Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 540

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 15 of the 15 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications

Vedadghavami, Armin, Minooei, Farnaz, Mohammadi, Mohammad Hossein, Khetani, Sultan, Rezaei Kolahchi, Ahmad, Mashayekhan, Shohreh, Sanati-Nezhad, Amir·2017·Acta Biomaterialia
DOI 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 15 references

Research works printed but not linked: 266

  1. Boffito, 2014, Polymeric scaffolds for cardiac tissue engineering: requirements and fabrication technologies, Polym. Int., 63, 2, 10.1002/pi.4608 · DOI
  2. Thakur, 2015, Recent advances in green hydrogels from lignin: a review, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 72, 834, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2014.09.044 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Ahmed, 2015, Hydrogel: preparation, characterization, and applications: a review, J. Adv. Res., 6, 105, 10.1016/j.jare.2013.07.006 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Almeida, 2016, Fibrin hydrogels functionalized with cartilage extracellular matrix and incorporating freshly isolated stromal cells as an injectable for cartilage regeneration, Acta Biomater., 36, 55, 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.008 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Antoine, 2014, Review of collagen I hydrogels for bioengineered tissue microenvironments: characterization of mechanics, structure, and transport, Tissue Eng. Part B: Rev., 20, 683, 10.1089/ten.teb.2014.0086 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Collins, 2013, Hyaluronic acid based scaffolds for tissue engineering—a review, Carbohydr. Polym., 92, 1262, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.10.028 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Bidarra, 2014, Injectable alginate hydrogels for cell delivery in tissue engineering, Acta Biomater., 10, 1646, 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Francisco, 2014, Photocrosslinkable laminin-functionalized polyethylene glycol hydrogel for intervertebral disc regeneration, Acta Biomater., 10, 1102, 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.11.013 · DOI
  9. Vignaud, 2013, Polyacrylamide hydrogel micropatterning, Methods Cell Biol., 120, 93, 10.1016/B978-0-12-417136-7.00006-9 · DOI
  10. Li, 2016, Analysis of friction between articular cartilage and polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel artificial cartilage, J. Mater. Sci. – Mater. Med., 27, 1, 10.1007/s10856-016-5700-y · DOI
  11. Verhulsel, 2014, A review of microfabrication and hydrogel engineering for micro-organs on chips, Biomaterials, 35, 1816, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.021 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Alessandri, 2016, A 3D printed microfluidic device for production of functionalized hydrogel microcapsules for culture and differentiation of human Neuronal Stem Cells (hNSC), Lab Chip, 16, 1593, 10.1039/C6LC00133E · DOI · Paper page
  13. Xie, 2015, Design of antimicrobial peptides conjugated biodegradable citric acid derived hydrogels for wound healing, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 103, 3907, 10.1002/jbm.a.35512 · DOI
  14. Reid, 2015, Analytical and simulation-based models for drug release and gel-degradation in a Tetra-PEG hydrogel drug-delivery system, Macromolecules, 48, 7359, 10.1021/acs.macromol.5b01598 · DOI
  15. Floren, 2016, Human mesenchymal stem cells cultured on silk hydrogels with variable stiffness and growth factor differentiate into mature smooth muscle cell phenotype, Acta Biomater., 31, 156, 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.11.051 · DOI
  16. Xavier, 2015, Bioactive nanoengineered hydrogels for bone tissue engineering: a growth-factor-free approach, ACS Nano, 9, 3109, 10.1021/nn507488s · DOI · Paper page
  17. Caló, 2015, Biomedical applications of hydrogels: A review of patents and commercial products, Eur. Polymer J., 65, 252, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2014.11.024 · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hoare, 2008, Hydrogels in drug delivery: progress and challenges, Polymer, 49, 1993, 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.01.027 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lai, 2016, Design and fabrication of hydrogel-based nanoparticulate systems for in vivo drug delivery, J. Control. Release, 243, 269, 10.1016/j.jconrel.2016.10.013 · DOI
  20. Wu, 2015, An injectable extracellular matrix derived hydrogel for meniscus repair and regeneration, Acta Biomater., 16, 49, 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.027 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Teti, 2015, 3D polysaccharide based hydrogel for bone tissue engineering, Italian J. Anatomy Embryol., 120, 129
  22. Bae, 2014, Photo-cured hyaluronic acid-based hydrogels containing growth and differentiation factor 5 (GDF-5) for bone tissue regeneration, Bone, 59, 189, 10.1016/j.bone.2013.11.019 · DOI
  23. Balakrishnan, 2014, Self-crosslinked oxidized alginate/gelatin hydrogel as injectable, adhesive biomimetic scaffolds for cartilage regeneration, Acta Biomater., 10, 3650, 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.04.031 · DOI · Paper page
