Cited by 695Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsGenetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders

Hippocampal LTP Is Accompanied by Enhanced F-Actin Content within the Dendritic Spine that Is Essential for Late LTP Maintenance In Vivo

Open access
Fukazawa, Yugo, Saitoh, Yoshito, Ozawa, Fumiko, Ohta, Yasuhiko, Mizuno, Kensaku, Inokuchi, Kaoru·2003·Neuron

Abstract

The dendritic spine is an important site of neuronal plasticity and contains extremely high levels of cytoskeletal actin. However, the dynamics of the actin cytoskeleton during synaptic plasticity and its in vivo function remain unclear. Here we used an in vivo dentate gyrus LTP model to show that LTP induction is associated with actin cytoskeletal reorganization characterized by a long-lasting increase in F-actin content within dendritic spines. This increase in F-actin content is dependent on NMDA receptor activation and involves the inactivation of actin depolymerizing factor/cofilin. Inhibition of actin polymerization with latrunculin A impaired late phase of LTP without affecting the initial amplitude and early maintenance of LTP. These observations suggest that mechanisms regulating the spine actin cytoskeleton contribute to the persistence of LTP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0896-6273(03)00206-x

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Several other proteins known to signal via actin-regulatory pathways, including VCP/neurofibromin, NESH/Abi-3 and Cofilin, drive similar effects on spine structure when either up- or downregulated.

    “As we observe an increase in immature spines upon CYFIP1 overexpression or haploinsufficiency in vitro, it is interesting to note that several other proteins known to signal via actin-regulatory pathways have been shown to drive similar effects on spine structure when either up- or downregulated, including VCP/neurofibromin, NESH/Abi-3 and Cofilin.47,48,57,64, 65, 66, 67”

    From The autism and schizophrenia associated gene CYFIP1 is critical for the maintenance of dendritic complexity and the stabilization of mature spines (2014) · cites this paper as [57]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) links ADF/cofilin to actin dynamics and proposes that its phosphorylation may regulate spine morphology. It also reports abnormal spine morphology in LIMK-1 knockout mice, but does not show that up- or downregulating cofilin itself produces the cited increase in immature spines. The other named proteins are not findings attributed specifically to this paper. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [1]1. Abe, H. ∙ Ohshima, S. ∙ Obinata, T. A cofilin-like protein is involved in the regulation of actin assembly in developing skeletal muscle J. Biochem. (Tokyo). 1989; 106:696-702 Crossref Scopus (91) PubMed Google Scholar
  2. [2]2. Abraham, W.C. ∙ Mason, S.E. ∙ Demmer, J. ... Correlations between immediate early gene induction and the persistence of long-term potentiation Neuroscience. 1993; 56:717-727

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fukazawa, Y., Saitoh, Y., Ozawa, F., Ohta, Y., Mizuno, K., & Inokuchi, K.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Physiological Sciences (JP)
  • Tottori University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
  • Yokohama National University (JP)
Corresponding author
Inokuchi, Kaoru
Venue
Neuron
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2003-05
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
447-460
ISSN
0896-6273 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040653138
Cited by
695
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 27 · 2016: 36 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 39 · 2012: 44
FWCI
14.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Neuron (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
Keywords
long-term potentiation, dendritic spines, F-actin, actin cytoskeleton, NMDA receptor, cofilin, actin depolymerizing factor, latrunculin A, dentate gyrus, synaptic plasticity, LTP maintenance
MeSH terms
Actins, Animals, Dendrites, Immunohistochemistry, Male, Microfilament Proteins, Microscopy, Electron, Models, Neurological, Synaptic Transmission, Neuropeptides, Synapses, Thiazoles, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Rats, Wistar, Long-Term Potentiation, Dentate Gyrus, Bridged Bicyclo Compounds, Heterocyclic, Actin Depolymerizing Factors, Rats, Thiazolidines

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review