The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 4 of the 77 sources its claims cite were checked for support.
A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Health behaviour models typically neglect habitual action. The Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) permits synthesis of evidence of the influence of habit on behaviour. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to review evidence around mean habit strength, habit-behaviour correlations, and habit x intention interactions, from applications of the SRHI to dietary, physical activity, and active travel behaviour. METHOD: Electronic database searches identified 126 potentially relevant papers. Twenty-two papers (21 datasets) passed eligibility screening. Mean scores and correlations were meta-analysed using fixed, random and mixed effects, and interactions were synthesised via narrative review. RESULTS: Twenty-three habit-behaviour correlations and nine habit x intention interaction tests were found. Typical habit strength was located around the SRHI midpoint. Weighted habit-behaviour effects were medium-to-strong (fixed: r + = 0.44; random: r + = 0.46). Eight tests found that habit moderated the intention-behaviour relation. CONCLUSION: More comprehensive understanding of nutrition and activity behaviours will be achieved by accounting for habitual responses to contextual cues.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This systematic review and meta-analysis synthesized 21 datasets using the Self-Report Habit Index (SRHI) in nutrition, physical activity, inactivity, and active travel. Habit strength was typically near the SRHI midpoint, habit-behaviour correlations were medium-to-strong, and habit moderated the intention-behaviour relation in eight of nine tests.
Key findings
- Across 22 eligible papers (21 unique datasets), the grand weighted mean SRHI score was near the scale midpoint: fixed-effects 48.61% (random-effects 49.30%). Nutrition habits averaged ~43%, whereas general physical activity/inactivity averaged ~60% and active travel ~55%; nutrition scores were significantly lower than general physical (in)activity scores (Q_B=52.59, p<0.001).
- The weighted habit-behaviour correlation was medium-to-strong: fixed-effects r+=0.44 and random-effects r+=0.46 (both p<0.001), with failsafe N=7,011 but strong heterogeneity (Q=223.01, p<0.001; I²=91.03). Active travel correlations were stronger (fixed r+=0.65; random r+=0.70) than those for general physical activity or nutrition (Q_B=12.79, p<0.001).
- Eight of nine tests found that habit moderated the intention-behaviour relationship, such that intention had less impact on behaviour as habit strength increased. One leisure-time activity study found no moderation when controlling for habit, TPB variables, intention stability, and an intention×intention-stability interaction (p=0.12).
Methods
- Systematic review and meta-analysis using a descendency search of five databases (PsycInfo, Medline, Embase, Web of Knowledge, Scopus) on 29 January 2011, with no date limits; 126 records were screened, and 22 papers (21 datasets) met eligibility criteria.
- Eligible studies were English-language, peer-reviewed primary-data papers using the 12-item SRHI for dietary intake (excluding alcohol), physical activity/inactivity, or active travel, and reporting a matched or counterhabitual habit-behaviour association or a habit moderation test.
- Means and bivariate habit-behaviour correlations were meta-analyzed in Comprehensive Meta Analysis using fixed, random, and mixed effects, Fisher’s Z transformations, Q and I² heterogeneity statistics, and Rosenthal’s failsafe N; moderation effects were synthesized narratively because partial correlations across models were not comparable.
Limitations
- Stated: many included studies were cross-sectional and modelled habit as a predictor of past behaviour, which conflicts with the expected temporal sequence; most behaviour measures were self-reported, and the two objective-measure studies posted lower habit-behaviour correlations, suggesting self-reports may inflate effects.
- Stated: SRHI items relating to behavioural frequency may inflate habit-behaviour correlations; interaction findings may reflect publication bias, and all interaction studies focused on intention-concordant habits with often strong habit-intention correlations, limiting external validity.
- Stated/evident: heterogeneity was high and subgroup analyses could not reliably attribute it to methodological characteristics; active travel findings may be an artefact of few studies (k=3), and physical inactivity analyses were underpowered for heterogeneity and precluded failsafe N calculation.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
51 Not checked yet · 42 Own result · 10 Own method · 10 No basis given · 9 Own interpretation · 2 Supported so far
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Weighted habit-behaviour effects were medium-to-strong (fixed: r + =0.44; random: r + =0.46).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Typical habit strength was located around the SRHI midpoint.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eight tests found that habit moderated the intention-behaviour relation.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“General physical activity habits correlated with behaviour at r + =0.43 (fixed; random: r + =0.44).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“De Bruijn [31] showed that intentions remained significantly predictive of fruit consumption, albeit less strongly so, at higher levels of habit.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] * De Bruijn GJ. Understanding college students' fruit consumption. Integrating habit strength in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite. 2010; 54: 16–22. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“raw within-study standard deviation scores ranged from 16 to 30 percentage points”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit Mean Scores
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Eight studies found moderation (Table 3).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Tests of Habit as Moderator of Intention-Behaviour Relationship
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The weighted habit-behaviour correlation effect estimate for nutritional habits was moderate to strong in size (fixed: r + =0.43; random: r + =0.41)”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“and effects were of equal magnitude across healthful (fixed: r + =0.43; random: r + = 0.42) and unhealthful (fixed: r + =0.42; random: r + =0.41) dietary habits.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“There was strong heterogeneity within each sub-domain (minimum I 2 =80.98, p=0.02)”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit Mean Scores
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 36
- It may state two separate claims as one. 48
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Recent work has pointed to habit as a key automaticity-based determinant of action [15][16][17].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] * De Bruijn GJ, Kremers SPJ, De Vet E, De Nooijer J, Van Mechelen W, Brug J. Does habit strength moderate the intention-behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption. Psychol Health. 2007; 22: 899–916. source
- Supportedcites [16] Kremers SPJ, De Bruijn GJ, Visscher TLS, van Mechelen W, de Vries NK, Brug J. Environmental influences on energy balance-related behaviors: A dual-process view. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006; 3: 9. source
The Background’s “Habit strength” subsection says routine energy balance-related behaviors may be largely determined by habit and that strong habits can produce automatic responses to environmental cues. This supports the cited characterization of habit as an automaticity-based determinant of action. (LLM, conf=0.90)
- Supportedcites [17] Lally P, van Jaarsveld E, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed? Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J of Soc Psychol. 2010; 40: 998–1009. source
The Present Research section reports that habit strength is associated with eating behaviours and predicts physical activity, supporting the description of habit as a determinant of action. The paper also studies how repeated behaviour develops automaticity. It distinguishes automaticity from habit in the Discussion, but that distinction does not undermine the citing sentence’s broad claim. (LLM, conf=0.88)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The sources with a verdict support this claim; the rest weren’t checked yet, have no full text we could read, or their verdicts aren’t rated yet.
