Cited by 1,085Chemokine receptors and signalingCancer Cells and MetastasisImmune cells in cancer

A CXCL1 Paracrine Network Links Cancer Chemoresistance and Metastasis

Open access
Acharyya, Swarnali, Oskarsson, Thordur, Vanharanta, Sakari, Malladi, Srinivas, Kim, Juliet, Morris, Patrick G., Manova-Todorova, Katia, Leversha, Margaret +5 more·2012·Cell

Abstract

Metastasis and chemoresistance in cancer are linked phenomena but the molecular basis for this link is unknown. We uncovered a network of paracrine signals between carcinoma, myeloid and endothelial cells that drives both processes in breast cancer. Cancer cells that overexpress CXCL1 and 2 by transcriptional hyperactivation or 4q21 amplification are primed for survival in metastatic sites. CXCL1/2 attract CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells into the tumor, which produce chemokines including S100A8/9 that enhance cancer cell survival. While chemotherapeutic agents kill cancer cells, these treatments trigger a parallel stromal reaction leading to TNF-α production by endothelial and other stromal cells. TNF-α heightens the expression of CXCL1/2 in cancer cells, thus amplifying the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop and causing chemoresistance. CXCR2 blockers break this cycle, augmenting the efficacy of chemotherapy against breast tumors and particularly against metastasis. This network of endothelial-carcinoma-myeloid signaling interactions provides a mechanism linking chemoresistance and metastasis, with opportunities for intervention.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2012.04.042

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Claims the paper makes

0 of 39 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

  • Findingown data

    Knockdown of CXCL1 and CXCL2 using two independent shRNA hairpins significantly reduces mammary tumor growth in all three models.

    “Knockdown of CXCL1 and 2 using two independent shRNA hairpins (Figure S1C–D) significantly reduced mammary tumor growth in all three models (Figures 1C–D, 1G–H and S1E–F)”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    A significant reduction in CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells is observed in CXCL1/2 knockdown tumors in both models.

    “A significant reduction in CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells was observed in CXCL1/2 knockdown tumors in both models (Figure S2G–H).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    CXCL1/2 knockdown is associated with reduced metastasis to the lungs.

    “This decrease was associated with reduced metastasis in the lungs (Figures 1E–F, 1I–J and S1G).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    CXCL1 and CXCL2 show a similar expression pattern in a combined cohort of 615 primary breast cancers.

    “Indeed, CXCL1 and CXCL2 showed a similar expression pattern in a combined cohort of 615 primary breast cancers (Figure 1A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Findingown data

    CXCL1 and CXCL2 are amplified in 7.5% of primary breast tumors and 19.9% of metastases by FISH.

    “Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of human tissue samples showed that CXCL1 and CXCL2 were amplified in 7.5% of primary breast tumors and in 19.9% of metastases (Figures 1B and S1A).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. 38
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 13
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingreasoning

    CXCR2 blockers break the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 cycle and augment chemotherapy efficacy against breast tumors and particularly against metastasis.

    “CXCR2 blockers break this cycle, augmenting the efficacy of chemotherapy against breast tumors and particularly against metastasis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Among other CXCR2 ligands tested, CXCL3 knockdown in LM2 cells contributes to tumor growth but not metastasis.

    “Interestingly, among other CXCR2 ligands that we tested, CXCL3 knockdown in LM2 cells contributed to tumor growth but not metastasis (Figure S1K–M).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    No appreciable decrease is observed in CD11b+Ly6C+, F4/80+ macrophages, SMA+ myofibroblast, Ter119+ erythroid cells or endothelial cells in CXCL1/2 depleted tumors.

    “No appreciable decrease was observed in the CD11b+Ly6C+, F4/80+ macrophages, SMA+ myofibroblast, Ter119+ erythroid cells or endothelial cells in the CXCL1/2 depleted tumors (Figure S2J–P, Table S1 and data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    PyMT-F and LM2 cells grow aggressively in the mammary fat pad and metastasize to the lungs.

    “PyMT-F and LM2 cells grew aggressively in the mammary fat pad and metastasized to the lungs.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CXCL1/2 knockdown is not accompanied by visible changes in apoptosis in vitro or in angiogenesis and cell proliferation rates in tumors.

