Cited by 530Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances researchToxic Organic Pollutants ImpactEnvironmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology

Perfluorinated compounds in aquatic organisms at various trophic levels in a Great Lakes food chain

Open access
Kannan, Kurunthachalam, Tao, Lin, Sinclair, Ewan, Pastva, Stephanie D, Jude, Dave J, Giesy, John P·2005·Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology

Abstract

Trophic transfer of perfluorooctanesulfonate (PFOS) and other related perfluorinated compounds was examined in a Great Lakes benthic foodweb including water-algae-zebra mussel-round goby-smallmouth bass. In addition, perfluorinated compounds were measured in livers and eggs of Chinook salmon and lake whitefish, in muscle tissue of carp, and in eggs of brown trout collected from Michigan. Similarly, green frog livers, snapping turtle plasma, mink livers, and bald eagle tissues were analyzed to determine concentrations in higher trophic-level organisms in the food chain. PFOS was the most widely detected compound in benthic organisms at various trophic levels. Concentrations of PFOS in benthic invertebrates such as amphipods and zebra mussels were approximately 1000-fold greater than those in surrounding water, which suggested a bioconcentration factor (BCF; concentration in biota/concentration in water) of 1000 in benthic invertebrates. Concentrations of PFOS in round gobies were two- to fourfold greater than those in their prey organisms such as zebra mussels and amphipods. Concentrations of PFOS in predatory fishes (Chinook salmon and lake whitefish) were 10 to 20-fold greater than those in their prey species. Concentrations of PFOS in mink and bald eagles were, on average, 5- to 10-fold greater than those in Chinook salmon, carp, or snapping turtles. Because of the accumulation of PFOS in liver and blood, the biomagnification factor (BMF) of perfluorinated compounds in higher trophic-level organisms such as salmonid fishes, mink, and eagles were based on the concentrations in livers or plasma. Overall, these results suggest a BCF of PFOS of approximately 1000 (whole-body based) in benthic invertebrates, and a BMF of 10 to 20 in mink or bald eagles, relative to their prey items. Eggs of fish contained notable concentrations of PFOS, suggesting oviparous transfer of this compound. PFOA was found in water, but its biomagnification potential was lower than that of PFOS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s00244-004-0133-x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PFASs may have adverse effects on wildlife and humans through the food web.

    “Thus PFASs may have adverse effects on wild life and even human beings through the food web”

    From Short- and long-chain perfluoroalkyl substances in the water, suspended particulate matter, and surface sediment of a turbid river (2016) · cites this paper as Kannan et al., 2005

    The Results and Discussion (page unavailable) report that PFOS biomagnifies through a Great Lakes food chain, with the highest concentrations in mink and bald eagles. This supports food-web exposure in wildlife, but the paper does not establish adverse effects or address effects in humans. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kannan, K., Tao, L., Sinclair, E., Pastva, S. D., Jude, D. J., & Giesy, J. P.
Affiliations
  • New York State Department of Health (US)
  • Michigan State University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • City University of Hong Kong (HK)
Corresponding author
Kannan, Kurunthachalam
Venue
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
Published
2005-03-26
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
559-566
ISSN
  • 0090-4341 (ISSN-L)
  • 1432-0703
OpenAlex
W2142983024
Cited by
530
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 26 · 2018: 27 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 36
FWCI
17.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Deep Blue (University of Michigan) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
Keywords
PFOS, perfluorinated compounds, perfluorooctanoic acid, trophic transfer, biomagnification, bioconcentration factor, food chain, Great Lakes, benthic invertebrates, Dreissena polymorpha, Neogobius melanostomus, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, lake whitefish, mink, bald eagle, snapping turtle, carp, green frog
MeSH terms
Animals, Environmental Monitoring, Fishes, Fluorocarbons, Great Lakes Region, Invertebrates, Liver, Michigan, Mink, Muscles, Ovum, Ranidae, Turtles, Water Pollutants, Chemical, Eagles, Food Chain, Rivers, Eukaryota

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review