In the paper
“Habits are behavioural patterns learned through context-dependent repetition [17][18][19][20]: repeated performance in unvarying settings reinforces context-behaviour associations such that, subsequently, encountering the context is sufficient to automatically cue the habitual response [21].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Supportedcites [17] Lally P, van Jaarsveld E, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed? Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J of Soc Psychol. 2010; 40: 998–1009. source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Supportedcites [18] Aarts H, Paulussen T, Schaalma H. Physical exercise habit: on the conceptualization and formation of habitual health behaviours. Health Educ Res. 1997; 12: 363–74. source
Split into 2 atoms — 2 confirmed, 0 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.
- Not checked yetcites [21] Orbell S, Verplanken B. The automatic component of habit in health behavior: Habit as cue-contingent automaticity. Health Psychol. 2010; 29: 374–83. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
- Supported
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Five correlations focused on general physical activity, two on inactivity, and three on active travel.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Title, keyword, and abstract screening against eligibility criteria removed five papers, and subsequent full-text screening removed a further 99 papers.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Results
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Mean within-dataset sample size (N) was 294.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“A total of 126 potentially relevant papers were identified, including 125 unique citations generated by the database search, and Verplanken and Orbell's paper [27].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [27] * Verplanken B, Orbell S. Reflections on past behavior: A self-report index of habit strength. J Appl Soc Psychol. 2003; 33: 1313–1330. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four moderation tests related to activity or inactivity, three to nutrition, and two to active travel.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 21 datasets reported 23 relevant and unique bivariate habit-behaviour correlations and nine tests of the moderating effect of habit on the intention-behaviour relation (see Table 1).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of 13 diet and nutrition habit-behaviour correlations, four related to healthful and nine to unhealthful dietary habits.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The 22 eligible papers were based on 21 unique datasets.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“De Bruijn et al. [15] observed that fruit consumption intentions correlated most strongly with behaviour where habit was weakest (r=0.32),but remained significantly correlated at moderate and strong levels of habit (both rs=0.23).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Nutrition
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [15] * De Bruijn GJ, Kremers SPJ, De Vet E, De Nooijer J, Van Mechelen W, Brug J. Does habit strength moderate the intention-behaviour relationship in the Theory of Planned Behaviour? The case of fruit consumption. Psychol Health. 2007; 22: 899–916. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“With the exception of physical inactivity, all weighted correlations were robust (minimum failsafe N=308) and highly heterogeneous (minimum Q=23.21, p=0.001; minimum I 2 =74.15).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plaincorrelationaln = 308 ·- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“All habitbehaviour correlations reported below were significant at p<0.001.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Scores were below the midpoint for healthy and unhealthy eating (both ~43%)”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit Mean Scores
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This effect was robust (failsafe N=7,011), but strong heterogeneity was observed around the mean (Q=223.01,p<0.001;I 2 =91.03).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
boostedcorrelationaln = 7,011- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Behaviour was measured via selfreport in 19 datasets, of which 13 focused on actual behaviour over a given period and eight on typical behavioural patterns.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most samples were university-based (14 datasets).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In six studies, habit, intention, and other variables derived from the Theory of Planned Behaviour (attitudes [subdivided into instrumental attitude and affective attitude in two studies], subjective norms, perceived behavioural control) were partialled out of the moderated multiple regression models.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Tests of Habit as Moderator of Intention-Behaviour Relationship
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four of the nine studies investigating the effect of habit on the intention-behaviour relation used cross-sectional, and five prospective, designs.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Tests of Habit as Moderator of Intention-Behaviour Relationship
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Two datasets used objective behaviour measures (observed food choice in a lab setting [37, study 2; 56]).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [37] * Conner M, Perugini M, O'Gorman R, Ayres K, Prestwich A. Relations between implicit and explicit measures of attitudes and measures of behaviour: Evidence of moderation by individual difference variables. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007: 33; 1727–40. source
- Not checked yetcites [56] * Brug J, de Vet E, de Nooijer J, Verplanken B. Predicting fruit consumption: Cognitions, intention, and habits. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 73–81. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“but above the midpoint for studies of physical activity or inactivity (both ~60%) and active travel (~55%).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit Mean Scores
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This effect was underpinned by correlations of r + ≈0.42 (fixed: r + =0.43; random: r + =0.44) for activity habits, and r + = 0.47 (both fixed and random) for inactivity habits.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Correlations did not differ by study quality, sample, design, whether actual or typical behaviour was measured, or whether behaviour was self-reported or objective (maximum Q B =2.31, p=0.13).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Neither study design (Q B =0.18, p=0.68) nor sample (Q B =0.82, p=0.66) explained variation in mean scores.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit Mean Scores
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Fourteen datasets used prospective designs, and seven were cross-sectional.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The average weighted correlation between habit and behaviour across all studies was estimated at r + =0.44 using a fixed model (p<0.001), and r + =0.46 using a random effects model (p<0.001),indicating a moderate to strong effect (see Table 2).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Habit measures showed satisfactory alphas within all datasets (minimum α=0.84).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Study Characteristics
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two studies controlled for intention and habit only.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Tests of Habit as Moderator of Intention-Behaviour Relationship
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“We found considerable between-study variation in mean habit scores and in habit-behaviour correlations, but subgroup analyses could not reliably attribute heterogeneity to methodological characteristics.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Chatzisarantis and Hagger ([59] studies 1 and 2) showed that intentions to engage in vigorous physical activity or active sports became less associated with behaviour as habit strength increased, but beta weights were not provided to illustrate this effect.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > General Physical (In)Activity
