A CXCL1 Paracrine Network Links Cancer Chemoresistance and Metastasis
Open accessAbstract
Metastasis and chemoresistance in cancer are linked phenomena but the molecular basis for this link is unknown. We uncovered a network of paracrine signals between carcinoma, myeloid and endothelial cells that drives both processes in breast cancer. Cancer cells that overexpress CXCL1 and 2 by transcriptional hyperactivation or 4q21 amplification are primed for survival in metastatic sites. CXCL1/2 attract CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells into the tumor, which produce chemokines including S100A8/9 that enhance cancer cell survival. While chemotherapeutic agents kill cancer cells, these treatments trigger a parallel stromal reaction leading to TNF-α production by endothelial and other stromal cells. TNF-α heightens the expression of CXCL1/2 in cancer cells, thus amplifying the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop and causing chemoresistance. CXCR2 blockers break this cycle, augmenting the efficacy of chemotherapy against breast tumors and particularly against metastasis. This network of endothelial-carcinoma-myeloid signaling interactions provides a mechanism linking chemoresistance and metastasis, with opportunities for intervention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 39 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Knockdown of CXCL1 and CXCL2 using two independent shRNA hairpins significantly reduces mammary tumor growth in all three models.
“Knockdown of CXCL1 and 2 using two independent shRNA hairpins (Figure S1C–D) significantly reduced mammary tumor growth in all three models (Figures 1C–D, 1G–H and S1E–F)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A significant reduction in CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells is observed in CXCL1/2 knockdown tumors in both models.
“A significant reduction in CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells was observed in CXCL1/2 knockdown tumors in both models (Figure S2G–H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CXCL1/2 knockdown is associated with reduced metastasis to the lungs.
“This decrease was associated with reduced metastasis in the lungs (Figures 1E–F, 1I–J and S1G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CXCL1 and CXCL2 show a similar expression pattern in a combined cohort of 615 primary breast cancers.
“Indeed, CXCL1 and CXCL2 showed a similar expression pattern in a combined cohort of 615 primary breast cancers (Figure 1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
CXCL1 and CXCL2 are amplified in 7.5% of primary breast tumors and 19.9% of metastases by FISH.
“Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of human tissue samples showed that CXCL1 and CXCL2 were amplified in 7.5% of primary breast tumors and in 19.9% of metastases (Figures 1B and S1A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
- Findingown data
LM2 cells show upregulation of CXCL1/2 compared to the parental MDA-MB-231 line.
“LM2 cells showed upregulation of CXCL1/2 compared to the parental line (Figure S1B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lung colonization assays by tail vein injection confirm that the effect of CXCL1/2 depletion on metastasis is not solely due to decreased tumor burden.
“Furthermore, lung colonization assays by tail vein injection of LM2 cells confirmed that the effect of CXCL1/2 depletion on metastasis is not solely a consequence of decreased tumor burden (Figure 1K–N).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Compared to high CXCL1/2 expression in lung metastatic cell lines, expression of CXCR1, CXCR2 and DARC is negligibly low at RNA and protein levels.
“Compared to the high levels of CXCL1/2 expression in lung metastatic cell lines, the expression of CXCR1, CXCR2 and DARC was negligibly low both at the RNA and protein levels (Figure 2C and Figure S2F and (Muller et al., 2001)).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Muller et al., 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Detailed characterization shows a decrease in CD11b+Ly6G+ granulocytic MDSC population in CXCL1/2 knockdown tumors compared to controls.
“Detailed characterization of the myeloid cells showed a decrease in the CD11b+Ly6G+ granulocytic MDSC population in CXCL1/2 knockdown tumors compared to controls (Figure 2D and S2I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Reduction in CXCL1/2 levels in LM2 xenograft and PyMT transplantation models is associated with a significant increase in apoptosis in tumors.
“Reduction in CXCL1/2 levels in the LM2 xenograft and PyMT transplantation models was associated with a significant increase in apoptosis in the tumors (Figure 2A–B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Size-matching knockdown tumors to controls yields similar results.
“Similar results were obtained upon size-matching the knockdown tumors to controls (Figure S1H and I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analysis of 67 metastases from breast cancer patients shows a 61% overlap in CXCL1-associated genes between primary breast tumors and metastases.
“Similar analysis of a dataset generated from 67 metastases from breast cancer patients showed a 61% overlap in CXCL1-associated genes between primary breast tumors and metastases (Figure 3B; Tables S3, S4).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In a qRT-PCR panel of typical NFκB/STAT1 activators, TNF-α was strongly induced in endothelial cells after doxorubicin treatment.
“Among a panel of prototypical activators of the NFκB/STAT1 pathway that we assayed by qRT-PCR, TNF-α was strikingly induced in endothelial cells upon doxorubicin chemotherapy treatment (Figure 6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In addition to CXCL1/2 and S100A8/9, the CXCL1-associated chemokine genes CCL20 and CXCL3 are also highly expressed in response to chemotherapy.
“In addition to CXCL1/2 and S100A8/9, the CXCL1-associated chemokine genes CCL20 and CXCL3 were also highly expressed in response to chemotherapy (Figure S5B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
When LM2 tumor cells were cultured with conditioned medium from chemotherapy-treated primary endothelial cells or primary bone marrow-derived cells, CXCL1/2 expression rose significantly.
“However, LM2 tumor cells incubated with conditioned media from chemotherapy-treated primary endothelial cells or primary bone marrow-derived cells showed a significant increase in CXCL1/2 expression (Figures 6A and S6B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
A significant increase in S100A9 expressing cells is observed in breast cancers after chemotherapy treatment.
“Consistent with our experimental models, a significant increase in S100A9 expressing cells was observed in breast cancers after chemotherapy treatment (Figure 5G–H and Table S5).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There is no discernible increase in senescence in LM2 tumors upon AC chemotherapy treatment.
“Although induction of CXCL chemokines occurs during chemotherapy-induced senescence (Coppe et al., 2008), there was no discernible increase in senescence in LM2 tumors upon AC chemotherapy treatment (Figure S5C–D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Coppe et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Findingown data
Enforced expression of S100A8/9 in LM2 cells rescues the CXCL1/2 knockdown phenotype of reduced tumor growth and metastasis.
“Furthermore, the enforced expression of S100A8/9 in LM2 cells (Figure S3G–H) rescued the CXCL1/2 knockdown phenotype of reduced tumor growth and metastasis (Figures 3H,I and S3I).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Infliximab, an anti-TNF-α antibody, reduced the recruitment of S100A9-expressing cells in chemotherapy-treated mammary tumors.
“Treatment with anti-TNF-α antibody infliximab reduced recruitment of S100A9-expressing cells in chemotherapy-treated mammary tumors (Figure 6G–H).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After chemotherapy, histopathological analysis showed strong TNF-α staining in tumor microenvironment cells, particularly lymphatic and blood vessels and fibroblast-rich stroma.
“Importantly, histopathological analysis revealed that cells from the tumor microenvironment specifically lymphatic and blood vessels and fibroblast-rich stroma showed strong TNF-α staining after chemotherapy (Figure 6J and S6D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Lymphocytic cells represent a minority of leukocytes infiltrated in immunocompetent PyMT transplanted tumors compared to myeloid components.
“Compared to the myeloid components, lymphocytic cells represented a minority of leukocytes infiltrated in the immunocompetent PyMT transplanted tumors (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
TNF-α immunostaining increased significantly in patient samples after neoadjuvant AC chemotherapy.
“Consistent with our hypothesis, a significant increase in TNF-α immunostaining was observed in patient samples after neoadjuvant AC chemotherapy treatment (Figure 6I–K)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Chemotherapy also induced TNF-α in smooth muscle cells and bone marrow-derived cells.
“TNF-α induction in response to chemotherapy also occurred in smooth muscle and bone marrow derived cells (Figure 6E)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Purified lung endothelial cells from LM2 tumor-bearing mice given systemic AC chemotherapy showed a tenfold rise in TNF-α expression.
“Moreover, we observed a ten-fold increase in TNF-α expression in purified lung endothelial cells from LM2 tumor bearing mice systemically treated with AC chemotherapy (Figure 6C,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The requirement of S100A8/9 in cell survival is even more evident when tumor-bearing mice are treated with chemotherapeutic agents as an inducer of cell death.
“The requirement of S100A8/9 in cell survival was even more evident when tumor-bearing mice were treated with chemotherapeutic agents as an inducer of cell death (Figure 4B–C and S4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In the authors' experimental models, chemotherapy-induced increases in CXCL1/2 were not attributable to extra copies of the gene locus, as assessed by FISH.
“In our experimental models, enhanced expression of CXCL1/2 in response to chemotherapy was not due to additional amplification of the locus as determined by FISH analysis (Figure S6A).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
CXCL1/2 upregulation in LM2 tumors is also observed with paclitaxel.
“CXCL1/2 upregulation in the LM2 tumors was but was also observed with another commonly used chemotherapeutic agent, paclitaxel (Figure S5A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
After subsequent rounds of chemotherapy, tumors become refractory as evidenced by reduction in apoptosis and resumed tumor growth.
“However, after subsequent rounds of chemotherapy, tumors became refractory as evidenced by reduction in apoptosis and resumed tumor growth (Figure 5A–B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
These 43 CXCL1-correlated genes show a predominance of chemokines (40%) and cytokines (21%).