    “However, CXCL1/2 knockdown was not accompanied by any visible changes in apoptosis in vitro or in angiogenesis and cell proliferation rates in tumors (Figure S2A–E).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    S100A8/9 addition only weakly activates NFkappaB in LM2 breast cancer cells and does not activate Akt or STAT3 pathways.

    “S100A8/9 addition only weakly activated NFκB in LM2 breast cancer cells and we detected no activation of the Akt or STAT3 pathways (Figure S4C and data not shown).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Addition of an ERK1/2 inhibitor or a p70S6K inhibitor abolishes the chemo-protective effect of S100A8/9, whereas a p38 inhibitor shows partial effect.

    “Addition of an ERK1/2 inhibitor (FR180204) or a p70S6K inhibitor (PF4708671) abolished the chemo-protective effect of S100A8/9 whereas addition of a p38 inhibitor (SB203580) showed partial effect (Figure 4F), suggesting that the ERK1/2 and p70S6K signaling mediate the pro-survival effect of S100A8/9 in metastatic cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    AC treated tumors significantly upregulate CXCL1/2 expression, associated with increased recruitment of S100A9-expressing cells and CD11b+Ly6G+ granulocytic cells.

    “AC treated tumors significantly upregulated CXCL1/2 expression (Figure 5C–D) and this effect was associated with increased recruitment of S100A9-expressing cells (Figure 5E) and CD11b+Ly6G+ granulocytic cells (Figure 5F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Within recruited CD11b+Ly6G+ population in PyMT immunocompetent transplant tumors, 6%, 12% and 25% of cells express CD80, F4/80 and Sca1, respectively, and a minority express CD86, CD117, IL4Ralpha, VEGFR1 and CD34.

    “Within the recruited CD11b+Ly6G+ population in the PyMT immunocompetent transplant tumors, 6, 12 and 25% of the cells expressed CD80, F4/80 and Sca1, respectively, and a minority expressed CD86, CD117, IL4Rα, VEGFR1 and CD34 (Table S2).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Chemotherapy treatment of mice bearing LM2 tumors initially results in significant apoptosis and a concomitant delay in tumor growth.

    “Chemotherapy treatment of mice bearing LM2 tumors initially resulted in significant apoptosis and a concomitant delay in tumor growth (Figure 5A–B).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CXCL1/2 depleted tumors show a decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, no major change in gamma-delta-TCR+ and CD25+ T-regulatory cells, and moderate increases in B220+ lymphocyte and CD49b+ NK cell numbers.

    “CXCL1/2 depleted tumors showed a decrease in CD4+ and CD8+ lymphocytes, no major change in γδ-TCR+ and CD25+ T-regulatory cells, and moderate increases in B220+ lymphocyte and CD49b+ NK cell numbers (Table S1).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Coinjection of wild-type MPRO cells with LM2 cancer cells enhances mammary tumor growth and lung metastasis, an effect significantly blunted by S100a8/9 knockdown in MPRO cells.

    “Coinjection of wild-type MPRO cells with LM2 cancer cells enhanced mammary tumor growth and lung metastasis, an effect that was significantly blunted by S100a8/9 knockdown in the MPRO cells (Figure S3E–F).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    A reduction in both monocytic CD11b+Ly6C+ and granulocytic CD11b+Ly6G+ cells occurs in the lungs of mice bearing CXCL1/2 depleted tumors, with minimal changes in F4/80+ macrophages.

    “Interestingly, a reduction both in monocytic CD11b+Ly6C+ and granulocytic CD11b+Ly6G+ cells occurred in the lungs of mice bearing CXCL1/2 depleted tumors with minimal changes in the number of F4/80+ macrophages (Figure S2R–T).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    This protection is more limited in co-culture with CD11b+Gr1+ cells derived from S100A9-/- marrow, confirming that pro-survival properties of myeloid factors under chemotherapy stress are partly due to S100A8/9.

    “However, this protection was more limited in co-culture with CD11b+Gr1+ cells derived from S100A9−/− marrow (Figure 4D), confirming that the pro-survival properties of myeloid factors under stress chemotherapy conditions are partly due to S100A8/9.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Fascin, part of a lung metastasis gene signature, does not show the same trend upon chemotherapy treatment as S100A8/9, confirming specificity of the association of S100A8/9 with chemotherapy resistance.