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [59] * Chatzisarantis NLD, Hagger MS. Mindfulness and the intention-behavior relationship within the Theory of Planned Behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2007; 33: 663–76. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Weighted mean habit-behaviour correlations were typically medium to large in size, and active travel correlations were strongest.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The SRHI-behaviour correlation (r= 0.86) was attenuated using the abbreviated index (r=0.80),and marginally lower mean scores were observed (expressed as percentages of maximum scores, M=69.67 vs 67.50, respectively), but reliability and habit×intention interaction coefficients were identical.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Two studies which used objective measures posted lower habit-behaviour correlations, suggesting that self-reports of action may inflate true effects.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Rests on an assumption: Self-reports of behaviour are prone to inaccuracy.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Habit scores varied by around twenty percentage points between behaviours, with significantly higher scores observed for physical activity than nutritional behaviour.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Health behaviour models typically neglect habitual action.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
In the paper
“The SRHI offers a standardised and reliable measure to assess habitual action and so permits evidence synthesis across behaviours and populations [28].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [28] Verplanken B, Myrbakk V, Rudi E. The measurement of habit. In: Betsch T, Haberstroh S, eds. The routines of decision making. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 2005: 231–47.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Approaches to behaviour change have traditionally been based on reasoned action models [7].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [7] Conner M, Norman P. Predicting health behaviour: A social cognition approach. In: Conner M & Norman P, eds. Predicting health behaviour: Research and practice with social cognition models. 2nd ed. Buckingham: Open University Press; 2005: 1–27.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For example, the Theory of Planned Behaviour [8] and the Health Action Process Approach [9] posit that behaviour follows directly from a conscious decision to act, which summarises beliefs around the favourability and controllability of action.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [8] Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Dec. 1991; 50: 179–211. source
- Not checked yetcites [9] Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol—Int Rev. 2008; 57: 1–29.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“These models portray behaviour as the outcome of conscious deliberation and emphasise concepts such as intentions, attitudes, and self-efficacy.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The measure has been found to conform to theoretical predictions by correlating with behavioural frequency, and moderating the intention-behaviour relation [29,30].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] * Gardner B. Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transport Res F – Traf. 2009; 12: 68–76. source
- Not checked yetcites [30] * Kremers SPJ, Brug J. Habit strength of physical activity and sedentary behavior among children and adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2008; 20: 5–17. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a multiplicative combination of performance frequency ('how often do you do behavior X?') and cue stability ('when you do behavior X, how often is cue Y present?') appears to offer a useful habit index, but depends upon prior identification of relevant cues [25,26].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [25] Ouellette JA, Wood W. Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychol Bull. 1998; 124: 54–74. source
- Not checked yetcites [26] Wood W, Tam L, Witt MG. Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2005: 88, 918–33. source
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Dual-process theories suggest that behaviour can be initiated through two competing pathways: a deliberative route, which entails prior thought and cognitive effort (as depicted by reasoned action accounts), and an automatic route, which is characterised by environmentally cued responses which proceed in the absence of effort, volitional control, and awareness [13,14].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [13] Bargh JA. The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer RS, Srull TK, eds. Handbook of social cognition. Vol. 1. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1996: 1–40.
- Not checked yetcites [14] Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behaviour. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004; 8: 220–47. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The measure may thereby fail to detect, for example, habits prompted by temporal cues where only location cue stability is measured, making integration of evidence across behaviours and contexts problematic.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Where habit or behaviour was measured on multiple occasions, habit data were taken from the earliest timepoint, and behaviour data from the earliest follow-up timepoint, so as to observe the causal sequence of habit-behaviour relationships [22].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Prospective Studies
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [22] Triandis H. Interpersonal behavior. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole; 1977.
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Potential between-study sources of bias were assessed by coding for four methodological variables pertaining to study design (whether cross-sectional or prospective), behaviour measure (self-report or objective; actual or typical behaviour), and sample (university-based, school-based or general adult population).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Data Extraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“If unwanted habitual health-risk behaviours proceed without forethought, then shifts in motivation may fail to change behaviour [33].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Mark. 2006; 25: 90–103. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Estimation of typical strength of habits for specific health behaviours would be informative for intervention design, because behaviour change interventions may be most effective when tailored to habit strength of the focal behaviour [33].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Mark. 2006; 25: 90–103. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Assuming the availability of 15 datasets, each with a mean within-study N of 80, and statistical significance set at 0.05, power to detect a small effect (r=0.10 [46]) using a fixed-effects model was 0.97.Assuming also high between-study heterogeneity, power to detect a small effect using random effects procedures was 0.80.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
What the sources say
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirty five percent of datasets (including published and unpublished material) were second-coded by an independent coder (PL), with 97% agreement found.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Data Extraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“On these bases, we created a dichotomous indicator of study quality for analysis of correlations, which treated studies as low quality where they were (a) cross-sectional and based on (b) selfreported and (c) typical behaviour, and all other studies as acceptable quality.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Data Extraction
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A second reviewer (PL) independently filtered 20% of papers at both screening stages, and 100% agreement was found between reviewers.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Screening Procedure
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Additionally, forming habits for health-promoting behaviours may prevent relapse and aid maintenance of behaviour change beyond the duration of an intervention [33,35].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Mark. 2006; 25: 90–103. source
- Not checked yetcites [35] Rothman AJ, Sheeran P, Wood W. Reflective and automatic processes in the initiation and maintenance of dietary change. Ann Behav Med. 2009; 38 (S1):S4–S17 source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Publication bias was assessed by calculating Rosenthal's failsafe N, which estimates the number of studies needed to reduce weighted habit-behaviour correlations to statistical non-significance (p>0.05[53]).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Meta-analysis of Means and Correlations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [53] Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedures for social research. London: Sage; 1984.