“These genes showed a predominance of chemokines (40%) and cytokines (21%).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
Tumor-bearing mice transplanted with S100A9-/- bone marrow show a marked increase in apoptotic cells in mammary tumors and lung.
“Tumor-bearing mice transplanted with S100A9−/− bone marrow showed a marked increase in the number of apoptotic cells in the mammary tumors and the lung (Figure 4A).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Similar numbers of CD11b+ and CD68+ myeloid cells are present in tumors and lung nodules from mice transplanted with either S100A9-/- or S100A9+/+ bone marrow cells.
“Similar numbers of CD11b+ and CD68+ myeloid cells were present in tumors and lung nodules from mice transplanted with either S100A9−/− or S100A9+/+ bone marrow cells (Figure S4B and data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Analysis of 615 breast tumors from three independent datasets yielded 43 genes that correlate with CXCL1 with a coefficient greater than 0.3.
“Analysis of 615 breast tumors from three independent datasets yielded 43 such genes that correlated with CXCL1 with a coefficient >0.3 (Figure 3A and Table S3).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Exposing LM2 cells directly to the chemotherapeutic drugs did not raise CXCL1/2 expression.
“Direct treatment of LM2 cells with the chemotherapeutic agents did not induce CXCL1/2 expression (Figure S6B and data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Co-culture of cancer cells with bone marrow derived CD11b+Gr1+ cells protects cancer cells from doxorubicin-induced apoptosis.
“Consistent with the survival advantage provided by S100A8/9 in vivo, co-culture of cancer cells with bone marrow derived CD11b+Gr1+ cells protected cancer cells from doxorubicin-induced apoptosis (Figure 4D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Using the NFκB pathway inhibitor NBD, the authors found that TNF-α-driven NFκB activation stimulated CXCL1/2 expression in LM2 tumor cells.
“NFκB activation by TNF-α stimulated the expression of CXCL1/2 in LM2 tumor cells, as determined with the use of NFκB pathway inhibitor (Nemo binding domain peptide or NBD) (Figure 6F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
TNF-α immunostaining increased significantly in LM2 mammary tumors from mice treated with AC chemotherapy.
“and in LM2 mammary tumors in mice treated with AC chemotherapy (Figure S6C).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Patients with high S100A8/9 in metastatic nodules have significantly shorter overall survival compared to low S100A8/9 (p=0.01).
“Kaplan Meier analysis showed that patients with high S100A8/9 in the metastatic nodules had a significantly shorter overall survival compared to low S100A8/9 (p-value=0.01) (Figure 3K).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mammary tumor growth and lung metastasis are significantly reduced in mice transplanted with S100a9-/- bone marrow compared to S100a9+/+ counterpart.
“Mammary tumor growth and lung metastasis were significantly reduced in mice transplanted with S100a9−/− bone marrow compared to the S100a9+/+ counterpart (Figure 3E–G).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
S100A8/9 cause activation of ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and p70S6K in LM2 cells.
“Using blot arrays that detect phosphorylation of 46 different protein kinases, we found that S100A8/9 cause activation of ERK1/2, p38 MAPK, and p70S6K in LM2 cells (Figures 4E and S4D), as confirmed by immunoblotting (Figures S4E–F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
The CXCR2 inhibitor alone had partial or no effect, depending on the model.
“As a single agent CXCR2 inhibitor had partial to no effect depending on the model system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Mice bearing tumors and treated with AC chemotherapy alone showed reduced tumor growth.
“Tumor-bearing mice treated with AC chemotherapy alone showed a reduction in tumor growth (Figures 7A,B and S7A,B).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
S100A8/9 activate p70S6K, contributing to their pro-survival effect in these cells.
“In addition to activating MAPK pathways (Gebhardt et al., 2006; Ichikawa et al., 2011), we find that S100A8/9 activate p70S6K as contributors to the pro-survival effect of S100A8/9 in these cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Clinically and biologically, metastasis is intricately linked with resistance to chemotherapy.
“Clinically as well as biologically, metastasis is intricately linked with resistance to chemotherapy (Hu et al., 2009; Morris et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hu et al., 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Morris et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given
Cancer cells that overexpress CXCL1 and CXCL2 through transcriptional hyperactivation or 4q21 amplification are primed for survival in metastatic sites.
“Cancer cells that overexpress CXCL1 and 2 by transcriptional hyperactivation or 4q21 amplification are primed for survival in metastatic sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The endothelial-carcinoma-myeloid signaling network provides a mechanism linking chemoresistance and metastasis.
“This network of endothelial-carcinoma-myeloid signaling interactions provides a mechanism linking chemoresistance and metastasis, with opportunities for intervention.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Increased copy number contributes to higher CXCL1/2 expression in invasive breast tumors and metastases.
“These results suggested that increased copy number contributes to the higher CXCL1/2 expression in invasive breast tumors and metastases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
A paracrine signaling network involving carcinoma, myeloid and endothelial cells drives both metastasis and chemoresistance in breast cancer.
“We uncovered a network of paracrine signals between carcinoma, myeloid and endothelial cells that drives both processes in breast cancer.”
- Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
“We uncovered a paracrine network, with the chemokines CXCL1 and 2 at its core that mediates lung metastasis and chemoresistance in breast cancer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § INTRODUCTION · plain
- Interpretationown data
CXCL1/2 play a prominent role in breast cancer progression and metastasis.
“We concluded that CXCL1/2 play a prominent role in breast cancer progression and metastasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
ERK1/2 and p70S6K signaling mediate the pro-survival effect of S100A8/9 in metastatic cells.
“suggesting that the ERK1/2 and p70S6K signaling mediate the pro-survival effect of S100A8/9 in metastatic cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Study design and conductown data
Successful engraftment of S100a9+/+ or S100a9-/- bone marrow was confirmed with an efficiency greater than 98%.
“After confirming successful engraftment of S100a9+/+ or S100a9−/− bonemarrow with an efficiency of >98% (Figure S3C)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The authors' findings suggest that at least some chemotherapy drugs have a self-defeating effect by causing stromal release of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α.
“Our findings suggest that a self-defeating consequence of at least some chemotherapy drugs is the release of potent pro-inflammatory cytokines such as TNF-α from stromal sources.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher apoptotic rates in the S100A9-/- group are not due to defective accumulation of myeloid cells.
“This result ruled out the possibility that higher apoptotic rates in the S100A9−/− group were due to a defective accumulation of myeloid cells (Hiratsuka et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hiratsuka et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
S100A8/9 mediate the pro-metastatic effect of CXCL1/2 in these models.
“Together, these results suggest that S100A8/9 mediate the pro-metastatic effect of CXCL1/2 in our models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Chemotherapy activates a burst of paracrine factors including the cancer cell survival axis CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 that selects for cancer cells that can resist chemotherapy.
“Together, these results suggest that chemotherapy activates a burst of paracrine factors including the cancer cell survival axis CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 that selects for cancer cells that can resist chemotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TNF-α release is a general stromal response to chemotherapy across different cell types.
“suggesting that TNF-α release is a general response to chemotherapy in different stromal cell types.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
TNF-α produced by chemotherapy-activated stroma can amplify the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop.
“Thus, TNF-α from chemotherapy-activated stroma can boost the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Sca1 expression in CD11b+Ly6G+ populations indicates a potential progenitor-like phenotype of tumor granulocytic cells recruited by CXCL1/2.
“Sca1, a marker of the hematopoietic stem cells, was expressed in CD11b+Ly6G+ populations, indicating potential progenitor-like phenotype of the tumor granulocytic cells recruited by CXCL1/2 (Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
The NFκB/STAT1 pathway targets CXCL1/2 genes.
“CXCL1/2 are target genes of the NFκB/STAT1 pathway (Amiri and Richmond, 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Amiri and Richmond, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
A recent Phase 2 breast cancer study found that non-responders to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients with residual disease had significantly higher circulating MDSC levels than responders.
“In line with our findings, recent Phase 2 study in breast cancer patients showed that non-responders of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and patients with residual disease had significantly higher circulating MDSC levels than did responders (Montero et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Montero et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
Such a paracrine survival network could benefit cancer cells under stress in both primary tumors and distant metastatic sites.
“Such a paracrine survival network could be beneficial to cancer cells under stress both in the primary tumor and at distant metastatic sites.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The study identifies a new role for CD11b+Gr1+ cells in supporting metastatic breast cancer cell survival through S100A8/9 production.
“Our study delineates a new role for the CD11b+Gr1+ cells in mediating metastatic breast cancer cell survival through the production of S100A8/9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The paper's work links CXCL1/2 and S100A8/9 as functional partners in a paracrine loop between breast cancer cells and CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells that supports cancer cell survival during invasion or chemotherapy.
“In addressing this challenge, our work links CXCL1/2 and S100A8/9 as functional partners of a paracrine loop between breast cancer cells and CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells that supports the survival of cancer cells facing the rigors of invading new microenvironments or the impact of chemotherapy (Figure 7E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
The present work illuminates how the tumor microenvironment responds to chemotherapy by hyperactivating a TNF-α-CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 paracrine axis that supports cancer cell survival under stress.
“The present work sheds light on how the tumor microenvironment responds to chemotherapy with hyperactivation of a TNF-α-CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 paracrine axis for cancer cell survival under stress.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These results suggest that targeting the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 axis may sensitize distant metastases to standard chemotherapy.
“Together, these results highlight the potential of targeting the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 axis thereby sensitizing distant metastases to standard of care chemotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CXCR2 is the primary receptor for CXCL1/2.
