, acylcarnitines, glycerophospholipids, sphingomyelin, ferritin, processed meat, hepatic lipid metabolism, blood metabolites, EPIC-Potsdam cohort, biomarkers of diabetes risk, saturated fatty acids, lysophosphatidylcholine
MeSH terms
Adult, Amino Acids, Energy Intake, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diet, Female, Ferritins, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Life Style, Male, Meat, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Risk Factors, Reproducibility of Results, Multicenter Studies as Topic, Biomarkers, Body Mass Index, Incidence, Linear Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Lipid Metabolism

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review