Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 816

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The dark triad: Facilitating a short‐term mating strategy in men

Jonason, Peter K., Li, Norman P., Webster, Gregory D., Schmitt, David P.·2009·European Journal of Personality
DOI 10.1002/per.698
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This survey (N = 224) found that characteristics collectively known as the Dark Triad (i.e. narcissism, psychopathy and Machiavellianism) were correlated with various dimensions of short‐term mating but not long‐term mating. The link between the Dark Triad and short‐term mating was stronger for men than for women. The Dark Triad partially mediated the sex difference in short‐term mating behaviour. Findings are consistent with a view that the Dark Triad facilitates an exploitative, short‐term mating strategy in men. Possible implications, including that Dark Triad traits represent a bundle of individual differences that promote a reproductively adaptive strategy are discussed. Findings are discussed in the broad context of how an evolutionary approach to personality psychology can enhance our understanding of individual differences. Copyright © 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/per.698

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. 10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.729 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Costa P., 1992, Professional manual for the NEO‐PI‐R
  3. Larson R., 2006, Personality psychology: Domains of knowledge
  4. Malamuth N., 2005, Evolutionary psychology handbook, 394
  5. Paulhus D. L., Self‐Report Psychopathy scale (SRP‐III)
  6. 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00038-6 · doi:10.1016/s0191-8869(00)00038-6
  7. 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.894 · Paper page
  8. 10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870 · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.6.870 · Paper page
  9. Trivers R., 1972, Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871–1971, 136
  10. 10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285 · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.285 · Paper page
  11. 10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00531.x · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1981.tb00531.x

Cited by

See all 816

Metadata

Authors
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P.
Venue
European Journal of Personality
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-02
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
5-18
ISSN
  • 0890-2070 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0984
DOI
10.1002/per.698
OpenAlex
W1965044563
Cited by
816
References
88
FWCI
19.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.