- Interpretationown data
The findings functionally unify TNF-α, CXCL1/2, and S100A8/9 in a tumor-stroma paracrine axis that gives metastatic cells a survival advantage in stressed primary and metastatic microenvironments.
“Our findings functionally unify three important inflammatory modulators, TNF-α, CXCL1/2 and S100A8/9, in a tumor-stroma paracrine axis that provides a survival advantage to metastatic cells in stressed primary and metastatic microenvironments.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation
The relevance of targeting the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 axis may extend beyond breast cancer.
“Moreover, the important role of CXCR2 in pancreatic adenocarcinoma models (Ijichi et al., 2011) and of S100A8/9 in colorectal cancer (Ichikawa et al., 2011) suggest that the relevance of targeting the CXCL1/2–S100A8/9 axis may extend beyond breast cancer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationown data
The authors' findings suggest that this cytokine burst includes TNF-α induced in several components of the tumor microenvironment after chemotherapy.
“Our current findings suggest that this cytokine burst includes TNF-α induced in several components of the tumor microenvironment after chemotherapy treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The paper's results provide mechanistic insights into the link between chemoresistance and metastasis in breast cancer.
“In conclusion, our results provide mechanistic insights into the link between two major hurdles in treating breast cancer: chemoresistance and metastasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning
An adverse cycle involving TNF-α, CXCL1/2, and S100A8/9 could expand in response to chemotherapy.
“An adverse cycle involving TNF-α-CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 could thus be expanded in response to chemotherapy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
These agents are a promising pharmacological approach in metastatic breast cancer when combined with standard chemotherapy.
“and we show that these agents are a promising pharmacological approach in metastatic breast cancer when combined with standard chemotherapeutic regimen.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CXCR2 is the primary receptor for CXCL1/2.
- Rests on an assumption: Stroma has lower selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes than cancer cell genomes.
- Interpretationown data
Stromal TNF-α has the undesirable effect of further increasing CXCL1/2 expression in breast cancer cells.
“An undesirable consequence of the stromal TNF-α is to further boost CXCL1/2 expression in breast cancer cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
Higher CXCL1/2 levels then drive the paracrine loop involving myeloid cell-derived S100A8/9 to enhance cancer cell survival.
“A higher level of CXCL1/2 then drives the paracrine loop involving myeloid cell-derived S100A8/9 to enhance cancer cell survival (Figure 7E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The effective combination of chemotherapy with CXCR2 inhibitors at metastatic sites in preclinical models suggests potential to limit disseminated tumor burden.
“The effective combination of chemotherapy with CXCR2 inhibitors at the metastatic site in our preclinical models underscores the potential application of this therapy to limit disseminated tumor burden.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: CXCR2 is the primary receptor for CXCL1/2.
- Rests on an assumption: Stroma has lower selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes than cancer cell genomes.
- May combine two claims. 38
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
May combine two claims.
FindingreasoningCXCR2 blockers break the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 cycle and augment chemotherapy efficacy against breast tumors and particularly against metastasis.
“CXCR2 blockers break this cycle, augmenting the efficacy of chemotherapy against breast tumors and particularly against metastasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAmong other CXCR2 ligands tested, CXCL3 knockdown in LM2 cells contributes to tumor growth but not metastasis.
“Interestingly, among other CXCR2 ligands that we tested, CXCL3 knockdown in LM2 cells contributed to tumor growth but not metastasis (Figure S1K–M).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataNo appreciable decrease is observed in CD11b+Ly6C+, F4/80+ macrophages, SMA+ myofibroblast, Ter119+ erythroid cells or endothelial cells in CXCL1/2 depleted tumors.
“No appreciable decrease was observed in the CD11b+Ly6C+, F4/80+ macrophages, SMA+ myofibroblast, Ter119+ erythroid cells or endothelial cells in the CXCL1/2 depleted tumors (Figure S2J–P, Table S1 and data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataPyMT-F and LM2 cells grow aggressively in the mammary fat pad and metastasize to the lungs.
“PyMT-F and LM2 cells grew aggressively in the mammary fat pad and metastasized to the lungs.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCXCL1/2 knockdown is not accompanied by visible changes in apoptosis in vitro or in angiogenesis and cell proliferation rates in tumors.
“However, CXCL1/2 knockdown was not accompanied by any visible changes in apoptosis in vitro or in angiogenesis and cell proliferation rates in tumors (Figure S2A–E).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataS100A8/9 addition only weakly activates NFkappaB in LM2 breast cancer cells and does not activate Akt or STAT3 pathways.
“S100A8/9 addition only weakly activated NFκB in LM2 breast cancer cells and we detected no activation of the Akt or STAT3 pathways (Figure S4C and data not shown).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAddition of an ERK1/2 inhibitor or a p70S6K inhibitor abolishes the chemo-protective effect of S100A8/9, whereas a p38 inhibitor shows partial effect.
“Addition of an ERK1/2 inhibitor (FR180204) or a p70S6K inhibitor (PF4708671) abolished the chemo-protective effect of S100A8/9 whereas addition of a p38 inhibitor (SB203580) showed partial effect (Figure 4F), suggesting that the ERK1/2 and p70S6K signaling mediate the pro-survival effect of S100A8/9 in metastatic cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataAC treated tumors significantly upregulate CXCL1/2 expression, associated with increased recruitment of S100A9-expressing cells and CD11b+Ly6G+ granulocytic cells.
“AC treated tumors significantly upregulated CXCL1/2 expression (Figure 5C–D) and this effect was associated with increased recruitment of S100A9-expressing cells (Figure 5E) and CD11b+Ly6G+ granulocytic cells (Figure 5F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataWithin recruited CD11b+Ly6G+ population in PyMT immunocompetent transplant tumors, 6%, 12% and 25% of cells express CD80, F4/80 and Sca1, respectively, and a minority express CD86, CD117, IL4Ralpha, VEGFR1 and CD34.
“Within the recruited CD11b+Ly6G+ population in the PyMT immunocompetent transplant tumors, 6, 12 and 25% of the cells expressed CD80, F4/80 and Sca1, respectively, and a minority expressed CD86, CD117, IL4Rα, VEGFR1 and CD34 (Table S2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataChemotherapy treatment of mice bearing LM2 tumors initially results in significant apoptosis and a concomitant delay in tumor growth.
“Chemotherapy treatment of mice bearing LM2 tumors initially resulted in significant apoptosis and a concomitant delay in tumor growth (Figure 5A–B).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCXCL1/2 depleted tumors show a decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, no major change in gamma-delta-TCR+ and CD25+ T-regulatory cells, and moderate increases in B220+ lymphocyte and CD49b+ NK cell numbers.
“CXCL1/2 depleted tumors showed a decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, no major change in γδ-TCR+ and CD25+ T-regulatory cells, and moderate increases in B220+ lymphocyte and CD49b+ NK cell numbers (Table S1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCoinjection of wild-type MPRO cells with LM2 cancer cells enhances mammary tumor growth and lung metastasis, an effect significantly blunted by S100a8/9 knockdown in MPRO cells.
“Coinjection of wild-type MPRO cells with LM2 cancer cells enhanced mammary tumor growth and lung metastasis, an effect that was significantly blunted by S100a8/9 knockdown in the MPRO cells (Figure S3E–F).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataA reduction in both monocytic CD11b+Ly6C+ and granulocytic CD11b+Ly6G+ cells occurs in the lungs of mice bearing CXCL1/2 depleted tumors, with minimal changes in F4/80+ macrophages.
“Interestingly, a reduction both in monocytic CD11b+Ly6C+ and granulocytic CD11b+Ly6G+ cells occurred in the lungs of mice bearing CXCL1/2 depleted tumors with minimal changes in the number of F4/80+ macrophages (Figure S2R–T).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataThis protection is more limited in co-culture with CD11b+Gr1+ cells derived from S100A9-/- marrow, confirming that pro-survival properties of myeloid factors under chemotherapy stress are partly due to S100A8/9.
“However, this protection was more limited in co-culture with CD11b+Gr1+ cells derived from S100A9−/− marrow (Figure 4D), confirming that the pro-survival properties of myeloid factors under stress chemotherapy conditions are partly due to S100A8/9.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataFascin, part of a lung metastasis gene signature, does not show the same trend upon chemotherapy treatment as S100A8/9, confirming specificity of the association of S100A8/9 with chemotherapy resistance.
“In contrast, Fascin that is part of a lung metastasis gene signature (Minn et al., 2005) did not show the same trend upon chemotherapy treatment as S100A8/9 (Figure S5E), further confirming the specificity of the association of S100A8/9 with chemotherapy resistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Minn et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataS100A8 and S100A9 are abundantly expressed in tumor-derived CD11b+Gr1+ cells and are not of epithelial origin.
“To identify cancer cell survival factors derived from the recruited myeloid cells, we identified candidates that are abundantly expressed in tumor-derived CD11b+Gr1+ cells and are not of epithelial origin (Figure 3C,D and Figure S3A). S100A8 and A9 fulfilled these criteria.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCD11b+Gr1+ cells and specifically the CD11b+Ly6G+ subpopulation express CXCR2.
“In line with our hypothesis, CD11b+Gr1+ cells and specifically the CD11b+Ly6G+ subpopulation expressed CXCR2 (Figure 2E, S2Q).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataCombining AC with the CXCR2 inhibitor markedly reduced lung metastatic burden, and the drugs interacted synergistically.
