The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations
Abstract
The success of an innovating firm often depends on the efforts of other innovators in its environment. How do the challenges faced by external innovators affect the focal firm's outcomes? To address this question we first characterize the external environment according to the structure of interdependence. We follow the flow of inputs and outputs in the ecosystem to distinguish between upstream components that are bundled by the focal firm, and downstream complements that are bundled by the firm's customers. We hypothesize that the effects of external innovation challenges depend not only on their magnitude, but also on their location in the ecosystem relative to the focal firm. We identify a key asymmetry that results from the location of challenges relative to a focal firm—greater upstream innovation challenges in components enhance the benefits that accrue to technology leaders, while greater downstream innovation challenges in complements erode these benefits. We further propose that the effectiveness of vertical integration as a strategy to manage ecosystem interdependence increases over the course of the technology life cycle. We explore these arguments in the context of the global semiconductor lithography equipment industry from its emergence in 1962 to 2005 across nine distinct technology generations. We find strong empirical support for our framework. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors
(1980) · Journal of Sustainable Competitive Intelligence · doi:10.24883/iberoamericanic.v2i2.38 · Cited by 16,592
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
Teece, D. J. (1986) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · Cited by 7,842
Technological paradigms and technological trajectories
Dosi, G. (1982) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/0048-7333(82)90016-6 · Cited by 6,685
Cited by
Towards a theory of ecosystems
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2904 · Cited by 3,724
Ecosystem as Structure: An Actionable Construct for Strategy
Adner, R. (2017) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316678451 · Cited by 2,600
Self-citationIndustry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation
Gawer, A., & Cusumano, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Product Innovation Management · doi:10.1111/jpim.12105 · Cited by 2,394
Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework
Gawer, A. (2014) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006 · Cited by 1,869
Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps
McIntyre, D. P., & Srinivasan, A. (2017) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2596 · Cited by 1,109
Introduction—Platforms and Infrastructures in the Digital Age
Constantinides, P., Henfridsson, O., & Parker, G. G. (2018) · Information Systems Research · doi:10.1287/isre.2018.0794 · Cited by 943
Unpacking the innovation ecosystem construct: Evolution, gaps and trends
Gomes, L. A. D. V., Facin, A. L. F., Salerno, M. S., & Ikenami, R. K. (2018) · Technological Forecasting and Social Change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.009 · Cited by 836
How firms navigate cooperation and competition in nascent ecosystems
Hannah, D. P., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2018) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2750 · Cited by 692
Global platforms and ecosystems: Implications for international business theories
Nambisan, S., Zahra, S. A., & Luo, Y. (2019) · Journal of International Business Studies · doi:10.1057/s41267-019-00262-4 · Cited by 587
Maneuvering in Poor Visibility: How Firms Play the Ecosystem Game when Uncertainty is High
Dattée, B., Alexy, O., & Autio, E. (2018) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2015.0869 · Cited by 567
Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: How organizational forms shape new technology investments
Kapoor, R., & Lee, J. M. (2013) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2010 · Cited by 502
Self-citationEcosystems: broadening the locus of value creation
Kapoor, R. (2018) · Journal of Organization Design · doi:10.1186/s41469-018-0035-4 · Cited by 504
Self-citationKapoor, R., & Agarwal, S. (2017) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1122 · Cited by 453
Self-citationCompeting in Digital Markets: A Platform-Based Perspective
Cennamo, C. (2021) · Academy of Management Perspectives · doi:10.5465/amp.2016.0048 · Cited by 487
Burström, T., Parida, V., Lahti, T., & Wincent, J. (2021) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.01.016 · Cited by 424
Serban, A. C., & Lytras, M. D. (2020) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2020.2990123 · Cited by 300
Building sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: A holistic approach
Theodoraki, C., Dana, L.-P., & Caputo, A. (2022) · Journal of Business Research · doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.11.005 · Cited by 297
The Rise of Platform Ecosystems
Tiwana, A. (2014) · Platform Ecosystems · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-408066-9.00001-1 · Cited by 264
Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems
Ozalp, H., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2018) · Journal of Management Studies · doi:10.1111/joms.12351 · Cited by 223
Demand Heterogeneity in Platform Markets: Implications for Complementors
Rietveld, J., & Eggers, J. P. (2018) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2017.1183 · Cited by 221
Jacobides, M. G., Cennamo, C., & Gawer, A. (2024) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2023.104906 · Cited by 220
Relationship Marketing: Looking Backwards towards the Future
Payne, A., & Frow, P. (2017) · Journal of Services Marketing · doi:10.1108/jsm-11-2016-0380 · Cited by 216
Platform governance matters: How platform gatekeeping affects knowledge sharing among complementors
Zhang, Y., Li, J., & Tong, T. W. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3191 · Cited by 214
Chen, L., Yi, J., Li, S., & Tong, T. W. (2022) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206320988337 · Cited by 177
“Following Adner and Kapoor (2010), we direct attention to modular component providers that are part of a platform ecosystem.”
