Cited by 107Neuroendocrine regulation and behaviorStress Responses and CortisolHuman-Animal Interaction Studies

Sex differences and developmental effects of manipulations of oxytocin on alloparenting and anxiety in prairie voles

Open access
Bales, Karen L., Pfeifer, Lisa A., Carter, C. Sue·2004·Developmental Psychobiology

Abstract

In adult animals, peptide hormones, including oxytocin and arginine vasopressin, have been implicated in both parental behavior and the modulation of anxiety. The purpose of this study was to examine the consequences of developmental manipulations of oxytocin for the later expression of alloparental behavior as well as behavioral responses to a novel environment, the elevated plus maze (EPM). Prairie voles (Microtus ochrogaster), a cooperatively breeding species, were selected for this study. On neonatal Day 1, pups received an ip injection of oxytocin or oxytocin antagonist, or were controls, receiving either saline or handling only. At 21 and approximately 60 days of age, each animal was tested for parental care toward novel stimulus pups. At approximately 67 days, an EPM test was administered. Control females at 60 days of age were more likely to attack pups and spent less time in the open arm of the EPM, both of which might reflect higher levels of anxiety in females than males. In males, neonatal treatment with oxytocin antagonist was associated with reductions in parental care, especially during the initial exposure to pups on Day 21. Female behavior was not significantly changed as a function of neonatal treatments. Findings to date implicate vasopressin in the behavioral changes in males, that in later life followed a single exposure to an oxytocin antagonist, and suggest caution in the clinical use of agents such as Atosiban, which may have the potential to influence infant development.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/dev.10165

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A single neonatal i.p. injection of an OTR antagonist on postnatal day 1 decreased alloparental care in male, but not female, juvenile prairie voles.

    “a single neonatal i.p. injection of an OTR antagonist ([d(CH2)5, Tyr(Me)2, Orn8]-Vasotocin) on postnatal day 1 decreased alloparental care in male, but not female, juvenile prairie voles”
  • After single developmental manipulations of the oxytocin system, male prairie voles appear more responsive to lower doses of oxytocin, which induce changes in partner preference, sexual behavior and reproductive potential, responses to infants, and AVP receptors.

    “Single developmental manipulations of the OT system males appear to be more responsive to lower doses of OT which induce changes in partner preference (20,35), sexual behavior and reproductive potential (36), responses to infants (37), and AVP receptors (38).”
  • Sex differences in responses to OT are pervasive in both adult voles and in single-dose developmental studies.

    “While sex differences in responses to OT are pervasive in both adult voles (3,72) and in single-dose developmental studies (37,38,73)”
  • Studies in numerous species provide converging evidence that oxytocin during development can have permanent effects on the brain and behavior.

    “Yet, in the last 12 years, there has been a resurgence of research in this area, with studies in numerous species providing converging evidence that Oxt during development can have permanent effects on the brain and behavior (3, 13–29) (see Table 1).”
  • In male prairie voles, treatment with an oxytocin receptor antagonist in neonates decreases alloparental behaviors, as measured by fewer retrievals, less time spent huddling over pups, and increases in pup-directed attacks when tested on postnatal day 21.

    “Specifically, males injected with an OTA within 24 h of birth and later tested on PND21 decrease their parental care, as measured by fewer retrievals, less time spent huddling over pups, and increases in pup-directed attacks.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bales, K. L., Pfeifer, L. A., & Carter, C. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Corresponding author
Bales, Karen L.
Venue
Developmental Psychobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-02-23
Volume
44
Issue
2
Pages
123-131
ISSN
  • 0012-1630 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2302
OpenAlex
W1973555825
Cited by
107
References
70
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 8
FWCI
8.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Psychobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01 HD 38490, P01HD038490, F32 HD08702, F32HD008702)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Human-Animal Interaction Studies
Keywords
oxytocin, oxytocin antagonist, Microtus ochrogaster, alloparenting, parental care, anxiety, sex differences, vasopressin, elevated plus maze, atosiban, infant development, cooperative breeding
MeSH terms
Animals, Anxiety, Behavior, Animal, Cooperative Behavior, Female, Male, Oxytocin, Random Allocation, Sex Factors, Vasopressins, Parenting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review