“However, when AC was combined with the CXCR2 inhibitor, lung metastatic burden was markedly reduced and the interaction between the drugs exhibited synergism (Figure 7C,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn those mice, metastatic cells were not fully eliminated, and micrometastases were found throughout the lungs.
“However metastatic cells were not completely eliminated and micrometastases were detected throughout the lungs (Figure 7C,D).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationLess than 0.1% of circulating cancer cells are estimated to withstand the stresses of infiltrating and colonizing distant metastatic sites.
“Biologically, less than 0.1% of the circulating cancer cells are estimated to withstand the harsh stresses of infiltrating and colonizing distant metastatic sites (Weiss, 2000).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Weiss, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
PremisecitationDrug resistance in cancer can be cell-intrinsic or a combination of host and tumor mediated pathways.
“Drug resistance in cancer can be cell-intrinsic (Poulikakos and Rosen, 2011) or a combination of host and tumor mediated pathways (Bergers and Hanahan, 2008; Ebos et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCXCL1 expression is associated with lung relapse in breast tumors, including tumors not exposed to prior chemotherapy, and increases aggressiveness of circulating breast tumor cells.
“CXCL1 emerged among a set of genes whose expression is associated with lung relapse in breast tumors, including tumors that had not been exposed to prior chemotherapy (Minn et al., 2007; Minn et al., 2005), and as a gene that increases the aggressiveness of circulating breast tumor cells (Kim et al., 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationHigh expression of CXCL1 in breast tumors without gene amplification is also possible.
“Additionally, high expression of CXCL1 in breast tumors without gene amplification is also possible (Bieche et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bieche et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone givenChemotherapeutic agents kill cancer cells but also trigger a parallel stromal reaction leading to TNF-alpha production by endothelial and other stromal cells.
“While chemotherapeutic agents kill cancer cells, these treatments trigger a parallel stromal reaction leading to TNF-α production by endothelial and other stromal cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).
InterpretationreasoningCXCL1/2 mediates tumor cell survival via paracrine mechanisms.
“Based on these results, we postulated that CXCL1/2 mediates tumor cell survival via paracrine mechanisms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCXCL1/2 attract CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells into the tumor, and these myeloid cells produce chemokines including S100A8/9 that enhance cancer cell survival.
“CXCL1/2 attract CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells into the tumor, which produce chemokines including S100A8/9 that enhance cancer cell survival.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCXCL1 and CXCL2 are 90% identical by amino-acid sequence and signal through the same receptor CXCR2.
“CXCL1 and 2 are 90% identical by amino-acid sequence and signal through the same receptor CXCR2 (Balkwill, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Balkwill, 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningTNF-alpha heightens CXCL1/2 expression in cancer cells, amplifying the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop and causing chemoresistance.
“TNF-α heightens the expression of CXCL1/2 in cancer cells, thus amplifying the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop and causing chemoresistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRecent evidence points to tumor microenvironment components as potential participants in the generation of chemoresistance.
“Recent evidence points to tumor microenvironment components as potential participants in the generation of chemoresistance (Denardo et al., 2011; Gilbert and Hemann, 2010; Roodhart et al., 2011; Shaked et al., 2008; Shree et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationCopy number alterations at 4q21 occur in breast cancer and engulf fifteen genes in the amplification peak, including CXCL1-8.
“Copy number alterations at 4q21 occur in breast cancer (Beroukhim et al., 2010) and engulf fifteen genes in the amplification peak, including CXCL1-8.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Beroukhim et al., 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCXCR2 receptor is expressed by several stromal cell types such as endothelial and myeloid cells.
“CXCR2 receptor is expressed by several stromal cell types such as endothelial and myeloid cells (Murdoch et al., 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Murdoch et al., 2008 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationBoth TLR4 and RAGE are expressed in breast cancer cells.
“Both TLR4 and RAGE are expressed in breast cancer cells (Bos et al., 2009; Hsieh et al., 2003).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationS100A8/9 bind to TLR4 and RAGE, which activate diverse signaling cascades.
“S100A8/9 bind to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products), which activate diverse signaling cascades (Gebhardt et al., 2006; Vogl et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationS100A8/9 are low molecular weight calcium-binding proteins associated with chronic inflammation and cancer.
“S100A8/9 are low molecular weight calcium-binding proteins that are associated with chronic inflammation and cancer (Gebhardt et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gebhardt et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCXCL1/2 from breast cancer cells recruit myeloid producers of S100A8/9, which in turn promote breast cancer metastasis.
“Collectively our results suggest that CXCL1/2 from breast cancer cells recruit myeloid producers of S100A8/9, which in turn promote breast cancer metastasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
InterpretationreasoningOnce started, this chemo-protective program could become self-sustaining, enriching residual aggressive clones that resist chemotherapy and thrive in the lung and elsewhere.
“Once initiated, this chemo-protective program could become self-sustaining, leading to the enrichment of residual aggressive clones able to resist chemotherapy and thrive in the lung”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThis raises the possibility of clinically targeting this axis to limit cancer cell dissemination and reduce drug resistance.
“This raises the possibility of clinically targeting this axis both to limit the dissemination of cancer cells and to diminish drug resistance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningSuch pro-inflammatory bursts can enhance the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 survival axis and promote expansion of chemoresistant breast cancer cells.
“Such pro-inflammatory bursts can boost the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 survival axis and facilitates the expansion of chemoresistant breast cancer cells.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationCD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells are a heterogeneous group with known roles in tumor angiogenesis and T cell immunosuppression.
“CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells are a heterogeneous group with previously identified roles in tumor angiogenesis and T cell immunosuppression (Gabrilovich and Nagaraj, 2009; Ostrand-Rosenberg and Sinha, 2009; Shojaei et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataDisrupting the CXCL1-driven paracrine axis could improve therapeutic response in existing lesions and suppress metastasis, even in advanced tumor progression.
“Our findings argue that although therapy induced inflammation is a predominant feature of the use of chemotherapy, disrupting the CXCL1 driven paracrine axis could improve therapeutic response in existing lesions and also suppress metastasis, even at an advanced stage of tumor progression.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Stroma has lower selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes than cancer cell genomes.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationThe main obstacles to curing advanced breast cancer are pan-resistance to all known chemotherapy drugs and widely metastatic disease, and these two problems are closely linked clinically.
“The major impediments to cure advanced breast cancer are the emergence of pan-resistance to all known chemotherapy drugs and the development of widely metastatic disease, two phenomena that are closely linked clinically (Gonzalez-Angulo et al., 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gonzalez-Angulo et al., 2007 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationThe critical role of the microenvironment in tumor progression and therapy response is increasingly recognized.
“The critical role of the microenvironment in tumor progression and response to therapy is being increasingly recognized (Condeelis and Pollard, 2006; Denardo et al., 2011; Gilbert and Hemann, 2010; Shree et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationChemotherapy induces a storm of cytokines and chemokines in the tumor microenvironment, many of which may be linked to chemoresistance.
“Recent reports (Denardo et al., 2011; Gilbert and Hemann, 2010) and the present work show that chemotherapy induces a storm of cytokines and chemokines in the tumor microenvironment many of which might be linked to chemoresistance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationCXCR2 receptor antagonists are in clinical trials for chronic inflammatory diseases.
“CXCR2 receptor antagonists are in clinical trials for chronic inflammatory diseases (Chapman et al., 2009)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Chapman et al., 2009 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningThese findings highlight the clinical relevance of CD11b+Gr1+ cells in making chemotherapy ineffective and promoting metastasis.
“These findings accentuate the clinical relevance of CD11b+Gr1+ in rendering chemotherapy ineffective and promoting metastasis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductnone givenAll animal experiments followed a protocol approved by the MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.
“All experiments using animals were done in accordance to a protocol approved by MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductown dataPatient samples were acquired in compliance with protocols approved by the MSKCC Institutional Review Board.
“Paraffin embedded tissue microarrays and sections from lung metastases and primary breast tumor cores before and after chemotherapy treatment were acquired from the MSKCC Department of Pathology in compliance with protocols approved by the MSKCC Institutional Review Board (IRB).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
An integrated understanding of acquired drug resistance in the context of inputs from tumor and its microenvironment is lacking.
“However, an integrated understanding of acquired drug resistance in the context of inputs from tumor and its microenvironment is lacking.”
The paper relies on this without support.
A very small fraction of cells exposed to genotoxic stress can survive and outgrow under repeated cycles of chemotherapy.
“Similarly, a very small fraction of cells exposed to genotoxic stress can survive and outgrow under repeated cycles of chemotherapy.”
The paper relies on this without support.
CXCR2 is the primary receptor for CXCL1/2.
“we utilized antagonists of CXCR2, the primary receptor for CXCL1/2”
The paper relies on this without support.
Stroma has lower selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes than cancer cell genomes.
“targeting the immune microenvironment would be an attractive option because of the potentially low selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes on the stroma compared to the cancer cell genomes.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Data from various mouse models indicate that disrupting the CXCR1/2-MDSC axis is therapeutically efficacious across a wide variety of solid cancers.
“Notably, data from various mouse models indicate that disrupting the CXCR1/2–MDSC axis in tumours is therapeutically efficacious across a wide variety of solid cancers166–172.”
