Cited by 83Social and Intergroup PsychologyElectoral Systems and Political ParticipationDeath Anxiety and Social Exclusion

The prime psychological suspects of toxic political polarization

Moore-Berg, Samantha L, Hameiri, Boaz, Bruneau, Emile·2020·Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Once categorical boundaries between 'us and them' are drawn, destructive social psychological processes may kick in, including stereotyping, prejudice, in-group favouritism, out-group derogation and even dehumanization.

    “Once categorical boundaries between ‘us and them’ are drawn, a whole host of destructive social psychological processes may kick in, including stereotyping, prejudice, in-group favouritism, out-group derogation and even dehumanization3,55,93–95.”
  • Distorting images of the out-group as deviant, hostile, stubborn, extreme and unreasonable serves to justify treating the out-group unfavourably.

    “Presumably, distorting images of the out-group as deviant, hostile, stubborn, extreme and unreasonable serves to justify treating the out-group unfavourably55,89,95,155.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moore-Berg, S. L., Hameiri, B., & Bruneau, E.
Affiliations
  • Tel Aviv University (IL)
  • Beyond Conflict (US)
Corresponding author
Bruneau, Emile
Venue
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-08
Volume
34
Pages
199-204
ISSN
2352-1546 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3035549027
Cited by
83
References
51
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2
FWCI
1.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
Keywords
political polarization, intergroup hostility, dehumanization, metaperception, political ideology, intergroup evaluation, social cohesion, democracy, ideological differences, affective evaluation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review