  24. C. Fuoco, E. Sangalli, R. Vono, S. Testa, B. Sacchetti, M. Latronico, S. Bernardini, P. Madeddu, G. Cesareni, D. Seliktar, 3D hydrogel environment rejuvenates aged pericytes for skeletal muscle tissue engineering, Front. Physiol. 5(203) (2014) 10.3389. · DOI
  25. Salimath, 2016, Biofunctional hydrogels for skeletal muscle constructs, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 10, 967, 10.1002/term.1881 · DOI
  26. Moreira Teixeira, 2014, Skeletal tissue regeneration: where can hydrogels play a role?, Int. Orthop., 38, 1861, 10.1007/s00264-014-2402-2 · DOI
  27. Oyen, 2014, Mechanical characterisation of hydrogel materials, Int. Mater. Rev., 59, 44, 10.1179/1743280413Y.0000000022 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Tibbitt, 2009, Hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics for 3D cell culture, Biotechnol. Bioeng., 103, 655, 10.1002/bit.22361 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Anseth, 1996, Mechanical properties of hydrogels and their experimental determination, Biomaterials, 17, 1647, 10.1016/0142-9612(96)87644-7 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Kalyankar, 2016, A review on effect on properties of al-sic composites fabricated by stir casting method, Int. J. Res. Eng. Technol., 5, 283, 10.15623/ijret.2016.0502051 · doi:10.15623/ijret.2016.0502051
  31. Ahearne, 2008, Mechanical characterisation of hydrogels for tissue engineering applications, Topics Tissue Eng., 4, 1
  32. Ahearne, 2005, Characterizing the viscoelastic properties of thin hydrogel-based constructs for tissue engineering applications, J. R. Soc. Interface, 2, 455, 10.1098/rsif.2005.0065 · DOI · Paper page
  33. McKee, 2011, Indentation versus tensile measurements of Young's modulus for soft biological tissues, Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews, 17, 155, 10.1089/ten.teb.2010.0520 · DOI · Paper page
  34. Drury, 2004, The tensile properties of alginate hydrogels, Biomaterials, 25, 3187, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.10.002 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Virk, 2010, Failure strain as the key design criterion for fracture of natural fibre composites, Compos. Sci. Technol., 70, 995, 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.018 · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.02.018
  36. Urayama, 2008, Markedly compressible behaviors of gellan hydrogels in a constrained geometry at ultraslow strain rates, Polymer, 49, 3295, 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.05.045 · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2008.05.045
  37. McKee, 2014, Thermoresponsive nanocellulose hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties, ACS Macro Lett., 3, 266, 10.1021/mz400596g · DOI · Paper page
  38. Hadryś, 2016, Compressive strength of steel frames after welding with micro-jet cooling, Arch. Metall. Mater., 61, 123, 10.1515/amm-2016-0023 · doi:10.1515/amm-2016-0023
  39. Loh, 2013, Three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering applications: role of porosity and pore size, Tissue Eng. B Rev., 19, 485, 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0437 · DOI · Paper page
  40. Kharkar, 2013, Designing degradable hydrogels for orthogonal control of cell microenvironments, Chem. Soc. Rev., 42, 7335, 10.1039/C3CS60040H · DOI · Paper page
  41. Xiao, 2013, Mechanical testing of hydrogels in cartilage tissue engineering: beyond the compressive modulus, Tissue Eng. B Rev., 19, 403, 10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0461 · DOI
  42. Tirella, 2014, Strain rate viscoelastic analysis of soft and highly hydrated biomaterials, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 102, 3352, 10.1002/jbm.a.34914 · DOI
  43. Gu, 2003, New insight into deformation-dependent hydraulic permeability of gels and cartilage, and dynamic behavior of agarose gels in confined compression, J. Biomech., 36, 593, 10.1016/S0021-9290(02)00437-2 · doi:10.1016/s0021-9290(02)00437-2
  44. Toohey, 2016, Indentation analysis of biphasic viscoelastic hydrogels, Mech. Mater., 92, 175, 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.09.010 · doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.09.010
  45. Chen, 2004, Dynamic mechanical properties of agarose gels modeled by a fractional derivative model, J. Biomech. Eng., 126, 666, 10.1115/1.1797991 · doi:10.1115/1.1797991
  46. Whitehead, 1992, Nanoindentation studies of thin film coated systems, Thin Solid Films, 220, 277, 10.1016/0040-6090(92)90585-Y · doi:10.1016/0040-6090(92)90585-y
  47. Yang, 2007, A novel optical coherence tomography-based micro-indentation technique for mechanical characterization of hydrogels, J. R. Soc. Interface, 4, 1169, 10.1098/rsif.2007.1044 · DOI
  48. Markert, 2013, Characterizing the micro-scale elastic modulus of hydrogels for use in regenerative medicine, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 27, 115, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2013.07.008 · DOI
  49. Qiang, 2011, Estimating material elasticity by spherical indentation load-relaxation tests on viscoelastic samples of finite thickness, IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control, 58, 1418, 10.1109/TUFFC.2011.1961 · DOI