    “In contrast, Fascin that is part of a lung metastasis gene signature (Minn et al., 2005) did not show the same trend upon chemotherapy treatment as S100A8/9 (Figure S5E), further confirming the specificity of the association of S100A8/9 with chemotherapy resistance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Minn et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    S100A8 and S100A9 are abundantly expressed in tumor-derived CD11b+Gr1+ cells and are not of epithelial origin.

    “To identify cancer cell survival factors derived from the recruited myeloid cells, we identified candidates that are abundantly expressed in tumor-derived CD11b+Gr1+ cells and are not of epithelial origin (Figure 3C,D and Figure S3A). S100A8 and A9 fulfilled these criteria.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    CD11b+Gr1+ cells and specifically the CD11b+Ly6G+ subpopulation express CXCR2.

    “In line with our hypothesis, CD11b+Gr1+ cells and specifically the CD11b+Ly6G+ subpopulation expressed CXCR2 (Figure 2E, S2Q).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    Combining AC with the CXCR2 inhibitor markedly reduced lung metastatic burden, and the drugs interacted synergistically.

    “However, when AC was combined with the CXCR2 inhibitor, lung metastatic burden was markedly reduced and the interaction between the drugs exhibited synergism (Figure 7C,D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Findingown data

    In those mice, metastatic cells were not fully eliminated, and micrometastases were found throughout the lungs.

    “However metastatic cells were not completely eliminated and micrometastases were detected throughout the lungs (Figure 7C,D).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    Less than 0.1% of circulating cancer cells are estimated to withstand the stresses of infiltrating and colonizing distant metastatic sites.

    “Biologically, less than 0.1% of the circulating cancer cells are estimated to withstand the harsh stresses of infiltrating and colonizing distant metastatic sites (Weiss, 2000).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Weiss, 2000

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Drug resistance in cancer can be cell-intrinsic or a combination of host and tumor mediated pathways.

    “Drug resistance in cancer can be cell-intrinsic (Poulikakos and Rosen, 2011) or a combination of host and tumor mediated pathways (Bergers and Hanahan, 2008; Ebos et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Poulikakos and Rosen, 2011

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Bergers and Hanahan, 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ebos et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CXCL1 expression is associated with lung relapse in breast tumors, including tumors not exposed to prior chemotherapy, and increases aggressiveness of circulating breast tumor cells.

    “CXCL1 emerged among a set of genes whose expression is associated with lung relapse in breast tumors, including tumors that had not been exposed to prior chemotherapy (Minn et al., 2007; Minn et al., 2005), and as a gene that increases the aggressiveness of circulating breast tumor cells (Kim et al., 2009).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Minn et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Minn et al., 2005 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Kim et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    High expression of CXCL1 in breast tumors without gene amplification is also possible.

    “Additionally, high expression of CXCL1 in breast tumors without gene amplification is also possible (Bieche et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Bieche et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationnone given

    Chemotherapeutic agents kill cancer cells but also trigger a parallel stromal reaction leading to TNF-alpha production by endothelial and other stromal cells.

    “While chemotherapeutic agents kill cancer cells, these treatments trigger a parallel stromal reaction leading to TNF-α production by endothelial and other stromal cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted).

    Interpretationreasoning

    CXCL1/2 mediates tumor cell survival via paracrine mechanisms.

    “Based on these results, we postulated that CXCL1/2 mediates tumor cell survival via paracrine mechanisms.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    CXCL1/2 attract CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells into the tumor, and these myeloid cells produce chemokines including S100A8/9 that enhance cancer cell survival.

    “CXCL1/2 attract CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells into the tumor, which produce chemokines including S100A8/9 that enhance cancer cell survival.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CXCL1 and CXCL2 are 90% identical by amino-acid sequence and signal through the same receptor CXCR2.

    “CXCL1 and 2 are 90% identical by amino-acid sequence and signal through the same receptor CXCR2 (Balkwill, 2004).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Balkwill, 2004 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    TNF-alpha heightens CXCL1/2 expression in cancer cells, amplifying the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop and causing chemoresistance.

    “TNF-α heightens the expression of CXCL1/2 in cancer cells, thus amplifying the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 loop and causing chemoresistance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Classified as probably not a substantial claim.

    Premisecitation

    Recent evidence points to tumor microenvironment components as potential participants in the generation of chemoresistance.