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Applications of the SRHI have shown dietary behaviours, physical activity, and sedentary behaviours to have a habitual component for many people, with habit predicting behaviour over and above reasoned concepts such as intentions, behavioural control, attitudes, and social norms [29][30][31][32].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] * Gardner B. Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transport Res F – Traf. 2009; 12: 68–76. source
- Not checked yetcites [30] * Kremers SPJ, Brug J. Habit strength of physical activity and sedentary behavior among children and adolescents. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2008; 20: 5–17. source
- Not checked yetcites [31] * De Bruijn GJ. Understanding college students' fruit consumption. Integrating habit strength in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite. 2010; 54: 16–22. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No differences were found: correlation coefficients varied by a maximum of 0.015 and subgroup analyses yielded stable results across all treatments.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“the small number of available studies (k=2) is likely to have underpowered heterogeneity analyses [56], and precluded calculation of failsafe Ns.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [56] * Brug J, de Vet E, de Nooijer J, Verplanken B. Predicting fruit consumption: Cognitions, intention, and habits. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2006; 38: 73–81. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Additionally, all studies in which habit interacted with intention focused on intentionconcordant habits and many reported strong habit-intention correlations (e.g.[29]).”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [29] * Gardner B. Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transport Res F – Traf. 2009; 12: 68–76. source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A more comprehensive model of nutrition and activity behaviour may also require a temporal element, so as to acknowledge that frequent performance of reasoned action leads to habit formation [17,20].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Lally P, van Jaarsveld E, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed? Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J of Soc Psychol. 2010; 40: 998–1009. source
- Not checked yetcites [20] Lally P, Wardle J, Gardner B. Experiences of habit formation: A qualitative study. Psychol Health Med (in press)
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“The failure of intention to translate into action where habit is strong suggests that motivation change, while likely to be necessary for behaviour change, will not change unhealthful ('bad') habits, and so the cue-response association underpinning habitual action must be disrupted [33].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [33] Verplanken B, Wood W. Interventions to break and create consumer habits. J Public Policy Mark. 2006; 25: 90–103. source
hedgeddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“The predictive and explanatory utility of these models may be increased by incorporating habit as a determinant of action situated on a parallel, cue-driven pathway to behaviour and a variable which can bypass deliberation and obstruct the translation of intention into action [14,62].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [14] Strack F, Deutsch R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behaviour. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2004; 8: 220–47. source
- Not checked yetcites [62] Verplanken B, Aarts H, van Knippenberg A. Habit, information acquisition and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur J of Soc Psychol. 1997; 27: 539–560. source
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“This fails to acknowledge the expected temporal sequence between habit and behaviour [62], and is also conceptually problematic given that, at least in early stages of habit formation, repeated action strengthens habit [17].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [62] Verplanken B, Aarts H, van Knippenberg A. Habit, information acquisition and the process of making travel mode choices. Eur J of Soc Psychol. 1997; 27: 539–560. source
- Not checked yetcites [17] Lally P, van Jaarsveld E, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed? Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J of Soc Psychol. 2010; 40: 998–1009. source
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many of the studies used cross-sectional designs, and so modelled habit as a predictor of past behaviour.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“A more comprehensive understanding of nutrition and activity behaviours, and how they might be changed, will be achieved by integrating habitual responses to contextual cues into theoretical accounts of behaviour.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: fails — It may be too vague to check against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may be too vague to check against evidence.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Some SRHI items relate to behavioural frequency (e.g.'[Behaviour X…] is something I do frequently', 'is something I have been doing for a long time'), and so are likely to inflate the habit-behaviour correlation.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some researchers have removed frequency items when applying the SRHI, with no apparent losses in reliability [17,29].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [17] Lally P, van Jaarsveld E, Potts HWW, Wardle J. How are habits formed? Modelling habit formation in the real world. Eur J of Soc Psychol. 2010; 40: 998–1009. source
- Not checked yetcites [29] * Gardner B. Modelling motivation and habit in stable travel mode contexts. Transport Res F – Traf. 2009; 12: 68–76. source
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Alternatively, between-study variation in habit strength may be attributable to covariates pertaining to the populations studied.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Active travel habits, for example, were predominantly documented in the Netherlands, where bicycling is the main mode of transport for short journeys [65], which may make bicycle habit formation more likely.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [65] Statistics Netherlands. Kernresultaten mobiliteit [Main Results Mobility]. 7th ed. Statistics Netherlands: Voorburg; 2002, pp12-13.
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Various subscales have been proposed, and we synthesised evidence using the 12-item SRHI for the purpose of between-study consistency.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Concerns have been raised around the validity of the SRHI for modelling habit-behaviour correlations [31].”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites [31] * De Bruijn GJ. Understanding college students' fruit consumption. Integrating habit strength in the theory of planned behaviour. Appetite. 2010; 54: 16–22. source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
The paper relies on this without support.