  50. Geckil, 2010, Engineering hydrogels as extracellular matrix mimics, Nanomedicine, 5, 469, 10.2217/nnm.10.12 · DOI · Paper page
  51. Tsakalakos, 1981, The bulge test: a comparison of the theory and experiment for isotropic and anisotropic films, Thin Solid Films, 75, 293, 10.1016/0040-6090(81)90407-7 · DOI
  52. Lin, 2005, Use of rigid spherical inclusions in Young’s moduli determination: application to DNA-crosslinked gels, J. Biomech. Eng., 127, 571, 10.1115/1.1933981 · doi:10.1115/1.1933981
  53. Buffinton, 2015, Comparison of mechanical testing methods for biomaterials: Pipette aspiration, nanoindentation, and macroscale testing, J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater., 51, 367, 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2015.07.022 · DOI
  54. Boudou, 2006, An extended modeling of the micropipette aspiration experiment for the characterization of the Young's modulus and Poisson's ratio of adherent thin biological samples: numerical and experimental studies, J. Biomech., 39, 1677, 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2005.04.026 · DOI
  55. Weitz, 2007, Oscillatory rheology: Measuring the viscoelastic behaviour of soft materials, GIT Laboratory J. Europe, 11, 68
  56. Zuidema, 2014, A protocol for rheological characterization of hydrogels for tissue engineering strategies, J. Biomed. Mater. Res. B Appl. Biomater., 102, 1063, 10.1002/jbm.b.33088 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Grattoni, 2001, Rheology and permeability of crosslinked polyacrylamide gel, J. Colloid Interface Sci., 240, 601, 10.1006/jcis.2001.7633 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Kavanagh, 1998, Rheological characterisation of polymer gels, Prog. Polym. Sci., 23, 533, 10.1016/S0079-6700(97)00047-6 · DOI · Paper page
  59. Kloxin, 2010, Mechanical properties of cellularly responsive hydrogels and their experimental determination, Adv. Mater., 22, 3484, 10.1002/adma.200904179 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Schultz, 2009, Rapid rheological screening to identify conditions of biomaterial hydrogelation, Soft Matter, 5, 740, 10.1039/B818178K · doi:10.1039/b818178k
  61. Lee, 2008, Three-dimensional micropatterning of bioactive hydrogels via two-photon laser scanning photolithography for guided 3D cell migration, Biomaterials, 29, 2962, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  62. Oyen, 2015, Nanoindentation of hydrated materials and tissues, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 19, 317, 10.1016/j.cossms.2015.03.001 · DOI
  63. Galli, 2009, Viscoelastic and poroelastic mechanical characterization of hydrated gels, J. Mater. Res., 24, 973, 10.1557/jmr.2009.0129 · doi:10.1557/jmr.2009.0129
  64. Wang, 2016, Hydrogel-based methods for engineering cellular microenvironment with spatiotemporal gradients, Crit. Rev. Biotechnol., 36, 553
  65. L. D. Muiznieks, F. W. Keeley, Molecular assembly and mechanical properties of the extracellular matrix: A fibrous protein perspective, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Molecular Basis of Disease 1832(7) (2013) 866-875. · DOI · Paper page
  66. Oh, 2016, Wide-range stiffness gradient PVA/HA hydrogel to investigate stem cell differentiation behavior, Acta Biomater., 35, 23, 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.02.016 · DOI · Paper page
  67. Luo, 2004, A photolabile hydrogel for guided three-dimensional cell growth and migration, Nat. Mater., 3, 249, 10.1038/nmat1092 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Loessner, 2010, Bioengineered 3D platform to explore cell–ECM interactions and drug resistance of epithelial ovarian cancer cells, Biomaterials, 31, 8494, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.07.064 · DOI · Paper page
  69. K. M. Yamada, E. Cukierman, Modeling Tissue Morphogenesis and Cancer in 3D, Cell 130(4) 601-610. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Hasan, 2016, Micro and nanotechnologies in heart valve tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 103, 278, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.07.001 · DOI
  71. Alsberg, 2003, Regulating bone formation via controlled scaffold degradation, J. Dent. Res., 82, 903, 10.1177/154405910308201111 · DOI · Paper page
  72. McKinnon, 2014, Biophysically defined and cytocompatible covalently adaptable networks as viscoelastic 3D cell culture systems, Adv. Mater., 26, 865, 10.1002/adma.201303680 · DOI · Paper page
  73. Cameron, 2014, The effect of time-dependent deformation of viscoelastic hydrogels on myogenic induction and Rac1 activity in mesenchymal stem cells, Biomaterials, 35, 1857, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.11.023 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Ehrbar, 2011, Elucidating the role of matrix stiffness in 3D cell migration and remodeling, Biophys. J ., 100, 284, 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.11.082 · DOI · Paper page
  75. Pathak, 2012, Independent regulation of tumor cell migration by matrix stiffness and confinement, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 109, 10334, 10.1073/pnas.1118073109 · DOI · Paper page
