Cited by 439Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsDementia and Cognitive Impairment Research

Selective Changes in Thin Spine Density and Morphology in Monkey Prefrontal Cortex Correlate with Aging-Related Cognitive Impairment

Open access
Dumitriu, Dani, Hao, Jiandong, Hara, Yuko, Kaufmann, Jeffrey, Janssen, William G. M., Lou, Wendy, Rapp, Peter R., Morrison, John H.·2010·The Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract

Age-associated memory impairment (AAMI) occurs in many mammalian species, including humans. In contrast to Alzheimer's disease (AD), in which circuit disruption occurs through neuron death, AAMI is due to circuit and synapse disruption in the absence of significant neuron loss and thus may be more amenable to prevention or treatment. We have investigated the effects of aging on pyramidal neurons and synapse density in layer III of area 46 in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex of young and aged, male and female rhesus monkeys ( Macaca mulatta ) that were tested for cognitive status through the delayed non-matching-to-sample (DNMS) and delayed response tasks. Cognitive tests revealed an age-related decrement in both acquisition and performance on DNMS. Our morphometric analyses revealed both an age-related loss of spines (33%, p < 0.05) on pyramidal cells and decreased density of axospinous synapses (32%, p < 0.01) in layer III of area 46. In addition, there was an age-related shift in the distribution of spine types reflecting a selective vulnerability of small, thin spines, thought to be particularly plastic and linked to learning. While both synapse density and the overall spine size average of an animal were predictive of number of trials required for acquisition of DNMS (i.e., learning the task), the strongest correlate of behavior was found to be the head volume of thin spines, with no correlation between behavior and mushroom spine size or density. No synaptic index correlated with memory performance once the task was learned.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1523/jneurosci.6410-09.2010

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Decreases in both thin and mushroom spine types have been reported in animal models of cognitive decline.

    “Decreases in both spine types have been reported in animal models of cognitive decline [54], [55].”

    From Arf4 Determines Dentate Gyrus-Mediated Pattern Separation by Regulating Dendritic Spine Development (2012) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Results (Effects of aging on dendritic spine morphology) report a 45.6% decrease in thin spine density but no statistically significant difference in mushroom spine density. The Discussion (Synaptic basis for cognitive aging) explicitly says mushroom spine density was unchanged in aged versus young monkeys, contrary to the claim that both types decreased. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Loss of thin spines in monkey PFC is selectively correlated with age-related cognitive impairment.

    “The loss of thin spines in monkey PFC, which are particularly plastic and linked to learning, is selectively correlated with age-related cognitive impairment 241.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dumitriu, D., Hao, J., Hara, Y., Kaufmann, J., Janssen, W. G. M., Lou, W., Rapp, P. R., & Morrison, J. H.
Affiliations
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai (US)
  • Hebei Medical University (CN)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • Mount Sinai Hospital (US)
Venue
The Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2010-06-02
Volume
30
Issue
22
Pages
7507-7515
ISSN
  • 0270-6474 (ISSN-L)
  • 1529-2401
OpenAlex
W2070524933
Cited by
439
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 43
FWCI
12.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Neuroscience (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 016765, AG 006647, R37AG010606, R01AG006647, P01AG016765, R01AG010606, AG010606, R37AG006647)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (F30MH083402)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
Keywords
age-associated memory impairment, aging, prefrontal cortex, dendritic spine morphology, synaptic density, pyramidal neurons, rhesus monkeys, area 46, delayed nonmatching-to-sample, delayed response, memory acquisition, synaptic plasticity, sex differences
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aging, Animals, Cognition Disorders, Female, Macaca mulatta, Male, Neurons, Neuropsychological Tests, Reaction Time, Synapses, Linear Models, Prefrontal Cortex, Recognition, Psychology, Microscopy, Electron, Transmission, Dendritic Spines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review