No systematic review of applications of the SRHI to dietary and physical activity habits is available.
“Despite growing theoretical and empirical research interest in the relevance of habit to health behaviour [16,17,31], no systematic review of applications of the SRHI to dietary and physical activity habits is available.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The everyday contexts that support habits remain stable and are regularly encountered.
“First, assuming the everyday contexts that support habits remain stable and are regularly encountered, habit strength will correlate with behavioural frequency.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Within-study habit score distributions are normal.
“assuming normal within-study habit score distributions”
The paper relies on this without support.
Self-reports of behaviour are prone to inaccuracy.
“which are prone to inaccuracy”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Actions performed regularly apparently became habitual and persisted with little guidance from intentions (see also Gardner et al. 2011).”
From Psychology of Habit. (2016) · cites this paper as Gardner et al. 2011
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“For example, the majority of the studies on exercise habit are cross-sectional (Gardner et al., 2011).”
From Exercise habit formation in new gym members: a longitudinal study (2015) · cites this paper as Gardner et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Overall, habit has demonstrated predictive validity in the physical activity domain; for example, a recent meta-analysis found it to correlate r = .43 with behavior which is similar to the magnitude of the intention-behavior relationship (Gardner et al., 2011).”
From Exercise habit formation in new gym members: a longitudinal study (2015) · cites this paper as Gardner et al., 2011
In the citing paper
“Second, the habit model proposed by Lally and Gardner (2013) presents a strong case of four antecedents of habit which have individually been found to correlate with habit in various studies (Gardner et al., 2011).”
From Exercise habit formation in new gym members: a longitudinal study (2015) · cites this paper as Gardner et al., 2011
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
“With the exception of physical inactivity, all weighted correlations were robust (minimum failsafe N=308)”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
“Active travel | 549 | 3 Fixed | 53.60 (51.15, 56.06) 4.22 (4.07, 4.36) 43.00* 95.35 0.65* (0.60, 0.70) 32.55* 93.86 267”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
“for activity habits, and r + = 0.47 (both fixed and random) for inactivity habits.”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
“Physical activity | 1,284 5 Fixed | 60.76 (59.58, 61.95) 4.65 (4.57, 4.72) 55.33* 92.77 0.41* (0.36, 0.45) 22.10* 81.90 308”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
“minimum Q=23.21, p=0.001; minimum I 2 =74.15”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
“0.42* (0.38, 0.46) 29.59* 72.96 677”
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Habit-Behaviour Correlations
“minimum Q=23.21, p=0.001; minimum I 2 =74.15”
§ A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Applications of the Self-Report Habit Index to Nutrition and Physical Activity Behaviours > Discussion
“0.41* (0.36, 0.45) 22.10* 81.90 308”
Citations
Cites
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173 · Cited by 91,532
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions
(1992) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.29-3352 · Cited by 36,647
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009) · doi:10.1002/9780470743386 · Cited by 14,225
Wasserman, S. S., Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1988) · Journal of Educational Statistics · doi:10.2307/1164953 · Cited by 10,377
Efficacy of the Theory of Planned Behaviour: A meta‐analytic review
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1348/014466601164939 · Cited by 9,970
Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2021) · doi:10.1002/9781119558378 · Cited by 9,799
Cohen, J. (1992) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.112.1.155 · Cited by 8,771
(1991) · Cited by 7,187
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. OECD Health Data 2010. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development; 2010.
- World Health Organisation. WHO Mega Country Health Promotion Network: Behavioural Risk Factor Surveillance Guide. Genera: World Health Organisation; 2002.
- Craig R, Mindell J, Harani V. Health Survey for England 2008. London: NHS Information Centre; 2009.
- Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando: Academic Press; 1985.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Wood, W., & Rünger, D. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033417 · Cited by 1,445
Time to retire the theory of planned behaviour
Sniehotta, F. F., Presseau, J., & Araújo-Soares, V. (2014) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.869710 · Cited by 1,406
Gardner, B. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2013.876238 · Cited by 1,016
Self-citationLally, P., & Gardner, B. (2013) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2011.603640 · Cited by 901
Self-citationGardner, B., Abraham, C., Lally, P. J., & de Bruijn, G. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-102 · Cited by 909
Self-citationRhodes, R. E., & de Bruijn, G. (2013) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12032 · Cited by 787
Visschers, V. H. M., Wickli, N., & Siegrist, M. (2016) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.11.007 · Cited by 800
Making health habitual: the psychology of ‘habit-formation’ and general practice
Gardner, B., Lally, P., & Wardle, J. (2012) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp12x659466 · Cited by 591
Self-citationUnderstanding the intention-behavior gap: The role of intention strength
Conner, M., & Norman, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.923464 · Cited by 509
Theories of physical activity behaviour change: A history and synthesis of approaches