  76. Khetan, 2009, Sequential crosslinking to control cellular spreading in 3-dimensional hydrogels, Soft Matter, 5, 1601, 10.1039/b820385g · DOI · Paper page
  77. Rehfeldt, 2012, Hyaluronic acid matrices show matrix stiffness in 2D and 3D dictates cytoskeletal order and myosin-II phosphorylation within stem cells, Integr. Biol., 4, 422, 10.1039/c2ib00150k · DOI
  78. Mohammadi, 2016, Skin diseases modeling using combined tissue engineering and microfluidic technologies, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 5, 2459, 10.1002/adhm.201600439 · DOI
  79. Ching, 2003, The effect of cyclic compression on the mechanical properties of the inter-vertebral disc: an in vivo study in a rat tail model, Clin. Biomech., 18, 182, 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00188-2 · doi:10.1016/s0268-0033(02)00188-2
  80. Di Luca, 2016, Tuning cell differentiation into a 3d scaffold presenting a pore shape gradient for osteochondral regeneration, Adv. Healthcare Mater., 5, 1753, 10.1002/adhm.201600083 · DOI
  81. Blinder, 2014, Engineering approaches for inducing blood vessel formation, Curr. Opin. Chem. Eng., 3, 56, 10.1016/j.coche.2013.11.003 · DOI
  82. Singh, 2008, Strategies and applications for incorporating physical and chemical signal gradients in tissue engineering, Tissue Eng. Part B Rev., 14, 341, 10.1089/ten.teb.2008.0304 · DOI · Paper page
  83. Sant, 2010, Biomimetic gradient hydrogels for tissue engineering, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 88, 899, 10.1002/cjce.20411 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Sanati-Nezhad, 2013, The cellular mechanics of an invasive lifestyle, J. Exp. Bot., 64, 4709, 10.1093/jxb/ert254 · DOI
  85. Sanati-Nezhad, 2013, Quantification of cellular penetrative forces using lab-on-a-chip technology and finite element modeling, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 110, 8093, 10.1073/pnas.1221677110 · doi:10.1073/pnas.1221677110
  86. Kim, 2015, Creating stiffness gradient polyvinyl alcohol hydrogel using a simple gradual freezing–thawing method to investigate stem cell differentiation behaviors, Biomaterials, 40, 51, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.11.017 · DOI · Paper page
  87. Rao, 2012, Inherent interfacial mechanical gradients in 3D hydrogels influence tumor cell behaviors, PLoS ONE, 7, e35852, 10.1371/journal.pone.0035852 · DOI
  88. Kuo, 2012, Complex stiffness gradient substrates for studying mechanotactic cell migration, Adv. Mater., 24, 6059, 10.1002/adma.201202520 · DOI
  89. de Vicente, 2016, Topographically and elastically micropatterned PEG-based hydrogels to control cell adhesion and migration, Eur. Polym. J., 8, 290, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2016.03.020 · DOI
  90. Vincent, 2013, Mesenchymal stem cell durotaxis depends on substrate stiffness gradient strength, Biotechnol. J., 8, 472, 10.1002/biot.201200205 · DOI · Paper page
  91. Orsi, 2014, A new 3D concentration gradient maker and its application in building hydrogels with a 3D stiffness gradient, J. Tissue Eng. Regen. Med., 11, 256, 10.1002/term.1908 · DOI
  92. Hadjipanayi, 2009, Guiding cell migration in 3D: a collagen matrix with graded directional stiffness, Cell Motil. Cytoskelet., 66, 121, 10.1002/cm.20331 · DOI · Paper page
  93. Ghoorchian, 2015, Bioinspired reversibly cross-linked hydrogels comprising polypeptide micelles exhibit enhanced mechanical properties, Adv. Funct. Mater., 25, 3122, 10.1002/adfm.201500699 · DOI
  94. Murphy, 2016, Hydrogel biophysical properties instruct coculture-mediated osteogenic potential, FASEB J., 30, 477, 10.1096/fj.15-279984 · DOI
  95. Hennink, 2012, Novel crosslinking methods to design hydrogels, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 64, 223, 10.1016/j.addr.2012.09.009 · DOI · Paper page
  96. Slaughter, 2009, Hydrogels in regenerative medicine, Adv. Mater., 21, 3307, 10.1002/adma.200802106 · DOI · Paper page
  97. Matricardi, 2013, Interpenetrating Polymer Networks polysaccharide hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 65, 1172, 10.1016/j.addr.2013.04.002 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Ullah, 2015, Classification, processing and application of hydrogels: a review, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 57, 414, 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.053 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Dragan, 2014, Design and applications of interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels: a review, Chem. Eng. J., 243, 572, 10.1016/j.cej.2014.01.065 · DOI · Paper page
  100. Luo Zheng, 2015, Biocompatibility of poly(ethylene glycol) and poly(acrylic acid) interpenetrating network hydrogel by intrastromal implantation in rabbit cornea, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 103, 3157, 10.1002/jbm.a.35453 · DOI
  101. Ganguly, 2015, Synthesis of a novel pH responsive phyllosilicate loaded polymeric hydrogel based on poly(acrylic acid-co-N-vinylpyrrolidone) and polyethylene glycol for drug delivery: modelling and kinetics study for the sustained release of an antibiotic drug, RSC Adv., 5, 18312, 10.1039/C4RA16119J · doi:10.1039/c4ra16119j
  102. Miao, 2015, Physically crosslinked polyvinyl alcohol and gelatin interpenetrating polymer network theta-gels for cartilage regeneration, J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 9242, 10.1039/C5TB00989H · DOI