    “Recent evidence points to tumor microenvironment components as potential participants in the generation of chemoresistance (Denardo et al., 2011; Gilbert and Hemann, 2010; Roodhart et al., 2011; Shaked et al., 2008; Shree et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Denardo et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gilbert and Hemann, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Roodhart et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Copy number alterations at 4q21 occur in breast cancer and engulf fifteen genes in the amplification peak, including CXCL1-8.

    “Copy number alterations at 4q21 occur in breast cancer (Beroukhim et al., 2010) and engulf fifteen genes in the amplification peak, including CXCL1-8.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Beroukhim et al., 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CXCR2 receptor is expressed by several stromal cell types such as endothelial and myeloid cells.

    “CXCR2 receptor is expressed by several stromal cell types such as endothelial and myeloid cells (Murdoch et al., 2008).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Murdoch et al., 2008 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    Both TLR4 and RAGE are expressed in breast cancer cells.

    “Both TLR4 and RAGE are expressed in breast cancer cells (Bos et al., 2009; Hsieh et al., 2003).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Bos et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Hsieh et al., 2003 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    S100A8/9 bind to TLR4 and RAGE, which activate diverse signaling cascades.

    “S100A8/9 bind to Toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and RAGE (receptor for advanced glycation end products), which activate diverse signaling cascades (Gebhardt et al., 2006; Vogl et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Gebhardt et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Vogl et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    S100A8/9 are low molecular weight calcium-binding proteins associated with chronic inflammation and cancer.

    “S100A8/9 are low molecular weight calcium-binding proteins that are associated with chronic inflammation and cancer (Gebhardt et al., 2006).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gebhardt et al., 2006 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    CXCL1/2 from breast cancer cells recruit myeloid producers of S100A8/9, which in turn promote breast cancer metastasis.

    “Collectively our results suggest that CXCL1/2 from breast cancer cells recruit myeloid producers of S100A8/9, which in turn promote breast cancer metastasis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • May combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Once started, this chemo-protective program could become self-sustaining, enriching residual aggressive clones that resist chemotherapy and thrive in the lung and elsewhere.

    “Once initiated, this chemo-protective program could become self-sustaining, leading to the enrichment of residual aggressive clones able to resist chemotherapy and thrive in the lung”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    This raises the possibility of clinically targeting this axis to limit cancer cell dissemination and reduce drug resistance.

    “This raises the possibility of clinically targeting this axis both to limit the dissemination of cancer cells and to diminish drug resistance.”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    Such pro-inflammatory bursts can enhance the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 survival axis and promote expansion of chemoresistant breast cancer cells.

    “Such pro-inflammatory bursts can boost the CXCL1/2-S100A8/9 survival axis and facilitates the expansion of chemoresistant breast cancer cells.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells are a heterogeneous group with known roles in tumor angiogenesis and T cell immunosuppression.

    “CD11b+Gr1+ myeloid cells are a heterogeneous group with previously identified roles in tumor angiogenesis and T cell immunosuppression (Gabrilovich and Nagaraj, 2009; Ostrand-Rosenberg and Sinha, 2009; Shojaei et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Gabrilovich and Nagaraj, 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Ostrand-Rosenberg and Sinha, 2009

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Shojaei et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationown data

    Disrupting the CXCL1-driven paracrine axis could improve therapeutic response in existing lesions and suppress metastasis, even in advanced tumor progression.

    “Our findings argue that although therapy induced inflammation is a predominant feature of the use of chemotherapy, disrupting the CXCL1 driven paracrine axis could improve therapeutic response in existing lesions and also suppress metastasis, even at an advanced stage of tumor progression.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
    • Rests on an assumption: Stroma has lower selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes than cancer cell genomes.
  • May combine two claims.

    Premisecitation

    The main obstacles to curing advanced breast cancer are pan-resistance to all known chemotherapy drugs and widely metastatic disease, and these two problems are closely linked clinically.

    “The major impediments to cure advanced breast cancer are the emergence of pan-resistance to all known chemotherapy drugs and the development of widely metastatic disease, two phenomena that are closely linked clinically (Gonzalez-Angulo et al., 2007).”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Gonzalez-Angulo et al., 2007 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    The critical role of the microenvironment in tumor progression and therapy response is increasingly recognized.

    “The critical role of the microenvironment in tumor progression and response to therapy is being increasingly recognized (Condeelis and Pollard, 2006; Denardo et al., 2011; Gilbert and Hemann, 2010; Shree et al., 2011; Tan et al., 2011).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked
    • cites Condeelis and Pollard, 2006

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Denardo et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gilbert and Hemann, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationcitation

    Chemotherapy induces a storm of cytokines and chemokines in the tumor microenvironment, many of which may be linked to chemoresistance.