Rhodes, R. E., McEwan, D., & Rebar, A. L. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.11.010 · Cited by 564
The importance of habits in eating behaviour. An overview and recommendations for future research
Riet, J. V., Sijtsema, S. J., Dagevos, H., & De Bruijn, G.-J. (2011) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2011.07.010 · Cited by 399
Healthy diet: Health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions
de Ridder, D. T. D., Kroese, F. M., Evers, C., Adriaanse, M. A., & Gillebaart, M. (2017) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2017.1316849 · Cited by 351
Kurz, T., Gardner, B., Verplanken, B., & Abraham, C. (2014) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.327 · Cited by 322
Self-citationHagger, M. S. (2018) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2018.12.007 · Cited by 350
Wilson, A. L., Buckley, E., Buckley, J. D., & Bogomolova, S. (2016) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2016.02.009 · Cited by 308
Nilsen, P., Roback, K., Broström, A., & Ellström, P.-E. (2012) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-7-53 · Cited by 284
Poelman, M. P., Gillebaart, M., Schlinkert, C., Dijkstra, S. C., Derksen, E., Mensink, F., Hermans, R. C. J., Aardening, P., de Ridder, D. T. D., & de Vet, E. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.105002 · Cited by 314
Exercise habit formation in new gym members: a longitudinal study
Kaushal, N., & Rhodes, R. E. (2015) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-015-9640-7 · Cited by 285
A systematic review of the effects of non-conscious regulatory processes in physical activity
Rebar, A. L., Dimmock, J. A., Jackson, B., Rhodes, R. E., Kates, A., Starling, J., & Vandelanotte, C. (2016) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2016.1183505 · Cited by 301
Habit in Personality and Social Psychology
Wood, W. (2017) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868317720362 · Cited by 299
Forming a flossing habit: An exploratory study of the psychological determinants of habit formation
Judah, G., Gardner, B., & Aunger, R. V. (2012) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2012.02086.x · Cited by 281
Self-citationInterventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer
Bourke, L., Homer, K., Thaha, M. A., Steed, L., Rosario, D. J., Robb, K. A., Saxton, J., & Taylor, S. J. (2013) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010192.pub2 · Cited by 265
Gardner, B., Phillips, L. A., & Judah, G. (2016) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12189 · Cited by 232
Self-citationDigital Behaviour Change Interventions to Break and Form Habits
Pinder, C., Vermeulen, J., Cowan, B. R., & Beale, R. (2018) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3196830 · Cited by 235
Interventions for promoting habitual exercise in people living with and beyond cancer
Turner, R. R., Steed, L., Quirk, H., Greasley, R., Saxton, J., Taylor, S. J., Rosario, D. J., Thaha, M. A., & Bourke, L. (2018) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd010192.pub3 · Cited by 239
Shifting the balance between goals and habits: Five failures in experimental habit induction.
de Wit, S., Kindt, M., Knot, S. L., Verhoeven, A. A. C., Robbins, T. W., Gasull-Camós, J., Evans, M., Mirza, H., & Gillan, C. M. (2018) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000402 · Cited by 217
Habitual Behavior Is Goal-Driven
Kruglanski, A. W., & Szumowska, E. (2020) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/1745691620917676 · Cited by 231
Rhodes, R. E., & Yao, C. A. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0168-6 · Cited by 209
Sedentary behavior as a daily process regulated by habits and intentions.
Conroy, D. E., Maher, J. P., Elavsky, S., Hyde, A. L., & Doerksen, S. E. (2013) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031629 · Cited by 211
Modelling Habit Formation and Its Determinants
Gardner, B., & Lally, P. (2018) · The Psychology of Habit · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_12 · Cited by 187
Self-citationVainio, A., Niva, M., Jallinoja, P. T., & Latvala, T. (2016) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2016.03.002 · Cited by 178
Indonesian Millennials’ Halal food purchasing: merely a habit?
Amalia, F. A., Sosianika, A., & Suhartanto, D. (2020) · British Food Journal · doi:10.1108/bfj-10-2019-0748 · Cited by 223
Gardner, B., Lally, P. J., & Rebar, A. L. (2020) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12553 · Cited by 200
Self-citationGardner, B., & Lally, P. J. (2012) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-012-9442-0 · Cited by 201
Self-citationThe Habitual Use of the Self-report Habit Index
Sniehotta, F. F., & Presseau, J. (2011) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9305-x · Cited by 171
Kaushal, N., & Rhodes, R. E. (2014) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2014.07.026 · Cited by 175
Orbell, S., & Verplanken, B. (2015) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2014.992031 · Cited by 184
McGowan, L., Cooke, L. J., Gardner, B., Beeken, R. J., Croker, H., & Wardle, J. (2013) · The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · doi:10.3945/ajcn.112.052159 · Cited by 160
Self-citationPresseau, J., Johnston, M., Heponiemi, T., Elovainio, M. J., Francis, J., Eccles, M., Steen, N., Hrisos, S., Stamp, E., Grimshaw, J., et al. (2014) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12160-014-9609-8 · Cited by 160
Habit, identity, and repetitive action: A prospective study of binge‐drinking in UK students
Gardner, B., de Bruijn, G., & Lally, P. J. (2011) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8287.2011.02056.x · Cited by 159
Self-citationThe Evolving Understanding of Physical Activity Behavior
Rhodes, R. E. (2016) · Advances in motivation science · doi:10.1016/bs.adms.2016.11.001 · Cited by 162
Fleig, L., Pomp, S., Schwarzer, R., & Lippke, S. (2013) · Rehabilitation Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0033885 · Cited by 139
Rebar, A. L., Gardner, B., Rhodes, R. E., & Verplanken, B. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_3 · Cited by 138
Self-citationHabitual exercise instigation (vs. execution) predicts healthy adults’ exercise frequency.