  103. Baek, 2015, In situ assembly of the collagen–polyacrylamide interpenetrating network hydrogel: Enabling decoupled control of stiffness and degree of swelling, Eur. Polymer J., 72, 413, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.07.044 · DOI
  104. Chan, 2012, Robust and semi-interpenetrating hydrogels from poly(ethylene glycol) and collagen for elastomeric tissue scaffolds, Macromol. Biosci., 12, 1490, 10.1002/mabi.201200234 · DOI
  105. Munoz-Pinto, 2015, Characterization of sequential collagen-poly(ethylene glycol) diacrylate interpenetrating networks and initial assessment of their potential for vascular tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 40, 32, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.10.051 · DOI
  106. Wen, 2014, Mechanically Robust Gelatin-Alginate IPN hydrogels by a combination of enzymatic and ionic crosslinking approaches, Macromol. Mater. Eng., 299, 504, 10.1002/mame.201300274 · DOI
  107. Amer, 2016, Tensile properties of polyacrylamide-gelatin/calcium carbonate and polyacrylamide-chitosan/alginic acid double network hydrogels, J. Polym. Sci. Technol., 1, 10
  108. Chen, 2016, High-toughness polyacrylamide gel containing hydrophobic crosslinking and its double network gel, Polymer, 87, 73, 10.1016/j.polymer.2016.01.069 · DOI
  109. Fan, 2015, Preparation and characterization of double macromolecular network (DMMN) hydrogels based on hyaluronan and high molecular weight poly(ethylene glycol), J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 6618, 10.1039/C5TB00867K · DOI
  110. Wei, 2015, Tough and fully recoverable hydrogels, J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 5284, 10.1039/C5TB00504C · doi:10.1039/c5tb00504c
  111. Li, 2013, Preparation and characterization of pH- and temperature-responsive nanocomposite double network hydrogels, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 33, 1951, 10.1016/j.msec.2013.01.004 · DOI
  112. Teng, 2014, A tough, precision-porous hydrogel scaffold: Ophthalmologic applications, Biomaterials, 35, 8916, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2014.07.013 · DOI
  113. Darnell, 2013, Performance and biocompatibility of extremely tough alginate/polyacrylamide hydrogels, Biomaterials, 34, 8042, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.06.061 · DOI · Paper page
  114. Gong, 2009, Synthesis and characterization of PEG-PCL-PEG thermosensitive hydrogel, Int. J. Pharm., 365, 89, 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2008.08.027 · DOI · Paper page
  115. Buwalda, 2012, Stereocomplexed 8-armed poly (ethylene glycol)–poly (lactide) star block copolymer hydrogels: gelation mechanism, mechanical properties and degradation behavior, Polymer, 53, 2809, 10.1016/j.polymer.2012.05.006 · DOI
  116. Wang, 2014, Cell-laden photocrosslinked GelMA–DexMA copolymer hydrogels with tunable mechanical properties for tissue engineering, J. Mater. Sci. – Mater. Med., 25, 2173, 10.1007/s10856-014-5261-x · DOI
  117. Kim, 2003, Poly (ethylene glycol)-containing hydrogels for oral protein delivery applications, Biomed. Microdevices, 5, 333, 10.1023/A:1027313931273 · DOI
  118. Mishra, 2008, Mechanical properties and heat shrinkability of electron beam crosslinked polyethylene–octene copolymer, Radiat. Phys. Chem., 77, 675, 10.1016/j.radphyschem.2007.12.004 · DOI
  119. Abdel-Bar, 2016, Tunable Biodegradable nanocomposite hydrogel for improved cisplatin efficacy on HCT-116 colorectal cancer cells and decreased toxicity in rats, Biomacromolecules, 17, 407, 10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01206 · doi:10.1021/acs.biomac.5b01206
  120. Wang, 2012, A Strong bio-inspired layered PNIPAM–clay nanocomposite hydrogel, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 51, 4676, 10.1002/anie.201200267 · DOI · Paper page
  121. Haraguchi, 2007, Nanocomposite hydrogels, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 11, 47, 10.1016/j.cossms.2008.05.001 · DOI · Paper page
  122. Adnan, 2016, Hydrogels improved properties with nanomaterial composites for biomedical applications, Biomed. Mater., 11, 014104
  123. Meesaragandla, 2015, Synthesis of upconverting hydrogel nanocomposites using thiol-ene click chemistry: template for the formation of dendrimer-like gold nanoparticle assemblies, chemistry – A, Eur. J., 21, 16811, 10.1002/chem.201502620 · doi:10.1002/chem.201502620
  124. Gwak, 2016, Electrophoretically prepared hybrid materials for biopolymer hydrogel and layered ceramic nanoparticles, Biomater. Res., 20, 1, 10.1186/s40824-016-0048-4 · DOI
  125. Jayaramudu, 2013, Development of novel biodegradable Au nanocomposite hydrogels based on wheat: For inactivation of bacteria, Carbohydr. Polym., 92, 2193, 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.12.006 · DOI
  126. Merino, 2015, Nanocomposite hydrogels: 3D polymer-nanoparticle synergies for on-demand drug delivery, ACS Nano, 9, 4686, 10.1021/acsnano.5b01433 · DOI · Paper page
  127. Thomas, 2015, Ceramic nanoparticles: fabrication methods and applications in drug delivery, Curr. Pharm. Des., 21, 6165, 10.2174/1381612821666151027153246 · DOI · Paper page
