Cited by 385Autophagy in Disease and TherapyCell death mechanisms and regulationGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Autophagy, Not Apoptosis, Is Essential for Midgut Cell Death in Drosophila

Open access
Denton, Donna, Shravage, Bhupendra, Simin, Rachel, Mills, Kathryn, Berry, Deborah L., Baehrecke, Eric H., Kumar, Sharad·2009·Current Biology

Abstract

Most developmentally programmed cell death in metazoans is mediated by caspases. During Drosophila metamorphosis, obsolete tissues, including the midgut and salivary glands, are removed by programmed cell death [1]. The initiator caspase Dronc and its activator Ark are required for the death of salivary glands, but not for midgut removal [2, 3]. In addition to caspases, complete removal of salivary glands requires autophagy [4]. However, the contribution of autophagy to midgut cell death has not been explored. Examination of combined mutants of the main initiator and effector caspases revealed that the canonical apoptotic pathway is not required for midgut cell death. Further analyses revealed that the caspase Decay is responsible for most of the caspase activity in dying midguts, yet inhibition of this activity has no effect on midgut removal. By contrast, midgut degradation was severely delayed by inhibition of autophagy, and this occurred without a decrease in caspase activity. Surprisingly, the combined inhibition of caspases and autophagy did not result in an additional delay in midgut removal. Together, our results indicate that autophagy, not caspases, is essential for midgut programmed cell death, providing the first in vivo evidence of caspase-independent programmed cell death that requires autophagy despite the presence of high caspase activity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cub.2009.08.042

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In developing D. melanogaster midgut, caspase inactivation has no consequences, whereas mutations or deletions in essential Atg genes suppress midgut tissue degradation.

    “Thus, whereas the genetic inactivation of caspases in the midgut of developing D. melanogaster has no consequences, mutations or deletions in essential autophagy-related (Atg) genes suppress midgut tissue degradation [827–829].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Denton, D., Shravage, B., Simin, R., Mills, K., Berry, D. L., Baehrecke, E. H., & Kumar, S.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Cancer Biology (AU)
  • University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School (US)
  • South Australia Pathology (AU)
  • Georgetown University (US)
Corresponding author
Kumar, Sharad
Venue
Current Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-11
Volume
19
Issue
20
Pages
1741-1746
ISSN
0960-9822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2067684692
Cited by
385
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 28 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 33 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 31
FWCI
16.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Medical Research Council
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R01GM059136, R01GM079431)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Autophagy in Disease and Therapy
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Cell death mechanisms and regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
autophagy, programmed cell death, Drosophila metamorphosis, caspase-independent cell death, salivary gland removal, tissue degradation
MeSH terms
Animals, Autophagy, Drosophila, Metamorphosis, Biological, Apoptosis, Body Patterning, Caspases, Drosophila Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review