BackgroundBuilding the Value of Next-Generation Platforms: The Paradox of Diminishing Returns
Cennamo, C. (2018) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206316658350 · Cited by 173
Bruns, K., Bosma, N., Sanders, M., & Schramm, M. (2017) · Small Business Economics · doi:10.1007/s11187-017-9866-6 · Cited by 173
Ma, Y., Rong, K., Mangalagiu, D., Thornton, T. F., & Zhu, D. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.03.323 · Cited by 157
Assessing value creation in digital innovation ecosystems: A Social Media Analytics approach
Suseno, Y., Laurell, C., & Sick, N. (2018) · The Journal of Strategic Information Systems · doi:10.1016/j.jsis.2018.09.004 · Cited by 151
Rietveld, J., Ploog, J. N., & Nieborg, D. B. (2020) · Academy of Management Discoveries · doi:10.5465/amd.2019.0064 · Cited by 151
From product system to ecosystem: How firms adapt to provide an integrated value proposition
Stonig, J., Schmid, T., & Müller‐Stewens, G. (2022) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3390 · Cited by 150
Foerderer, J., Kude, T., Schuetz, S. W., & Heinzl, A. (2019) · Information Systems Journal · doi:10.1111/isj.12186 · Cited by 126
Kingpins, Bottlenecks, and Value Dynamics Along a Sector
Jacobides, M. G., & Tae, C. J. (2015) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2014.0958 · Cited by 118
Don't adapt, shape! Use the crisis to shape your minimum viable system – And the wider market
Nenonen, S., & Storbacka, K. (2020) · Industrial Marketing Management · doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2020.05.022 · Cited by 114
Global value chains, innovation and performance: firm-level evidence from the Great Recession
Brancati, E., Brancati, R., & Maresca, A. (2017) · Journal of Economic Geography · doi:10.1093/jeg/lbx003 · Cited by 114
Agarwal, S., & Kapoor, R. (2023) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2022.1615 · Cited by 105
Self-citationJones, S. L., Leiponen, A., & Vasudeva, G. (2021) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.3244 · Cited by 95
NK model as a representation of innovative search
Ganco, M. (2017) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.08.009 · Cited by 83
Clough, D. R., & Wu, A. (2022) · Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.2020.0222 · Cited by 84
Generational Transitions in Platform Markets—The Role of Backward Compatibility
Kretschmer, T., & Claussen, J. (2016) · Strategy Science · doi:10.1287/stsc.2015.0009 · Cited by 78
Blockchain-powered value creation in the 5G and smart grid use cases
Valtanen, K., Backman, J., & Yrjola, S. (2019) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2019.2900514 · Cited by 72
Andreoni, A. (2018) · Cambridge Journal of Economics · doi:10.1093/cje/bey037 · Cited by 53
Connecting entrepreneurial ecosystem and innovation. Grasping at straws or hitting a home run?
Chaudhary, S., Kaur, P., Ferraris, A., Bresciani, S., & Dhir, A. (2024) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2023.102942 · Cited by 52
Digital platform ecosystems in flux: From proprietary digital platforms to wide-spanning ecosystems
Nerbel, J. F., & Kreutzer, M. (2023) · Electronic Markets · doi:10.1007/s12525-023-00625-8 · Cited by 37
Lechowski, G., & Krzywdzinski, M. (2022) · Global Networks · doi:10.1111/glob.12380 · Cited by 26
Architectural Convergence and Platform Evolution: Empirical Test of Complementor Moves in Videogames
Srinivasan, A., & Venkatraman, V. N. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2018.2881560 · Cited by 26
Havinga, F., Mahdad, M., & Dolfsma, W. (2023) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137455 · Cited by 25
Andersson, J., Hojcková, K., & Sandén, B. A. (2023) · Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions · doi:10.1016/j.eist.2023.100786 · Cited by 23
Multihoming within Platform Ecosystems: The Strategic Role of Human Capital
Venkataraman, V., Ceccagnoli, M., & Forman, C. (2018) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3134846 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Adner, R., & Kapoor, R.
- Venue
- Strategic Management Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-17
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 306-333
- ISSN
- 0143-2095 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0266
- OpenAlex
- W3124269743
- Cited by
- 2,627
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 76.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.