  128. Biondi, 2015, Nanoparticle-Integrated hydrogels as multifunctional composite materials for biomedical applications, Gels, 1, 162, 10.3390/gels1020162 · DOI
  129. Chen, 2016, Synthesis and cytocompatibility of collagen/hydroxyapatite nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering, Polym. Compos., 37, 81, 10.1002/pc.23157 · DOI
  130. Noori, 2015, Nanoclay enhanced the mechanical properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) /chitosan/montmorillonite nanocomposite hydrogel as wound dressing, Procedia Materials Science, 11, 152, 10.1016/j.mspro.2015.11.023 · doi:10.1016/j.mspro.2015.11.023
  131. Li, 2015, Nanocomposite hydrogel consisting of Na-montmorillonite with enhanced mechanical properties, J. Polym. Sci., Part B: Polym. Phys., 53, 1020, 10.1002/polb.23732 · doi:10.1002/polb.23732
  132. Boyaci, 2016, Poly(N, N-dimethylaminoethyl methacrylate-co-2-acrylamido-2-methyl-propanosulfonic acid)/Laponite nanocomposite hydrogels and cryogels with improved mechanical strength and rapid dynamic properties, Appl. Clay Sci., 121–122, 162, 10.1016/j.clay.2015.12.018 · DOI
  133. Li, 2015, Gelatin effects on the physicochemical and hemocompatible properties of Gelatin/PAAm/Laponite nanocomposite hydrogels, ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces, 7, 18732, 10.1021/acsami.5b05287 · DOI
  134. Song, 2015, Nanocomposite hydrogels and their applications in drug delivery and tissue engineering, J. Biomed. Nanotechnol., 11, 40, 10.1166/jbn.2015.1962 · DOI · Paper page
  135. Tan, 2015, Electric field-induced gradient strength in nanocomposite hydrogel through gradient crosslinking of clay, J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 4426, 10.1039/C5TB00506J · doi:10.1039/c5tb00506j
  136. Ramón-Azcón, 2013, dielectrophoretically aligned carbon nanotubes to control electrical and mechanical properties of hydrogels to fabricate contractile muscle myofibers, Adv. Mater., 25, 4028, 10.1002/adma.201301300 · DOI · Paper page
  137. Zhang, 2014, Graphene oxide/polyacrylamide/carboxymethyl cellulose sodium nanocomposite hydrogel with enhanced mechanical strength: preparation, characterization and the swelling behavior, RSC Adv., 4, 44600, 10.1039/C4RA07576E · DOI
  138. Kayalvizhy, 2016, Swelling of poly (N-cyclohexylacrylamide-co-acrylamide/AMPSNa) gold nanocomposite hydrogels, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 86, 721, 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.047 · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2016.01.047
  139. Lunardi, 2015, Improvement of drug delivery using gold nanoparticle and berberine associated to a new hydrogel system, FASEB J., 29, 620
  140. Kumar, 2016, Design and in vitro investigation of nanocomposite hydrogel based in situ spray dressing for chronic wounds and synthesis of silver nanoparticles using green chemistry, J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 133, 43260, 10.1002/app.43260 · DOI
  141. Schexnailder, 2008, Nanocomposite polymer hydrogels, Colloid Polym. Sci., 287, 1, 10.1007/s00396-008-1949-0 · DOI · Paper page
  142. Surudžić, 2016, Physico–chemical and mechanical properties and antibacterial activity of silver/poly(vinyl alcohol)/graphene nanocomposites obtained by electrochemical method, Compos. B Eng., 85, 102, 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.029 · doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.029
  143. Bhowmick, 2016, Assessment of PVA/silver nanocomposite hydrogel patch as antimicrobial dressing scaffold: Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 59, 109, 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.003 · DOI
  144. Spasojević, 2015, Dual responsive antibacterial Ag-poly(N-isopropylacrylamide/itaconic acid) hydrogel nanocomposites synthesized by gamma irradiation, Eur. Polymer J., 69, 168, 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.06.008 · doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2015.06.008
  145. Schneider, 2002, Responsive hydrogels from the intramolecular folding and self-assembly of a designed peptide, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 124, 15030, 10.1021/ja027993g · DOI · Paper page
  146. Stephanopoulos, 2013, Self-assembly for the synthesis of functional biomaterials, Acta Mater., 61, 912, 10.1016/j.actamat.2012.10.046 · DOI · Paper page
  147. Zhang, 2013, Self-assembled DNA hydrogel as switchable material for aptamer-based fluorescent detection of protein, Anal. Chem., 85, 11077, 10.1021/ac4027725 · DOI · Paper page
  148. Li, 2006, Self-assembled supramolecular hydrogels formed by biodegradable PEO–PHB–PEO triblock copolymers and α-cyclodextrin for controlled drug delivery, Biomaterials, 27, 4132, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.03.025 · DOI · Paper page
  149. van de Manakker, 2008, Self-assembling hydrogels based on β-cyclodextrin/cholesterol inclusion complexes, Macromolecules, 41, 1766, 10.1021/ma702607r · DOI
  150. Rösler, 2001, Advanced drug delivery devices via self-assembly of amphiphilic block copolymers, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 53, 95, 10.1016/S0169-409X(01)00222-8 · DOI · Paper page
  151. Chung, 2009, Self-assembled and nanostructured hydrogels for drug delivery and tissue engineering, Nano Today, 4, 429, 10.1016/j.nantod.2009.08.008 · DOI · Paper page