Phillips, L. A., & Gardner, B. (2015) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0000249 · Cited by 147
Self-citationFrom intentions via planning and behavior to physical exercise habits
Fleig, L., Pomp, S., Parschau, L., Barz, M., Lange, D., Schwarzer, R., & Lippke, S. (2013) · Psychology of sport and exercise · doi:10.1016/j.psychsport.2013.03.006 · Cited by 133
Behavioral and Neural Evidence of the Rewarding Value of Exercise Behaviors: A Systematic Review
Cheval, B., Radel, R., Neva, J., Boyd, L., Swinnen, S., Sander, D., & Boisgontier, M. (2018) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-018-0898-0 · Cited by 109
The habitual nature of food purchases at the supermarket: Implications for policy making
Machín, L., Curutchet, M. R., Gugliucci, V., Vitola, A., Otterbring, T., de Alcântara, M., & Ares, G. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104844 · Cited by 129
Rees, J. H., Bamberg, S., Jäger, A. H., Lennart, V., Bergmeyer, M., & Friese, M. (2018) · Basic and Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/01973533.2018.1449111 · Cited by 134
Ashton, L. M., Sharkey, T., Whatnall, M. C., Williams, R. L., Bezzina, A., Aguiar, E. J., Collins, C. E., & Hutchesson, M. J. (2019) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu11040825 · Cited by 134
Raman, J., Smith, E., & Hay, P. (2013) · Journal of Obesity · doi:10.1155/2013/240128 · Cited by 120
Encouraging Dog Walking for Health Promotion and Disease Prevention
Christian, H. E., Bauman, A. E., Epping, J. N., Levine, G. N., McCormack, G. R., Rhodes, R. E., Richards, E. A., Rock, M. J., & Westgarth, C. (2016) · American Journal of Lifestyle Medicine · doi:10.1177/1559827616643686 · Cited by 126
Physical Activity Habit: Complexities and Controversies
Rhodes, R. E., & Rebar, A. L. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-97529-0_6 · Cited by 119
Gardner, B., Sheals, K., Wardle, J., & McGowan, L. (2014) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-014-0135-7 · Cited by 182
Self-citationTargeting habits in anorexia nervosa: a proof-of-concept randomized trial
STEINGLASS, J. E., Glasofer, D. R., Walsh, E. K., Guzman, G., Peterson, C. B., Walsh, B. T., Attia, E., & Wonderlich, S. A. (2018) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329171800020x · Cited by 109
Chevance, G., Bernard, P., Chamberland, P.-É., & Rebar, A. L. (2019) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2019.1618726 · Cited by 121
Spence, J. C., Rhodes, R. E., McCurdy, A., Mangan, A. J., Hopkins, D., & Mummery, W. K. (2020) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12497 · Cited by 113
Habit Formation and Behavior Change
Gardner, B., & Rebar, A. L. (2019) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199828340-0232 · Cited by 113
Self-citationDeterminants of dietary behavior among youth: an umbrella review
Sleddens, E. F. C., Kroeze, W., Kohl, L. F., Bolten, L. M., Velema, E., Kaspers, P. J., Brug, J., & Kremers, S. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0164-x · Cited by 103
Consumer acceptance of circular business models
Elzinga, R., Reike, D., Negro, S. O., & Boon, W. (2020) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.119988 · Cited by 127
Skagerström, J., Alehagen, S., Häggström‐Nordin, E., Årestedt, K., & Nilsén, P. (2013) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/1471-2458-13-780 · Cited by 99
Challenges and opportunities of digital health in a post-COVID19 world
Manteghinejad, A., & Javanmard, S. H. (2021) · Journal of Research in Medical Sciences · doi:10.4103/jrms.jrms_1255_20 · Cited by 116
Multi-Process Action Control in Physical Activity: A Primer
Rhodes, R. E. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.797484 · Cited by 111
Asbjørnsen, R. A., Wentzel, J., Smedsrød, M. L., Hjelmesæth, J., Clark, M. M., Solberg Nes, L., & Van Gemert-Pijnen, J. E. W. C. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22598 · Cited by 84
Habit slips: when consumers unintentionally resist new products
Labrecque, J. S., Wood, W., Neal, D. T., & Harrington, N. (2016) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/s11747-016-0482-9 · Cited by 103
Effects of habit and intention on behavior: Meta-analysis and test of key moderators.
Hagger, M. S., Hamilton, K., Phipps, D. J., Protogerou, C., Zhang, C., Girelli, L., Mallia, L., & Lucidi, F. (2023) · Motivation Science · doi:10.1037/mot0000294 · Cited by 102
Predicting adoption and maintenance of physical activity in the context of dual-process theories
Strobach, T., Englert, C., Jekauc, D., & Pfeffer, I. (2020) · Performance Enhancement & Health · doi:10.1016/j.peh.2020.100162 · Cited by 106
Potthoff, S., Rasul, O., Sniehotta, F. F., Marques, M. M., Beyer, F. R., Thomson, R., Avery, L., & Presseau, J. (2019) · Health Psychology Review · doi:10.1080/17437199.2018.1547119 · Cited by 94
Predicting walking and cycling behaviour change using an extended Theory of Planned Behaviour
Bird, E. L., Panter, J., Baker, G., Jones, T. J., & Ogilvie, D. (2018) · Journal of Transport & Health · doi:10.1016/j.jth.2018.05.014 · Cited by 85
Reflecting on non‐reflective action: An exploratory think‐aloud study of self‐report habit measures
Gardner, B., & Tang, V. (2013) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12060 · Cited by 95
Self-citationClustering and correlates of screen-time and eating behaviours among young adolescents
Pearson, N., Griffiths, P. L., Biddle, S., Johnston, J., McGeorge, S., & Haycraft, E. (2017) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4441-2 · Cited by 89
Brown, D. J., Hagger, M. S., Morrissey, S. A., & Hamilton, K. (2017) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2017.11.106 · Cited by 91
de Bruijn, G., Gardner, B., van Osch, L., & Sniehotta, F. F. (2013) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-013-9348-4 · Cited by 88
Self-citationThe role of habit in different phases of exercise
Kaushal, N., Rhodes, R. E., Meldrum, J. T., & Spence, J. C. (2017) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12237 · Cited by 91
