Cited by 64Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and ManagementMedical Imaging Techniques and ApplicationsLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 16 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The rapid assessment of fatigue severity in cancer patients

Mendoza, Tito R., Wang, X. Shelley, Cleeland, Charles S., Morrissey, Marilyn, Johnson, Beth A., Wendt, Judy K., Huber, Stephen L.·1999·Cancer

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/(sici)1097-0142(19990301)85:5<1186::aid-cncr24>3.0.co;2-n

Cites

16 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 11 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mendoza, T. R., Wang, X. S., Cleeland, C. S., Morrissey, M., Johnson, B. A., Wendt, J. K., & Huber, S. L.
Venue
Cancer
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-03-01
Volume
85
Issue
5
Pages
1186-1196
OpenAlex
W7131823493
Cited by
1
References
26
Citations by year
2024: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
high-risk melanoma, whole-body FDG PET, primary staging, follow-up, metastasis detection, melanoma recurrence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review