Cited by 224Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorAnimal Behavior and ReproductionNeuropeptides and Animal Physiology

Both oxytocin and vasopressin may influence alloparental behavior in male prairie voles

Open access
Bales, Karen L, Kim, Albert J, Lewis-Reese, Antoniah D, Sue Carter, C·2004·Hormones and Behavior

Abstract

Neuropeptides, especially oxytocin (OT) and arginine vasopressin (AVP), have been implicated in several features of monogamy including alloparenting. The purpose of the present study was to examine the role of OT and AVP in alloparental behavior in reproductively naïve male prairie voles. Males received intracerebroventricular (ICV) injections of artificial cerebrospinal fluid (aCSF), OT, an OT receptor antagonist (OTA), AVP, an AVP receptor antagonist (AVPA), or combinations of OTA and AVPA and were subsequently tested for parental behavior. Approximately 45 min after treatment, animals were tested for behavioral responses to stimulus pups. In a 10-min test, spontaneous alloparental behavior was high in control animals. OT and AVP did not significantly increase the number of males that showed parental behavior, although more subtle behavioral changes were observed. Combined treatment with AVPA and OTA (10 ng each) significantly reduced male parental behavior and increased attacks; following a lower dose (1 ng OTA/1 ng AVPA), males were less likely to display kyphosis and tended to be slower to approach pups than controls. Since treatment with only one antagonist did not interfere with the expression of alloparenting, these results suggest that access to either OT or AVP receptors may be sufficient for the expression of alloparenting.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.01.004

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 62 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bales, K. L., Kim, A. J., Lewis-Reese, A. D., & Sue Carter, C.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Bales, Karen L
Venue
Hormones and Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
45
Issue
5
Pages
354-361
ISSN
0018-506X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2056925553
Cited by
217
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 15
FWCI
6.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Hormones and Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Institute for Research on Unlimited Love
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01 HD 38490, P01HD038490, F32 HD08702, F32HD008702)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuropeptides and Animal Physiology
Keywords
oxytocin, vasopressin, Microtus ochrogaster, monogamy, neuropeptides, oxytocin receptor antagonist, vasopressin receptor antagonists, male parental behavior, intracerebroventricular administration, kyphosis
MeSH terms
Aggression, Animals, Arvicolinae, Injections, Intraventricular, Male, Nesting Behavior, Oxytocin, Paternal Behavior, Vasopressins, Vasotocin, Receptors, Oxytocin, Antidiuretic Hormone Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review