From The current state of the art and future trends in RAS-targeted cancer therapies (2022) · cites this paper as [166]
Cites
Myeloid-derived-suppressor cells as regulators of the immune system
Gabrilovich, D. I., & Nagaraj, S. (2009) · Nature Reviews Immunology · doi:10.1038/nri2506 · Cited by 6,753 · see citing works
Involvement of chemokine receptors in breast cancer metastasis
Müller, A., Homey, B., Soto, H., Ge, N., Catron, D., Buchanan, M. E., McClanahan, T., Murphy, E., Yuan, W., Wagner, S. N., et al. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35065016 · Cited by 5,340 · see citing works
The landscape of somatic copy-number alteration across human cancers
Beroukhim, R., Mermel, C. H., Porter, D., Wei, G., Raychaudhuri, S., Donovan, J., Barretina, J., Boehm, J. S., Dobson, J., Urashima, M., et al. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08822 · Cited by 4,017 · see citing works
Modes of resistance to anti-angiogenic therapy
Bergers, G., & Hanahan, D. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2442 · Cited by 2,953 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Drug resistance in cancer can be cell-intrinsic (Poulikakos and Rosen, 2011) or a combination of host and tumor mediated pathways (Bergers and Hanahan, 2008; Ebos et al., 2009).”
Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to lung
Minn, A. J., Gupta, G. P., Siegel, P. M., Bos, P. D., Shu, W., Giri, D. D., Viale, A., Olshen, A. B., Gerald, W. L., & Massagué, J. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03799 · Cited by 2,922 · see citing works
Self-citationGene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer
Wang, Y., Klijn, J. G. M., Zhang, Y., Sieuwerts, A. M., Look, M. P., Yang, F., Talantov, D., Timmermans, M. A. M., Gelder, M. E. M., Yu, J. X., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)17947-1 · Cited by 2,848 · see citing works
Macrophages: Obligate Partners for Tumor Cell Migration, Invasion, and Metastasis
Condeelis, J. S., & Pollard, J. W. (2006) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.01.007 · Cited by 2,693 · see citing works
Cancer and the chemokine network
Balkwill, F. (2004) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1388 · Cited by 2,343 · see citing works
Genes that mediate breast cancer metastasis to the brain
Bos, P. D., Zhang, X. H.-F., Nadal, C., Shu, W., Gomis, R. R., Nguyen, D. X., Minn, A. J., van de Vijver, M. J., Gerald, W. L., Foekens, J. A., et al. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08021 · Cited by 1,863 · see citing works
Self-citationEndogenous human microRNAs that suppress breast cancer metastasis
Tavazoie, S. F., Alarcón, C. R., Óskarsson, T., Padua, D. M., Wang, Q., Bos, P. D., Gerald, W. L., & Massagué, J. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06487 · Cited by 1,858 · see citing works
Self-citationMyeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells: Linking Inflammation and Cancer
Ostrand‐Rosenberg, S., & Sinha, P. (2009) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.0802740 · Cited by 1,733 · see citing works
DeNardo, D. G., Brennan, D. J., Rexhepaj, E., Ruffell, B., Shiao, S. L., Madden, S. F., Gallagher, W. M., Wadhwani, N., Keil, S. D., Junaid, S. A., et al. (2011) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8274.cd-10-0028 · Cited by 1,715 · see citing works
The role of myeloid cells in the promotion of tumour angiogenesis
Murdoch, C., Muthana, M., Coffelt, S. B., & Lewis, C. E. (2008) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc2444 · Cited by 1,642 · see citing works
Vogl, T., Tenbrock, K., Ludwig, S., Leukert, N., Ehrhardt, C., van Zoelen, M. A. D., Nacken, W., Foell, D., van der Poll, T., Sorg, C., et al. (2007) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm1638 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
DeNardo, D. G., Barreto, J., Andreu, P., Vásquez, L. J., Tawfik, D., Kolhatkar, N. S., & Coussens, L. M. (2009) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.06.018 · Cited by 1,340 · see citing works
Tumor Self-Seeding by Circulating Cancer Cells
Kim, M.-Y., Oskarsson, T., Acharyya, S., Nguyen, D. X., Zhang, X. H.-F., Norton, L., & Massagué, J. (2009) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2009.11.025 · Cited by 1,335 · see citing works
Self-citationGene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer
Wang, Y., Klijn, J. G. M., ZHANG, Y., et al. (2005) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(05)70933-8 · Cited by 1,233 · see citing works
Breast Tumor Cell Lines From Pleural Effusions2
Cailleau, R., Young, R. K., Olivé, M., & Reeves, W. J. (1974) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/53.3.661 · Cited by 1,019 · see citing works
Overview of resistance to systemic therapy in patients with breast cancer
Gonzalez-Angulo, A. M., Morales-Vasquez, F., & Hortobagyi, G. N. (2007) · Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-74039-3_1 · Cited by 904 · see citing works
Tumor refractoriness to anti-VEGF treatment is mediated by CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells
Shojaei, F., Wu, X., Malik, A. K., Zhong, C., Baldwin, M. E., Schanz, S., Fuh, G., Gerber, H.-P., & Ferrara, N. (2007) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt1323 · Cited by 849 · see citing works
Mediators of vascular remodelling co-opted for sequential steps in lung metastasis
Gupta, G. P., Nguyen, D. X., Chiang, A. C., Bos, P. D., Kim, J. Y., Nadal, C., Gomis, R. R., Manova-Todorova, K. O., & Massagué, J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature05760 · Cited by 728 · see citing works
Self-citationProinflammatory S100 Proteins Regulate the Accumulation of Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
Sinha, P., Okoro, C., Foell, D., Freeze, H. H., Ostrand‐Rosenberg, S., & Srikrishna, G. (2008) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.181.7.4666 · Cited by 722 · see citing works
S100A8 and S100A9 in inflammation and cancer
Gebhardt, C., Németh, J., Angel, P., & Hess, J. (2006) · Biochemical Pharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.bcp.2006.05.017 · Cited by 696 · see citing works
Latent Bone Metastasis in Breast Cancer Tied to Src-Dependent Survival Signals
Zhang, X. H.-F., Wang, Q., Gerald, W. L., Hudis, C. A., Norton, L., Smid, M., Foekens, J. A., & Massagué, J. (2009) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2009.05.017 · Cited by 663 · see citing works
Self-citationTan, W., Zhang, W., Strasner, A., Grivennikov, S. I., Cheng, J. Q., Hoffman, R. M., & Karin, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature09707 · Cited by 647 · see citing works
The S100A8-serum amyloid A3-TLR4 paracrine cascade establishes a pre-metastatic phase
Hiratsuka, S., Watanabe, A., Sakurai, Y., Akashi-Takamura, S., Ishibashi, S., Miyake, K., Shibuya, M., Akira, S., Aburatani, H., & Maru, Y. (2008) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb1794 · Cited by 642 · see citing works
Macrophages and cathepsin proteases blunt chemotherapeutic response in breast cancer
Shree, T., Olson, O. C., Elie, B. T., Kester, J. C., Garfall, A. L., Simpson, K., Bell-McGuinn, K. M., Zabor, E. C., Brogi, E., & Joyce, J. A. (2011) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.180331.111 · Cited by 541 · see citing works
Self-citationPegram, M. D., Konecny, G., O'Callaghan, C. J., Beryt, M., Pietras, R. J., & Slamon, D. J. (2004) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djh131 · Cited by 513 · see citing works
Shaked, Y., Henke, E., Roodhart, J. M. L., Mancuso, P., Langenberg, M. H. G., Colleoni, M. A., Daenen, L. G. M., Man, S., Xu, P., Emmenegger, U., et al. (2008) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2008.08.001 · Cited by 439 · see citing works
DNA Damage-Mediated Induction of a Chemoresistant Niche
Gilbert, L. A., & Hemann, M. T. (2010) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.09.043 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Hu, G., Chong, R. A., Yang, Q., Wei, Y., Blanco, M. A., Li, F., Reiß, M., Au, J. L. ‐., Haffty, B. G., & Kang, Y. (2009) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2008.11.013 · Cited by 420 · see citing works
Lung metastasis genes couple breast tumor size and metastatic spread
Minn, A. J., Gupta, G. P., Padua, D., Bos, P., Nguyen, D. X., Nuyten, D., Kreike, B., Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., Ishwaran, H., et al. (2007) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0701138104 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Self-citationS100A8/A9 activate key genes and pathways in colon tumor progression
Ichikawa, M., Williams, R., Wang, L., Vogl, T., & Srikrishna, G. (2011) · Molecular Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-10-0394 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Roodhart, J. M. L., Daenen, L. G. M., Stigter, E. C. A., Prins, H.-J., Gerrits, J., Houthuijzen, J. M., Gerritsen, M. G., Schipper, H. S., Backer, M. J. G., van Amersfoort, M., et al. (2011) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.08.010 · Cited by 305 · see citing works
Coppé, J.-P., Patil, C. K., Rodier, F., Sun, Y., Muñoz, D. P., Goldstein, J., Nelson, P. S., Desprez, P.-Y., & Campisi, J. (2008) · PLoS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0060301 · Cited by 302 · see citing works
Ebos, J. M. L., Lee, C. R., & Kerbel, R. S. (2009) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-09-0095 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Ijichi, H., Chytil, A., Gorska, A. E., Aakre, M. E., Bierie, B., Tada, M., Mohri, D., Miyabayashi, K., Asaoka, Y., Maeda, S., et al. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci42754 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Mutant BRAF Melanomas—Dependence and Resistance
Poulikakos, P. I., & Rosen, N. X. (2011) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2011.01.008 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Tsai, S. Y., & Collins, S. (1993) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.90.15.7153 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Myeloid Cell Function in MRP-14 (S100A9) Null Mice
Hobbs, J. A. R., May, R. D., Tanousis, K., McNeill, E., Mathies, M., Gebhardt, C., Henderson, R. B., Robinson, M. J., & Hogg, N. (2003) · Molecular and Cellular Biology · doi:10.1128/mcb.23.7.2564-2576.2003 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationCXCR2 antagonists for the treatment of pulmonary disease
Chapman, R. W., Phillips, J. E., Hipkin, R. W., Curran, A. K., Lundell, D., & Fine, J. S. (2009) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2008.10.005 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
CXC chemokines located in the 4q21 region are up-regulated in breast cancer
Bieche, I., Chavey, C., Andrieu, C., Busson, M., Vacher, S., Le Corre, L., Guinebretiere, J.-M., Burlinchon, S., Lidereau, R., & Lazennec, G. (2007) · Endocrine Related Cancer · doi:10.1677/erc.1.01301 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Metastasis of cancer: a conceptual history from antiquity to the 1990s.
