Cited by 402Spaceflight effects on biologySpace exploration and regulationSpace Exploration and Technology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 153 of the 163 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 79 of the 131 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

Comprehensive Multi-omics Analysis Reveals Mitochondrial Stress as a Central Biological Hub for Spaceflight Impact

Open access

Abstract

Summary Spaceflight is known to impose changes on human physiology with unknown molecular etiologies. To reveal these causes, we used a multi-omics, systems biology analytical approach using biomedical profiles from fifty-nine astronauts and data from NASA’s GeneLab derived from hundreds of samples flown in space, to determine transcriptomic, proteomic, metabolomic, and epigenetic responses to spaceflight. Overall pathway analyses on the multi-omic datasets showed significant enrichment for mitochondrial processes, as well as innate immunity, chronic inflammation, cell cycle, circadian rhythm, and olfactory functions. Importantly, NASA’s Twin Study provided a platform to confirm several of our principal findings. Evidence of altered mitochondrial function and DNA damage was also found in the urine and blood metabolic data compiled from the astronaut cohort and NASA Twin Study data, indicating mitochondrial stress as a consistent phenotype of spaceflight.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cell.2020.11.002

Cites

153 of 153 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

79 of 131 cited sources checked · 32 supported · 3 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 105 claims

  • It may state two separate claims as one. 87
  • Probably not a substantial claim. 59
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
123 of 123
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Modeled metabolic flux activity does not necessarily directly correspond to metabolite concentration.

    “While metabolic flux activity does not necessarily directly relate to metabolite concentration, our flux model results do not disagree with our MS/MS experimental observations of increases in free muscle L-carnitine and malate.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The spaceflight food system is limited and astronauts' diets differ from a nominal earth-based diet.

    “Still, it is worth noting that the spaceflight food system is limited, and astronauts’ diets differ from a nominal (earth based) diet.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Findings from mouse and cell line models can be generalized to human astronaut physiology.

    “The lower levels of 1,25 Vitamin D and higher IL-1 and IGF-1 levels measured from 59 astronauts are consistent with findings at the cellular and tissue levels (Fig. 5).”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The publicly available GeneLab datasets are of sufficient quality and comparable across missions to support integrated multi-omics analysis.

    “All transcriptomic, proteomic, and methylation data related to the Rodent Research-1 (RR-1) and Rodent Research-3 (RR-3) mission tissues were obtained from NASA’s GeneLab platform”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    The context-specific metabolic flux analysis accurately reflects in vivo metabolic activity.

    “Our context-specific metabolic flux analysis (Fig. 3G) further demonstrates that spaceflight upregulates NAD metabolism in the liver”
5 of 5

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 163 references

10 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Balsa, 2019, ER and nutrient stress promote assembly of respiratory chain supercomplexes through the PERK-eIF2alpha axis, Mol Cell, 74, 877, 10.1016/j.molcel.2019.03.031 · DOI
  2. Khan, 2017, mTORC1 regulates mitochondrial integrated stress response and mitochondrial myopathy progression, Cell Metab., 26, 419, 10.1016/j.cmet.2017.07.007 · DOI
  3. Thomer, 2016, Picard Tools, Broad Institute

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–391 of 391

Metadata

Authors
da Silveira, W. A., Fazelinia, H., Rosenthal, S. B., Laiakis, E. C., Kim, M. S., Meydan, C., Kidane, Y., Rathi, K. S., Smith, S. M., Stear, B., Ying, Y., Zhang, Y., Foox, J., Zanello, S., Crucian, B., Wang, D., Nugent, A., Costa, H. A., Zwart, S. R., Schrepfer, S., Elworth, R. A. L., Sapoval, N., Treangen, T., MacKay, M., Gokhale, N. S., Horner, S. M., Singh, L. N., Wallace, D. C., Willey, J. S., Schisler, J. C., Meller, R., McDonald, J. T., Fisch, K. M., Hardiman, G., Taylor, D., Mason, C. E., Costes, S. V., & Beheshti, A.
Affiliations
  • Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (US)
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Georgetown University Medical Center (US)
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (US)
  • Johnson Space Center (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Hampton University (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
  • The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston (US)
  • Rice University (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Morehouse School of Medicine (US)
  • Queen's University Belfast (GB)
  • Ames Research Center (US)
Corresponding author
Beheshti, Afshin
Venue
Cell
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-11
Volume
183
Issue
5
Pages
1185-1201.e20
ISSN
0092-8674 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3108506878
Cited by
402
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 80 · 2025: 80 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 44 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 10
FWCI
21.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Portal (Queen's University Belfast) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NNX15AB50G, NNX14AH50G, NNX17AB26G)
  • Pershing Square Foundation (R01CA249054, LLS-MCL7001-18, LLS 9238-16, R01MH117406, 19-19OMNI_2-0109)
  • American Heart Association (17PRE33670017)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Ames Research Center
  • National Institutes of Health (U01DA045300, U54MD010706, NNX16AO69A:0061, NNX16AO69A:0107, R01MH117406, R01CA249054, P30 CA051008, LLS-MCL7001-18, LLS 9238-16)
  • Government of South Australia (P30 CA051008)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Spaceflight effects on biology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Exploration and Technology
Keywords
spaceflight, mitochondrial stress, astronauts, GeneLab, mitochondrial DNA damage, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, epigenomics, innate immunity, chronic inflammation, circadian rhythm, olfactory function, cell cycle, multi-omics integration
MeSH terms
Animals, Circadian Rhythm, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Immunity, Innate, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Mitochondria, Muscles, Organ Specificity, Smell, Space Flight, Stress, Physiological, Genomics, Lipid Metabolism, Metabolic Flux Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-28, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-28 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review