  152. Zheng Shu, 2004, In situ crosslinkable hyaluronan hydrogels for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 25, 1339, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2003.08.014 · DOI · Paper page
  153. Dudukovic, 2014, Mechanical properties of self-assembled fmoc-diphenylalanine molecular gels, Langmuir, 30, 4493, 10.1021/la500589f · DOI
  154. Mahler, 2006, Rigid, self-assembled hydrogel composed of a modified aromatic dipeptide, Adv. Mater., 18, 1365, 10.1002/adma.200501765 · DOI · Paper page
  155. Toledano, 2006, Enzyme-triggered self-assembly of peptide hydrogels via reversed hydrolysis, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 128, 1070, 10.1021/ja056549l · DOI · Paper page
  156. Kopeček, 2009, Peptide-directed self-assembly of hydrogels, Acta Biomater., 5, 805, 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.10.001 · DOI · Paper page
  157. Zhou, 2009, Self-assembled peptide-based hydrogels as scaffolds for anchorage-dependent cells, Biomaterials, 30, 2523, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2009.01.010 · DOI · Paper page
  158. Li, 2015, Tuning the mechanical and morphological properties of self-assembled peptide hydrogels via control over the gelation mechanism through regulation of ionic strength and the rate of pH change, RSC Adv., 5, 301, 10.1039/C4RA13266A · doi:10.1039/c4ra13266a
  159. Maity, 2015, Spatial structuring of a supramolecular hydrogel by using a visible-light triggered catalyst, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 54, 998, 10.1002/anie.201409198 · DOI · Paper page
  160. Hule, 2008, Correlations between structure, material properties and bioproperties in self-assembled [small beta]-hairpin peptide hydrogels, Faraday Discuss., 139, 251, 10.1039/b717616c · DOI
  161. Jung, 2008, Modulating the mechanical properties of self-assembled peptide hydrogels via native chemical ligation, Biomaterials, 29, 2143, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.01.008 · DOI
  162. Abolmaali, 2016, Chemically crosslinked nanogels of PEGylated poly ethyleneimine (l-histidine substituted) synthesized via metal ion coordinated self-assembly for delivery of methotrexate: cytocompatibility, cellular delivery and antitumor activity in resistant cells, Mater. Sci. Eng., C, 62, 897, 10.1016/j.msec.2016.02.045 · DOI
  163. Li, 2014, Designing the mechanical properties of peptide-based supramolecular hydrogels for biomedical applications, Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astron., 57, 849, 10.1007/s11433-014-5427-z · doi:10.1007/s11433-014-5427-z
  164. Feng, 2016, Mechanically resilient, injectable, and bioadhesive supramolecular gelatin hydrogels crosslinked by weak host-guest interactions assist cell infiltration and in situ tissue regeneration, Biomaterials, 101, 217, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.05.043 · DOI · Paper page
  165. Wu, 2015, From macro to micro to nano: the development of a novel lysine based hydrogel platform and enzyme triggered self-assembly of macro hydrogel into nanogel, J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 2286, 10.1039/C4TB01902D · doi:10.1039/c4tb01902d
  166. Mendes, 2013, Self-assembly in nature: using the principles of nature to create complex nanobiomaterials, Wiley Interdis. Rev. Nanomed. Nanobiotechnol., 5, 582, 10.1002/wnan.1238 · DOI · Paper page
  167. Li, 2010, Enzymatic formation of a photoresponsive supramolecular hydrogel, Chem. Commun., 46, 5364, 10.1039/c0cc00163e · DOI
  168. Gao, 2009, Enzyme-instructed molecular self-assembly confers nanofibers and a supramolecular hydrogel of taxol derivative, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 131, 13576, 10.1021/ja904411z · DOI · Paper page
  169. Tasoglu, 2014, Guided and magnetic self-assembly of tunable magnetoceptive gels, Nat. Commun., 5, 4702, 10.1038/ncomms5702 · DOI · Paper page
  170. Chen, 2014, Microscale assembly directed by liquid-based template, Adv. Mater., 26, 5936, 10.1002/adma.201402079 · DOI
  171. Du, 2008, Directed assembly of cell-laden microgels for fabrication of 3D tissue constructs, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 105, 9522, 10.1073/pnas.0801866105 · DOI · Paper page
  172. Cruz, 2017, 3D self-assembly of microgel dispersion coordinated by an electric field, MRS Bull., 42, 178, 10.1557/mrs.2017.40 · doi:10.1557/mrs.2017.40
  173. Hutmacher, 2004, Scaffold-based tissue engineering: rationale for computer-aided design and solid free-form fabrication systems, Trends Biotechnol., 22, 354, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2004.05.005 · DOI · Paper page
  174. Guven, 2015, Multiscale assembly for tissue engineering and regenerative medicine, Trends Biotechnol., 33, 269, 10.1016/j.tibtech.2015.02.003 · DOI · Paper page
  175. Tasoglu, 2014, Untethered micro-robotic coding of three-dimensional material composition, Nat. Commun., 5, 1
  176. Li, 2015, Magnetically guided fabrication of multilayered iron oxide/polycaprolactone/gelatin nanofibrous structures for tissue engineering and theranostic application, Tissue Eng. C Meth., 21, 1015, 10.1089/ten.tec.2015.0051 · DOI