    “Recent reports (Denardo et al., 2011; Gilbert and Hemann, 2010) and the present work show that chemotherapy induces a storm of cytokines and chemokines in the tumor microenvironment many of which might be linked to chemoresistance.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked
    • cites Denardo et al., 2011 source

      Not checked in the free run.

    • cites Gilbert and Hemann, 2010 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Premisecitation

    CXCR2 receptor antagonists are in clinical trials for chronic inflammatory diseases.

    “CXCR2 receptor antagonists are in clinical trials for chronic inflammatory diseases (Chapman et al., 2009)”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked
    • cites Chapman et al., 2009 source

      Not checked in the free run.

  • May combine two claims.

    Interpretationreasoning

    These findings highlight the clinical relevance of CD11b+Gr1+ cells in making chemotherapy ineffective and promoting metastasis.

    “These findings accentuate the clinical relevance of CD11b+Gr1+ in rendering chemotherapy ineffective and promoting metastasis.”
    Quote in the paperSubstantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductnone given

    All animal experiments followed a protocol approved by the MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee.

    “All experiments using animals were done in accordance to a protocol approved by MSKCC Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
  • Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).

    Study design and conductown data

    Patient samples were acquired in compliance with protocols approved by the MSKCC Institutional Review Board.

    “Paraffin embedded tissue microarrays and sections from lung metastases and primary breast tumor cores before and after chemotherapy treatment were acquired from the MSKCC Department of Pathology in compliance with protocols approved by the MSKCC Institutional Review Board (IRB).”
    Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
47 of 47
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    An integrated understanding of acquired drug resistance in the context of inputs from tumor and its microenvironment is lacking.

    “However, an integrated understanding of acquired drug resistance in the context of inputs from tumor and its microenvironment is lacking.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    A very small fraction of cells exposed to genotoxic stress can survive and outgrow under repeated cycles of chemotherapy.

    “Similarly, a very small fraction of cells exposed to genotoxic stress can survive and outgrow under repeated cycles of chemotherapy.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    CXCR2 is the primary receptor for CXCL1/2.

    “we utilized antagonists of CXCR2, the primary receptor for CXCL1/2”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Stroma has lower selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes than cancer cell genomes.

    “targeting the immune microenvironment would be an attractive option because of the potentially low selective pressure for mutations and epigenetic changes on the stroma compared to the cancer cell genomes.”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Data from various mouse models indicate that disrupting the CXCR1/2-MDSC axis is therapeutically efficacious across a wide variety of solid cancers.

    “Notably, data from various mouse models indicate that disrupting the CXCR1/2–MDSC axis in tumours is therapeutically efficacious across a wide variety of solid cancers166–172.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Acharyya, S., Oskarsson, T., Vanharanta, S., Malladi, S., Kim, J., Morris, P. G., Manova-Todorova, K., Leversha, M., Hogg, N., Seshan, V. E., Norton, L., Brogi, E., & Massagué, J.
Affiliations
  • Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
Corresponding author
Massagué, Joan
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-07
Volume
150
Issue
1
Pages
165-178
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2151832198
Cited by
1,085
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 45 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 81 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 139 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 68 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 77 · 2015: 78 · 2014: 69 · 2013: 77 · 2012: 12
FWCI
37.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Defense
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (R37CA034610, P01CA094060, U54CA163167, CA94060, P30CA008748)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Chemokine receptors and signaling
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Cells and Metastasis
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune cells in cancer
Keywords
CXCL1, CXCL2, chemoresistance, metastasis, breast cancer, paracrine signaling, myeloid cells, endothelial cells, S100A8/S100A9, TNF-α, NF-kB, CXCR2, tumor microenvironment, chemotherapy
MeSH terms
Animals, Breast Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Disease Models, Animal, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Lymph Nodes, Lymphatic Metastasis, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Neoplasm Metastasis, Neoplasm Transplantation, Transplantation, Heterologous, Drug Resistance, Neoplasm, Paracrine Communication, Myeloid Cells, Calgranulin A, Calgranulin B, Endothelial Cells, Mice, Chemokine CXCL1, Gene Knockdown Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-06.

Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-06.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review