Weiss, L. (2000) · PubMed · Cited by 169 · see citing works
Expression analysis of S100 proteins and RAGE in human tumors using tissue microarrays
Hsieh, H.-L., Schäfer, B. W., Sasaki, N., & Heizmann, C. W. (2003) · Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications · doi:10.1016/s0006-291x(03)01190-2 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Metastatic Breast Cancer: The Treatment Challenge
Jones, S. E. (2008) · Clinical Breast Cancer · doi:10.3816/cbc.2008.n.025 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Montero, A. J., Diaz-Montero, C. M., Deutsch, Y. E., Hurley, J. E., Koniaris, L. G., Rumboldt, T., Yasir, S., Jorda, M., Garret-Mayer, E., Avisar, E., et al. (2011) · Breast Cancer Research and Treatment · doi:10.1007/s10549-011-1889-0 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Fascin Expression in Human Embryonic, Fetal, and Normal Adult Tissue
Zhang, F.-R., Tao, L., Shen, Z., Lv, Z., Xu, L., & Li, E. (2007) · Journal of Histochemistry & Cytochemistry · doi:10.1369/jhc.7a7353.2007 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Stewart, T. J., & Abrams, S. I. (2007) · The Journal of Immunology · doi:10.4049/jimmunol.179.5.2851 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Therapeutic options for metastatic breast cancer
Morris, P. G., McArthur, H. L., & Hudis, C. A. (2009) · Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy · doi:10.1517/14656560902834961 · Cited by 59 · see citing works
Self-citationFine Tuning the Transcriptional Regulation of the CXCL1 Chemokine
Amiri, K. I., & Richmond, A. J. (2003) · Progress in nucleic acid research and molecular biology · doi:10.1016/s0079-6603(03)01009-2 · Cited by 51 · see citing works
Mapping of Genomic Clones by Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization
Leversha, M. A. (2003) · Humana Press eBooks · doi:10.1385/1-59259-235-x:109 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emerging Biological Principles of Metastasis
Lambert, A. W., Pattabiraman, D. R., & Weinberg, R. A. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2016.11.037 · Cited by 3,075 · see citing works
Irradiation and anti–PD-L1 treatment synergistically promote antitumor immunity in mice
Deng, L., Liang, H. L., Burnette, B., Beckett, M., Darga, T. E., Weichselbaum, R. R., & Fu, Y. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci67313 · Cited by 2,101 · see citing works
Metastatic colonization by circulating tumour cells
Massagué, J., & Obenauf, A. C. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17038 · Cited by 2,062 · see citing works
Self-citationNeutrophils in cancer: Neutral no more
Coffelt, S. B., Wellenstein, M. D., & de Visser, K. E. (2016) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc.2016.52 · Cited by 1,830 · see citing works
Tumor microenvironment and therapeutic response
Wu, T., & Dai, Y. (2017) · Cancer Letters · doi:10.1016/j.canlet.2016.01.043 · Cited by 1,802 · see citing works
Neutrophil diversity and plasticity in tumour progression and therapy
Jaillon, S., Ponzetta, A., Mitri, D. D., Santoni, A., Bonecchi, R., & Mantovani, A. (2020) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0281-y · Cited by 1,298 · see citing works
Radiotherapy and immunotherapy: a beneficial liaison?
Weichselbaum, R. R., Liang, H. L., Deng, L., & Fu, Y. (2017) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.211 · Cited by 1,073 · see citing works
Ganesh, K., & Massagué, J. (2021) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-020-01195-4 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
Self-citationStructure and dynamics of molecular networks: A novel paradigm of drug discovery
Csermely, P., Korcsmáros, T., Kiss, H., London, G., & Nussinov, R. (2013) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2013.01.016 · Cited by 889 · see citing works
Zhou, S., Zhou, Z., Hu, Z., Huang, X., Wang, Z., Chen, E., Fan, J., Cao, Y., Dai, Z., & Zhou, J. (2016) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2016.02.040 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
Steele, C. W., Karim, S. A., Leach, J. D. G., Bailey, P. J., Upstill‐Goddard, R., Rishi, L., Foth, M., Bryson, S., McDaid, K., Wilson, Z., et al. (2016) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.04.014 · Cited by 850 · see citing works
Chemokines and the immune response to cancer
Ozga, A. J., Chow, M. T., & Luster, A. D. (2021) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2021.01.012 · Cited by 846 · see citing works
Bresnick, A. R., Weber, D. J., & Zimmer, D. B. (2015) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3893 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
Tumour-associated and non-tumour-associated microbiota in colorectal cancer
Flemer, B., Lynch, D. B., Brown, J. M. R., Jeffery, I. B., Ryan, F. J., Claesson, M. J., O'Riordain, M., Shanahan, F., & O'Toole, P. W. (2017) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309595 · Cited by 804 · see citing works
Role of the CXCL8-CXCR1/2 Axis in Cancer and Inflammatory Diseases
Ha, H., Debnath, B., & Neamati, N. (2017) · Theranostics · doi:10.7150/thno.15625 · Cited by 788 · see citing works
Neutrophil plasticity in the tumor microenvironment
Giese, M. A., Hind, L. E., & Huttenlocher, A. (2019) · Blood · doi:10.1182/blood-2018-11-844548 · Cited by 784 · see citing works
Microenvironmental regulation of therapeutic response in cancer
Klemm, F., & Joyce, J. A. (2014) · Trends in Cell Biology · doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2014.11.006 · Cited by 769 · see citing works
Tumor metastasis: moving new biological insights into the clinic
Wan, L., Pantel, K., & Kang, Y. (2013) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.3391 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Yang, X., Lin, Y., Shi, Y., Li, B., Liu, W., Yin, W., Dang, Y., Chu, Y., Fan, J., & He, R. (2016) · Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-15-2973 · Cited by 748 · see citing works
Tumor-associated stromal cells as key contributors to the tumor microenvironment
Bussard, K. M., Mutkus, L., Stumpf, K., Gomez-Manzano, C., & Marini, F. C. (2016) · Breast Cancer Research · doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0740-2 · Cited by 746 · see citing works
Metastatic Stem Cells: Sources, Niches, and Vital Pathways
Óskarsson, T., Batlle, E., & Massagué, J. (2014) · Cell stem cell · doi:10.1016/j.stem.2014.02.002 · Cited by 702 · see citing works
Self-citationNew horizons in tumor microenvironment biology: challenges and opportunities
Chen, F., Zhuang, X., Lin, L., Yu, P., Wang, Y., Shi, Y., Hu, G., & Sun, Y. (2015) · BMC Medicine · doi:10.1186/s12916-015-0278-7 · Cited by 704 · see citing works
Stromal cells in tumor microenvironment and breast cancer
Mao, Y., Keller, E. T., Garfield, D. H., Shen, K., & Wang, J. (2013) · Cancer and Metastasis Reviews · doi:10.1007/s10555-012-9415-3 · Cited by 671 · see citing works
Neutrophils as emerging therapeutic targets
Németh, T., Sperandio, M., & Mócsai, A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/s41573-019-0054-z · Cited by 657 · see citing works
Xiao, Y., Cong, M., Li, J., He, D., Wu, Q., Tian, P., Wang, Y., Yang, S., Liang, C., Liang, Y., et al. (2021) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2020.12.012 · Cited by 654 · see citing works
Chung, L., Orberg, E. T., Geis, A. L., Chan, J. L., Fu, K., Shields, C. E. D., Dejea, C. M., Fathi, P., Chen, J., Finard, B. B., et al. (2018) · Cell Host & Microbe · doi:10.1016/j.chom.2018.01.007 · Cited by 657 · see citing works
The necrosome promotes pancreatic oncogenesis via CXCL1 and Mincle-induced immune suppression
Seifert, L., Werba, G., Tiwari, S., Ly, N. N. G., Alothman, S., Alqunaibit, D., Avanzi, A., Barilla, R., Daley, D., Greco, S. H., et al. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature17403 · Cited by 606 · see citing works
Vanharanta, S., & Massagué, J. (2013) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.09.007 · Cited by 563 · see citing works
Self-citationNeutrophils in the tumor microenvironment
Powell, D. R., & Huttenlocher, A. (2016) · Trends in Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.it.2015.11.008 · Cited by 578 · see citing works
Wang, S., Wang, J., Chen, Z., Luo, J., Guo, W., Sun, L., & Lin, L. (2024) · npj Precision Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41698-024-00522-z · Cited by 600 · see citing works
Erin, N., Grahovac, J., Brozovic, A., & Efferth, T. (2020) · Drug Resistance Updates · doi:10.1016/j.drup.2020.100715 · Cited by 527 · see citing works
Neutrophils in cancer carcinogenesis and metastasis
Xiong, S., Dong, L., & Cheng, L. (2021) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-021-01187-y · Cited by 570 · see citing works
Platelets guide the formation of early metastatic niches
Labelle, M., Begum, S., & Hynes, R. O. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1411082111 · Cited by 555 · see citing works
The current state of the art and future trends in RAS-targeted cancer therapies
Punekar, S. R., Velcheti, V., Neel, B. G., & Wong, K.-K. (2022) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-022-00671-9 · Cited by 549 · see citing works
Cruceriu, D., Baldasici, O., Bălăcescu, O., & Berindan‐Neagoe, I. (2020) · Cellular Oncology · doi:10.1007/s13402-019-00489-1 · Cited by 531 · see citing works
Gpr132 sensing of lactate mediates tumor–macrophage interplay to promote breast cancer metastasis
Chen, P., Zuo, H., Xiong, H., Kolar, M. J., Chu, Q., Saghatelian, A., Siegwart, D. J., & Wan, Y. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1614035114 · Cited by 526 · see citing works
Regulation of Tumor Metastasis by Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells
Condamine, T., Ramachandran, I., Youn, J., & Gabrilovich, D. I. (2014) · Annual Review of Medicine · doi:10.1146/annurev-med-051013-052304 · Cited by 521 · see citing works
Drug Resistance Driven by Cancer Stem Cells and Their Niche
