Cited by 778Body Composition Measurement TechniquesNutrition and Health in AgingAdipose Tissue and Metabolism

Age-related changes in total and regional fat distribution

Kuk, Jennifer L., Saunders, Travis J., Davidson, Lance E., Ross, Robert·2009·Ageing Research Reviews

Abstract

Aging is associated with progressive changes in total and regional fat distribution that have negative health consequences. Indeed, a preferential increase in abdominal fat, in particular visceral fat, combined with a decrease in lower body subcutaneous fat are commonly cited in the literature. These age-related changes in body composition can occur independent of changes in total adiposity, body weight or waist circumference, and represent a phenotype closely associated with increased morbidity and mortality risk. Tissues such as the heart, liver and skeletal muscle in the elderly have increased fat deposition, which increases risk for insulin resistance and cardiovascular disease. Furthermore, aging is associated with increased fat content within bone marrow, which exposes the elderly to fracture risk beyond that associated with low bone mineral density alone. Many of the age-associated body compositional changes cannot be detected by simple anthropometric measures alone, and the influence of gender, race or ethnicity, and physical activity patterns on these changes is unclear. This review will explore some of these age-related changes in total and regional fat distribution. Consideration will also be given to the strengths and limitations associated with some of the anthropometric methodologies employed for assessing these changes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.arr.2009.06.001

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kuk, J. L., Saunders, T. J., Davidson, L. E., & Ross, R.
Affiliations
  • York University (CA)
  • Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA)
  • St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
  • Queen's University (CA)
Corresponding author
Ross, Robert
Venue
Ageing Research Reviews
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-10
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
339-348
ISSN
1568-1637 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1974545118
Cited by
778
References
142
Citations by year
2026: 53 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 56 · 2023: 79 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 49 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 47 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
3.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Ageing Research Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Adipose Tissue and Metabolism
Keywords
aging, regional fat distribution, visceral fat, abdominal fat, subcutaneous adipose tissue, body composition, adiposity, bone marrow fat, insulin resistance, cardiovascular disease, fracture risk, anthropometry, older adults
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Age Factors, Aged, Aging, Body Weight, Humans, Body Fat Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review