Cited by 634Neural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorMotor Control and Adaptation

How the Brain Translates Money into Force: A Neuroimaging Study of Subliminal Motivation

Open access
Pessiglione, Mathias, Schmidt, Liane, Draganski, Bogdan, Kalisch, Raffael, Lau, Hakwan, Dolan, Ray J., Frith, Chris D.·2007·Science

Abstract

Unconscious motivation in humans is often inferred but rarely demonstrated empirically. We imaged motivational processes, implemented in a paradigm that varied the amount and reportability of monetary rewards for which subjects exerted physical effort. We show that, even when subjects cannot report how much money is at stake, they nevertheless deploy more force for higher amounts. Such a motivational effect is underpinned by engagement of a specific basal forebrain region. Our findings thus reveal this region as a key node in brain circuitry that enables expected rewards to energize behavior, without the need for the subjects`awareness.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1126/science.1140459

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In humans, reinforcement learning appears to proceed even when the cues, reward, or motivation signals are presented below the consciousness threshold.

    “Remarkably, in humans, such learning appears to proceed even when the cues, reward, or motivation signals are presented below the consciousness threshold ( 17 , 18 ).”

    From What is consciousness, and could machines have it? (2017) · cites this paper as [18]

    The paper’s Abstract (page unavailable) reports that masked monetary incentives affected hand-grip force even when subjects could not report the reward at stake, supporting unconscious motivation in humans. It does not establish that reinforcement learning proceeded below the consciousness threshold; its task tested how subliminal incentives energized behavior, not whether participants learned from them. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cues indicating reward availability elicit increases in VS activity proportional to the amount of signaled reward, and these signals correlate with performance enhancement for larger compared to smaller rewards.

    “Cues that indicate that a certain amount of reward is available given successful performance of an instrumental action, or even of a complex cognitive task, elicit increases in VS activity proportional to the amount of signaled reward and these signals correlate with the degree of performance enhancement found for larger compared to smaller rewards [12,13].”
  • Findings implicating the ventral striatum in incentive-based performance can arguably be accounted for in terms of the role of this structure in the expression of Pavlovian conditioned responses.

    “Findings implicating the ventral striatum in incentive-based performance [12,13,39,40] can arguably also be accounted for in terms of the role of this structure in the expression of Pavlovian conditioned responses.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pessiglione, M., Schmidt, L., Draganski, B., Kalisch, R., Lau, H., Dolan, R. J., & Frith, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Wellcome Trust Centre for NeuroImaging, Institute of Neurology, University College London, 12 Queen Square London WC1N 3BG, UK.
Corresponding author
Pessiglione, Mathias
Venue
Science
Published
2007-05-11
Volume
316
Issue
5826
Pages
904-906
ISSN
  • 0036-8075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1095-9203
OpenAlex
W2003118297
Cited by
634
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 26 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 37 · 2018: 43 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 38 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 47 · 2012: 44
FWCI
15.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • The HKU Scholars Hub (University of Hong Kong) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (078865)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
Keywords
unconscious motivation, monetary rewards, physical exertion, force generation, basal forebrain, reward processing, brain circuits
MeSH terms
Adult, Autonomic Nervous System, Basal Ganglia, Brain Mapping, Female, Galvanic Skin Response, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Motivation, Reward, Subliminal Stimulation, Unconscious, Psychology, Prosencephalon, Hand Strength

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review