Prieto‐Vila, M., Takahashi, R., Usuba, W., Kohama, I., & Ochiya, T. (2017) · International Journal of Molecular Sciences · doi:10.3390/ijms18122574 · Cited by 506 · see citing works
Genetically engineered mouse models in oncology research and cancer medicine
Kersten, K., de Visser, K. E., van Miltenburg, M. H., & Jonkers, J. (2017) · EMBO Molecular Medicine · doi:10.15252/emmm.201606857 · Cited by 502 · see citing works
Halama, N., Zoernig, I., Berthel, A., Kahlert, C., Klupp, F., Suarez‐Carmona, M., Sütterlin, T., Brand, K., Krauss, J., Lasitschka, F., et al. (2016) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.005 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Therapy-induced tumour secretomes promote resistance and tumour progression
Obenauf, A. C., Zou, Y., Ji, A. L., Vanharanta, S., Shu, W., Shi, H., Kong, X., Bosenberg, M., Wiesner, T., Rosen, N. X., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature14336 · Cited by 485 · see citing works
Self-citationChow, M. T., & Luster, A. D. (2014) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-14-0160 · Cited by 491 · see citing works
Katoh, H., Wang, D., Daikoku, T., Sun, H., Dey, S. K., & DuBois, R. N. (2013) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.10.009 · Cited by 477 · see citing works
S100A8/A9: From basic science to clinical application
Pruenster, M., Vogl, T., Roth, J., & Sperandio, M. (2016) · Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1016/j.pharmthera.2016.07.015 · Cited by 451 · see citing works
Visualization of immediate immune responses to pioneer metastatic cells in the lung
Headley, M. B., Bins, A. D., Nip, A., Roberts, E. W., Looney, M. R., Gérard, A., & Krummel, M. F. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature16985 · Cited by 442 · see citing works
Toso, A., Revandkar, A., Di Mitri, D., Guccini, I., Proietti, M., Sarti, M., Pinton, S., Zhang, J., Kalathur, M., Civenni, G., et al. (2014) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2014.08.044 · Cited by 418 · see citing works
“…the SASP of PICS was characterized by increased levels of several cytokines reported to play a negative role in cancer by favoring an immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment (Vanneman and Dranoff, 2012; Acharyya et al., 2012; Ostrand-Rosenberg and Sinha, 2009; Figures 1B, left, and S1C).”
Selection of Bone Metastasis Seeds by Mesenchymal Signals in the Primary Tumor Stroma
Zhang, X. H.-F., Jin, X., Malladi, S., Zou, Y., Wen, Y. H., Brogi, E., Smid, M., Foekens, J. A., & Massagué, J. (2013) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2013.07.036 · Cited by 425 · see citing works
Self-citationTumor Cell Dissemination: Emerging Biological Insights from Animal Models and Cancer Patients
Kang, Y., & Pantel, K. (2013) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2013.04.017 · Cited by 419 · see citing works
The Multifaceted Roles Neutrophils Play in the Tumor Microenvironment
Sionov, R. V., Fridlender, Z. G., & Granot, Z. (2014) · Cancer Microenvironment · doi:10.1007/s12307-014-0147-5 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Neutrophils in Homeostasis, Immunity, and Cancer
Nicolás-Ávila, J. Á., Adrover, J. M., & Hidalgo, A. (2017) · Immunity · doi:10.1016/j.immuni.2016.12.012 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Tumour angiogenesis regulation by the miR-200 family
Pecot, C. V., Rupaimoole, R., Yang, D., Akbani, R., Ivan, C., Lu, C., Wu, S. Y., Han, H., Shah, M., Rodriguez‐Aguayo, C., et al. (2013) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms3427 · Cited by 400 · see citing works
Metastasis-Initiating Cells and Ecosystems
Massagué, J., & Ganesh, K. (2021) · Cancer Discovery · doi:10.1158/2159-8290.cd-21-0010 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Self-citationComplement Component 3 adapts the cerebrospinal fluid for leptomeningeal metastasis.
Boire, A., Zou, Y., Shieh, J., Macalinao, D. G., Pentsova, E., & Massagué, J. (2017) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2017.02.025 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Self-citationInterleukin-8 in cancer pathogenesis, treatment and follow-up
Alfaro, C., Sanmamed, M. F., Rodriguez-Ruiz, M. E., Teijeira, Á., Oñate, C., González, Á., Ponz‐Sarvisé, M., Schalper, K. A., Perez‐Gracia, J. L., & Melero, I. (2017) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2017.08.004 · Cited by 373 · see citing works
Lotti, F., Jarrar, A., Pai, R. K., Hitomi, M., Lathia, J. D., Mace, A. G., Gantt, G., Sukhdeo, K., DeVecchio, J., Vasanji, A., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20131195 · Cited by 362 · see citing works
Immunosuppression associated with chronic inflammation in the tumor microenvironment
Wang, D., & DuBois, R. N. (2015) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgv123 · Cited by 358 · see citing works
Tumor Immune Microenvironment during Epithelial–Mesenchymal Transition
Taki, M., Abiko, K., Ukita, M., Murakami, R., Yamanoi, K., Yamaguchi, K. D., Hamanishi, J., Baba, T., Matsumura, N., & Mandai, M. (2021) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-4459 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
The Complex Role of Neutrophils in Tumor Angiogenesis and Metastasis
Liang, W. P., & Ferrara, N. (2016) · Cancer Immunology Research · doi:10.1158/2326-6066.cir-15-0313 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Potential roles and targeted therapy of the CXCLs/CXCR2 axis in cancer and inflammatory diseases
Cheng, Y., Ma, X., Wei, Y.-Q., & Wei, X. (2019) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.bbcan.2019.01.005 · Cited by 343 · see citing works
Epithelial–mesenchymal transition: a new target in anticancer drug discovery
Marcucci, F., Stassi, G., & Maria, R. D. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2015.13 · Cited by 340 · see citing works
Distinctive properties of metastasis-initiating cellsPreprint
Celià-Terrassa, T., & Kang, Y. (2016) · Genes & Development · doi:10.1101/gad.277681.116 · Cited by 333 · see citing works
T helper 17 cells play a critical pathogenic role in lung cancer
Chang, S. H., Mirabolfathinejad, S. G., Katta, H., Cumpian, A. M., Gong, L., Caetano, M. S., Moghaddam, S. J., & Dong, C. (2014) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1319051111 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Metastasis prevention by targeting the dormant niche
Ghajar, C. M. (2015) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3910 · Cited by 317 · see citing works
Wang, N., Liu, W., Zheng, Y., Wang, S., Yang, B., Li, M., Song, J., Zhang, F., Zhang, X., Wang, Q., et al. (2018) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-018-0876-3 · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Role of the tumor microenvironment in tumor progression and the clinical applications (Review)
YUAN, Y., JIANG, Y.-C., SUN, C.-K., & CHEN, Q.-M. (2016) · Oncology Reports · doi:10.3892/or.2016.4660 · Cited by 320 · see citing works
Non-cell-autonomous cancer progression from chromosomal instability
Li, J., Hubisz, M. J., Earlie, E. M., Paez, M. A. D., Hong, C., Varela, A., Lettera, E., Deyell, M., Tavora, B., Havel, J. J., et al. (2023) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06464-z · Cited by 321 · see citing works
Differential effects on lung and bone metastasis of breast cancer by Wnt signalling inhibitor DKK1
Zhuang, X., Zhang, H., Li, X., Li, X., Cong, M., Peng, F., Yu, J., Zhang, X., Yang, Q., & Hu, G. (2017) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3613 · Cited by 309 · see citing works
Macrophages as Key Drivers of Cancer Progression and Metastasis
Nielsen, S. R., & Schmid, M. C. (2017) · Mediators of Inflammation · doi:10.1155/2017/9624760 · Cited by 281 · see citing works
Breast cancer lung metastasis: Molecular biology and therapeutic implications
Jin, L., Han, B., Siegel, E. L., Cui, Y., Giuliano, A. E., & Cui, X. (2018) · Cancer Biology & Therapy · doi:10.1080/15384047.2018.1456599 · Cited by 298 · see citing works
Doxorubicin and other anthracyclines in cancers: Activity, chemoresistance and its overcoming
Mattioli, R., Ilari, A., Colotti, B., Mosca, L., Fazi, F., & Colotti, G. (2023) · Molecular Aspects of Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.mam.2023.101205 · Cited by 303 · see citing works
Taki, M., Abiko, K., Baba, T., Hamanishi, J., Yamaguchi, K. D., Murakami, R., Yamanoi, K., Horikawa, N., Hosoe, Y., Nakamura, E., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03966-7 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Extracellular matrix components in breast cancer progression and metastasis
Óskarsson, T. (2013) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2013.07.012 · Cited by 291 · see citing works
Tumor microenvironment promotes breast cancer chemoresistance
Mehraj, U., Dar, A. H., Wani, N. A., & Mir, M. A. (2021) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-020-04222-w · Cited by 287 · see citing works
How chemokines organize the tumour microenvironment
Mempel, T. R., Lill, J. K., & Altenburger, L. M. (2023) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-023-00635-w · Cited by 306 · see citing works
Logue, S. E., McGrath, E. P., Cleary, P., Greene, S., Mnich, K., Almanza, A., Chevet, É., Dwyer, R. M., Oommen, A. M., Legembre, P., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-05763-8 · Cited by 284 · see citing works
Neutrophils Promote the Malignant Glioma Phenotype through S100A4
Liang, J., Piao, Y., Holmes, L., Fuller, G. N., Henry, V. K., Tiao, N., & de Groot, J. F. (2013) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-13-1279 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Ibrahim, S., Gadalla, R., Elghonaimy, E. A., Samir, O., Mohamed, H. T., Hassan, H., Greve, B., El‐Shinawi, M., Mohamed, M. M., & Götte, M. (2017) · Molecular Cancer · doi:10.1186/s12943-017-0621-z · Cited by 273 · see citing works
Plasticity of tumour and immune cells: a source of heterogeneity and a cause for therapy resistance?