  177. Chung, 2011, Three-dimensional fluidic self-assembly by axis translation of two-dimensionally fabricated microcomponents in railed microfluidics, Small, 7, 796, 10.1002/smll.201001806 · doi:10.1002/smll.201001806
  178. Xu, 2011, Three-dimensional magnetic assembly of microscale hydrogels, Adv. Mater., 23, 4254, 10.1002/adma.201101962 · DOI · Paper page
  179. Lu, 2013, Techniques for fabrication and construction of three-dimensional scaffolds for tissue engineering, Int. J. Nanomed., 8, 337, 10.2147/IJN.S38635 · DOI · Paper page
  180. Chung, 2008, Guided and fluidic self-assembly of microstructures using railed microfluidic channels, Nat. Mater., 7, 581, 10.1038/nmat2208 · DOI · Paper page
  181. MacNeil, 2008, Biomaterials for tissue engineering of skin, Mater. Today, 11, 26, 10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70087-7 · DOI · Paper page
  182. Khademhosseini, 2007, Microengineered hydrogels for tissue engineering, Biomaterials, 28, 5087, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.021 · DOI · Paper page
  183. Yanagawa, 2016, Hydrogel microfabrication technology toward three dimensional tissue engineering, Regen. Ther., 3, 45, 10.1016/j.reth.2016.02.007 · DOI
  184. Yeh, 2006, Micromolding of shape-controlled, harvestable cell-laden hydrogels, Biomaterials, 27, 5391, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2006.06.005 · DOI · Paper page
  185. Mironi-Harpaz, 2015, In-Situ architectures designed in 3D cell-laden hydrogels using microscopic laser photolithography, Adv. Mater., 27, 1933, 10.1002/adma.201404185 · DOI
  186. Hsieh, 2015, 3D bioprinting of neural stem cell-laden thermoresponsive biodegradable polyurethane hydrogel and potential in central nervous system repair, Biomaterials, 71, 48, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2015.08.028 · DOI · Paper page
  187. Rosser, 2015, Recent advances of biologically inspired 3D microfluidic hydrogel cell culture systems, J. Cell Biol. Cell Metab., 2, 1
  188. Pedron, 2015, Spatially gradated hydrogel platform as a 3D engineered tumor microenvironment, Adv. Mater., 27, 1567, 10.1002/adma.201404896 · DOI
  189. Short, 2015, Hydrogels that allow and facilitate bone repair, remodeling, and regeneration, J. Mater. Chem. B, 3, 7818, 10.1039/C5TB01043H · DOI
  190. Sadat-Shojai, 2016, A new strategy for fabrication of bone scaffolds using electrospun nano-HAp/PHB fibers and protein hydrogels, Chem. Eng. J., 289, 38, 10.1016/j.cej.2015.12.079 · DOI
  191. Murphy, 2014, 3D bioprinting of tissues and organs, Nat. Biotechnol., 32, 773, 10.1038/nbt.2958 · DOI · Paper page
  192. Duan, 2013, 3D Bioprinting of heterogeneous aortic valve conduits with alginate/gelatin hydrogels, J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A, 101, 1255, 10.1002/jbm.a.34420 · DOI · Paper page
  193. Jose, 2016, Evolution of bioinks and additive manufacturing technologies for 3d bioprinting, ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng., 2, 1662, 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.6b00088 · DOI · Paper page
  194. Skardal, 2010, Bioprinting vessel-like constructs using hyaluronan hydrogels crosslinked with tetrahedral polyethylene glycol tetracrylates, Biomaterials, 31, 6173, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.04.045 · DOI · Paper page
  195. Skardal, 2010, Photocrosslinkable hyaluronan-gelatin hydrogels for two-step bioprinting, Tissue Eng. Part A, 16, 2675, 10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0798 · DOI · Paper page
  196. Melchels, 2014, Development and characterisation of a new bioink for additive tissue manufacturing, J. Mater. Chem. B, 2, 2282, 10.1039/c3tb21280g · DOI · Paper page
  197. Rodriguez, 2017, Silk based bioinks for soft tissue reconstruction using 3-dimensional (3D) printing with in vitro and in vivo assessments, Biomaterials, 117, 105, 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.11.046 · DOI · Paper page
  198. Hospodiuk, 2017, The bioink: A comprehensive review on bioprintable materials, Biotechnol. Adv., 35, 217, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.12.006 · DOI · Paper page
  199. Wüst, 2014, Tunable hydrogel composite with two-step processing in combination with innovative hardware upgrade for cell-based three-dimensional bioprinting, Acta Biomater., 10, 630, 10.1016/j.actbio.2013.10.016 · DOI · Paper page
  200. V. Serpooshan, M. Mahmoudi, D.A. Hu, J.B. Hu, S.M. Wu, Bioengineering cardiac constructs using 3D printing, Journal of 3D Printing in Medicine 1(2) (2017) 123-139. · DOI

200 of 266 shown

Cited by

See all 540

Metadata

Authors
Vedadghavami, A., Minooei, F., Mohammadi, M. H., Khetani, S., Rezaei Kolahchi, A., Mashayekhan, S., & Sanati-Nezhad, A.
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-10
Volume
62
Pages
42-63
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028
OpenAlex
W2736974560
Cited by
540
References
15
FWCI
13.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028
The paper
Vedadghavami, A., Minooei, F., Mohammadi, M. H., Khetani, S., Rezaei Kolahchi, A., Mashayekhan, S., & Sanati-Nezhad, A. (2017). Manufacturing of hydrogel biomaterials with controlled mechanical properties for tissue engineering applications. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2017.07.028

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.