Antecedents and consequents of consumers not adopting e-commerce
Mainardes, E. W., de Souza, I. M., & Correia, R. D. (2020) · Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services · doi:10.1016/j.jretconser.2020.102138 · Cited by 83
Feil, K., Allion, S., Weyland, S., & Jekauc, D. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.626750 · Cited by 85
Ma, H., Wang, A., Pei, R., & Piao, M. (2023) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-023-01493-3 · Cited by 93
Canova, L., & Manganelli, A. M. (2020) · Europe’s Journal of Psychology · doi:10.5964/ejop.v16i3.1893 · Cited by 88
Piao, M., Ryu, H., Lee, H., & Kim, J. (2020) · JMIR mHealth and uHealth · doi:10.2196/15085 · Cited by 75
Dolcos, S., & Albarracin, D. (2014) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.2048 · Cited by 79
Habit Formation in Wearable Activity Tracker Use Among Older Adults: Qualitative Study
Peng, W., Li, L., Kononova, A. G., Cotten, S. R., Kamp, K., & Bowen, M. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/22488 · Cited by 76
Correlates of dietary behavior in adults: an umbrella review
Sleddens, E. F. C., Kroeze, W., Kohl, L. F., Bolten, L. M., Velema, E., Kaspers, P. J., Kremers, S., & Brug, J. (2015) · Nutrition Reviews · doi:10.1093/nutrit/nuv007 · Cited by 83
Habits Predict Physical Activity on Days When Intentions Are Weak
Rebar, A. L., Elavsky, S., Maher, J. P., Doerksen, S. E., & Conroy, D. E. (2014) · Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology · doi:10.1123/jsep.2013-0173 · Cited by 78
Mullan, B. A., Allom, V., Sainsbury, K., & Monds, L. A. (2015) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2015.02.033 · Cited by 77
Predictors of Physical Activity Change Among Adults Using Observational Designs
Rhodes, R. E., & Quinlan, A. (2014) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40279-014-0275-6 · Cited by 73
Niermann, C. Y. N., Herrmann, C., von Haaren‐Mack, B., van Kann, D., & Wöll, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00677 · Cited by 82
Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., de Wit, S., & Lally, P. J. (2024) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12975 · Cited by 93
Self-citationTheory-based predictors of multiple clinician behaviors in the management of diabetes
Presseau, J., Johnston, M., Francis, J., Hrisos, S., Stamp, E., Steen, N., Hawthorne, G., Grimshaw, J., Elovainio, M. J., Hunter, M., et al. (2013) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-013-9513-x · Cited by 82
LI, L. C., Feehan, L. M., Xie, H. W., Lu, N., Shaw, C., Gromala, D., Aviña-Zubieta, J. A., Koehn, C. L., Hoens, A. M., English, K., et al. (2020) · Arthritis Care & Research · doi:10.1002/acr.24199 · Cited by 74
Fleig, L., Kerschreiter, R., Schwarzer, R., Pomp, S., & Lippke, S. (2014) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2014.930146 · Cited by 72
Beyond Sexist Beliefs: How Do People Decide to Use Gender-Inclusive Language?
Sczesny, S., Moser, F., & Wood, W. (2015) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167215585727 · Cited by 88
LI, L. C., Feehan, L. M., Xie, H., Lu, N., Shaw, C., Gromala, D., Zhu, S., Aviña-Zubieta, J. A., Hoens, A. M., Koehn, C. L., et al. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/19116 · Cited by 71
Evolution of physical activity habits after a context change: The case of COVID‐19 lockdown
Maltagliati, S., Rebar, A. L., Fessler, L., Forestier, C., Sarrazin, P. G., Chalabaëv, A., Sander, D., Sivaramakrishnan, H., Orsholits, D., Boisgontier, M. P., et al. (2021) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12524 · Cited by 84
Self-citationGardner, B., Richards, R., Lally, P. J., Rebar, A. L., Thwaite, T. L., & Beeken, R. J. (2021) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2021.105183 · Cited by 69
Self-citationSingh, B., Murphy, A., Maher, C., & Smith, A. E. (2024) · Healthcare · doi:10.3390/healthcare12232488 · Cited by 98
de Bruijn, G., Rhodes, R. E., & van Osch, L. (2011) · Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s10865-011-9380-2 · Cited by 78
A matter of habit: Recognizing the multiple roles of habit in health behaviour
Gardner, B., Rebar, A. L., & Lally, P. J. (2019) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12369 · Cited by 66
Self-citationMurray, J., Brennan, S., French, D., Patterson, C., Kee, F., & Hunter, R. F. (2018) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kay012 · Cited by 67
Predicting limiting ‘free sugar’ consumption using an integrated model of health behavior
Phipps, D. J., Hagger, M. S., & Hamilton, K. (2020) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2020.104668 · Cited by 69
Ellingson, L. D., Lansing, J. E., DeShaw, K. J., Peyer, K. L., Bai, Y., Pérez, M., Phillips, L. A., & Welk, G. J. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/10988 · Cited by 65
The Cambridge Handbook of Substance and Behavioral Addictions
Sussman, S. Y. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108632591 · Cited by 64
Metadata
- Authors
- Gardner, B., de Bruijn, G.-J., & Lally, P.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Venue
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2011-05-28
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 174-187
- ISSN
- 0742-5554 (ISSN-L)
- 0883-6612
- 1532-4796
- OpenAlex
- W2074638810
- Cited by
- 574
- References
- 71
- Citations by year
- 2026: 25 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 43 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 111 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Annals of Behavioral Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
- Keywords
- Self-Report Habit Index, habit strength, habitual behavior, dietary behaviour, physical activity, active travel, intention-behavior relationship, health behavior models, contextual cues
- MeSH terms
- Habits, Humans, Motor Activity, Nutritional Status, Travel, Health Behavior, Self Report
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review