Hölzel, M., Bovier, A., & Tüting, T. (2013) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc3498 · Cited by 267 · see citing works
IL8, Neutrophils, and NETs in a Collusion against Cancer Immunity and Immunotherapy
Teijeira, Á., Garasa, S., Ochoa, M. C., Villalba-Esparza, M., Olivera, I., Cirella, A., Eguren‐Santamaría, I., Berraondo, P., Schalper, K. A., de Andrea, C. E., et al. (2020) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-20-1319 · Cited by 270 · see citing works
Regulation of the anti-tumour immune response by cancer-associated fibroblasts
Harper, J. A., & Sainson, R. C. A. (2014) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2013.12.005 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Mousset, A., Lecorgne, E., Bourget, I., Lopez, P., Jenovai, K., Cherfils‐Vicini, J., Dominici, C., Rios, G., Girard-Riboulleau, C., Liu, B., et al. (2023) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2023.03.008 · Cited by 272 · see citing works
Gu, Y., Liu, Y., Fu, L., Zhai, L., Zhu, J., Han, Y., Jiang, Y., Zhang, Y., Zhang, P., Jiang, Z., et al. (2019) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-018-0309-y · Cited by 267 · see citing works
Lee, K., Kuo, Y., Ho, Y., & Huang, Y. (2019) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers11091334 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Huang, R., Wang, S., Wang, N., Zheng, Y., Zhou, J., Yang, B., Wang, X., Zhang, J., Guo, L., Wang, S., et al. (2020) · Cell Death and Disease · doi:10.1038/s41419-020-2435-y · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Targeting the perivascular niche sensitizes disseminated tumour cells to chemotherapy
Carlson, P., Dasgupta, A., Grzelak, C. A., Kim, J., Barrett, A. S., Coleman, I. M., Shor, R. E., Goddard, E. T., Dai, J., Schweitzer, E. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/s41556-018-0267-0 · Cited by 251 · see citing works
Self-citationSu, W., Han, H. H., Wang, Y., Zhang, B., Zhou, B., Cheng, Y., Rumandla, A., Gurrapu, S., Chakraborty, G., Su, J., et al. (2019) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2019.06.009 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
The immune system and inflammation in breast cancer
Jiang, X., & Shapiro, D. J. (2013) · Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.mce.2013.06.003 · Cited by 243 · see citing works
TP63-mediated enhancer reprogramming drives the squamous subtype of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma
Somerville, T. D. D., Xu, Y., Miyabayashi, K., Tiriac, H., Cleary, C. R., Maia-Silva, D., Milazzo, J. P., Tuveson, D. A., & Vakoc, C. R. (2018) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2018.10.051 · Cited by 225 · see citing works
Targeting Breast Cancer Metastasis
Jin, X., & Mu, P. (2015) · Breast Cancer Basic and Clinical Research · doi:10.4137/bcbcr.s25460 · Cited by 239 · see citing works
Activating hotspot L205R mutation in <i>PRKACA</i> and adrenal Cushing’s syndrome
Cao, Y., He, M., Gao, Z., Peng, Y., Li, Y., Li, L., Zhou, W., Li, X., Zhong, X., Lei, Y., et al. (2014) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1249480 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
The oxysterol–CXCR2 axis plays a key role in the recruitment of tumor-promoting neutrophils
Raccosta, L., Fontana, R., Maggioni, D., Lanterna, C., Villablanca, E. J., Paniccia, A., Musumeci, A. G., Chiricozzi, E., Trincavelli, M. L., Daniele, S., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Experimental Medicine · doi:10.1084/jem.20130440 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Miyake, M., Hori, S., Morizawa, Y., Tatsumi, Y., Nakai, Y., Anai, S., Torimoto, K., Aoki, K., Tanaka, N., Shimada, K., et al. (2016) · Neoplasia · doi:10.1016/j.neo.2016.08.002 · Cited by 229 · see citing works
Yu, P., Huang, Y., Han, Y., Lin, L., Sun, W., Rabson, A. B., Wang, Y., & Shi, Y. (2016) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/onc.2016.217 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Hadadi, É., Taylor, W. R., Li, X., Aslan, Y., Vilotte, M., Rivière, J., Duvallet, G., Auriau, C., Dulong, S., Raymond‐Letron, I., et al. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16890-6 · Cited by 223 · see citing works
Circulating and disseminated tumor cells: harbingers or initiators of metastasis?
Dasgupta, A., Lim, A. R., & Ghajar, C. M. (2017) · Molecular Oncology · doi:10.1002/1878-0261.12022 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Paradoxical effects of chemotherapy on tumor relapse and metastasis promotion
D’Alterio, C., Scala, S., Sozzi, G., Roz, L., & Bertolini, G. (2019) · Seminars in Cancer Biology · doi:10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.08.019 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Stankic, M., Pavlovic, S., Chin, Y., Brogi, E., Padua, D. M., Norton, L., Massagué, J., & Benezra, R. (2013) · Cell Reports · doi:10.1016/j.celrep.2013.11.014 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationTumor-associated myeloid cells: diversity and therapeutic targeting
Mantovani, A., Marchesi, F., Jaillon, S., Garlanda, C., & Allavena, P. (2021) · Cellular and Molecular Immunology · doi:10.1038/s41423-020-00613-4 · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Oncogenic mTOR signalling recruits myeloid-derived suppressor cells to promote tumour initiation
Welte, T., Kim, I. S., Tian, L. H., Gao, X., Wang, H., Li, J., Holdman, X. B., Herschkowitz, J. I., Pond, A. C., Xie, G., et al. (2016) · Nature Cell Biology · doi:10.1038/ncb3355 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
NF‐κB Signaling in Gastric Cancer
Sokolova, O. V., & Naumann, M. (2017) · Toxins · doi:10.3390/toxins9040119 · Cited by 217 · see citing works
- Authors
- Acharyya, S., Oskarsson, T., Vanharanta, S., Malladi, S., Kim, J., Morris, P. G., Manova-Todorova, K., Leversha, M., Hogg, N., Seshan, V. E., Norton, L., Brogi, E., & Massagué, J.
- Affiliations
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Cancer Research UK (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Massagué, Joan
- ORCID
- Venue
- Cell
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2012-07
- Volume
- 150
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 165-178
- ISSN
- 0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3528019
- OpenAlex
- W2151832198
- Semantic Scholar
- 925990be27c66128df282d0f18c8f2ac8b6b6953
- Cited by
- 1,085
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 12
- FWCI
- 37.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Cell (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute
- National Institutes of Health
- National Cancer Institute (R37CA034610, P01CA094060, U54CA163167, CA94060, P30CA008748)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
- Keywords
- CXCL1, CXCL2, chemoresistance, metastasis, breast cancer, paracrine signaling, myeloid cells, endothelial cells, S100A8/S100A9, TNF-α, NF-kB, CXCR2, tumor microenvironment, chemotherapy
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Transplantation, Transplantation, Heterologous, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Paracrine Communication, Myeloid Cells, Calgranulin A, Calgranulin B, Endothelial Cells, Mice, Chemokine CXCL1, Gene Knockdown Techniques
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review