Cited by 538Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Animal Learning Development

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index, and 2 are not checked yet; none of the 116 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.

The paradox of cognitive flexibility in autism

Open access
Geurts, Hilde M., Corbett, Blythe, Solomon, Marjorie·2009·Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Abstract

We present an overview of current literature addressing cognitive flexibility in autism spectrum disorders. Based on recent studies at multiple sites, using diverse methods and participants of different autism subtypes, ages and cognitive levels, no consistent evidence for cognitive flexibility deficits was found. Researchers and clinicians assume that inflexible everyday behaviors in autism are directly related to cognitive flexibility deficits as assessed by clinical and experimental measures. However, there is a large gap between the day-to-day behavioral flexibility and that measured with these cognitive flexibility tasks. To advance the field, experimental measures must evolve to reflect mechanistic models of flexibility deficits. Moreover, ecologically valid measures are required to be able to resolve the paradox between cognitive and behavioral inflexibility.

Checked 2026-10-06 · 2 references not checked yet

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.006

Cites

69 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

0 of 116 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged

Show all 62 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 24
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 24
44 of 44
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Autism involves pervasive cognitive and behavioral rigidity across functional domains.

    “Clinical observation indicates that pervasive cognitive and behavioral rigidity across functional domains is diagnostic of autism.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Individuals with autism encounter difficulties changing strategy during daily activities and adapting their perspective during social interactions.

    “They encounter difficulties in changing strategy during daily activities or adapting their perspective during social interactions.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Autism involves deficits in both cognitive and motivational domains.

    “because we know that autism is associated with deficits in both domains.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Neurodevelopmental disorders may differ in the onset of apparent deficits and in the neurobiological substrate where those deficits arise.

    “Moreover, neurodevelopmental disorders might differ in terms of onset of apparent deficits in addition to the neurobiological substrate level in which these deficits arise.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Attention difficulties may interact with deficits in other developmental domains in autism.

    “because attention difficulties might interact with deficits in other developmental domains where people with autism are challenged.”
5 of 5

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Ambery, 2006, Differences in neuroanatomy and their relationship to cognitive functioning in people with Asperger's syndrome and high functioning autism, Biol. Psychiatry, 59
  2. Barcelo, 1999, Role of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in attentional set shifting: parsing the cognitive significance of WCST errors with event-related potentials, Psychophysiology, 36, S30
  3. Cambridge, 2002

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Geurts, H. M., Corbett, B., & Solomon, M.
Affiliations
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
  • University of California Davis Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Geurts, Hilde M.
Venue
Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-02
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
74-82
ISSN
1364-6613 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2172212100
Cited by
538
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 26 · 2021: 40 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 45 · 2018: 34 · 2017: 33 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 24 · 2014: 31 · 2013: 24 · 2012: 33
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Trends in Cognitive Sciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • University of California, Davis
  • National Institute of Mental Health (K08MH074967)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
Keywords
cognitive flexibility, autism spectrum disorder, behavioral inflexibility, ecological validity, autism subtypes
MeSH terms
Autistic Disorder, Cognition, Humans, Neuropsychological Tests, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychomotor Performance, Pliability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-06, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-06 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review